stunthanger.com

General control line discussion => Open Forum => Topic started by: badbill on April 03, 2015, 01:14:46 PM

Title: Maxford P-51
Post by: badbill on April 03, 2015, 01:14:46 PM
Looking at the sale on Maxford ARF's today and noticed they list C/L as a catagory. Check out this link, and look at the bellcrank... what is wrong with this picture? The bellcrank pivots on a glow plug?? Am I nuts?

http://www.maxfordusa.com/p-51u-controlarf-1.aspx (http://www.maxfordusa.com/p-51u-controlarf-1.aspx)
Title: Re: Maxford P-51
Post by: Crist Rigotti on April 03, 2015, 01:17:57 PM
Look closer.
Title: Re: Maxford P-51
Post by: Avaiojet on April 03, 2015, 01:25:14 PM
BB,


That's not a glowplug. I agree with Crist, "Look closer."  ;D
Title: Re: Maxford P-51
Post by: badbill on April 03, 2015, 01:35:49 PM
LOL!! I should have used the little magnifying glass thing to start with. Still about the crummiest bellcrank I have ever seen!
Title: Re: Maxford P-51
Post by: Tim Wescott on April 03, 2015, 02:03:05 PM
So how many people are to try one of these and decide that control line is crap?

If they asked ME, I would have done a design review for free, or for a plane.  Jeesh.
Title: Re: Maxford P-51
Post by: Mike Griffin on April 03, 2015, 02:37:04 PM
That has got to be the biggest piece of Chinese looking crap I have ever seen.  I am with Tim....Sheesh

Mike
Title: Re: Maxford P-51
Post by: Mike Griffin on April 03, 2015, 02:44:20 PM
Open up the instruction manual and it shows a clear picture of the bell crank .  No bushing on the lead outs attached to this (and I use this term loosely) bell crank.

Mike
Title: Re: Maxford P-51
Post by: Scott Richlen on April 03, 2015, 02:58:37 PM
Gee, I hope we can purchase that bellcrank separately.  It looks top drawer!   LL~
Title: Re: Maxford P-51
Post by: tom brightbill on April 03, 2015, 03:23:02 PM
Read the first paragraph of the instruction manual.  And if you are not already sitting down %^ %^ or falling down, do so, and read the rest.
Title: Re: Maxford P-51
Post by: dale gleason on April 03, 2015, 03:37:37 PM
The Stars are upside down, everywhere.
Title: Re: Maxford P-51
Post by: Paul Taylor on April 03, 2015, 04:44:55 PM
http://youtu.be/qY3MDtbxQTE

Anyone know the guys in the credits?
Title: Re: Maxford P-51
Post by: Larrys4227 on April 03, 2015, 04:50:38 PM
From the instruction manual .... nobody recognizes the name or design?  I don't ... just asking ...

<snip>
These profile models are offered with special thanks and appreciation to Mr. Charlie Bauer. As owner of
4π RC and a District VI AMA Vice President, Mr. Bauer designed and sold these airplanes as kits for many
years. Mr. Bauer recently gave his design to Richard Sang, owner of Maxford USA, so these airplanes could
be redesigned and reproduced for sale in today’s ARF market. We sincerely thank Mr. Bauer for his design,
for his review of our redesign, and for his valuable advice
</snip>
Title: Re: Maxford P-51
Post by: pipemakermike on April 03, 2015, 04:58:09 PM
Chuck Rudder <G>

You Yanks and your funny names
Title: Re: Maxford P-51
Post by: dave siegler on April 03, 2015, 06:29:04 PM
Gee, I hope we can purchase that bellcrank separately.  It looks top drawer!   LL~

Oh but you can y1

http://www.lowes.com/ProductDisplay?partNumber=315655-1277-DPB116&langId=-1&storeId=10151&productId=3169829&catalogId=10051&cmRelshp=req&rel=nofollow&cId=PDIO1 (http://www.lowes.com/ProductDisplay?partNumber=315655-1277-DPB116&langId=-1&storeId=10151&productId=3169829&catalogId=10051&cmRelshp=req&rel=nofollow&cId=PDIO1)
Title: Re: Maxford P-51
Post by: Steven Kientz on April 03, 2015, 07:21:14 PM
Charlie Bauer WAS the VP of AMA District 6. I don't remember why he isn't now( stepped down, voted out or ?).
Title: Re: Maxford P-51
Post by: Sean McEntee on April 03, 2015, 08:41:11 PM
Charlie Bauer WAS the VP of AMA District 6. I don't remember why he isn't now( stepped down, voted out or ?).


    Charlie Bauer was a prominant fixture in the CL Scale circuit for as long as I can remember.  I say "was" only because last year was supposed to be his last Nat's apperance.  He is getting up there in age and I suppose's he's throttling back.  Probably the same reason he relinquished his VP seat.  I was always annoyed that he NEVER covered anything but RC fun-fly's and expos in any of his columns.  He used to be a regular at the Broken Arrow contest in St Louis but coverege of it was never worthy of his editorial in MA.

