News:


  • June 14, 2025, 01:43:00 PM

Login with username, password and session length

Author Topic: Micro balloons versus zinc sterate as a filler in dope  (Read 2356 times)

Offline Mike Quinn

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Lieutenant
  • ***
  • Posts: 100
Micro balloons versus zinc sterate as a filler in dope
« on: April 27, 2025, 03:09:49 PM »
Hi

Any experience or opinions on how/if  micro balloons  compare against zinc sterate as a filler when used with dope?

Thinking about initial coats to fill the grain.

Cheers

Mike

Online Dan McEntee

  • 25 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 7492
Re: Micro balloons versus zinc sterate as a filler in dope
« Reply #1 on: April 27, 2025, 04:10:08 PM »
  That's a good question. I don't think I have ever heard of or read where anyone has done that. I would think micro balloons have more "volume" for lack of a better word. But is zinc sterate heavier? I wonder how it compares to talcum powder, which is what sterate replaces??Is zinc sterate cheaper and easier to purchase?  I'll be following this.
  Type at you later,
   Dan McEntee
AMA 28784
EAA  1038824
AMA 480405 (American Motorcyclist Association)

Online Dave_Trible

  • 24 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 6707
Re: Micro balloons versus zinc sterate as a filler in dope
« Reply #2 on: April 27, 2025, 04:11:39 PM »
Hi

Any experience or opinions on how/if  micro balloons  compare against zinc sterate as a filler when used with dope?

Thinking about initial coats to fill the grain.

Cheers

Mike
Mike I and a few others use neither for wood grain.   We are using the ultra light spackling paste you get from your home improvement store.  The stuff that feels like the container is empty when you buy it.   Scrape it on all the wood on the outside surface using an old gift or credit card.  When dry sand most all of it away save for what is actually in the grain and other pin holes and cracks.   Use a swiffer or tack cloth to remove the dust and you are ready to proceed with dope and covering.   The grain is completely filled,  the stuff is vinyl so doesn't shrink or soak further into the wood and adds nothing to the weight of the airplane.  Also is a bunch cheaper than the dope and filler needed to do the same job.  There are also no chemical issues with dope or whatever you are going to finish the airplane with.   It is water based.  I do sometimes brush on a thinned dope first and sand off the fuzz before I apply the spackling.   This stiffens the soft wood a little to aid in sanding.

Dave
AMA 20934
FAA Certificate FA3ATY4T94
 Investing in a Gaza resort if the billionaire doesn't take all my social security check

Online Dan McEntee

  • 25 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 7492
Re: Micro balloons versus zinc sterate as a filler in dope
« Reply #3 on: April 27, 2025, 04:48:32 PM »
Mike I and a few others use neither for wood grain.   We are using the ultra light spackling paste you get from your home improvement store.  The stuff that feels like the container is empty when you buy it.   Scrape it on all the wood on the outside surface using an old gift or credit card.  When dry sand most all of it away save for what is actually in the grain and other pin holes and cracks.   Use a swiffer or tack cloth to remove the dust and you are ready to proceed with dope and covering.   The grain is completely filled,  the stuff is vinyl so doesn't shrink or soak further into the wood and adds nothing to the weight of the airplane.  Also is a bunch cheaper than the dope and filler needed to do the same job.  There are also no chemical issues with dope or whatever you are going to finish the airplane with.   It is water based.  I do sometimes brush on a thinned dope first and sand off the fuzz before I apply the spackling.   This stiffens the soft wood a little to aid in sanding.

Dave

      If you review one of Allen Brickhaus' articles where he details his method of finishing a model for a rattle can paint job, he used spackling compound but thinned it with water to a brushing consistency and then sand it off. I think he made a couple of applications like this before going to the next step. I know at least the Beguine article went into detail on the finish.

  Type at you later,
  Dan McEntee
AMA 28784
EAA  1038824
AMA 480405 (American Motorcyclist Association)

Offline Frank Imbriaco

  • 24 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 951
  • At the 69 Willow Grove NATS with J.D. FALCON II
Re: Micro balloons versus zinc sterate as a filler in dope
« Reply #4 on: April 27, 2025, 05:43:31 PM »
I'll just add to the lightweight spackle filler.  Works great. Word of caution. Some name brands now mix in a primer with the spackle. Wasn't keen on that. While browsing at a Dollar Store / Dollar General noticed they carry it without primer.

Offline 944_Jim

  • 25 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 935
Re: Micro balloons versus zinc sterate as a filler in dope
« Reply #5 on: April 27, 2025, 05:49:09 PM »
Just curious...somewhere along the way I seem to remember reading MicroBalloons (trademarked) is nothing more than glass bead. That is, the same stuff I glass bead aluminum and steel with.

Please DO correct me if I'm wrong. This one has been banging around in my head for close to ten years...especially each time I fire up the bead blaster.

Online Brett Buck

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • ******
  • Posts: 14461
Re: Micro balloons versus zinc sterate as a filler in dope
« Reply #6 on: April 27, 2025, 06:01:08 PM »
Just curious...somewhere along the way I seem to remember reading MicroBalloons (trademarked) is nothing more than glass bead. That is, the same stuff I glass bead aluminum and steel with.

Please DO correct me if I'm wrong. This one has been banging around in my head for close to ten years...especially each time I fire up the bead blaster.

   A phenolic balloon, as far as I know, not glass. Phenolic is the base material of bakelite, etc.

     Brett

Offline Paul Smith

  • 25 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 6119
Re: Micro balloons versus zinc sterate as a filler in dope
« Reply #7 on: April 27, 2025, 06:59:19 PM »
I can easily buy a quart of microballoons at the local boat store.  They don't weigh anything.  I'm only a third of the way through a quart after fifteen years.

They definately accelerate the cure time of 30-minute epoxy, maybe to only 10 minutes.
Paul Smith

Offline Paul Smith

  • 25 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 6119
Re: Micro balloons versus zinc sterate as a filler in dope
« Reply #8 on: April 27, 2025, 06:59:56 PM »
I have no incentive to look for an alternate to Micro balloons.
Paul Smith

Offline M Spencer

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • ******
  • Posts: 5238
Re: Micro balloons versus zinc sterate as a filler in dope
« Reply #9 on: April 27, 2025, 08:13:22 PM »
I get ' TALC ' from an art store . He saqys its TALC , Not talcum Powder . Poms & talcum Powder - fill of oil and scent , for babies undersides & other parts  .

the art store TALC seems heavy . But I havnt weighd it ., finish wise . Its chalky like stuff . micro Ballons seem a lot lighter , In the Bag .

Offline Motorman

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • ******
  • Posts: 3664
Re: Micro balloons versus zinc sterate as a filler in dope
« Reply #10 on: April 27, 2025, 08:19:18 PM »
Don't they have glass and phenolic balloons? One is white the other brown or, am I remembering something different?

MM :)
Wasted words ain't never been heard. Alman Brothers

Offline Ken Culbertson

  • 25 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 7034
Re: Micro balloons versus zinc sterate as a filler in dope
« Reply #11 on: April 28, 2025, 11:28:12 PM »
for babies undersides & other parts  .
the art store TALC seems heavy ..
Maybe it is used? LL~

Ken
AMA 15382
If it is not broke you are not trying hard enough.
USAF 1968-1974 TAC

Online Lauri Malila

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • ******
  • Posts: 1732
Re: Micro balloons versus zinc sterate as a filler in dope
« Reply #12 on: April 29, 2025, 03:03:24 AM »
   A phenolic balloon, as far as I know, not glass. Phenolic is the base material of bakelite, etc.

