Ed,
I saw that posting and it is part of the reason I posted here. It seems there are so many old designs being modified by people either by accident or intentionally or just plain being built wrong. I was at a contest some time back and saw a plane that slightly resembled a plane that I had built three of from the old kits. The wing was almost twice as thick as the kit version and the fuselage was the wrong length. I asked someone nearby about it and was told that the person took liberties with the design but no one would say anything. I recently saw an attempt to build an old design. Being well aquanted with this plane, I immediately saw 9 bad errors in the construction. I am sure when it is finished the builder will put the name on the wing and pass it off as that model. These are things that bother me. I try to remain true to the original plan/design wherever possible. When Larry Cunningham drew the Playboy plans into Autocad, he spent a year getting them as correct as could be done. When all the rechecking and redrawing was done it was well over a year to produce the first kits of it. Later when Larry did the Tom Warden Continental, which was sold as the Laser continental, we took the same care in production as the Playboy. We spent over a year getting those kits out as well.
Back to the Juno kit. Not knowing anything about this Juno kit I wanted to see if it will build a copy of the Juno as it really was. I was hoping someone had experience with it that also had knowledge of the original plane for comparison.