News:



  • July 20, 2025, 02:22:53 PM

Login with username, password and session length

Author Topic: Drone hit on Airliner  (Read 4039 times)

Offline BillP

  • 21 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 513
Drone hit on Airliner
« on: March 30, 2016, 05:25:39 PM »
Bill P.

Offline Steve Fitton

  • 24 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 2278
Re: Drone hit on Airliner
« Reply #1 on: March 30, 2016, 05:34:56 PM »
fake....
Steve

Offline JoeJust

  • 2019 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 1553
Re: Drone hit on Airliner
« Reply #2 on: March 30, 2016, 06:03:19 PM »
Thi one has ben around for a ling time and is BUNK!
Joe
I only enter contests so somebody else is not always in last place

Offline Steve Helmick

  • 24 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 10280
Re: Drone hit on Airliner
« Reply #3 on: March 30, 2016, 06:18:39 PM »
It apparently got the FAA's attention, however.  '' Steve
"The United States has become a place where professional athletes and entertainers are mistaken for people of importance." - Robert Heinlein

In 1944 18-20 year old's stormed beaches, and parachuted behind enemy lines to almost certain death.  In 2015 18-20 year old's need safe zones so people don't hurt their feelings.

Offline Ken Burdick

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Captain
  • *****
  • Posts: 600
Re: Drone hit on Airliner
« Reply #4 on: March 30, 2016, 06:36:06 PM »
just below the google report, Fake

A shocking video showing a drone clipping the wing of a Southwest plane is what a flyer's nightmares are made of.

But this video is fake. The footage was widely shared after it was posted to YouTube on Tuesday. People claiming to have recorded the video when leaving JFK airport in New York also copied the footage and uploaded it as their own.

Offline BillP

  • 21 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 513
Re: Drone hit on Airliner
« Reply #5 on: March 31, 2016, 10:36:34 AM »
Yep, I found a comment where someone freeze framed the video and they said parts came off the plane prior to the drone hitting.
Bill P.

Offline Target

  • C/L Addict
  • 2019 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 1692
Re: Drone hit on Airliner
« Reply #6 on: March 31, 2016, 12:02:33 PM »


People claiming to have recorded the video when leaving JFK airport in New York also copied the footage and uploaded it as their own.


IMO, those people should be investigated/charged with some form of fraud. They are not helping us, and they are not amusing.
Regards,
Chris
Regards,
Chris
AMA 5956

Offline Wynn Robins

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • ******
  • Posts: 1684
Re: Drone hit on Airliner
« Reply #7 on: March 31, 2016, 09:25:26 PM »
fake ?  really ? 
what led you all to that conclusion?  the fact that they show you how they created the video at the end of it?   HB~> HB~> HB~>



In the battle of airplane versus ground, the ground is yet to lose

Offline jim gilmore

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • ******
  • Posts: 1216
Re: Drone hit on Airliner
« Reply #8 on: April 01, 2016, 12:34:16 AM »
Looking at that video if that drone was real how large a drone would you say it was.
if it hit taht vert stab on the tip of the wing are we talking a part that while 60-80 ft from the camera the aircraft part looks to be about 4 feet high and 20-30 inches at the base at least. So that drone is how big ?

Offline Paul Wood

  • 21 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Commander
  • *
  • Posts: 297
Re: Drone hit on Airliner
« Reply #9 on: April 01, 2016, 12:12:32 PM »
My criteria for determining a fake..."If it's not on the TV news, it's fake." Those guys don't miss anything!

Offline john e. holliday

  • 25 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 22995
Re: Drone hit on Airliner
« Reply #10 on: April 02, 2016, 08:39:49 PM »
You got to be kidding. LL~ LL~
John E. "DOC" Holliday
10421 West 56th Terrace
Shawnee, KANSAS  66203
AMA 23530  Have fun as I have and I am still breaking a record.

Offline Gordon Van Tighem

  • 25 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 421
Gord VT
MAAC 3738L, Life Member
AMA C3738L

Offline Andrew Tinsley

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • ******
  • Posts: 1345
Re: Drone hit on Airliner
« Reply #12 on: April 24, 2016, 05:57:21 AM »
Well that incident was fake. However there was a drone strike on an Airbus landing at London Heathrow. So it HAS finally happened.

Andrew.
BMFA Number 64862

Offline pmackenzie

  • Pat MacKenzie
  • 25 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 777
Re: Drone hit on Airliner
« Reply #13 on: April 24, 2016, 06:08:49 AM »
Well that incident was fake. However there was a drone strike on an Airbus landing at London Heathrow. So it HAS finally happened.

Andrew.

Perhaps not.
They now think he hit a plastic bag.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/04/21/drone-believed-to-have-hit-british-airways-flight-may-have-been/

Since there was zero damage to the aircraft that seems far more probable.
MAAC 8177

Offline Target

  • C/L Addict
  • 2019 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 1692
Re: Drone hit on Airliner
« Reply #14 on: April 24, 2016, 09:59:55 AM »
We really need to start registration on plastic bags.
Operators need to be held accountable.
Regards,
Chris
AMA 5956

Offline Jim Kraft

  • 2015
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 3433
  • AMA78415
Re: Drone hit on Airliner
« Reply #15 on: April 24, 2016, 12:04:43 PM »
And party balloons. I was flying a pipeline with our pipeline flyer one day when we passed something flashing in the sky. We went back to see what it was and it was one of those aluminized party balloons. If you are going to have a birthday party, you must register all balloons with the FAA. What if one should get away and attack an airliner.

Can you still play golf? How high can you hit a golf ball and still be in compliance unless of course the ball is registered. Are they going to register birds? We might as well have a little fun with this sad state of affairs. Trying to deal with government agencies is like trying to push a log chain. It is like going around the world. You will end up back where you started no matter what.

Maybe we can have veterans of model aviation where we all meet once a year and cry in our beer, and talk about the good old days when freedom was still alive and well.

When ever people complain about someone else and their activity to the government, you have just cut your own throat. They will come after your activity next. The lawyers love it though.

The trouble with most of us is we are to old and do remember freedom. It is a slow death that started 100 years ago, and there is no way to back it up. It can only move forward. It is called progressiveness. Only the elite understand it.
Jim Kraft

Offline Jim Oliver

  • 25 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 1414
Re: Drone hit on Airliner
« Reply #16 on: April 24, 2016, 04:30:44 PM »
Jim,

As crazy as it sounds, when I was playing corporate pilot I once saw a mylar party balloon at 16,000 ft......

Jim
Jim Oliver
AMA 18475

Offline Target

  • C/L Addict
  • 2019 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 1692
Re: Drone hit on Airliner
« Reply #17 on: April 24, 2016, 07:22:39 PM »
Don't get me started on Mylar balloons. I work offshore, and you guys have no idea how many I see every day off the coast of California. I believe they mostly come from cruise ships. I'm not really a tree hugger, but in my opinion, the balloons on cruise ships should be made of biodegradable materials.
Mylar lasts decades in the water....
I've also launched latex weather balloons (6' diameter) from my boat for the navy weather guys. Those go up 80,000 ft they say before popping. They sometimes have 6" aluminum spheres dangling below them, over 100' on "kite string".
When I asked about the impact to a jet engine, they said that because the string was 42# breaking strength, it was legal. Of course I then asked what the breaking strength and impact of the metal sphere would be to a jet engine...
I'm considered somewhat of a trouble maker at work. I'm not sure why though. :-p
Regards,
Chris
AMA 5956

Tags: