As I recall, Bob said it was basically an upside down Thundergazer.
...
By removing one screw, he has access to the engine, the battery compartment (fuel tank compartment?) and the flap horn.
And you get all that access without leaving anything open right next to the motor mount. To my non-engineer eye that looks like good structural integrity. On the other hand, the landing gear needs to be pretty tall. Also, I was wondering if the very low tailplane is so low that it can be vulnerable in a less than perfect landing.
..... now I started wondering about the control linkage:
- done the "usual" way, the elevator pushrod would have tight bends and there's very little room below the tailplane
- it could be upside down too, but then extending the hatch so far back wouldn't make sense (?)
- flap pushrod and horn on topside, another flap horn on the bottom to drive the elevator pushrod, with elevator horn on top?

- I'm thinking too complicated
