stunthanger.com

General control line discussion => Open Forum => Topic started by: Perry Rose on February 24, 2016, 06:10:58 AM

Title: Just wondering.
Post by: Perry Rose on February 24, 2016, 06:10:58 AM
Is "Tarnation" as in "what in Tarnation?" a stronger word than "Thunderation"? Or are my hearing aids too tight?
Title: Re: Just wondering.
Post by: Mike Griffin on February 24, 2016, 07:45:54 AM
Hey Perry,

You got me wondering too, so I looked it up...here is one explanation I found.


“What in tarnation?” is one of a wide variety of euphemistic expressions of surprise, bewilderment or anger that arose in 18th and 19th century America. Perhaps due to our Puritan legacy, Americans were, during this period, especially creative in devising oaths that allowed us to express strong emotions while still skirting blasphemy.

Such inventions as “heck,” “drat,” “darn,” “gosh,” “jiminy,” “gee-whiz” and “goldarn” were all devised to disguise exclamations that would have been considered shocking in polite society. “Sam Hill,” for example, is simply an early 19th century euphemism for “hell” (and while there have been many people named Sam Hill throughout history, the expression does not come from the name of any particular Sam Hill).

“Tarnation,” which dates back to the late 18th century, is an interesting example of this generation of euphemisms because it’s actually two euphemisms rolled into one word. The root of “tarnation” is “darnation,” a euphemistic modification of the word “damnation,” which at that time was considered unfit for polite conversation. “Darnation” became “tarnation” by being associated in popular speech with “tarnal,” an aphetic, or clipped, form of “eternal.”

It may seem odd that “eternal” would ever have been considered a curse word, but to speak of “the Eternal” at that time was often to invoke a religious context (God, Heaven, etc.), and thus to label something or someone “eternal” in a disparaging sense (“You eternal villain!”) was considered a mild oath. Shakespeare, for example, used “eternal” in this way in at least two of his plays.

So at some point someone, probably in a moment of exasperation, mixed “darnation” with “tarnal,” and we ended up with “tarnation.”

Source: www.word-detective.com/050404.html
Title: Re: Just wondering.
Post by: john e. holliday on February 24, 2016, 09:58:42 AM
Hadn't heard 'tarnation' since I was a kid.    In todays society it is nothing to hear kids say words in front of their mothers that if I had said them I would be getting a good taste of lye soap in the mouth.   Now how did we get from using 'aeroplane' to 'airplane'?
Title: Re: Just wondering.
Post by: FLOYD CARTER on February 24, 2016, 11:14:12 AM
South of the Mason-Dixon Line, "tarnation" is a common expression.

FC
Title: Re: Just wondering.
Post by: Jim Kraft on February 24, 2016, 11:27:21 AM
My little brother coined his own swear word. "Baddumit". It seemed to work for him. He had another word for things tangled up. He said they were "all augied up". So next time your control lines get tangled up, you can say baddumit, my lines are all augied uup.