Well...we've kind of already been there and done that. The 3D printing only became a phenomenon lately when (a) the price became cheap, and (b) the material properties improved. But the technology has been around a long time. I think our lab had a couple of versions about 20-25 years ago. I recall that NASA/JPL put out the request to aerospace firms to help them print sections of the Martian surface as they mapped it prior(?) to the rover landings. The ideas was to build a large map quickly a la quilting squares. At Hughes Aircraft, we printed large sections with one of our machines that was essentially laminated paper--or cellulose, which is about as close to wood as a processed material is going to be unless you are trying to replicate wood exactly. I, of course checked what each of the new machines that we brought in could do with a hobbiest's agenda. None of the results were particularly attractive, except on the latest versions, which can grow parts with decent properties, so if you want some intricate fittings that is possible. They can do the same thing with certain metals, but it is quite fussy, and until you approach it as a "foundry on a desktop" you are going to have poor parts that crack before you finish depositing metal. It is a lot harder than buying the latest machine and then sending out advertisements. I believe GE was claiming success with near net shape turbine parts which is the most impressive achievement so far in my opinion. I was not that impressed with the internet "frenzy" over the "printed submarine" that the Navy was claiming.
But for model airplanes? Not a real boon for a builder in my opinion. But certainly possible.