I was a kid (about 17) when the Aldrich pattern happened. Of course, I flew CCW. For yucks, I decided to try the look and feel of going clockwise. Took off, flipped inverted and tried the pattern. Kept enough sky under the model for a one-mistake-high-glitch to get corrected. Flipped back upright before end of tank. Many flights this way. Sorta got the hang of it shortly, but it wasn't pretty. At that time neither was my CCW-upright pattern.
Maybe I just didn't have to unlearn so many deeply trained reflexes? It was fun, more so when a wrong one-mistake-high-move almost started, but got corrected.
I have judged clockwise fliers. It feels different until about until the turn to inverted in the Rev W/O... Then on, it seemed routine...
When we took a leave from Germany to visit England (for the 1978 CL World Champs at RAF Woodvale. Oh, yeah, and some tourism.) My mind "flipped over" coming down the ramp from the car ferry, to start driving on the left. It was easy, but felt odd. The one time I got confused was when Penny and both kids kept asking how I did it. Distracted me. Local Brits saw our US Forces, Germany, license plates and gave us lots of room...
Back to topic... Anyone mention Hal deBolt as a CW flier? Check the All Americans plans. (Don't recall if his Continental and Lethal Lucy also went that way... (Principle may have been that basic engine torque load would lift the inboard wing; CCW rotation would lift the outboard wing. Not good for the AA-series much longer inboard wings.) I did fly an AA, Sr. with a reverse rotation shaft Fox 35. Engine ran identically to a stock CCW rig. Noted difference - it did NOT need outboard tipweight! Easy takeoffs!
Hal DeB had some ingenious ideas, but overdid many of them. He curved the fuse of his Speedwagon to "match" the curve of the flight circle. It was way too much, but since speed models have NO LACK of pull, it may have reduced the load on the pilot some. His 3" longer inboard panel on the AA, Sr. was about 2.5" too much...
But, they did work...