This is what I have found so far, the first year for the award was in 1977.
1977 Ted Fancher Citation
1978 Ron Harding P-40
1979 Les McDonald Stiletto 660
1980 Gene Martine Mariner
1981 Ted Fancher Intimidation
1982 Stan Powell Dove
1983 Joe Reinhard Cycle II
1984 Jim Armor Epic
1985 Windy Urtnowski Killer Bee
1986 Ski Dombrowski Lacemaker
1987 Windy Urtnowski Tradition
1988 Jim Casale Columbia
1989 Bob Whitely "Showtime" Laser
1990
1991 Steve Buso Zap Machine
1992 Windy Urtnowski
1993 Bob Lampione United III
1994 Bill Werwage Junar
1995 Bill Werwage P47-N
1996 Windy Urtnowski Spitfire
1997 Windy Urtnowski Seafire
1998 Windy Urtnowski Seafire
1999 Windy Urtnowski Seafire
2000 Curt Contrata Tempest II
2001 Bill Werwage P-47
2002 Paul Walker P-51 Miss America
2003 Windy Urtnowski B-25 Mitchell
2004 Windy Urtnowski A-26
2005 Windy Urtnowski
2007 Windy Urtnowski
2008 Phil Granderson Zealot
If people can fill in the blanks and/or correct mistakes, it would be great.
Curt
Looks like Windy U. won enough props to drive a fleet of giant drones...and maybe get coverage in "Toy Aviat...." oops, "Model" Aviation Magazine!
The last comment was a bit of a tease to my good friend Eric who sort of dissed the use of appearance points counting in the bottom line competition tally.
(Quote: Who knows, maybe the individual appearance point scores of every entrant might be intentionally with held from publication, otherwise people might start adding stuff up to see who won on the merits of flight score only... )I combined those two comments and came up with the following summation of their gist: United States "stunt" has always included appearance points in its decision making. The underlying reason is that US stunt is a "modeling" event, not a toy plane fly-in as is so much of the "Model Aviation" coverage of store bought toy airplanes steered by their buyers. Inasmuch as it is a "modeling" event some modest percentage of the competitions for such aircraft quite properly include recognition toward the final outcome based on the "modeling" of the airplane by the contestant.
No desire to start yet another 'Yeah, But..." thread herein. Only felt the need to juxtapose the difference between "modeling" versus "buying" the tools of the small airplane competitions of different eras...and values.
Ted