News:



  • July 07, 2025, 11:49:01 AM

Login with username, password and session length

Author Topic: Debate Zone. To be or not to be?  (Read 8050 times)

Offline Bill Morell

  • 21 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 956
Re: Debate Zone. To be or not to be?
« Reply #50 on: December 01, 2013, 08:17:17 AM »
3 days of voting, 93 votes out of 3604 members. I don't think the vast majority of members really give a sh-t one way or the other.
Bill Morell
It wasn't that you could and others couldn't, its that you did and others didn't.
Vietnam 72-73
  Better to have it and not need it than it is to need it and not have it.

Offline Bill Johnson

  • 25 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 540
Re: Debate Zone. To be or not to be?
« Reply #51 on: December 01, 2013, 09:49:06 AM »
Maybe this should be moved to the "Debate Zone".  D>K
Best Regards,
Bill

AMA 350715

Offline Bill Morell

  • 21 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 956
Re: Debate Zone. To be or not to be?
« Reply #52 on: December 01, 2013, 11:28:48 AM »
There is nothing to debate about ucontrol airplanes that can't be done in the open forum. Totally pointless idea.
Bill Morell
It wasn't that you could and others couldn't, its that you did and others didn't.
Vietnam 72-73
  Better to have it and not need it than it is to need it and not have it.

Offline Clint Ormosen

  • 2019 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 2632
Re: Debate Zone. To be or not to be?
« Reply #53 on: December 01, 2013, 03:30:29 PM »
There is nothing to debate about ucontrol airplanes that can't be done in the open forum. Totally pointless idea.

x2
-Clint-

AMA 559593
Finding new and innovated ways to screw up the pattern since 1993

Offline Chris Wilson

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • ******
  • Posts: 1710
Re: Debate Zone. To be or not to be?
« Reply #54 on: December 01, 2013, 04:17:23 PM »
The "Debate Zone" seems to sit under the heading of "General Control Line Discussion" - does it not?

So does the "Open Forum".

So any subject posted there that is not within the genre of general control line discussion really is off topic - how is that for a logical opinion?
MAAA AUS 73427

You have enemies? Good. That means you've stood up for something, sometime in your life.
 Nothing in life is so exhilarating as to be shot at without result.  It's not enough that we do our best; sometimes we have to do what's required

Offline Randy Cuberly

  • 21 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 3673
Re: Debate Zone. To be or not to be?
« Reply #55 on: December 02, 2013, 10:20:24 PM »
The "Debate Zone" seems to sit under the heading of "General Control Line Discussion" - does it not?

So does the "Open Forum".

So any subject posted there that is not within the genre of general control line discussion really is off topic - how is that for a logical opinion?


Well if you follow that logic to the end then the Open Forum and the Debate zone are one and the same!  So is it logical to have both?  Not in my opinion!  which actually counts for nothing of course!   n~ n~ LL~ LL~

Randy Cuberly
Randy Cuberly
Tucson, AZ

Offline Dennis Moritz

  • 22 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 2485
Re: Debate Zone. To be or not to be?
« Reply #56 on: December 03, 2013, 04:58:23 PM »
Debate Zone still there. Thanks Derek and Robert (guess it was you guys) for the clean up. I now change my five votes for dump to five votes for keep.  :) (I'm joking, I only voted once. Can you vote more than once?)
« Last Edit: December 03, 2013, 06:47:26 PM by Dennis Moritz »


Advertise Here
Tags: