stunthanger.com

Electric Stunt => Gettin all AMP'ed up! => Topic started by: Bob Hunt on December 17, 2010, 07:48:09 PM

Title: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on December 17, 2010, 07:48:09 PM
Hi all:
Well, my electric twin project is back on the front burner. I put this project aside for a while until I could get assurance that a proper timer that would both control both motors and retract the landing gear in proper sequence was available. Now it is! Will Hubin has developed the timer that I need for this project and so it’s full speed ahead on it.

The first two photos show the beginnings of the cooling tunnel in the molded fuselage top shell. The only cooling air that this tunnel has to handle is from the battery. The new Hyperion batteries that we are using just don’t get hot. They come down barely warm in even the hottest weather conditions, and that’s in situations where they are mounted aft of the motor. In this configuration they should come down almost cool to the touch! This tunnel will be sealed with a thin coat of finishing resin and then two strips of balsa will be added to fill in the around the bottom of the area where the splitter is installed. There will be two outlet holes; one on either side of the fuselage and they will be louvered. They will be styled to fit up against the back of the painted on canopy that will be added during the finishing process.

The second photo shows the molded top shell taped in position to illustrate the cooling tunnel as it will look when finished. The fourth photo just shows the overall project – sans flaps and elevators – at the point where it stands now. I’m hoping to get the top shell installed permanently by Sunday (12-19-10) and start working on fitting the bottom front molded shell and cut the retract openings. Then comes the removable top front molded shell that covers the battery and the electronics. The nose cone will be carved and hollowed and it will have an air inlet hole in it. Being in clean, undisturbed air, it should bring in plenty of cooling air.

The last thing that will be built and installed will be the nacelles. I’ll make profile “dummy” nacelles and mount the motors, props and spinners to them. I’ll make them longer than necessary and keep cutting them back and checking the balance point until I have a just slightly nose heavy condition. When I'm satisfied with the CG, I'll make built-up nacelles that have the main gear retract mounts and front-mount motor mounts. More finish will be applied aft of the desired CG point, so that will, hopefully, bring the CG to the exact right point without the need to add nose or tail weight during the trimming process.

Hopefully I’ll be able to complete all the woodwork and get into finish by the end of January.

Later – Bob Hunt  

Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Wynn Robins on December 18, 2010, 02:22:51 AM
I was wondering what happened to this project.......looks good so far. y1

Can you post pics of how you do the louvres to the cooling vents - I have been struggling to get a good way of doing it
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Matt Colan on December 18, 2010, 07:57:05 AM
Looks great Bob!!!!  #^
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Rob Smith on December 18, 2010, 09:45:21 AM
Glad to see this project back on the front burner. I've been running Hyperion batteries all this last year. They have been great batteries!

Rob
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on December 18, 2010, 11:27:03 AM
Hi Wynn:

The outlet holes and the louvers are not that difficult to do, but you need to work very carefully and make clean, accurate cuts in the top shell. One mistake here and the surface will be marred and it will be difficult to make the overall effect look good later.

Before I begin making the cooling outlet holes I brush a coat of Z-Poxy Finishing Resin on all the parts that will show inside the tunnel. This coat of resin also seals the tunnel against any moisture.

Next I determine what shape I want the outlet hole to be and layout the shape in pencil on Mylar. In this case, the cooling holes will be positioned just behind the painted-on canopy frame. In this example I’ve put a piece of tape around the top of the shell to indicate where the back of the canopy frame will be located.  See photo 1.

The next step is to position the Mylar pattern accurately onto the side of the top shell and secure it with masking tape. Be sure to make very accurate measurements so that you can duplicate the positioning on the opposite side of the shell later for the other outlet hole. See photo 2.

Transfer the shape of the outlet hole using pin punches around the perimeter of the pattern and then remove the pattern and connect the pin punches. See photo 3

Carefully open the outlet hole with a very sharp knife and clean up the edges with a round file and small flat sanding blocks. Get the shape perfect at this point. See photo 4.

Paint the inside of the cooling hole with flat black (or whatever color you desire) plastic model enamel. See photos 5 and 6.

At this point I will glue the top shell in place and sand it in smooth to the fuselage sides. I’ll cut slots in the front and back of the cooling outlet holes later on and install vanes or louvers made from 1/32 plywood. They will sit flush with the surface of the top shell and be painted flat black to match the inside color of the hole. I like to use black as it will really show the shape of the hole in contrast to the surface color of the plane at that point.

Hope this helps.  -  Bob Hunt

Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Andrew Borgogna on December 18, 2010, 11:38:16 AM
Hi Bob
Can you talk a little about the retracts?  Are they off the shelf R/C retracts, are they electric or air driven retracts?  As I get more into electric planes it seems that retracts are a natural addition and I would like to leverage off your work.  I am also interested in how the Hubin timer will work in this plan.
Andy Borgogna
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Crist Rigotti on December 18, 2010, 11:50:40 AM
Bob,
It is appreciated that you take the time to document and share your great building tips.   BW@ BW@ BW@
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Dennis Adamisin on December 18, 2010, 12:09:39 PM
Hi Bob
Can you talk a little about the retracts?  Are they off the shelf R/C retracts, are they electric or air driven retracts?  As I get more into electric planes it seems that retracts are a natural addition and I would like to leverage off your work.  I am also interested in how the Hubin timer will work in this plan.
Andy Borgogna

Check the other build threads - I suspect an alterior motive. Using Retracts would let Andy avoid carving those monster signature wheelpants for his outstanding new CONTINENTAL!  LL~  LL~

Glad to see the project bubbled up to the top of your work pile.  Looking good
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on December 18, 2010, 01:05:28 PM
Hi Andy:

I’m using the Horizon Hobbies E-Flite 25-size electric retracts in this model. They are self-contained units that have a small electric motor and a worm gear to retract the gear leg. You simply hook them up to a Y-harness and plug the end of that harness onto the board of the Hubin Timer. The new version he just designed has a second channel that sequences the retracts. The retracts work off of the motor battery (One battery will operate both motors and the retracts), so all you have to do is put in a battery and fly.

I’m attaching a couple of photos that I posted once before that shows the nose-gear retract mount. I’ll be putting the mounts for the mains in the nacelles sometime next week.

Later - Bob       
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on December 18, 2010, 05:01:44 PM
Okay, the top molded shell is now glued permanently in place and has been sanded in to the fuselage sides. I'm getting ready to do the fitting of the front molded shell, which will be the removeable hatch through which battery and electronics access will be achieved. I just could not resist the urge to make up a "dummy" rudder and sub fin and do a partial mock-up to get a rough idea of what this creature will really look like. So, I've attached a couple of photos of that exercise. The rudder shape will be tweaked a good bit, and the sub fin may be increased in size just a bit as well.

I've thought long and hard about the name for this one and have resisted the urge to give it a "cutesey" electric oriented name. It will be known as... Reality.

Bob  
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on December 18, 2010, 06:15:59 PM
Here's one more mock-up shot from above...

Bob
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: William DeMauro on December 18, 2010, 06:48:54 PM
Hi Bob,
Glad this project is back on track!!!! I looking forward to seeing this plane completed and even more to seeing it fly. Hope to talk to you soon and hope all is well.
William
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on December 19, 2010, 10:42:33 AM
Here’s this morning’s work on the Reality twin:

Photos 1 thru 4 show the sequence of fitting the lower cowl molded shell to the corresponding formers and the fuse sides. The first step in this process is to accurately position the formers that were generated from the fuselage mold buck onto their corresponding fuse crutch formers. I use masking tape for some of these and pins for others.

The next step is to install and glue the 1/8-inch square stringer into the notches in the formers.

Next the shell is put onto the formers and moved around until it seats properly. Note that at this point the sides of the shell are long; they will be trimmed later.

The shell is attached to the stringer by inverting the fuselage and letting a few drops of thin CA glue drop onto the stringer/shell interface. The CA glue will flow down the stringer. This step is not shown in the photos… use your imagination!

The shell can then be removed. Detail glue the sides of the formers to the shell and then trim and sand the sides of the shell until the assembly fits the fuselage perfectly.

The last photo shows the top removable hatch and the lower cowl piece coated inside with a very thin coat of Z-Poxy Finishing Resin.  I let the resin saturate the balsa for a few minutes and then wipe out the excess with a paper towel. This takes out a lot of unnecessary weight! Note that the top hatch has been fitted with a piece of 1/32 plywood around its perimeter where it will meet the fuselage sides. This makes it much stiffer and easier to fit as well.

The next step will be hatch hold downs, and installation of the lower cowl block. I will have to do a lot of work on the lower cowl block to allow the landing gear strut to retract properly. The formers in the removable hatch will also have to be relieved to clear the battery that will reside in that area. The rear of the removable hatch is also faced with 1/32 plywood and it too will have to be opened to allow airflow into the tunnel. This is the fun part for me! I like getting all these pieces to fit properly. 

Bob Hunt
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Andrew Borgogna on December 19, 2010, 12:30:21 PM
Thanks Bob for the information on the retracts.  Dennis you are right I would have put this setup in the Continental if I had known about it, but it's too late for the Continental. BUT the next project in the schedule is a Walter Umland Spitfire that I have had for a couple of years.  It will get retracts and I will use Bob's technology for the installation.  I have already contacted Will about the FM-9 timer and will order a couple of them both with the retract option.  This is really exciting, a Spitfire with retracts Oh Boy!  ;D
Andy
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Wynn Robins on December 19, 2010, 01:46:56 PM
thanks Bob - I thought you were putting louvre blades in your vents - which is what I was looking for....but that is cool.
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on December 19, 2010, 03:23:47 PM
Hi Wynn:

You must have missed the following sentence that was included with the air outlet posting:

"At this point I will glue the top shell in place and sand it in smooth to the fuselage sides. I’ll cut slots in the front and back of the cooling outlet holes later on and install vanes or louvers made from 1/32 plywood. They will sit flush with the surface of the top shell and be painted flat black to match the inside color of the hole."

There will be louvers...

Later - Bob
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: wwwarbird on December 19, 2010, 05:40:22 PM
 Great pics and info Bob, glad to see you back on this one.

 I'm trying to get a visual on some of the outlines and small details. Do I notice a slightly defined "step" in the top toward the nose where the leading edge of the windshield meets the nose? I really like the subtle ventral fin too, small details like that can really add to "The Look". y1

 Just a "two cents" idea here. When you do the nacelles I imagine you'll need to have cooling exit holes somewhere. Maybe design and place them to look like the big turbine exhausts on a turboprop plane? That would add realism and also add to the cool factor, no pun intended.
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Rudy Taube on December 19, 2010, 05:52:34 PM
Hi Bob,

What a fantastic machine! The retracts are cool, yet another advantage of E power: EASY RETRACTS!  #^

I loved Will Moore's great twin ECL. With his two Hackers it pulled like a freight train and looked cool doing it. Yours with retracts looks like it will be a another step forward for CLPA aircraft. Seeing a competitive twin with retracts and E power will be an inspiration to us all. Like others have said, we are looking forward to seeing yours fly.

Bob, what were you thinking? I am shocked that for someone who counts every single gram of weight, that you would use four "HEAVY" metal nuts and bolts for each of three retract gear mounts! I thought for sure you would use light weight nylon nuts and bolts and save a lot of "easy" grams? Or at least aluminum HW. ?  LL~  ..... I can't imagine any landing that would break the nylon bolts without breaking some wood 1st? ..... I love to tease my good friend Bob about weight.  n~

Warm Regards,  H^^
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Paul Walker on December 20, 2010, 12:26:53 PM
Glad to see this project back on the front burner. I've been running Hyperion batteries all this last year. They have been great batteries!

Rob

Bob,
This note triggered a thought.  On your suggestion, I tried a Hyperion battery.  Same specs as the TP battery I have been using. It worked the same, although it may have run cooler than the TP battery. The only difference is that it weighed about 2 ounces MORE than the TP battery. That's 2 ounces that I don't want to give up.  I already have that 2 ounces scheduled for something else in my new plane.  I'll post pics when far enough along.

Paul Walker
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on December 20, 2010, 12:39:52 PM
That's a good thought, Paul. In my converted Genesis Extreme model (from glow to electric) I needed the extra weight just to balance the model. In the twin I could adjust for the lower weight with nacelle length. I'll give that serious thought.

Thanks for the suggestion - Bob
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Howard Rush on December 20, 2010, 02:21:54 PM
I already have that 2 ounces scheduled for something else in my new plane.
Fluorescent paint?
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Dean Pappas on December 21, 2010, 09:22:38 AM
C'mon Howard ... it must be invisible feet!

