stunthanger.com

General control line discussion => Open Forum => Topic started by: Robert Zambelli on January 26, 2010, 09:12:33 AM

Title: Just When You Think You've Seen All The Different Ringmasters
Post by: Robert Zambelli on January 26, 2010, 09:12:33 AM
OK, these will get your attention.

I built the "Pushmaster" in 1994.  Stock Ringmaster with a Como 40 mounted backwards driving a trailing edge mounted pusher prop. The drive shaft consisted of an aluminum tube supported in a rear mounted ball bearing. Had to launch it quickly because the engine would overheat - no prop blast to cool it. A bit nose heavy but flew well.

Then there's the "Jetmaster" - I don't claim any part of this - built by someone in the Philly Flyers - Banjock , maybe. Not sure if it ever flew.

Comments??????????????????????

Bob Z.
Title: Re: Just When You Think You've Seen All The Different Ringmasters
Post by: Ironbomb on January 26, 2010, 10:18:45 AM
Bob, those are just too cool for words. The Jetmaster looks most excellent. I gotta get me one of those engines.

happy bulding, (i see you are)

 ~>  Greg
Title: Re: Just When You Think You've Seen All The Different Ringmasters
Post by: Russell Shaffer on January 26, 2010, 11:43:48 AM
From what I can see of the jet mounts, if that thing ever fired it would go forward and leave the plane behind.  Interesting concept, though.  I wonder if the glo engine could move it fast enough to start if you could fire the plug somehow.
Title: Re: Just When You Think You've Seen All The Different Ringmasters
Post by: Mike Anderson on January 26, 2010, 12:06:14 PM
Plus, it doesn't look to have any landing gear - I AIN'T handlaunching that thing!   LL~
Title: Re: Just When You Think You've Seen All The Different Ringmasters
Post by: Larry Fulwider on January 26, 2010, 12:58:18 PM
. . .
 . . . I built the "Pushmaster" in 1994.  Stock Ringmaster with a Como 40 mounted backwards driving a trailing edge mounted pusher prop. The drive shaft consisted of an aluminum tube supported in a rear mounted ball bearing. . . .

Bob Z.

Bob --

Did you ever talk to Banjock about his pusher Ringmaster? He said it was a real education in aerodynamics -- how much performance changes without propwash over the wing. Long take off rolls, for example.

Contrats on the drive shaft success. That is not a trivial engineering feat! For the rest of you, think about it.

       Larry Fulwider
Title: Re: Just When You Think You've Seen All The Different Ringmasters
Post by: John Cralley on January 26, 2010, 01:27:04 PM
Bob,

You need to post those photos over on the Brotherhood of the Ring (www.brotherhoodofthering.info). You will definitely generate comments over there!!

John
Title: Re: Just When You Think You've Seen All The Different Ringmasters
Post by: Robert Zambelli on January 26, 2010, 02:09:22 PM
Larry - that IS the pusher Ringmaster that Banjock had - I built it for him.   y1 y1

The first takeoff roll was hilarious - lasted 3 minutes! But it never took off.   LL~
I built the plane with a high tailwheel to clear the prop. I didn't think to notice that it sat at a slight NEGATIVE angle of attack. Since a symmetric airfoil needs a slight positive angle, even with full up, it could not rotate and lift off. So, it just ran around on the ground until it ran out of fuel. Lowering the tail and adding slightly larger front wheels cured the problem.

The real comedy was when it crashed. It went in a about 45 degrees, stuck into the ground and the engine just ran for around 20 seconds. Remember, the prop never hit the ground so there was nothing to stop it!  n~ n~

Bob Z.
Title: Re: Just When You Think You've Seen All The Different Ringmasters
Post by: Elwyn Aud on January 26, 2010, 04:42:38 PM
The Dynajet would have turned the rudder to cinders. ;D
Title: Re: Just When You Think You've Seen All The Different Ringmasters
Post by: Robert Zambelli on January 27, 2010, 07:17:15 AM
Hi, Guys - good comments.

Ty, you are correct - no matter what is done to a pig, it's still a pig!!!!!  LL~ LL~ LL~

Russell - that setup was temporary just to get some CG ideas. He had all the proper mounting hardware for the pulse jet. Also, there was a landing gear, not shown in the photo.