     Brett

There is many kind of microballoons, it can be glass- nylon- phenolic- or metal spheres, for example.
The most common white ones is glass. Phenolic is red/brown and in my opinion the best for our general use.
The problem when mixing with dope is that they all float, and you must keep mixing the dope during use. L

Online Dave_Trible

  • 24 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 6707
Re: Micro balloons versus zinc sterate as a filler in dope
« Reply #13 on: April 29, 2025, 05:40:45 AM »
There is many kind of microballoons, it can be glass- nylon- phenolic- or metal spheres, for example.
The most common white ones is glass. Phenolic is red/brown and in my opinion the best for our general use.
The problem when mixing with dope is that they all float, and you must keep mixing the dope during use. L
My one try with micro balloons many moons ago left me with that impression.   balloons floated to the top,   all got sanded off,  so that just dope was left to fill the grain.   Thats when I decided to use JUST dope anyway to fill the grain - until I found the spackling.  I have used the talc some but it was always a source of extra weight I wanted to avoid.

Dave
AMA 20934
FAA Certificate FA3ATY4T94
 Investing in a Gaza resort if the billionaire doesn't take all my social security check

Offline Ty Marcucci

  • 25 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 812
Re: Micro balloons versus zinc sterate as a filler in dope
« Reply #14 on: April 29, 2025, 08:00:43 AM »
I have used zinc stearate since 1999.. It weighs nothing, Talc (soap stone) is a from a rock and is heavy.  About 99% gets sanded off, leaving some in the grooves/holes in the wood. I use the micro balloons for big gouges or fillets. Mixed with epoxy.
Ty Marcucci

Offline doug coursey

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Commander
  • ****
  • Posts: 276
Re: Micro balloons versus zinc sterate as a filler in dope
« Reply #15 on: April 29, 2025, 09:30:14 AM »
I watched one of windys videos and he said it didnt work out for him with the spackel but i dont remember why...i think it was in a paint video...IT WAS IN HIS ADVANCE DOPE FINISHING
« Last Edit: April 29, 2025, 02:18:18 PM by doug coursey »
AMA 21449

Offline EricV

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Commander
  • ****
  • Posts: 177
Re: Micro balloons versus zinc sterate as a filler in dope
« Reply #16 on: April 29, 2025, 01:42:16 PM »
I've used Zinc Stearate for dope filler for years as recommended by Randy Smith to me way back. The Zinc Stearate is way lighter than just about anything else and mixes in nicely and stays in suspension quite a while.

As far as sanding and breathing goes, zinc stearate is generally considered to be less toxic than talc powder. While talc can be a source of asbestos, or carcinogenic and maybe even mildly radioactive (I know I know Brett), zinc stearate is considered a non-toxic substance with low overall toxicity. Micro balloons of any type are something I would want to avoid breathing while sanding as well.

Bottom line, occasional use probably won't ever affect the typical 1 plane per year builder, but I'd wear a particle mask just the same when sanding anything, period, because even something as seemingly harmless as balsa wood has a cumulative allergic effect on a lot of people over the years. YMMV.

EricV

Offline Steve Helmick

  • 24 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 10265
Re: Micro balloons versus zinc sterate as a filler in dope
« Reply #17 on: May 04, 2025, 11:00:53 PM »
Researched zinc sterate online some years ago and found sources for a good price if I wanted to buy large amounts, like 1,000 lbs or something nuts. I got some from Randy Smith. He may still sell it, but IDK for sure. I'm not at all sure about what Randy is up to these days. 

Seems to me that I've read about using microballoons in clear dope before and it wasn't a good thing. I do know that you can put a lot of clear dope on something without much weight penalty. The first coat is the one that adds most weight. PIGments are vile things, and aptly named.

I would bet that the lightweight spackle is microballoons of some type. Perhaps the fine print on the label would give clues about what the binder is? And, I seem to recall that dope & vinyl might be incompatible....latex for sure. Caution is a good idea when you have so much time, work and $ invested in a project. Test samples would be good!  H^^ Steve
"The United States has become a place where professional athletes and entertainers are mistaken for people of importance." - Robert Heinlein

In 1944 18-20 year old's stormed beaches, and parachuted behind enemy lines to almost certain death.  In 2015 18-20 year old's need safe zones so people don't hurt their feelings.


Advertise Here
Tags: