Right, Gary,
Looks about right, as Jim said.
I don't like to build limits on the controls. We can keep them from hanging up while building by checking their full range of motion and clearing space wherever needed.
I usually build to clear about 60° bellcrank rotation each way, just to make sure nothing will snag. Also, that much motion must be free without excess space between pushrods and horns - vibration can make space like that chew out the fit to where things get sloppy, or worse, break...
Limits on how much angle to use in the air can be helped by adjusting the space between lines at the handle. Closer together shifts the lines less, and line shift is what turns the bellcrank... Longer from the hinge on the elevator horn also 'slows' response, and gives you more torque to turn the elevator against air loads. In your sketch of the elevator horn, it looks like the middle hole is about twice as far from the elevator hing as the iner hole, and the outer hole is about that distance further out. So, yes, it takes twice as much force to use the inner hole as with the middle hole. Three times as much if you compare the force needed at the innermost hole with what the outermost hole needs - and if my SWAG about the horn hole distances from the hinge is anywhere close...
HOWEVER, we have the full force of line pull* to overcome the airloads, and the differences shouldn't be noticeable from the handle.
(* - if airloads require, we could turn the handle so as to pull one line hard enough that the entire CF is on that line. Seldom seen. Not a thing to worry about.)
In our cars, the steering wheel can be turned enough to make a tight U-turn, but we don't turn the wheel that far in any other situation that that. We steer just as much as needed. Flying CL is like that - we 'steer' only enough to do what we need, and we can finesse it, too.