The plan was to start the Diesel engine and then fire up the jet. Since the engine would already be running and cooling the jet, startup time was not that critical.

Elwyn - yes, he would definitely have to shorten the rudder.

Oh well, all for fun!!!!!

Bob Z.
Title: Re: Just When You Think You've Seen All The Different Ringmasters
Post by: pat king on January 28, 2010, 07:59:37 AM
One shouldn't be disparaging of Ringmasters. There are some of we intellectually challenged who think they are great.  y1 You shouldn't hurt our feelings. LL~

Pat
Title: Re: Just When You Think You've Seen All The Different Ringmasters
Post by: Jim Kraft on January 28, 2010, 09:43:11 AM
Yeah: Some of my best friends fly Ringmasters. y1 LL~ My wife warned me about hanging out with guys that fly Ringmasters, but I didn't listen, and now I have 2 myself.
Title: Re: Just When You Think You've Seen All The Different Ringmasters
Post by: Robert McHam on January 28, 2010, 11:48:35 AM
Yeah: Some of my best friends fly Ringmasters. y1 LL~ My wife warned me about hanging out with guys that fly Ringmasters, but I didn't listen, and now I have 2 myself.

I think that there is something addictive about the Ringmaster design. Even to those who have not flown one yet. I really can't say what it is or put a finger on it. Personally I have not built one but several of the smaller Ringmasters are on mu "bucket list" including the Baby Ringmaster and Beginner's Ringmaster bipe or possibly a built up wing version like the Baby Ringmaster. I have one of the Estes/Sterling PT Ringmaster 049 kits and it urges me to finish it.

Robert, I just have to ask about the engine start procedure for the "Pushmaster"!.

Robert
Title: Re: Just When You Think You've Seen All The Different Ringmasters
Post by: Bill Gruby on January 28, 2010, 01:07:40 PM
 UMMMM  Bob:

  Do you have any idea just how many Ringmaster Varients there are? At last count on the BOTR there were 34 and that was 6 months ago.  LOL  Let's see 207, 307, 546, 576, 547 Bipe, 715 Bipe, +P Foamie, RM 1000, SDR, Pulsemaster. RM Twin, and the Ducted Fan ( in development ) etc. There are more but I don't want ty to think I am in a rut.   LL~ LL~ LL~

  "Billy G"   S?P
Title: Re: Just When You Think You've Seen All The Different Ringmasters
Post by: Randy Powell on January 28, 2010, 01:17:45 PM
Bill,

Hey, what about mine?   ;D
Title: Re: Just When You Think You've Seen All The Different Ringmasters
Post by: Bill Gruby on January 28, 2010, 01:23:19 PM
Bill,

Hey, what about mine?   ;D

 Sorry Randy it plum slipped my mind. The Ringmaster Delux is georgeous. You can tell em what happened, I don't like to go there. It makes me cringe.  LOL

  "Billy G
Title: Re: Just When You Think You've Seen All The Different Ringmasters
Post by: Bill Gruby on January 28, 2010, 02:58:01 PM
 Why you ole snake in the grass. You is a closet "Ringmasterer"  VD~ VD~ LL~ LL~ LL~ VD~ VD~

  "Billy G"   S?P S?P S?P
Title: Re: Just When You Think You've Seen All The Different Ringmasters
Post by: Terry Bolin on January 28, 2010, 08:09:44 PM
Bill, Were  you building a special Ringmaster ( Maybe a bipe) a while back?
Title: Re: Just When You Think You've Seen All The Different Ringmasters
Post by: Scott Hartford on January 28, 2010, 09:23:17 PM
He has a few "special" Ringmasters!  n~ Very special indeed......
Title: Re: Just When You Think You've Seen All The Different Ringmasters
Post by: Bill Gruby on January 29, 2010, 07:34:21 AM
Bill, Were  you building a special Ringmaster ( Maybe a bipe) a while back?

 Sure did Terry. It is waiting for the Trim Paint and will be done and flown this season. The big one will also be flown in the spring. The RM 1000 met with terra firma last July and a new one with some changes is underway. Thanks for asking.

  "Billy G"   H^^