Interesting discussion, reminds me of my Dad. About the time I became a teenager, we began having great discussions, playing devil's advocate if you will. He'd state the pros/benefits/advantages of a position; I'd take the opposite view. Or vice versa.
The discussions were often about current events, but a recurring topic was the good/evil of "progress" - progress usually meaning advances in technology.
Is dynamite good? Alfred Noble invented it - and then left most of his fortune to a trust providing for the Nobel Prizes, in part because he didn't want to be remembered as the man "who became rich by finding ways to kill more people faster than ever before" (as a French newspaper put it).
How about cell phones? I absolutely love the convenience, though mine doesn't get much use. I was in a hospital waiting room a few weeks back when a young couple came in ... They sat down, turned on their cell phones, and appeared to begin texting others. And didn't say anything to one another. (We've all seen the cartoons depicting a group of people, all with eyes/ears only for their cell phones, and oblivious to those around them.)
A few things I hope to have learned from those discussions with Dad - (1) Respect for one with an opposing viewpoint is a very healthy thing; (2) Only by considering thoughtfully that viewpoint can we really form an intelligent opinion, and (3) There are often very compelling points to support either (any) opinion.
I choose to embrace "progress" for the most part, but also think - as Randy suggests - that some skepticism and paranoia is often a good thing.
Dennis

“It is not the strongest of the species that survive, nor the most intelligent, but the one most responsive to change.” - Charles Darwin