News:


  • June 01, 2024, 12:32:52 PM

Login with username, password and session length

Author Topic: protest the effort to eliminate electrics from classic  (Read 4045 times)

Offline bob branch

  • AMA Member
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 941
protest the effort to eliminate electrics from classic
« on: November 12, 2012, 07:16:14 PM »
The folks who participate in this forum need to go to the main forum and comment on the movement to try to ban electrics from classic and ots. This was attempted a number of years back and was beat down because the AMA allows it in the rules.  Get your voice heard. This is another power grab being attempted by those who just do not care if the hobby dies.

bob branch

Online Crist Rigotti

  • 23 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 3862
  • Electric - The future of Old Time Stunt
Re: protest the effort to eliminate electrics from classic
« Reply #1 on: November 12, 2012, 09:10:33 PM »
Not just classic but OTS too!
Crist
AMA 482497
Waxahachie, TX
Electric - The Future of Old Time Stunt

Offline Andrew Borgogna

  • Andy
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • ******
  • Posts: 1188
Re: protest the effort to eliminate electrics from classic
« Reply #2 on: November 12, 2012, 11:22:45 PM »
I posted my response to this stupid proposal, I have two gas planes one sparky and one 1/2a racer.  Everything else I fly is electric from Old Time to modern and a bunch in between.  Now some click wants me to toss them so I can fly in their contest.  No Way!  n1
Andy
Andrew B. Borgogna

Offline Glenn (Gravitywell) Reach

  • Gravitywell
  • 2016 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 1391
Re: protest the effort to eliminate electrics from classic
« Reply #3 on: November 13, 2012, 09:59:16 AM »
I don't fly electric at all and probably never will, but I thought OTS and Classic was about keeping the old designs alive, not what powered them.  Being a purist in this hobby is fine, but forcing it on everyone will kill it faster than anything else.  In the not to distant future, IC engines will be banned in most flying sites, what do we do then?  Come on people, lighten up and let everyone enjoy the hobby! H^^
Glenn Reach
Westlock, Alberta
gravitywell2011 @ gmail . com

Offline John Hammonds

  • 23 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 567
Re: protest the effort to eliminate electrics from classic
« Reply #4 on: November 13, 2012, 10:03:25 AM »
Well, I don't have a horse in this race unless the FAI, SAM35 or BMFA decide to go down this route so I don't think it appropriate to add my opinion directly to that thread at this point in time but I have to admit I had to check it was not 1st April when I first read through it.

I'm amazed that such a minority pastime as Control Line has people who want to further limit participation.  ??? Most if any new blood we can attract will increasingly come from an electric background.

Has anyone else noticed the same people who laughed in your face and were deeply offended a few years ago if you suggested they might have problems with over/under runs, bad runs, starting issues etc are the same people who now want to ban electric because of the very same thing?
   
Perhaps an electric only event would be an option and then we can see which gets the most entries in a few years time. Would we allow the solitary guy who turns up with an IC model fly in "our" competition?

Just my 2p worth

TTFN
John.
I started out with nothing and still have most of it left.....
Fast, Cheap, Reliable - Choose any 2!
BMFA 165249

Offline Chuck_Smith

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Captain
  • *****
  • Posts: 685
Re: protest the effort to eliminate electrics from classic
« Reply #5 on: November 13, 2012, 10:08:12 AM »
Maybe there could be a points penalty for electric. C'mon, face it.. it's a little easier to get a start and a consistent run from an electric than an inverted glow or sparky. 'Just sayin'.

Seems like some compromise can be reached rather than putting in a rule that will discourage some participation.

As noted above, we are so few and far between we need to consider what's best for the hobby rather than "the principle of the thing".

Or maybe I'm just nuts. 

Whatever. Been accused of worse.
AMA 76478

Offline Andrew Borgogna

  • Andy
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • ******
  • Posts: 1188
Re: protest the effort to eliminate electrics from classic
« Reply #6 on: November 13, 2012, 01:30:08 PM »
"Maybe there could be a points penalty for electric. C'mon, face it.. it's a little easier to get a start and a consistent run from an electric than an inverted glow or sparky. 'Just sayin'."

Only if you assign a points penalty to every other kind of propulsion improvemen since the "Glory Days" of OTS and Classic.  And for what its worth it took me a while to come up with a knowledge base that now allows me to go right to the field and get good engine performance off the board with a new setup.  If you care to check it out the people on this forum are very quick to share everything we have learned through our efforts.  We have worked hard to keep the initial cost down and the success up, it really pisses me off that the thanks I get from the gas clan is we don't want you in our contests.  I guess that's why I just finished my first R/C plane in six years and a second is nearing completion.  The fights over BOM and now electric power systems is really starting to get old.  >:(

1. Modern fuel and synthetic oils.
2. Schnuerle porting.
3. Custom bar stock engines.
4. All Eastern European engines, we didn't like the Eastern European Soviet block back then.
5. All Chinese Engines, we really didn't like the Chinese back then.
6. Tuned Pipes were still a ways off.
7. Carbon Fiber props, and anything else made of Carbon fiber.  Example would be bell cranks and engine mounts.
8. We should only use Ambroid and dope, no modern covering materials to get those 20 point finishes.
9. Foam core wings.

I'm sure with a little time I could come up with more, but that's a good start.  Yep electric is bad and every other new improvement is good.
Andy
Andrew B. Borgogna

Offline Trostle

  • 22 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 3344
Re: protest the effort to eliminate electrics from classic
« Reply #7 on: November 13, 2012, 02:27:35 PM »

Has anyone else noticed the same people who laughed in your face and were deeply offended a few years ago if you suggested they might have problems with over/under runs, bad runs, starting issues etc are the same people who now want to ban electric because of the very same thing?
   
TTFN
John.


I guess I had not "noticed the same people who laughed in your face and were deepley offended a few years ago..."

Who were those people?  What did they say?  What did they do?  Where are they now?

Just wondering.  I would like to understand more what some of these arguments/discussions are all about, particularly since there is no formal change proposal made anywhere regarding the use or nonuse of electrics in Classic and/or OTS.

Keith

Offline John Hammonds

  • 23 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 567
Re: protest the effort to eliminate electrics from classic
« Reply #8 on: November 13, 2012, 03:13:07 PM »
Hi Keith,
 Well I'm from the other side of the pond so I guess it's unlikely that you would notice these people and it's unlikely that they would ever frequent this forum at least until recently, but yes that's exactly the situation I have experienced over here. I've spent the last 3 years campaigning my electric models flying Vintage (Your OTS) and working myself through class 2 (Beginner) until I graduated to the full F2B pattern. Nothing to prove, no one to impress, it was just the route I decided to take.

It's been a lonely road with nothing more than a casual interest shown by most other pilots. Encouraging comments about "Keeping at it with my experiments but it will never replace IC" were common place and trying to explain the merits of spending time finding a set up which worked and was 99.9% repeatable. (I'll leave the other 0.1% to chance) was usually met with indignation and the suggestion that possibly someone might not be able to start an engine in the allotted time or might put too much or not enough fuel in it was an insult. In short it was a non issue.

Then Igor spoilt it all by winning the worlds. . . . .

Now everything is suddenly easy with electric. All the bad things which never happened before with IC now seem to be common place and put the IC guys at a disadvantage.

The truth of it though we know is a little different. Sure I can get a faultless run time after time after time after... Sure I can get the rpm exactly right time after time after time aft.... but it did not come out of the box like that, some seem to think you just buy the bits connect them all up and it all works like magic. Well, I'll say here and now a badly set up electric model will happily fly just as badly as its poorly set up IC counterpart. The motive power is immaterial. It turns a prop. As long as it gives a good run it doesn't matter if it's powered by electric, gas or a hamster running in a wheel.

You or any other good pilot would beat me hands down  regardless of what you flew and what you powered it with. You can't beat skill with technology. (Just my opinion). I am at a total loss to understand why IC v Electric is even an issue.

TTFN
John.
I started out with nothing and still have most of it left.....
Fast, Cheap, Reliable - Choose any 2!
BMFA 165249

Offline Dan Bregar

  • 24 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 690
  • Field Marshall
Re: protest the effort to eliminate electrics from classic
« Reply #9 on: November 13, 2012, 04:32:03 PM »
I wish I had just one dollar (1$) for each gallon of glow fuel I burned in the last 50 yrs. I could take my wife to Hawaii.
But all seriousness aside, I've found a secret to give my electric powered stunters 25% more power than the stock set up. You guys remember Missle Mist ?  Well I soak my batteries & electric mtr. in it for 72 hrs. and the nitro is absorbed into the battery & motor molecules. And that's why my set ups are superior to everyone else in the whole world.  But now you all know my secret. Just remember you heard it here first. Now if I could just figure out a way to put out the flames in time for landing.  ;) ;) ;)
AMA 33676

Offline Andrew Borgogna

  • Andy
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • ******
  • Posts: 1188
Re: protest the effort to eliminate electrics from classic
« Reply #10 on: November 13, 2012, 04:35:37 PM »
Hey Keith
I will tell you my little story.  I was flying one of my electrics in a contest and one of the judges wrote on the score sheet "deduct 20 points for electric".  It was meant as a joke only problem was the tabulators weren't in on it and did exactly what he said and took 20 points off my score.  If he hadn't told me what he did I would never have known.  Needless to say Keith I didn't think it was funny.
Andy
Andrew B. Borgogna

Offline Mike Keville

  • AMA Member
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 2320
Re: protest the effort to eliminate electrics from classic
« Reply #11 on: November 13, 2012, 05:07:16 PM »
. . . I was flying one of my electrics in a contest and one of the judges wrote on the score sheet "deduct 20 points for electric".  It was meant as a joke only problem was the tabulators weren't in on it and did exactly what he said and took 20 points off my score.  If he hadn't told me what he did I would never have known.

Now that's just mean.  Andy is one of the nicest guys in the hobby, and while he & I have had some, ah, "spirited" discussions about electrics, he firmly believes in what he's doing, and is very gracious about it.

Besides that, his wife bakes some really delicious cookies to share at the VSC.

(Hmm....wonder if she uses a gas oven.)
FORMER member, "Academy of Multi-rotors & ARFs".

Online Crist Rigotti

  • 23 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 3862
  • Electric - The future of Old Time Stunt
Re: protest the effort to eliminate electrics from classic
« Reply #12 on: November 13, 2012, 05:24:21 PM »
snip
(Hmm....wonder if she uses a gas oven.)


Now that was funny Mike!
Crist
AMA 482497
Waxahachie, TX
Electric - The Future of Old Time Stunt

Offline Howard Rush

  • 22 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 7818
Re: protest the effort to eliminate electrics from classic
« Reply #13 on: November 13, 2012, 05:56:59 PM »
But all seriousness aside, I've found a secret to give my electric powered stunters 25% more power than the stock set up. You guys remember Missle Mist ?  Well I soak my batteries & electric mtr. in it for 72 hrs. and the nitro is absorbed into the battery & motor molecules. And that's why my set ups are superior to everyone else in the whole world.  But now you all know my secret. Just remember you heard it here first. Now if I could just figure out a way to put out the flames in time for landing.  ;) ;) ;)

Dan, you don't need to use the entirety of Missile Mist in a marinade-- just the white stuff that settles to the bottom of the can.  It's concentrated phlogiston, and can be used merely to baste the batteries.  Hope this helps.
The Jive Combat Team
Making combat and stunt great again

Offline Randy Cuberly

  • 21 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 3674
Re: protest the effort to eliminate electrics from classic
« Reply #14 on: November 13, 2012, 07:57:56 PM »
You unlock this door with the key of imagination. Beyond it is another dimension, a dimension of sound, a dimension of sight, a dimension of mind. You are moving into a land of substance and a land of ideas. You have just crossed over into ... the Twilight Zone"

Now that I've let my the smoke out of my governor .... I'm wondering if maybe we need to take a different approach. After all they (the glow contingent) have been telling me for years electrics won't work, they don't have any power, you've never experienced power until you have flown my PA .75, electrics are just throwing a switch. Oh and of course anyone can fly a glow motored plane, give up that electric @#$% and fly a real plane.  These are just a few I have heard since I started with electric. Never mind that I have flown glow since the 50's.

Well, maybe its time to dish it back? Tell these cavemen that real fliers fly electric. That is where the challenges are at. Any idiot can fly glow. Hell, stunt has known how to do that since the 40's. Want a real challenge, drop your PA and try to make it with an electric! You try to compete with a plane you have to weigh with all the fuel onboard and drag those lines around. You try to figure out how to win when you get no appearance points, you try to figure out how to be competitive when you only have 3 props to choose from that work in the entire range of motor sizes. You try to compete when your car battery is running down. Hell, any 7 year old kid from the 50's could make a fox .35 run. Anyone can fly stunt with a $350 to $400- custom motor turning a $60 prop on a carbon fiber pipe. Get out here with a $25 motor and try to compete against that kinda stuff you are flying with. They whine about having to compete against a Yosenko cause it costs too much. Well, we take out $18 to $100 motors out against them every week and try to compete. If they have any ba**s, let them try to take on that kind of a challenge!  Their airplanes are even refined with over 60 years of extensive design work by every stunt flier since the 50's refining every little design nuance optimized to their type of power system. I have only seen a few electric airplanes designed from the ground up for electric. All of my electrics drag around airfoils designed for a glow motor that has to be loaded down. To an electric that is just a power and weight penalty to drag around for the entire flight, from takeoff thru every maneuver. And now they whine cause a guy won a contest they thought should be perpetually theirs while he was using an electric. What a bunch of wimps! And a glow flier is gonna try to tell someone that they are the best with those kind of inbred advantages? Give me a break!

Of course I would NEVER say anything like that to a glow flier. I'd be afraid to hurt their ego. As it is they want to scarf up more points for appearance, more points for being weighed without the entire power system weight, more advantage here, more advantage there...ban electrics from classes they have been allowed in, ignore the rulebooks that allow electrics to fly, penalize them if they do not fly a plane that is built and finished in some mythical manner that is what their idea of the world should be.  Don't they have enough to come out and try to just plane outfly an electric without all their little additional advantages? I am starting to think they should be challenged right where it rests, with their ego! If they know so much and electric is so easy,I think they should be challenged to come out and try it. To make it easier for them, we will even post every detail of every electric stunter we have flown since we started competing in electric in public for them to learn what has taken years and years for us to figure out.  (Oh, we already do that don't we? Right down to the rpm's they should dial to! Its so simple, just throwing a switch guys!) They want to FLY stunt competition, let them come out and face electrics on a level playing field and actually compete for a change!

We now return control of your computer to you. We thank you for traveling thru imagination, time, and space, thru ... the Twilight Zone.

Ya know Bob...
I don't know you but I'm beginning to get really irritated at your arrogance and hostility.
Put a cork in it!

Randy Cuberly
Randy Cuberly
Tucson, AZ

Offline Dan Bregar

  • 24 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 690
  • Field Marshall
Re: protest the effort to eliminate electrics from classic
« Reply #15 on: November 13, 2012, 08:01:25 PM »
Howard

Where were you during all my research ?  I should have known that you would have beat me to the punch, erh, a
Missle Mist.  Yeh "basting" is far superior to soaking. And here I thought I had an edge ! Darn !  
Thanks for your help Howard.  Your secret is safe with me  :-X  Hey everybody, don't soak em baste em with M.M.

Howard your humor is almost as sick as mine.  Did you ever think about quitting stunt and learning to fly combat ?  ;D
« Last Edit: November 14, 2012, 04:08:40 AM by Dan Bregar »
AMA 33676

Offline Andrew Borgogna

  • Andy
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • ******
  • Posts: 1188
Re: protest the effort to eliminate electrics from classic
« Reply #16 on: November 14, 2012, 09:03:33 AM »
Hey Mike got a good laugh out of the cookie part and so did Jackie.  Just for the record we use an electric oven, they are just so much better than gas! ;D
Andy
Andrew B. Borgogna

Offline Mike Keville

  • AMA Member
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 2320
Re: protest the effort to eliminate electrics from classic
« Reply #17 on: November 14, 2012, 10:23:23 AM »
. . .Just for the record we use an electric oven, they are just so much better than gas! ;D
Andy

. . . and you don't need to fuel-proof them.   LL~
FORMER member, "Academy of Multi-rotors & ARFs".

Offline john e. holliday

  • 24 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 22783
Re: protest the effort to eliminate electrics from classic
« Reply #18 on: November 15, 2012, 09:55:06 AM »
Does RJ realize what he has started?   As a kid we had propane cook stoves.  Then later in life Mother got her first electric range.  Had to have the house wired for it and Dad did the wiring.  Then later when I got married, it was an electrice range.  Cooking oil fire got rid of the electric range.  They both had good points and bad points.   With storms and no power, no electrice range.  With gas a match would light the flame and also with gas it didn't take as long to heatup.   

And yes Andrew's lovely wife make great cookies.  He is so lucky.  Also she is not afraid to get oil on her hands from those slimy model planes. 
John E. "DOC" Holliday
10421 West 56th Terrace
Shawnee, KANSAS  66203
AMA 23530  Have fun as I have and I am still breaking a record.

Offline Andrew Borgogna

  • Andy
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • ******
  • Posts: 1188
Re: protest the effort to eliminate electrics from classic
« Reply #19 on: November 15, 2012, 02:20:06 PM »
You are very right Doc I am a lucky man. :)
Andy
Andrew B. Borgogna

Offline Dean Pappas

  • Moderator
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *****
  • Posts: 1195
  • Welcome to the Stunt Hanger.
Re: protest the effort to eliminate electrics from classic
« Reply #20 on: November 15, 2012, 03:20:14 PM »
Dan, you don't need to use the entirety of Missile Mist in a marinade-- just the white stuff that settles to the bottom of the can.  It's concentrated phlogiston, and can be used merely to baste the batteries.  Hope this helps.

Phlogiston ... so that's what makes for a hot motor run!
I should have known.  LL~
  Dean P.
Dean Pappas

Offline Dan Bregar

  • 24 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 690
  • Field Marshall
Re: protest the effort to eliminate electrics from classic
« Reply #21 on: November 15, 2012, 06:51:47 PM »
Yeh Dean !  Of all people, YOU should have known.  I'm shocked and horrified.  A man of your intelligence.  ::) :## :##

Don't forget, ya gotta BASTE, NOT Soak. Very important ! ;D  I have ultimate confidence in Howard.  He wouldn't say it if it wasn't true.  :##
AMA 33676

Offline bob branch

  • AMA Member
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 941
Re: protest the effort to eliminate electrics from classic
« Reply #22 on: November 15, 2012, 08:15:58 PM »
Dan

Even with his history you can't find fault with Dean on this. Its been so long since I even saw an old Missle Mist Can I had almost forgotten about that lovely elixer until you mentioned it. And here all I have around is 20% Rich's brew at the hot end. No wonder I have to use an extra cell in my packs!

bob branch

Offline Dan Bregar

  • 24 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 690
  • Field Marshall
Re: protest the effort to eliminate electrics from classic
« Reply #23 on: November 16, 2012, 07:02:42 PM »
Geez Bob, what are we going to do with you. Just think you could save some weight by soaking, no BASTING with "the purple brew".   How come I'm the only one who thinks I'm funny.  A complex I'm going to get !  ;) 
AMA 33676

Offline bob branch

  • AMA Member
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 941
Re: protest the effort to eliminate electrics from classic
« Reply #24 on: November 18, 2012, 06:27:20 PM »
Funny? Heck, I'm jealous I didn't think of it!  y1

bob branch

Offline James Strickland

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Lieutenant
  • ***
  • Posts: 85
Re: protest the effort to eliminate electrics from classic
« Reply #25 on: November 22, 2012, 06:30:19 PM »
Hi All,
Here's what I posted in the main forum under no elecs allowed.---James

Hi all,
I have 2 elec. OTS, and 2 elec. Classic ships to fly in comp.  It seems to me, if anyone wants to ban elecs. from current OTS & Classic comp. because of some performance advantage, then it seems that they should want to ban any "modern" IC engines also, and I don't see anyone wanting to do that. Have I missed that issue in a rules change proposal somewhere?

Will that work?           James

Offline Chuck_Smith

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Captain
  • *****
  • Posts: 685
Re: protest the effort to eliminate electrics from classic
« Reply #26 on: December 21, 2012, 04:45:00 PM »
If electrics are banned then all IC ships should be forced to use the old clear neoprene fuel line.
AMA 76478

Offline Mike Keville

  • AMA Member
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 2320
Re: protest the effort to eliminate electrics from classic
« Reply #27 on: December 21, 2012, 07:01:26 PM »
If electrics are banned then all IC ships should be forced to use the old clear neoprene fuel line.

Ahh!  Someone who remembers that awful stuff that became rock-hard after several flights and finally slipped off the connection.  <chuckle>  Bet there aren't many on here who remember the awful stuff.

(No, Doc....I know YOU do.)
FORMER member, "Academy of Multi-rotors & ARFs".

Offline John Cralley

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • ******
  • Posts: 1235
Re: protest the effort to eliminate electrics from classic
« Reply #28 on: December 21, 2012, 08:05:34 PM »
Ahh!  Someone who remembers that awful stuff that became rock-hard after several flights and finally slipped off the connection.  <chuckle>  Bet there aren't many on here who remember the awful stuff.

(No, Doc....I know YOU do.)

Count me as one who remembers too!!  ;D
John Cralley
Scratch Built - Often Re-kitted!!!
AMA 52183
Central Illinois

Offline James Strickland

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Lieutenant
  • ***
  • Posts: 85
Re: protest the effort to eliminate electrics from classic
« Reply #29 on: December 21, 2012, 11:21:15 PM »
yeah, I know of that stuff too!!

Offline Steve Helmick

  • AMA Member and supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 9950
Re: protest the effort to eliminate electrics from classic
« Reply #30 on: December 21, 2012, 11:25:12 PM »
For the record, neoprene fuel line is black. The horrible clear stuff...I don't know, I soon learned not to use it, when I was about 10, middle '50's. Maybe that's vinyl?

I don't know what the solution is regarding electrics in OTS and Classic. But I do maintain that if electrics are to be allowed in OTS and Classic, then IC's should be allowed to use tuned pipes in these same events. Otherwise, electrics have an even bigger advantage than they would otherwise. Or, how about if you're going to be allowed to use electrics in OTS and Classic, you'll have to use Ni-Cad batteries? The extra weight should make it an interesting challenge and equalizer.  

Any CD or contest organizer can put into their pre-contest publicity that electrics will get a 10 point bonus or a 10 point penalty, or tuned pipes will (or won't) be allowed, and it's legal. That's up to them, so either live with it, lobby for your point of view, or just don't attend. It might be a rule at VSC, but only if they put it into the publicity...so read the fine print! If they don't put it into the publicity, then run what you brung!   H^^ Steve
"The United States has become a place where professional athletes and entertainers are mistaken for people of importance." - Robert Heinlein

In 1944 18-20 year old's stormed beaches, and parachuted behind enemy lines to almost certain death.  In 2015 18-20 year old's need safe zones so people don't hurt their feelings.

Offline john e. holliday

  • 24 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 22783
Re: protest the effort to eliminate electrics from classic
« Reply #31 on: December 22, 2012, 09:44:26 AM »
As someone learned long ago, well maybe a few years ago.  Someone was going to have an Old Time contest.  Stipulation was no electrics allowed.  Also stated no electrics allowed in the stunt competition.   Wound up only him and his friend showed up to fly.   It doesn't matter what powers the plane.  It is the person who built it, set it up and practiced that is going to win.  Remember in some parts of this great land of ours, people are sensitive to noise.  They won't complain about the neighbors lawn mower that needs a muffler replaced or the same about an old clunker with a bad muffler.  But, just fire up an .049 in the back yard and watch out.

Hey Mike K. remember when gas(IC engines) was out lawed in free flight competition?

I do remember the clear tubing for our IC engines.  Was taught to wire it on.  Then it was the problem of getting it off for me. LL~ LL~
John E. "DOC" Holliday
10421 West 56th Terrace
Shawnee, KANSAS  66203
AMA 23530  Have fun as I have and I am still breaking a record.

Offline Dan Bregar

  • 24 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 690
  • Field Marshall
Re: protest the effort to eliminate electrics from classic
« Reply #32 on: December 22, 2012, 10:51:32 AM »
Clear fuel line tubing !  just like Doc said.  Had to wire it on the spray bar with soft copper wire.  Well er, ah, I don't actually remember the stuff, cause I'm certainly NOT THAT OLD, it's just my "older" friends told me about it, yeah that's it, my "older" friends told me about it.  LL~ LL~
AMA 33676

Offline Randy Cuberly

  • 21 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 3674
Re: protest the effort to eliminate electrics from classic
« Reply #33 on: December 22, 2012, 11:10:38 AM »
Well,
Electrics are quiet...wish I could say the same about the folks that fly them...they whine far louder than their airplanes!!

Or is that the dead horse that they keep kicking.  LL~ LL~ LL~ LL~
Randy Cuberly
Tucson, AZ

Offline Chuck_Smith

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Captain
  • *****
  • Posts: 685
Re: protest the effort to eliminate electrics from classic
« Reply #34 on: December 22, 2012, 04:10:58 PM »
He he, maybe we can have the requirement for a contest-provided "randomizer" chip that gets installed prior to the flight which alters the run somehow.

 H^^
AMA 76478

Offline Chuck_Smith

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Captain
  • *****
  • Posts: 685
Re: protest the effort to eliminate electrics from classic
« Reply #35 on: December 22, 2012, 04:13:33 PM »
Clear fuel line tubing !  just like Doc said.  Had to wire it on the spray bar with soft copper wire.  Well er, ah, I don't actually remember the stuff, cause I'm certainly NOT THAT OLD, it's just my "older" friends told me about it, yeah that's it, my "older" friends told me about it.  LL~ LL~

Copper wire on the spray bar...common field repair! You are so busted!

Next you'll tell us fuel line was on the Perfect Products rack on a spool with a ruler printed on the tank rack and ... a single edge razor blade sitting there for people to use... yeah right.

Copper wire, like around the neck of the baby pacifier.
AMA 76478

Offline Dan Bregar

  • 24 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 690
  • Field Marshall
Re: protest the effort to eliminate electrics from classic
« Reply #36 on: December 22, 2012, 06:06:33 PM »
Chuck

I've been had ! Wow, the Perfect Products rack.  That brings back memories.  Just like you said Chuck.  As far as pacifiers go, I was a bladder guy so no little baby toys for me. But yeah I wrapped em with the same copper wire that was used on the stinkin Perfect Clear fuel tubing. Surgical/Silicone tubling was a Godsend compared to that stuff.  Also remember you had to keep it away from the exhaust stack or it would get burned .  Boy I sure do miss all the glow engine related idiosyncrasies now that I turned Electric.  Yeah, sure I do.  LL~ LL~
AMA 33676

Offline Tom Niebuhr

  • AMA Member
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 2768
Re: protest the effort to eliminate electrics from classic
« Reply #37 on: December 24, 2012, 11:07:46 AM »
I said it before, but here it is again. Bob Hunt and I have nothing against electrics in OTS, Classic or any thing else.. BUT we prefer to use IC in OTS/Classics. I don't care what is in the nose, but the "Spirit" type awards would be hard to win with pipes or electrics, for sure.  

Maybe a "Martian" award can be created in the future.

Hey Andy, maybe there should be a cook off between your wife and Linda Gleason.  Cookies vs. Brownies . The guys (beneficiaries) will all appreciate it.
« Last Edit: December 27, 2012, 05:44:38 AM by Tom Niebuhr »
AMA 7544

Offline Andrew Borgogna

  • Andy
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • ******
  • Posts: 1188
Re: protest the effort to eliminate electrics from classic
« Reply #38 on: December 24, 2012, 03:25:13 PM »
Hey Tom, sounds good to me.  That's one of those contest where nobody loses. ;D
Andy
Andrew B. Borgogna

Offline Sam Howe

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • New Pilot
  • *
  • Posts: 7
Re: protest the effort to eliminate electrics from classic
« Reply #39 on: December 25, 2012, 09:43:43 AM »

 The motive power is immaterial. It turns a prop. As long as it gives a good run it doesn't matter if it's powered by electric, gas or a hamster running in a wheel.

John.


So, are we going to have a hamster impound with drug checking to see if the hamsters were fed steroids???

Sam

Offline john e. holliday

  • 24 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 22783
Re: protest the effort to eliminate electrics from classic
« Reply #40 on: December 26, 2012, 09:05:54 AM »

Hey Andy, maybe there should be a cook off between your wife and Linda Gleason.  Cookies vs. Brownies . The guys (beneficiaries) will all appreciate it.
[/quote]

It is a toss up,  one is just as good as the other.   They also help moving planes when you need help.  Two of great ladies we have among all the great ladies in control line.  Ole Dad and Andy are very, very, very lucky.
John E. "DOC" Holliday
10421 West 56th Terrace
Shawnee, KANSAS  66203
AMA 23530  Have fun as I have and I am still breaking a record.

Offline Randy Powell

  • 21 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 10478
  • TreeTop Flyer
Re: protest the effort to eliminate electrics from classic
« Reply #41 on: December 26, 2012, 11:39:02 AM »
I don't much care. I doubt I'll ever use electrics in a classic. It violates my sense of propriety, but I have no issue with others doing it.

And for the record, Howard:

phlogiston (fl-jstn)
A hypothetical colorless, odorless, weightless substance once believed to be the combustible part of all flammable substances and to be given off as flame during burning. In the 18th century, Antoine Lavoisier proved that phlogiston does not exist.

So there.
Member in good standing of P.I.S.T
(Politically Incorrect Stunt Team)
AMA 67711
 Randy Powell


Advertise Here
Tags:
 


Advertise Here