Needless to say, this project has been dynamite looking since the first sketch #^
Regards,
Dean P.
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: RandySmith on December 21, 2010, 10:38:45 AM
C'mon Howard ... it must be invisible feet!


methinks that would be hidden feet  ;D ;D

Randy
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Stuntflyn on December 21, 2010, 10:49:09 AM
Hi Bob,

Magnificient looking twin, great job as always. I thought I would chime in since I just received a new custom timer Will designed for me to allow for the E-Flite .10 to .15 electric retracts. I had been trying to get these retracts to work with my Z-Tron Z.4 timer, but ultimately found out this timer will not work with these specific retracts even though there is a retract channel built into this timer. After speaking with Mike Palko and Sergio, it was determined the cause was probably an insufficient sized BEC. These retracts operate in the 4.7 to 7.4 volt range and draw 5 milliamps at idle and 150 milliamps in operation. There is only one BEC that will work with the Z-Tron Z.4 timer and it is only sized to power the actual timer and one retract servo. These retracts do not use a servo, the motor is housed in the retract assembly and the only BEC available for the Z.4 is not large enough to power these retracts.

I ordered a 10 amp Castle BEC to pair with the new Hubin timer and anxiously waited for it's arrival. Here is the test report I sent to Will earlier today with the results. Hopefully this may save someone a bit of time sorting this whole electric retract thing out. I know Will sells a timer with an included BEC built in, but I did not test that one, I tested one which requires an internal BEC. Not sure if the timer with the built in BEC will work with these retracts or not, perhaps Will might know.

"Hi Will,

It was kind of cold and a bit windy last Sunday, but Wayne, Sam and I went flying anyway and we got a chance to check out your new timer with the retracts. Everything performed flawlessly though I might certainly tell you a funny story about the first takeoff. We programmed the timer and ran it through a few dry runs on the ground without powering the motor and the retracts worked perfectly. OK, get the lines rolled out, plug in a new battery and give it a go.

We had programmed the RPM for the Plettenberg 25/12 at just over 9300RPM as a starting point. Wayne wanted to get a tach reading so we would have a reference for the timer though I protested a bit due to the 10 second retract sequence. Well, it did seem we could check it for a second or two and still have time, so I said OK, let's try it.

Wayne's grandson Sam was holding the plane while Wayne plugged in the arming switch and then activated the timer, tach in hand. The motor started and quickly came up to RPM for Wayne to get a tach reading whereupon I immediately motioned Sam to let the plane go just as soon as Wayne had exited the immediate area. Sam let it go smoothly and it could not have rolled more than two feet on the ground when I noticed the gear starting to retract. Lucky for us, the small concrete pad we take off from only rolls about 10 feet before the slope takes a severe downturn. I was holding all the up elevator I could and luckily she went airborne without so much as even scratching the APC prop. Gear was completely retracted at about a foot of altitude.

You should certainly caution anyone purchasing this timer as is they cannot monkey around on takeoff. As soon as you feel the first pull of the prop spinning up, it is time to let this baby go. The longest distance we could get that day before the wheels retracted was just short of a full lap. While I think this is perfect and just what I would like for competition, it leaves no room for tach readings or any delay once the motor starts.

The three burp warning was excellent and it could not be missed. The 5 second delay after the burps was perfect for the gear retraction and using the Schulze ESC provided the immediate brake after motor shutdown. Couldn't really give much feedback on the slow start to RPM since we don't have a long paved takeoff area.

These are the E-Flite .10 - 15 size electric retracts and they worked perfectly with a 10 amp Castle BEC and your timer.

Plan on doing some more testing, but overall I am very satisfied with this timer. If I were to make a wish list of things I would like to see integrated in future models, here are a couple of items.

If it were possible to program both the retract delay time from start-up and the speed of the actual retraction itself, those would both be positive. I am not an engineer, but it seems these could likely be controlled through the timer. Another feature I think would be nice though certainly I don't know if it is possible is the brake feature. If this function could be set through the timer, might make life easier for Castle ESC's.

Going over to Waynes' tonight to set up another plane for electric conversion - we were thinking a Castle 75 AMP ESC and another Plettenberg 25/12 (since we already have those). Will look to find a way to use a brake with this controller, but I know you said this might not be a good match. I only have one Schulze 18.61 which is in the retract ship. I could borrow this Schulze 18.61 or get another one, but wanted to get your opinion on this. Please let me know if you know of anyone else successfully using a Plettenberg with a Castle ESC.

Thanks for the great job and the quick service, you made our weekend. It was so impressive seeing that gear come up and surprisingly, we were amazed at the difference it made in this particular aircrafts performance. It is a lead sled of the highest order, probably tipping the scales at close to 80 ounces, but many of the weight related issues with cornering and wobbling seemed to smooth right out. Man, it looked good in the air as well, when I cut those four foot bottoms on the inside squares it looked like I had a mile of clearance :)

Thanks again and Merry Christmas !

Jim Smith (Smith Brothers Stunt) "

I am happy to relate our experiences with retracts to any who are interested. These retracts allow you to remove the coiled wire gear to replace with standard wire (without the coils) which we will do on the new Tracers we are about to build. They are very robust and I think on initial inspection and trial they will more than meet our strength needs - uses with 1/8 or 3mm wire, haven't miked yet. We all flew it a few times and Sam even got to try a nice bounced landing for a good stress test (it was very windy and cold). No problems so far. Will probably take a few photos next weekend to post here if the weather cooperates since most of us have never seen a ukie stunter flying with retracts.

Merry Christmas to all :)

Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Stuntflyn on December 21, 2010, 11:01:06 AM
Hi All,

Just to clarify my mistake, I was using a Will Hubin custom FM9 retract timer along with an EXTERNAL BEC. I did not try the timer with the built in BEC because I was not sure it would have enough power for these retracts. This timer requires an external BEC.

Thanks again,

Jim Smith
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Paul Walker on December 21, 2010, 12:33:10 PM
Not sure if the timer with the built in BEC will work with these retracts or not, perhaps Will might know.

[/quote]

I can tell you for a fact that it does NOT work with two or more retract units. It will drive ONE only .  That's how the FM-9R with external BEC came into existence.

I also have thought about removing the wire with the coil, but for now have decided to leave it with the coil to minimize the shock loads on the retract unit.  Time will tell on this subject.

Paul Walker
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bill Little on December 21, 2010, 12:46:21 PM
hi Bob,

it will be awesome in all respects, I am sure!

Of course I have no clue as to what a "BEC" is.............. ;D

Bill
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Rudy Taube on December 21, 2010, 02:23:00 PM
Jim,

Thanks for the informative, good news report on retracts and yet another great timer from Will. :-)

I would guess that your Battery Eliminator Circuit adds very little weight to the system. Do you have an estimate on how much the retracts added to the weight of the plane, compared to the weight of using the standard fixed gear? TIA
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bill Little on December 21, 2010, 02:32:27 PM
(snip)I would guess that your Battery Eliminator Circuit(snip)

Thank you very, very, very much, for slipping that in there, Rudy!  y1  <=  #^  n~  :##  H^^

Bill
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Andrew Borgogna on December 21, 2010, 04:14:59 PM
OK, I am new to all this, but I just ordered a FM-9 retract timer and if I understand correctly I will need an external BEC to provide enough power to drive the retracts.  No problem there, but who makes the external BEC and which unit should I get.  I am serious about going down this path with the Spitfire.
Andy
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Dean Pappas on December 21, 2010, 08:50:34 PM
Hi Paul,
Really? Does the BEC output voltage of the Schultze collapse under the load of the retracts?
"Is it the real voltage or did it come out of a bottle? ...Only his voltmeter knows?"
Now I have to get Hunt to hook his up and try it.
Castle sell a nice switching circuit BEC that will do the trick nicely.
Merry Bah Humbug to All!
    Dean P.

Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Rudy Taube on December 22, 2010, 01:59:07 AM
OK, I am new to all this, but I just ordered a FM-9 retract timer and if I understand correctly I will need an external BEC to provide enough power to drive the retracts.  No problem there, but who makes the external BEC and which unit should I get.  I am serious about going down this path with the Spitfire.
Andy

Hi Andy,

From what Jim says, it looks like his retracts pull around 450 mAh (if each gear is at 150 x 3?). So it looks like a small separate BEC will work. Here is a good selection from Hobby Lobby:

                  http://search2.hobby-lobby.com/psearch/svc/search.php?uid=2&q=bec

Maybe Jim will step in here and give us the exact make and model he uses in his setup. I'm sure any of the smaller ones from HL will do the job.

