Gentlemen,
Are Byron model airplane fuel components labeled by percentage by weight or volume? I recall it as
a quality fuel but not if it were sold with components by weight or volume percentage.
Thank you!
There are plenty of arguments about that. Byron fuel is *excellent* for stunt with modern-era stunt engines. I did boil-down tests and for close to 16% oil for the regular and 20% oil *by volume* for the "Classic", which was a touch more than with SIG Champion at the time.
In every case I found, the Byron fuel ran noticeably smoother than the other conventional alternatives. In some cases, it resolved "stopped like you flipped a switch" issues when nothing else would. One engine I had would *only* make it through a pattern on Byron and no other fuel I tried - and I guarantee that Byron was not the first thing I tried. I routinely used it for several years in the mid-90's including qualifying at the NATs several times.
The only technical issue I noticed was that Byron was quite a bit weaker for a given stated nitro content than any of the others. I used either Byron 15 or a 50/50 mix of 15 and 25, and that was in the ballpark with SIG. I don't know what was going on there, it was either short of nitro, or some of it was nitroethane, no idea. But it worked a lot better than SIG in some cases - like, it kept running through inside loops!
The other issue was the ragging I got on the topic. As with most things, people have ideas and they adopt them like a lifestyle, and one of them is fuel snobbery. I had one noted international competitor that was having problems with the "quite like you flipped a switch" flameouts at a big contest one time. I had some Byron 15% Classic, and offered it to him. He really didn't want to use it, but did, and of course, it ran perfectly for the first time all weekend, clean as a whistle and actually much smoother running all the rest of the time. I gave him a gallon, and he said "no, I can't run that, XXXX (the engine reworker) wouldn't like that" and went back to nearly flaming out in every inside corner for the rest of the weekend.
As an aside - I also ran *regular* Byron, with the 16% oil. It also ran just fine and I had no apparent wear issues or any other problems. Don't run it in Foxes/McCoys/iron-liner OS, etc, but conventional ABC/AAC stunt engines are OK. Of course in stunt, you shouldn't run iron-liner anything in the year 2015, aside from nostalgia.
If you are embarrassed, pour it into a Powermaster GMA can.
Brett
p.s. And just to be clear, I now use Powermaster fuel exclusively. I switch between Powermaster RO-Jett and Powermaster RC sport fuel (18% oil) or mix the two to get the response I want in the corners. I never found anything wrong with Byron, but Powermaster is a lot easier to get in quantity and somewhat less expensive. I also much prefer having the fuel in cans instead of plastic bottles - easier to pack/store, and a lot safer.