There should be no suggestion that the amount of dihedral that would be appropriate for a semi scale rendition of this aircraft would have any adverse affect on performance for CLPA. Several semi-scale stunt ships with dihedral have successfully competed at the highest levels as aptly demonstrated by Al Rabe and his masterpieces where he has two National Stunt Champion titles as well as a second place at the one World Championships where he flew.
Keith
I am not aware of anyone mentioning that dihedral would have an adverse affect on performance. We all know about Al's work. What I said is that, I am not going to do it on this ship. Between myself and the people over at John Millers CAD forum, we have enough muscle to do anything we want!! If we decide to collaborate, we can make the cats over at the Top Gun RC contest realize just what time it is! I simply don't want to.
As I stated before, please feel free to crank up your copy of Draftsight and gets to steppin on the version that's going to light you up. In addition, this version is STRICTLY for the Saito 4 stroke as per Bob Reeve's suggestion,(that's what got me going on this). But, don't hesitate to raid our CAD "parts bin" and install the electric motor and PA motor drawings and drop those babies into place.
Also lets not forget, if you want to channel up some Vic Macaluso like Larry Fernandez, get busy with the drop tanks and full on ordinance on this sucker. I can draw those for you if you are somewhat CAD challenged and place them in our "parts bin".
As for me so far, I have a top fuselage view that I like, and I have a wing planform that is right in the pocket for the 62\72 at 708 SQ. Stabilizer is got the muscle to lever the big block, so at this point it's just straight engineering work. Gotta make sure I have a structure that can withstand the power and the stress of the 72.
I will continue to place the screenshots over at the CAD forum so as not to hijack Ryan's thread and get busted here.