News:



  • July 05, 2025, 08:43:45 AM

Login with username, password and session length

Author Topic: E.M. Falcon Landing  (Read 1143 times)

Offline frank williams

  • 25 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 886
E.M. Falcon Landing
« on: January 19, 2016, 07:30:49 AM »
I think a "lockout collet" didn't latch on one leg.  Close but no cigar.


Offline peabody

  • 23 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 2866
Re: E.M. Falcon Landing
« Reply #1 on: January 19, 2016, 08:26:11 AM »
Musk reported that "at leas the pieces were bigger"......

Cool stuff

Offline Garf

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • ******
  • Posts: 1817
    • Hangar Flying
Re: E.M. Falcon Landing
« Reply #2 on: January 19, 2016, 04:14:28 PM »
It looked like they got the landing perfect, then it fell over.

Offline Tim Wescott

  • 25 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 12904
Re: E.M. Falcon Landing
« Reply #3 on: January 19, 2016, 04:18:38 PM »
It looked like they got the landing perfect, then it fell over.

Yup.  Given what the last one looked like it's definitely progress, even if they did end up with a rocket in flames at the end.
AMA 64232

The problem with electric is that once you get the smoke generator and sound system installed, the plane is too heavy.

Tags: