I've always believed that the "artificial" airspeed provided by the prop disk is what makes our planes fly the way they do. Not only does the air blast from the prop make the wing more efficient, but the elevators as well. How do I know this? I once made a canard with the prop aft of the elevator. I needed to more than double the size of the elevator to get the model to perform properly. The elevator was only seeing the air flow provided by the airspeed of the model; it was not getting the benefit of the additional prop blast. The light went on...
Since that time I figured that a twin was the optimum platform for CL stunt... if only I could get consistent engine runs. Let's face it, it's difficult enough to get one engine to run perfectly all the time; two engines running perfectly all the time is both a dream and a joke. With the advent of electric power I realized that all those sketches I made of twins over the years were suddenly practical possibilities.
As mentioned earlier in this thread, I had the opportunity to fly Gordan Delaney's Pathfinder Profile twin. That ship is powered by two 15's and is fitted with two 8.5-inch diameter props. It has effectively 17 inches of prop disk span providing a huge amount of that (as I call it) artificial air blast. Gordan's model was among the very best flying models that I've ever had the pleasure to pilot. It had plenty of line tension (but not excessive) everywhere; it flew at virtually one speed everywhere, and it was easy to fly anywhere on the hemisphere. I was sold at that point.
I know my twin has taken a long time to reach completion; I have had no time schedule for this one. It will fly in the spring. I've learned tons during the building process about engineering a model to be light, strong, and accurate. There were lots of challenges and that was the fun part. With what I've learned, we've already begun work on a totally new, and larger, twin design. In fact, we have a test bed almost ready for flight and it should fly later this week. I'll throw in a few photos of the testbed twin at the end of this response.
Power system? Well, we originally were going to use E-Flite Power 10 motors. The Kv was a bit high on those and so, my friend Will DeMauro did a bit of research and found the Cobra 2820-14 motor, which is a bit lighter than the Power 10, has a much larger main bearing and a lower Kv (850). Both of these motors - and the retracts - will run off one 4S 4,000 mAh Hyperion battery. Two Phoenix 35 ESC's are being used and a Castle Creations BEC is being used to power up the retracts. Will Hubin has provided a brand new Twin Timer that has separate ESC ports, a retract port and a pot with which one motor can be made to run faster or slower than the other motor. That promises to be a great trim tool...
The Cobra motors will be fitted with either 9-inch or 10-inch (Obviously we will try both...) props. We have obtained a number of matched sets of tractor/pusher props and will try all possible permutations to determine which setup works best. If the 10 inch props end up being the choice, that will yield 20 inches of prop disk span, covering a great deal of the span of the model. The wing should be lively... If we use the 9 inch props, we will only have a paltry 18 inches of disk span.
I'm making no predictions, but if this project reaches fruition anywhere near my hopes for it, I'll have a weapon like I've never had before.
Enjoy the photos of the new testbed... This model has 672 square inches of wing area and looks to be ready to fly with battery on board at 63 to 65 ounces. Buddy Wieder and I have put about a month of work into this one.
Later - Bob Hunt