stunthanger.com

General control line discussion => Open Forum => Topic started by: ChrisSarnowski on January 12, 2012, 04:20:55 PM

Title: 1948 Fox 35
Post by: ChrisSarnowski on January 12, 2012, 04:20:55 PM
Check the picture and let me know what you think.

http://www.modelaviation.com/enginehistory

It's just above the Fox 59 a little over half way through.

-Chris


Title: Re: 1948 Fox 35
Post by: John Paris on January 12, 2012, 04:38:55 PM
Amazingly similar to the Clarence Lee 1962 Veco 45.......
Title: Re: 1948 Fox 35
Post by: Clint Ormosen on January 12, 2012, 05:50:19 PM
I'd say they put in the wrong picture for the '48 Fox 35.
Title: Re: 1948 Fox 35
Post by: Lester Nicholson on January 12, 2012, 06:17:56 PM
Noy a fox!
Title: Re: 1948 Fox 35
Post by: Bill Mohrbacher on January 12, 2012, 06:24:41 PM
Yep wrong picture, I just checked the stuff I sent; my captions were correct.
Title: Re: 1948 Fox 35
Post by: ChrisSarnowski on January 12, 2012, 06:42:21 PM
Hi Bill,

I figured there was some glitch putting it on the internet.

I was surprised by their response when I pointed it out to them.

-Chris

Title: Re: 1948 Fox 35
Post by: John Stiles on January 12, 2012, 06:59:21 PM
I believe they got their pictures mixed up....they showed the same Veco .45 twice LL~
Title: Re: 1948 Fox 35
Post by: ChrisSarnowski on January 12, 2012, 08:17:19 PM
I don't know if you scrolled to the bottom but they respond to me questioning the picture with this line:

"While the 1948 Fox .38 and the 1962 Veco .45 are very similar, the 1962 Veco .45 has a slightly different shaft and casing."

 n~ n~ n~ n~ n~ n~ n~ n~ n~ n~ n~ n~ n~ n~ n~ n~ n~ n~ n~ n~ n~ n~ n~ n~ n~ n~ n~ n~ n~ n~ n~ n~ n~ n~ n~ n~ n~ n~ n~ n~ n~

Yeah, just slightly different!!!!
Title: Re: 1948 Fox 35
Post by: John Stiles on January 13, 2012, 05:42:48 AM
I don't know if you scrolled to the bottom but they respond to me questioning the picture with this line:

"While the 1948 Fox .38 and the 1962 Veco .45 are very similar, the 1962 Veco .45 has a slightly different shaft and casing."

 n~ n~ n~ n~ n~ n~ n~ n~ n~ n~ n~ n~ n~ n~ n~ n~ n~ n~ n~ n~ n~ n~ n~ n~ n~ n~ n~ n~ n~ n~ n~ n~ n~ n~ n~ n~ n~ n~ n~ n~ n~

Yeah, just slightly different!!!!

LL~ yeah, thanks for pointing that out. Somebody wasn't paying attention. Z@@ZZZ
Title: Re: 1948 Fox 35
Post by: Marvin Denny on January 13, 2012, 10:23:53 AM
  Looks like they finally corrected the picture.

  Bigiron
Title: Re: 1948 Fox 35
Post by: Damian_Sheehy on January 13, 2012, 05:23:14 PM
  Looks like they finally corrected the picture.

  Bigiron

Yep, the revised picture is certainly more like a Fox; looks like six bolts are required to hold it down.
Title: Re: 1948 Fox 35
Post by: ChrisSarnowski on January 13, 2012, 06:55:47 PM
I'm glad we got them to correct the picture.

Bill did a great job on the article and it is a pleasure to both read the words and look at the pictures!!!

-Chris
Title: Re: 1948 Fox 35
Post by: Bill Mohrbacher on January 13, 2012, 07:06:48 PM
Thanks Chris!
Title: Re: 1948 Fox 35
Post by: Jim Kraft on January 14, 2012, 08:11:37 AM
Great job on the article Bill. It brought back some memories from my childhood up through my early R/C pattern years. I fly a lot of old sparkers both control line and R/C old timers, and really enjoy anything written about engines.