Link 1
Stunt Hangar YouTube
P.A.M.P.A.
AMA
Balsa Density Calculator
This topic
This board
Entire forum
Google
Home
Help
Tags
Advertise
Login
Register
News:
July 05, 2025, 08:43:45 AM
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
stunthanger.com
»
General control line discussion
»
Open Forum
(Moderators:
RandySmith
,
Steve Berry
) »
E.M. Falcon Landing
« previous
next »
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Down
Author
Topic: E.M. Falcon Landing (Read 1143 times)
frank williams
25 supporter
Trade Count:
(
0
)
Captain
Posts: 886
E.M. Falcon Landing
«
on:
January 19, 2016, 07:30:49 AM »
I think a "lockout collet" didn't latch on one leg. Close but no cigar.
Logged
peabody
23 supporter
Trade Count:
(
0
)
Admiral
Posts: 2866
Re: E.M. Falcon Landing
«
Reply #1 on:
January 19, 2016, 08:26:11 AM »
Musk reported that "at leas the pieces were bigger"......
Cool stuff
Logged
See Ya
Peabody
www.manateerc.com
http://circleburners.wix.com/circleburners
Garf
Trade Count:
(
0
)
Admiral
Posts: 1817
Re: E.M. Falcon Landing
«
Reply #2 on:
January 19, 2016, 04:14:28 PM »
It looked like they got the landing perfect, then it fell over.
Logged
"SAVE ALL THE PIECES"-Phil Brown
http://hangarflying.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=wire
Tim Wescott
25 supporter
Trade Count:
(
0
)
Admiral
Posts: 12904
Re: E.M. Falcon Landing
«
Reply #3 on:
January 19, 2016, 04:18:38 PM »
Quote from: Garf on January 19, 2016, 04:14:28 PM
It looked like they got the landing perfect, then it fell over.
Yup. Given what the last one looked like it's definitely progress, even if they did end up with a rocket in flames at the end.
Logged
AMA 64232
The problem with electric is that once you get the smoke generator and sound system installed, the plane is too heavy.
Advertise Here
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Up
« previous
next »
Tags:
stunthanger.com
»
General control line discussion
»
Open Forum
(Moderators:
RandySmith
,
Steve Berry
) »
E.M. Falcon Landing