As for the model...**sigh** whatever....
Title: Re: Maxford P-51
Post by: jim gilmore on April 03, 2015, 09:41:24 PM
I'm really confused...
Where is the p-51 ???
The model shown is a p-47.
With no lead outs shown , so I'm not sure if they just come out the side of the fuselage we cannot see or they are meant to be in the wing.
Yes, the bell crank leaves a lot to be desired.
Title: Re: Maxford P-51
Post by: dave siegler on April 03, 2015, 09:59:05 PM
Charlie was at our contest last year, and most other years.  He beat me in 1/2 a scale.

https://www.modelaircraft.org/files/BauerCharles.pdf# (https://www.modelaircraft.org/files/BauerCharles.pdf#) 

His company web site is still up.
http://www.fourpi.com/ (http://www.fourpi.com/)
Title: Re: Maxford P-51
Post by: Steve Helmick on April 03, 2015, 11:02:24 PM
Looks like a 2" bellcrank, with about 5/8" to 3/4" crank arm. Anybody use a 1" line spacing on the handle? By the way, the flying site reminds me a lot of the video introduction of the TF Score for some reason.  :'( Steve
Title: Re: Maxford P-51
Post by: Chris McMillin on April 04, 2015, 01:23:42 AM
I don't know those names but the field is Whittier Narrows where many a Chinese ARF is videoed, usually a foam R/C Scale ARF!
Chris...
Title: Re: Maxford P-51
Post by: Robert Zambelli on April 04, 2015, 04:49:24 AM
52 inch span, 805 square inches.

805/52 = 15.48 inch chord.  :o

That's some low aspect ratio!

Interesting wires from the fuselage into the wing. Hybrid, maybe?  LL~

   Bob Z.
Title: Re: Maxford P-51
Post by: Scott Richlen on April 04, 2015, 06:15:37 AM
Quote
[/Gee, I hope we can purchase that bellcrank separately.  It looks top drawer!   Layingdown

Oh but you can y1

http://www.lowes.com/ProductDisplay?partNumber=315655-1277-DPB116&langId=-1&storeId=10151&productId=3169829&catalogId=10051&cmRelshp=req&rel=nofollow&cId=PDIO1quote]

Good one!

So, maybe we could have a "Maxford Event" where each of the contestants visits Lowes and buys all they need to construct an airplane?  (It'd be like the Orange Crate event we have at Brodak's each year.  But not as good since Lowes doesn't carry orange crates.)

Title: Re: Maxford P-51
Post by: Dwayne on April 04, 2015, 10:46:03 AM
52 inch span, 805 square inches.

805/52 = 15.48 inch chord.  :o

That's some low aspect ratio!

Interesting wires from the fuselage into the wing. Hybrid, maybe?  LL~

   Bob Z.

That's the first thing I saw, that's one FAT wing...lol <= n~ :o
Title: Re: Maxford P-51
Post by: john e. holliday on April 04, 2015, 11:17:36 AM
I'm really confused...
Where is the p-51 ???
The model shown is a p-47.
With no lead outs shown , so I'm not sure if they just come out the side of the fuselage we cannot see or they are meant to be in the wing.
Yes, the bell crank leaves a lot to be desired.


Read the title on the video.   Then go look in their ad under ARF CL.  They show both planes.    All I can say is if it gets people flying control line and will last more then a hundred flights,  great.
Title: Re: Maxford P-51
Post by: Larrys4227 on April 04, 2015, 05:06:49 PM
At least some of you know whom Charlie Bauer is. I was hoping it would spur some conversation about the models he designed by people that know him and his models, vs. what we are seeing out of Maxford.  Apparently he was involved with the 'redesign', and provided 'advice' ... and then signed off on it as ok.

Title: Re: Maxford P-51
Post by: wwwarbird on April 04, 2015, 07:43:27 PM

 Anyone who can't apply U.S. insignias right side up should be deported. Whenever I see that on a model it just screams stupidity.

 Oh, and the Maxford plane, TOTAL CRAP. Distributors of such garbage should be ashamed, and also be deported. D>K
Title: Re: Maxford P-51
Post by: Tim Wescott on April 04, 2015, 07:59:25 PM
So, Wayne -- do you have an opinion on this?  I can't tell.
Title: Re: Maxford P-51
Post by: Mike Keville on April 04, 2015, 08:06:27 PM
I'm with Wayne.....100%!
Title: Re: Maxford P-51
Post by: wwwarbird on April 04, 2015, 08:08:47 PM
So, Wayne -- do you have an opinion on this?  I can't tell.

 Yes, but I kind of held back. ;)
Title: Re: Maxford P-51
Post by: riley wooten on April 04, 2015, 09:05:31 PM
http://youtu.be/qY3MDtbxQTE

Anyone know the guys in the credits?

