News:


  • June 24, 2025, 04:27:23 PM

Login with username, password and session length

Author Topic: Interesting rule addition.  (Read 1835 times)

Offline PJ Rowland

  • AUS - 29541 AMA - 809970
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • ******
  • Posts: 2056
  • Melbourne - AUSTRALIA
Interesting rule addition.
« on: April 30, 2012, 06:51:46 PM »
As a non electric flier, but serious compeditor, it would be silly not to stay abreast of whats happening in the world of electric.

I read with interest that RC Aerobatics have just released a new rule :

At the recent European Championships the below domestic rules were enforced and these rules have now been put forward to be included as part of the permanant F3A rules. All pilots of electric models should immediately make sure their models comply.

1. For electric powered models, the electric power circuit(s) must not be physically connected, before the competitor is instructed to start his 8- minutes flight time and must be physically disconnected right after landing.

This means simply that electric motors should not be connected to power until they are in the ready box and asked to do so by the line director

2. The propulsion system(s) must automatically shut-off or fully idle at the moment a R/C signal failure should occur. (closed throttle in failsafe)

And, this means that all fliers using electric models must have their failsafe programmed to cut the throttle to zero (including idle) if there is a break in trasmission or severe inteference.
We will be introducing a rule at the next rules change opportunity that states: All electric models flown at APA sanctioned events must have an external means of connection and disconnection of power.
If you always put limit on everything you do, physical or anything else. It will spread into your work and into your life. There are no limits. There are only plateaus, and you must not stay there, you must go beyond them.” - Bruce Lee.

...
 I Yearn for a world where chickens can cross the road without having their motives questioned.

Offline Wynn Robins

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • ******
  • Posts: 1684
Re: Interesting rule addition.
« Reply #1 on: April 30, 2012, 09:46:02 PM »
pretty much already happens like that in stunt - albeit -not everyone has an arming switch on their models at the moment but they SHOULD
In the battle of airplane versus ground, the ground is yet to lose

Offline PJ Rowland

  • AUS - 29541 AMA - 809970
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • ******
  • Posts: 2056
  • Melbourne - AUSTRALIA
Re: Interesting rule addition.
« Reply #2 on: April 30, 2012, 10:23:11 PM »
Im aware its being proposed in Stunt already.

My point was, obviously we are not alone in thinking there are issues with safety.

I just found it interesting, nothing more.
If you always put limit on everything you do, physical or anything else. It will spread into your work and into your life. There are no limits. There are only plateaus, and you must not stay there, you must go beyond them.” - Bruce Lee.

...
 I Yearn for a world where chickens can cross the road without having their motives questioned.

Offline Wynn Robins

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • ******
  • Posts: 1684
Re: Interesting rule addition.
« Reply #3 on: April 30, 2012, 10:40:03 PM »
it IS interesting - and it is also a bloody good idea.........

In the battle of airplane versus ground, the ground is yet to lose

Offline John Rist

  • 25 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 3046
Re: Interesting rule addition.
« Reply #4 on: May 01, 2012, 05:58:27 AM »
it IS interesting - and it is also a bloody good idea.........



and a possible bloody hand if you don't.................   n~
John Rist
AMA 56277

Offline Darkstar1

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Commander
  • ****
  • Posts: 331
Re: Interesting rule addition.
« Reply #5 on: May 01, 2012, 07:51:22 AM »
Or legs which I witnessed on the RC side of the home field. A 3D profile RC plane just finished a flight. The pilot didn't
take out the battery. He accidentally bumped into the transmitter and the motor started up at full  throttle and it chased him around a lot like a dog chases its tail. LL~ Fortunately after three or four times around he was able to shut it down and disarm it. We had a discussion about arming plugs and where he could find them. Since then his and most RC models here are equipped with some kind of positive device for arming/disarming model aircraft.
 
Later,
Evolve or get left behind!

Offline PJ Rowland

  • AUS - 29541 AMA - 809970
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • ******
  • Posts: 2056
  • Melbourne - AUSTRALIA
Re: Interesting rule addition.
« Reply #6 on: May 01, 2012, 05:12:48 PM »
Im in strong favor of the Brett Buck rule proposal.

I wonder how many electric fliers are out there in any land - CL / RC who think that having some style of arming plug is counter-productive to their flying time..


Here is a link to the discussion of arming plugs and the proposed rules put forth by Brett buck on the matter, I think its as good a interpretation as possible.

FYI - for those who wonder why as a Non EL flyer Im even commenting is Im a strong advocate for safety - Ive spoken to people who for reasons or not, seem to think as CL fliers on tethered aircraft should be immune to such laws becasue our models " have the same chance of hurting someone as a golf bag "

All thats required is ; 1 person to be seriously injured, and there be a sever Knee jerk reaction and everything we are working hard for ,flying sites, contests, developers could be lost - the threat of litigation is there.

Im in favor of the following Brett Buck rule thread :
http://stunthanger.com/smf/index.php?topic=25426.0
If you always put limit on everything you do, physical or anything else. It will spread into your work and into your life. There are no limits. There are only plateaus, and you must not stay there, you must go beyond them.” - Bruce Lee.

...
 I Yearn for a world where chickens can cross the road without having their motives questioned.

Offline Robert Redmon

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Lieutenant
  • ***
  • Posts: 119
Re: Interesting rule addition.
« Reply #7 on: May 03, 2012, 05:26:40 PM »
The RC rule as quoted above makes good sense, but simply states that the battery must not be connected until acknowledgement is received that the pilot is to begin his fight attempt...and then that immediately after landing the battery should be disconnected. These actions do not require an "arming plug" or "arming switch" unless the battery is so buried in the air frame that connecting and disconnecting the battery cannot be accomplished in a reasonable amount of time. Most CL and RC electrics are built in a way that the battery is readily accessible. An additional connector and cable assembly is just added weight, drag (assuming it is external), complexity, and expense.  I will be glad to leave my hatch off so people can see that the battery is not connected.

Bob
Robert Redmon
AMA 58073

Offline bob branch

  • AMA Member
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 943
Re: Interesting rule addition.
« Reply #8 on: May 04, 2012, 10:33:56 AM »
If someone is not going to disconnect their battery after a flight they are just as likely to not disconnect an arming plug. As to chasing it down and pulling an arming plug... give me a break! Are you going to go put yourself in the way of an uncontrolled model with a motor turning full tilt? Not likely. They guy with the runaway rc plane who did not unplug his battery after the flight only had to pull the throttle back. He was right by the transmitter. THAT is the safe way to disarm that situation. The rule that the battery not be plugged in until ready to launch and be disconnected before leaving the circle or landing area unless restrained is the way to handle this safely. Not installing another device to fail or not be used. The only place I feel an arming switch has any safety advantage over just unplugging the battery is if there is a multiple battery system with a Y harness incorporated. In this senario an error could be made and one side of the Y harness disconnected and not the other leaving the motor still hot to a battery. I have seen this particular circumstance take place. The model was restrained and no injury occurred. This is not a likely situation in CL but it is a common installation in larger rc models. In this situation the arming plug disarms both packs and I can see it makes sense there.

I have been flying electric cl for over 6 years now and electric rc for 11. Unplug the battery. Is that so hard?

bob branch

Offline Dennis Adamisin

  • 2019 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 4400
Re: Interesting rule addition.
« Reply #9 on: May 04, 2012, 12:22:54 PM »
What Bob said.  For the scenario Darell described the battery plug on a 3D profile was almost certainly exposed/accessible, adding a arming plug would not improve a thing.  Proper PROCEDURE would!

Please also read that the proposal that PJ references says NOTHING about adding a harness or other failure system.  A point toally lost in Luddite plug proposal.  THe hardware means nothing.  Its all about PROCEDURE not hardware.

When I see the proposal that outlaws carbon fiber props on IC powered models then I will know that people are going after REAL hazards, ones that actually happen and cause serious injuries all too often.  CF props mean that there is no such thing as a minor injury.  Of course that would hit too close to home wouldn't it???
Denny Adamisin
Fort Wayne, IN

As I've grown older, I've learned that pleasing everyone is impossible, but pissing everyone off is a piece of cake!

Offline Jason Greer

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Captain
  • *****
  • Posts: 487
Re: Interesting rule addition.
« Reply #10 on: May 04, 2012, 12:30:55 PM »
On my larger RC models with multiple batteries in series I've started using a Y-harness setup as in the attached image.  With this setup the power system is never armed until both batteries are plugged in.  By disconnecting either battery the circuit is broken.  As was stated previously, most electric models are designed for quick battery swaps and this by design makes it possible to easily disarm them by simply using the built in arming plug...the battery connector.

Thanks,
Jason
El Dorado, AR
AMA 518858

Offline bob branch

  • AMA Member
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 943
Re: Interesting rule addition.
« Reply #11 on: May 04, 2012, 02:16:46 PM »
Jason
Yup, that will work too. Nice and simple too without another component to fail in the system. I like it.

bob branch

Offline RandySmith

  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 13756
  • Welcome to the Stunt Hanger.
    • Aero Products
Re: Interesting rule addition.
« Reply #12 on: May 04, 2012, 03:43:56 PM »
"When I see the proposal that outlaws carbon fiber props on IC powered models then I will know that people are going after REAL hazards, ones that actually happen and cause serious injuries all too often.  CF props mean that there is no such thing as a minor injury.  Of course that would hit too close to home wouldn't it???"


Dennis

That is just silly my friend, The worst I have ever seen anyone cut was by an APC prop on an Electric ship. ALL props are dangerous, so using your logic..if anyone did..  would be the end of Model Aircraft because ALL props can cut you and take a finger off, not just CF ones
By the way the worst and only 1 of 2 times in my life I was cut was by a 1/2 A with an APC prop.
So lets outlaw the APC s  too.

Randy

Offline PJ Rowland

  • AUS - 29541 AMA - 809970
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • ******
  • Posts: 2056
  • Melbourne - AUSTRALIA
Re: Interesting rule addition.
« Reply #13 on: May 04, 2012, 06:54:16 PM »
Wood & Plastic props take just as many fingers as Carbon Fiber ones when spinning at 8000RPM



Infact - Ever been out to Open Rubber Free Flight ? Those things will take it off at the Knuckle.



If you always put limit on everything you do, physical or anything else. It will spread into your work and into your life. There are no limits. There are only plateaus, and you must not stay there, you must go beyond them.” - Bruce Lee.

...
 I Yearn for a world where chickens can cross the road without having their motives questioned.

Tags: