News:


  • April 19, 2024, 09:59:13 AM

Login with username, password and session length

Author Topic: How thin of Shims used to adjust the tank height?  (Read 2394 times)

Offline Charles Carter

  • 22 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 915
  • Flying Control Line Stunt
    • Flying Control Line Stunt
How thin of Shims used to adjust the tank height?
« on: March 14, 2018, 09:20:10 PM »
How precise do you go regarding shimming the tank height.  I have used shims as thin as 1/32".  How thin of shims have you used to get that perfect engine?

Charles Carter

Offline Brett Buck

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • ******
  • Posts: 13732
Re: How thin of Shims used to adjust the tank height?
« Reply #1 on: March 14, 2018, 09:22:20 PM »
How precise do you go regarding shimming the tank height.  I have used shims as thin as 1/32".  How thin of shims have you used to get that perfect engine?

    The smallest I have ever used and had a positive result was about 1/64". But if it is that touchy, it's probably too touchy to actually use.

     Brett

Offline Charles Carter

  • 22 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 915
  • Flying Control Line Stunt
    • Flying Control Line Stunt
Re: How thin of Shims used to adjust the tank height?
« Reply #2 on: March 14, 2018, 09:27:06 PM »
    The smallest I have ever used and had a positive result was about 1/64". But if it is that touchy, it's probably too touchy to actually use.

     Brett

What material was the 1/64" shim made from?

Charles

Online Paul Walker

  • 23 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 1629
Re: How thin of Shims used to adjust the tank height?
« Reply #3 on: March 14, 2018, 11:32:55 PM »
What material was the 1/64" shim made from?

Charles

I used to use 1/64" ply when I ran IC's. Could tell the difference with that thick of a shim.

Offline Brett Buck

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • ******
  • Posts: 13732
Re: How thin of Shims used to adjust the tank height?
« Reply #4 on: March 14, 2018, 11:40:57 PM »
What material was the 1/64" shim made from?


   1/64"plywood - very useful stuff, albeit disproportionately heavy.

     Brett

Offline Randy Cuberly

  • 21 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 3674
Re: How thin of Shims used to adjust the tank height?
« Reply #5 on: March 14, 2018, 11:45:30 PM »
What material was the 1/64" shim made from?

Charles

I, the practical guy, think it depends on how much shimming is needed.  In some cases (somewhat rare perhaps) the tank actually needs to be a bit above the engine thrust line.  In this case you had better hav relieved the engine mounts or at least shimmed the front of them with something like 3/32 or 1/8 inch aluminum prior to finishing the nose of the airplane or you're going to have some serious dremel tool routing to do inside the fuselage on the engine mounts to raise the tank on a finished airplane.
To aboid this happenstance I usually relieve the engine mounts behind the engine mounting area as well as shim the engine mounting area with 3/32 think aluminum before mounting the engine crutch into the fuselage!  Under these circumstances it's smartest to start with a couple of whatever thickness of material it takes to lower (raise relative to the engine mounts) the tank into a reasonable position level with the thrust line.  Usually a 1/8 inch thick shim and a 1/16 inch thick shim.  From this position the tank can be easily lowered or raised by using 1/16 think shims.
The shims can most easily made from 1/8" thick light ply in the case of the 1/8" initial shim and 1/16 birch plywood with appropriate lighting patterns cut into the shim.  1/64" birch plywood shims with lightening patterns, can be used for fine tuning in either direction.
Shims can be made by cutting several at once by simply spot glueing the plywood together and cutting them several at a time.  They should be fuel proofed by coating them with thin epoxy.  I usually hold the stack including the tank into the fuselage with high density foam of the type used by the R/C guys to protect receivers etc. forcing the foam into the space between the tank and a long cross brace in the fuselage below the tank compartment that actually make the front of the fuselage into a box!  Added stiffness to the front of the fuselage is a big plus!

It's then very easy to shim the tank up or down by simply adding or subtracting shims from above or below the tank and can easily be done at the field during the trimming process!  they can usually be slid in or out by removing the engine without removing the tank!

Randy Cuberly
Randy Cuberly
Tucson, AZ

Offline Charles Carter

  • 22 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 915
  • Flying Control Line Stunt
    • Flying Control Line Stunt
Re: How thin of Shims used to adjust the tank height?
« Reply #6 on: March 15, 2018, 01:35:00 AM »
Thank you gentlemen for your help.   What is your favorite stunt maneuver to check for shim adjustment. 

Charles Carter
« Last Edit: March 15, 2018, 11:48:38 AM by Charles Carter »

Offline Brett Buck

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • ******
  • Posts: 13732
Re: How thin of Shims used to adjust the tank height?
« Reply #7 on: March 15, 2018, 03:55:30 AM »
Thank you gentlemen for your help.    What is your favorite stunt maneuver to check for shim adjustment. 

    Horizontal 8, but don't ignore it in other places.

     Many engines, even most, will not run the same in positive and negative-G maneuvers at all g loading. So you can shim the tank for one condition, and it will not be right for the other conditions. This is sort of the bane of existence for a stunt engine, and some engines cannot be adjusted or modified to work correctly no matter what you do. I think that is more-or-less understood, at least to me, due to the way the scavenging works, and it seems to be worse on engines with large ports to "get more power" for RC, which is swell if you are running it at 2 hp at 15,000 rpm and not so swell when you are chugging around at 10,000 rpm and 1/2 horse in a stunt plane.

      Even harder to resolve is when the difference gets progressively more marked as the maneuver goes along - rich on the first inside, lean on the first outside, richer still on the second inside, leaner still on the second outside. I had one engine that had something like 1/4" of shim to try to correct it in the horizontal 8, and in level flight, the same shim made it go 6 laps/sec in level inverted flight and 5 seconds upright  - but still screeching lean in the second outside. This is particularly true of schneurles, and usually much less of an issue on baffle-piston engines.

    The other factor that affects/effects this is the carburetion. This is both the venturi design AND the restrictions in the fuel feed system (like the bore of the spraybar and the fuel viscosity). "Fuel post"/"spigot" venturis sometime help over "flush inlet" systems, because the more consistent (although not necessarily increased) atomization and fuel draw,  but the fuel flow restrictions seem to be nearly as important.

     This has gotten several of us into pretty lengthy low-level arguments with various engine people over the years, because it seems to be much more noticeable in sea level dry air than anyplace else, particularly the midwest/southeast. So, in trying to resolve it, it doesn't necessarily repeat from place to place.

    So, shim it to get it even in the horizontal 8, then check the lap times in level and inverted flight, and see how close you are. If it's within a 0.05-0.1 seconds of the same, that's probably OK, if not, then you might have to look into other solutions, depending on the engine and venturi type.  A priori, I would use a diffuser over the venturi (air-filter or panty-hose diffuser), because I haven't seen anything negative about it and it usually helps. Beyond that, getting it closer to right makes it much easier to fly consistently.

    The other thing to consider is that making the venturi larger to Get More Power tends to exacerbate the problem, so sometimes it is to your advantage to give up on the power to get more even runs. That's essentially why we are running piped 61's and 75's in 625-650 square inch airplanes. You can't use the full power of even most 40's in these airplanes, much less a 75, but you don't care, you can put a tiny venturi on a 75 and still get plenty of power and dead-steady runs. David won the WC running a PA75 with some port modifications from the standard at the time, and a venturi smaller than we run on the 20FP.

     Brett

Offline Avaiojet

  • 22 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 7468
  • Just here for the fun of it also.
Re: How thin of Shims used to adjust the tank height?
« Reply #8 on: March 15, 2018, 11:49:10 AM »
This is true.

I had a guy tell me he used a dollar bill to shim a tank and it made all the difference in the world.
Trump Derangement Syndrome. TDS. 
Avaiojet Derangement Syndrome. ADS.
Amazing how ignorance can get in the way of the learning process.
If you're Trolled, you know you're doing something right.  Alpha Mike Foxtrot. "No one has ever made a difference by being like everyone else."  Marcus Cordeiro, The "Mark of Excellence," you will not be forgotten. "No amount of evidence will ever persuade an idiot."- Mark Twain. I look at the Forum as a place to contribute and make friends, some view it as a Realm where they could be King.   Proverb 11.9  "With his mouth the Godless destroys his neighbor..."  "Perhaps the greatest challenge in modeling is to build a competitive control line stunter that looks like a real airplane." David McCellan, 1980.

Online Ken Culbertson

  • 24 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 6103
Re: How thin of Shims used to adjust the tank height?
« Reply #9 on: March 15, 2018, 01:24:04 PM »
I, the practical guy, think it depends on how much shimming is needed.  In some cases (somewhat rare perhaps) the tank actually needs to be a bit above the engine thrust line.  In this case you had better hav relieved the engine mounts or at least shimmed the front of them with something like 3/32 or 1/8 inch aluminum prior to finishing the nose of the airplane or you're going to have some serious dremel tool routing to do inside the fuselage on the engine mounts to raise the tank on a finished airplane.
To aboid this happenstance I usually relieve the engine mounts behind the engine mounting area as well as shim the engine mounting area with 3/32 think aluminum before mounting the engine crutch into the fuselage!  Under these circumstances it's smartest to start with a couple of whatever thickness of material it takes to lower (raise relative to the engine mounts) the tank into a reasonable position level with the thrust line.  Usually a 1/8 inch thick shim and a 1/16 inch thick shim.  From this position the tank can be easily lowered or raised by using 1/16 think shims.
The shims can most easily made from 1/8" thick light ply in the case of the 1/8" initial shim and 1/16 birch plywood with appropriate lighting patterns cut into the shim.  1/64" birch plywood shims with lightening patterns, can be used for fine tuning in either direction.
Shims can be made by cutting several at once by simply spot glueing the plywood together and cutting them several at a time.  They should be fuel proofed by coating them with thin epoxy.  I usually hold the stack including the tank into the fuselage with high density foam of the type used by the R/C guys to protect receivers etc. forcing the foam into the space between the tank and a long cross brace in the fuselage below the tank compartment that actually make the front of the fuselage into a box!  Added stiffness to the front of the fuselage is a big plus!

It's then very easy to shim the tank up or down by simply adding or subtracting shims from above or below the tank and can easily be done at the field during the trimming process!  they can usually be slid in or out by removing the engine without removing the tank!

Randy Cuberly

You just redesigned the front end of the ship I am building!

ken
AMA 15382
If it is not broke you are not trying hard enough.
USAF 1968-1974 TAC

Offline RandySmith

  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *****
  • Posts: 13747
  • Welcome to the Stunt Hanger.
    • Aero Products
Re: How thin of Shims used to adjust the tank height?
« Reply #10 on: March 15, 2018, 01:40:54 PM »
A  Deck of  plastic , or plastiicized  playing cards  is  good to have, fuel does not bother them, they are  thick and can easily be stacked  to get whatever you want , use them when you get the  tank close,  I agree  1/64th s about as close as you can feel any difference

Randy

Online Lauri Malila

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • ******
  • Posts: 1632
Re: How thin of Shims used to adjust the tank height?
« Reply #11 on: March 15, 2018, 01:58:34 PM »
    Horizontal 8, but don't ignore it in other places.

     Many engines, even most, will not run the same in positive and negative-G maneuvers at all g loading. So you can shim the tank for one condition, and it will not be right for the other conditions. This is sort of the bane of existence for a stunt engine, and some engines cannot be adjusted or modified to work correctly no matter what you do. I think that is more-or-less understood, at least to me, due to the way the scavenging works, and it seems to be worse on engines with large ports to "get more power" for RC, which is swell if you are running it at 2 hp at 15,000 rpm and not so swell when you are chugging around at 10,000 rpm and 1/2 horse in a stunt plane.

      Even harder to resolve is when the difference gets progressively more marked as the maneuver goes along - rich on the first inside, lean on the first outside, richer still on the second inside, leaner still on the second outside. I had one engine that had something like 1/4" of shim to try to correct it in the horizontal 8, and in level flight, the same shim made it go 6 laps/sec in level inverted flight and 5 seconds upright  - but still screeching lean in the second outside. This is particularly true of schneurles, and usually much less of an issue on baffle-piston engines.

    The other factor that affects/effects this is the carburetion. This is both the venturi design AND the restrictions in the fuel feed system (like the bore of the spraybar and the fuel viscosity). "Fuel post"/"spigot" venturis sometime help over "flush inlet" systems, because the more consistent (although not necessarily increased) atomization and fuel draw,  but the fuel flow restrictions seem to be nearly as important.

     This has gotten several of us into pretty lengthy low-level arguments with various engine people over the years, because it seems to be much more noticeable in sea level dry air than anyplace else, particularly the midwest/southeast. So, in trying to resolve it, it doesn't necessarily repeat from place to place.

    So, shim it to get it even in the horizontal 8, then check the lap times in level and inverted flight, and see how close you are. If it's within a 0.05-0.1 seconds of the same, that's probably OK, if not, then you might have to look into other solutions, depending on the engine and venturi type.  A priori, I would use a diffuser over the venturi (air-filter or panty-hose diffuser), because I haven't seen anything negative about it and it usually helps. Beyond that, getting it closer to right makes it much easier to fly consistently.

    The other thing to consider is that making the venturi larger to Get More Power tends to exacerbate the problem, so sometimes it is to your advantage to give up on the power to get more even runs. That's essentially why we are running piped 61's and 75's in 625-650 square inch airplanes. You can't use the full power of even most 40's in these airplanes, much less a 75, but you don't care, you can put a tiny venturi on a 75 and still get plenty of power and dead-steady runs. David won the WC running a PA75 with some port modifications from the standard at the time, and a venturi smaller than we run on the 20FP.

     Brett

As you may find in previous discussions, the more you put thought to it, the more confusing it gets. (Not *you* as Brett, but in general.)
Still open questions;
-Why the phenomen reverses with running direction?
-Why you can often get fully rid of the issue by tilting the engine to something between cylinder down and horizontal position (usually near 45 degrees)? That is absolutely the best way to deal with the issue, you win both symmetrical lap times and symmetry in maneuvres. So these 2 separate things can be treated as 2 separate issues.
Things like smaller venturi, smaller exhaust outlet, smaller propeller, more efficient head design, onboard glow, hotter plug or plug shield/preheater all tend to help by making the issue smaller but never remove it completely.
At the moment I'm leaning towards a theory that it happens when an engine is used at a lower rpm/power output than where it's scavenging is designed to work.
Based on my experience I'm quite sure that what happens after the scavenging ports does not have much to do with the beforementioned issue. 

Lauri


Offline Chris_Rud

  • 2014 Supporters
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Commander
  • *
  • Posts: 189
Re: How thin of Shims used to adjust the tank height?
« Reply #12 on: March 15, 2018, 02:17:20 PM »
Playing cards. I only use Aces.

Offline RandySmith

  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *****
  • Posts: 13747
  • Welcome to the Stunt Hanger.
    • Aero Products
Re: How thin of Shims used to adjust the tank height?
« Reply #13 on: March 15, 2018, 02:36:52 PM »
This is true.

I had a guy tell me he used a dollar bill to shim a tank and it made all the difference in the world.

YES it is  true,  if you fold it 8 times !

Randy

Online Lauri Malila

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • ******
  • Posts: 1632
Re: How thin of Shims used to adjust the tank height?
« Reply #14 on: March 15, 2018, 02:58:13 PM »
Try folding more than 6 times :)

Offline don boka

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Lieutenant
  • ***
  • Posts: 69
Re: How thin of Shims used to adjust the tank height?
« Reply #15 on: March 15, 2018, 03:04:56 PM »
I personally use five dollar bills that I borrow from my wife, you only get what you pay for!
Don Boka.

Online Ken Culbertson

  • 24 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 6103
Re: How thin of Shims used to adjust the tank height?
« Reply #16 on: March 15, 2018, 03:31:30 PM »
YES it is  true,  if you fold it 8 times !

Randy
You should never get caught holding 8 aces, unless it is pinochle.
AMA 15382
If it is not broke you are not trying hard enough.
USAF 1968-1974 TAC

Offline Avaiojet

  • 22 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 7468
  • Just here for the fun of it also.
Re: How thin of Shims used to adjust the tank height?
« Reply #17 on: March 15, 2018, 03:55:37 PM »
Try folding more than 6 times :)

Nope, just the thickness of the dollar bill.

Honestly, I'll never forget the guy who told me this. I was going to say I thought that might be an exaggeration, but I didn't.

Maybe I'll tell you who said this.  ;D
Trump Derangement Syndrome. TDS. 
Avaiojet Derangement Syndrome. ADS.
Amazing how ignorance can get in the way of the learning process.
If you're Trolled, you know you're doing something right.  Alpha Mike Foxtrot. "No one has ever made a difference by being like everyone else."  Marcus Cordeiro, The "Mark of Excellence," you will not be forgotten. "No amount of evidence will ever persuade an idiot."- Mark Twain. I look at the Forum as a place to contribute and make friends, some view it as a Realm where they could be King.   Proverb 11.9  "With his mouth the Godless destroys his neighbor..."  "Perhaps the greatest challenge in modeling is to build a competitive control line stunter that looks like a real airplane." David McCellan, 1980.

Offline Brett Buck

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • ******
  • Posts: 13732
Re: How thin of Shims used to adjust the tank height?
« Reply #18 on: March 15, 2018, 04:19:18 PM »
As you may find in previous discussions, the more you put thought to it, the more confusing it gets. (Not *you* as Brett, but in general.)
Still open questions;
-Why the phenomen reverses with running direction?
-Why you can often get fully rid of the issue by tilting the engine to something between cylinder down and horizontal position (usually near 45 degrees)? That is absolutely the best way to deal with the issue, you win both symmetrical lap times and symmetry in maneuvres. So these 2 separate things can be treated as 2 separate issues.
Things like smaller venturi, smaller exhaust outlet, smaller propeller, more efficient head design, onboard glow, hotter plug or plug shield/preheater all tend to help by making the issue smaller but never remove it completely.

  Absolutely correct, if it wants to do it, it will do it anyway, but you can control how much.

Quote
At the moment I'm leaning towards a theory that it happens when an engine is used at a lower rpm/power output than where it's scavenging is designed to work.

   I am sure that this is the root cause, based on various examples I have seen.

Quote
Based on my experience I'm quite sure that what happens after the scavenging ports does not have much to do with the beforementioned issue. 

   I am pretty sure that this is not true - what happens is explainable if you look at the difference between a baffle-piston engine and a schnuerle engines. The baffle forces the charge up one side, and hopefully pushes out the exhaust down the other. On a schneurle, the charge is more-or-less aimed towards the top of the cylinder by the ports and the angling of the port edges. How much velocity you have when you do that, the momentum induced, it based on the flow rate, and the dimensions of the port - smaller = faster. But once it leaves the port, the momentum of the charge is altered by external accelerations, so, with acceleration towards the top of the cylinder the charge tends to move quickly up the sides, and with acceleration towards the bottom of the cylinder, it gets slowed down and curves over flatter than it would otherwise. When it finally fires the charge, it is in a different place with one set of accelerations than the other, with unpredictable (ahead of time) but repeatable (once you have built and put it in an airplane) results. The faster it shoots out of the ports, the less affected it is by this, and if it just gently wafts out, it is easily influenced - hence, engines designed for 3-4 HP running at .6 HP have very low velocities and are easily altered by external accelerations.

    Note this explains most of the known observations - like, blocking the boost port. That cuts off about 1/3 of the port area, meaning the flow out the two remaining ports is substantially faster. It also explains why smaller port sizes tend to do this much less. *Just like a Fox 35 burp*, which is what got us to thinking about it.

    It's an internal ballistics problem, that seems to explain almost all the observations. When I saw the Fox 35 thing it was like I was smacked up side the head with a baseball bat, of course that's what's going on. D'OH!

    Brett

Offline Istvan Travnik

  • 24 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Commander
  • *
  • Posts: 289
Re: How thin of Shims used to adjust the tank height?
« Reply #19 on: March 15, 2018, 04:32:01 PM »
Dear Lauri,
I fully agree with you.
In the ancient times (in early '80s) when we started to use HP 40s, in conventional inverted position, I got faced very soon with the asimmetry in horizontal eight. Others started to use pressurized tank, narrower venturi, etc.
I did not want to lose neither power, nor senstivity of my engine, so I plastered some silicon rubber into scavenge channels, making the cross-section to ca. 1/2 area. Immediately it got "healthy", without any noticeable power loss at 10.000 rpm.
When I started to position the engine into horizontal, the silicone rubber became needless, I scraped it out. 
From that time  (1985) I never returned to inverted position arrangement.
My favourite is -20° sloped, with side exhaust, reverse revolving tangential silencer, exactly beneath the crankshaft. I think, it allows to make fuselages pretty enough.
Istvan

Offline bob whitney

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • ******
  • Posts: 2248
Re: How thin of Shims used to adjust the tank height?
« Reply #20 on: March 15, 2018, 10:54:26 PM »
when I could still get around a pylon I had an ARF F2C side winder speed plane .they have a monster venture on suction. I could not get it to come on the pipe and stay there. after watching it John Newton told me to take a business card and put it behind the tank moving the tank outward that much ..after that it would come on the pipe almost every time
rad racer

Eric Viglione

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: How thin of Shims used to adjust the tank height?
« Reply #21 on: March 16, 2018, 09:17:14 AM »
Depends how desperate I am... If i am home in the shop, lots of stuff is within reach, though the thin ply's can be heavy... a lot heavier than the Joker out of your deck of Bicycle cards...hint hint. I saved all those fake credit card mailers for years. I got bunches of them. Some are hard plastic, some are plastic coated card stock.
All are various thicknesses and make great epoxy spreaders, tank shims, etc etc.
So, at least all junk mail isn't junk!
EricV

Offline Charles Carter

  • 22 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 915
  • Flying Control Line Stunt
    • Flying Control Line Stunt
Re: How thin of Shims used to adjust the tank height?
« Reply #22 on: March 16, 2018, 06:28:38 PM »
Depends how desperate I am... If i am home in the shop, lots of stuff is within reach, though the thin ply's can be heavy... a lot heavier than the Joker out of your deck of Bicycle cards...hint hint. I saved all those fake credit card mailers for years. I got bunches of them. Some are hard plastic, some are plastic coated card stock.
All are various thicknesses and make great epoxy spreaders, tank shims, etc etc.
So, at least all junk mail isn't junk!
EricV

The suggestions have been great thanks.  I am really excited about the fake credit cards ( the ones that do not have raised numbers and are smooth). They are super easy to cut with scissors and should be fuel proof. Besides dollar bills are scarce here so I think I will use a fake line of credit to shim my tank.  LL~


Advertise Here
Tags:
 


Advertise Here