Chuck Rudner is a well known combat flyer from Calif. and flew for USA at last WC........Charlie has been in kit business a long time but when kits come out of far east who knows what happens...............rw
Title: Re: Maxford P-51
Post by: Steve Helmick on April 04, 2015, 09:53:54 PM
Chuck Rudner is a well known combat flyer from Calif. and flew for USA at last WC........Charlie has been in kit business a long time but when kits come out of far east who knows what happens...............rw

I was wondering who this "Chuck Rudder" fella is. Suppose "Don Rapp" is also spelled incorrectly?

That model looked twitchy and also looked like it was stalled on some of the loops. The sad thing is that they'll get the idea that nobody likes their CL products and give up. A good design, properly executed, with a 4" bellcrank, slow controls, and the correct control ratios and CG location emphatically mentioned in the instructions could yield a much better result. NOT saying the design is faulty. The bellcrank is a major problem. I've met Chuck Rudner (he looked at my buggered ankle/foot one year at the Bladder Grabber). I'd bet that he hated flying that thing, whether it was a P-51 or P-47.   H^^ Steve
Title: Re: Maxford P-51
Post by: wwwarbird on April 05, 2015, 12:12:04 AM
I was wondering who this "Chuck Rudder" fella is. Suppose "Don Rapp" is also spelled incorrectly?

 It was probably edited by the same clown who installed the insignias. LL~
Title: Re: Maxford P-51
Post by: Steven Kientz on April 05, 2015, 02:07:39 PM
After looking at the website I thought the plane looked somewhat similar to the Tower Fun 51.
Steve
Title: Re: Maxford P-51
Post by: badbill on April 05, 2015, 04:23:57 PM
It is very similar to the Fun 51. BTW, I used to sell Maxford RC ARF's, and their quality was top notch. Can't vouch for this one though  LL~
Title: Re: Maxford P-51
Post by: Scott Richlen on April 05, 2015, 05:34:04 PM
By the way, the Fun 51 is definitely not what you want for CL.  However, you can make them work.  I did.

By changing every single dimension in the design!!!

The guys in my club thought I was nuts: "how come you're wasting time on that?  In the time you wasted on that, you could have scratch-built an Impact!'

I suppose they were right about that.  But I have to disagree with them that I could have built an Impact that quickly.

 ;D

Scott
Title: Re: Maxford P-51
Post by: Douglas Ames on April 05, 2015, 05:39:03 PM
Looking at the sale on Maxford ARF's today and noticed they list C/L as a catagory. Check out this link, and look at the bellcrank... what is wrong with this picture? The bellcrank pivots on a glow plug?? Am I nuts?

http://www.maxfordusa.com/p-51u-controlarf-1.aspx (http://www.maxfordusa.com/p-51u-controlarf-1.aspx)

Put your glasses on... That's a nyloc nut and pushrod stud in the background (looks like it sits on top, but not.)
Title: Re: Maxford P-51
Post by: Target on April 05, 2015, 06:04:43 PM
I was wondering who this "Chuck Rudder" fella is. Suppose "Don Rapp" is also spelled incorrectly?


My CL buddy is Don Repp, and since that video was at Whittier, I will be that he helped get it running/flying.
I'll ask him about the plane and report back.

Regards,
Chris
Title: Re: Maxford P-51
Post by: badbill on April 06, 2015, 04:41:51 AM
Put your glasses on... That's a nyloc nut and pushrod stud in the background (looks like it sits on top, but not.)

Duuuhhhh I think the 2nd post established that. Read and THEN speak...
Title: Re: Maxford P-51
Post by: Target on April 06, 2015, 05:56:35 AM
Don Repp confirmed that he was there when the video was shot and that the plane is not the best quality.
Also that Chuck Rudner was there as well.

An option to get started, one that THIS newbie is going to pass on. My Banshee is all but ready to maiden with the OS .40 that Don tuned for me.
Hopefully next Friday, If I don't have to work. I'm not sure if Mr "Rudder" will be there or not. :-)

Regards,
Chris
Title: Re: Maxford P-51
Post by: pipemakermike on April 06, 2015, 06:06:44 AM
So even the credits were spelt wrong!
I was musing that perhaps Chuck Rudder was Rab Rudder's long lost brother.
Title: Re: Maxford P-51
Post by: Target on April 06, 2015, 01:01:22 PM
Haha, you mean Rabe Rudder? <=

R,
Chris
Title: Re: Maxford P-51
Post by: Scott Richlen on April 06, 2015, 06:48:21 PM
Maybe he meant Rab Rudner?
Title: Re: Maxford P-51
Post by: Target on April 06, 2015, 08:11:17 PM
Maybe he meant Rab Rudner?
Hey, thanks, Scott!
I know funny, and THAT was FUNNY! LOL. Thanks for the laugh! LL~

R,
Chris
Title: Re: Maxford P-51
Post by: Scott Richlen on April 07, 2015, 05:10:43 AM
Well. considering the models under discussion, this is obviously a humor column.  No?