
these Adaminson wings were akin to the blue foam core carbon / kevlar Americers Cup / Aviation stuff .
In that the Balsa forms a filler / packer/ core for a dual epoxy skin / laminate - optimiseing strength-weight .

Though Ive concerns with the seperation of the skins , should the vertical rib members be seperate vertical grain
pieces , to maintain wing depth under duress / deflection ( such as an unspared foam core sheeted wing ) .
or be vertical geodesic or cross braced girders constructed from 1/32 Sq. balsa .

This is a bit along the line of wether shear webs are vertical or horizontal grain , pobably boths best .
Well Braced / securely located center section stucture - to maintain dimensional integredy at the area of greatest load concentration ,
while outboard the load concentration is proportionally less , so progressively less structure is necessary outboard . Though one can get carried away.
Then Again - some have more time than others , and less wood ( 1/32 sq. built up rib supports

)
Id think one could consider both fully ridgid and lateraly ( along the span ) or both. As in a combination . The trick being progressive absorbtion of loads.
And the Olde dreaded fokker wing flutter / control reversal , where if torsional strength is incorrect flying loads alter the incidance through flexure .
Grabbibg a I beam wing over your knee ( detroiter ) you can test the ' Bow ' , but ' D ' tube wings have considerably less dimensional displacement tolerance
before they snap . IF we're talking about DIMENSIONAL rather than LOAD . Obviously less displacement / Bow per LOAD on the 'D' tube or fully sheeted type .

This means That Looks About Right , there .