I too am interested. With all the extra power we have available, the drag of the fixed LG is not a big problem, but I think retracts will be worth the effort and weight just because it will look so cool!  8)  There may even be some aerodynamic advantages, like the smoothness that Jim talked about. I seem to remember someone else using retracts with their wet power CLPA plane and they had similar improvements in smoothness. That would be a nice bonus.  :)

They sure would look awesome on your E Spitfire!  y1
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Paul Walker on December 22, 2010, 09:23:45 AM
Hi Paul,
Really? Does the BEC output voltage of the Schultze collapse under the load of the retracts?
"Is it the real voltage or did it come out of a bottle? ...Only his voltmeter knows?"
Now I have to get Hunt to hook his up and try it.
Castle sell a nice switching circuit BEC that will do the trick nicely.
Merry Bah Humbug to All!
    Dean P.


Dean,

I didn't measure the input voltage to the timer as its power supply is tapped off the battery, and that is 18.5 V.

I found that the timer board overheated when trying to operate the two retract units together.  I coordinated this with Will, and he modified the board to have a separate input for the new Castle BEC, and eliminate his BEC circuit on the board. This cost the weight of the Castle BEC, however the unit works perfectly now with no overheating at all.  Thanks for the great support Will!

Paul Walker
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Will Hubin on December 22, 2010, 09:37:28 AM
Paul has been using the FM-9 timer with an on-board 7805 regulator to provide the 5 volts to run the timer and provide the signal amplitude. The 7805 is rated for up to 1A when heat-sinked, but it wasn't heat-sinked and clearly wasn't up to the job. The 7805 is a linear voltage regulator and so it is quite inefficient when used with a battery voltage as large as 18.5 volts, but that is not a problem with the very small current demands of just the timer. So, rather than trying to heat-sink the 7805 for the extra demands of the servos, it seemed advisable to design a new printed circuit board that had a connection for an external (switching) BEC, and this has proven to work well.
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Will Hubin on December 22, 2010, 09:47:06 AM
Incidentally, I've just completed a revised FM-9 Programmer microcontroller program that allows the gear parameters (the time into flight time when the gear retracts and the time that flight power is maintained after the gear is dropped) to be changed. It works with old or new timers except only the newest timers will accept the gear parameters. I'll ship the new chip (with exchange instructions) for $5; for anyone who has previous retract timers, I'll update the program in them to accept the parameters from the new chip for another $5 each, including shipping costs. ...and if I get a chance to photograph a gear-up Stunter in flight, you can claim a free picture from me! (If anyone doesn't feel comfortable changing the chip in the programming box, send it to me and I'll update it for $10, including shipping costs.)

Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Wynn Robins on December 22, 2010, 01:58:28 PM
would be good to start a new topic on retracts - I am very intersted in getting some setup and I am sure others would appreciate a "how to" type post on this - including the wiring setup with BEC etc.

Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Andrew Borgogna on December 22, 2010, 02:03:19 PM
Will
I was a computer tech/engineer for 40 years and diagrams are worth a thousand words.  Could you draw up a block diagram showing all the components and how they all interface.  It would include the timer, external bec, esc, battery, and motor.  I am still a bit confused and I don't want to buy stuff I can't use.  I have enough of  that now.

Rudy
Thanks for the info on where to get the bec.

Andy
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Will Hubin on December 22, 2010, 08:10:18 PM
The easiest/fastest attempt to make it clearer is to attach the photo I send with the instructions. This first photo shows the retract circuit board for a setup where the ESC has enough current capability for both the timer and (especially) the retracts (ESCs like the ICE and JetiSpin). The microcontroller is programmed by connecting to the 6 pins at the top. Then it is detached and the 3-wire connector from the ESC is connected to the left-most three pins, with the ground wire oriented as indicated. The gear servo is connected to the 3 pins on the left side, observing the ground wire. If there is just one 3-wire connection coming from the electric retracts, it is connected as shown. If there are two separate 3-wire connections from the retract servos (perhaps a nose-gear in addition), they must be combined into one, using a "Y" connector (one example is the Mpi/Maxx Stock No. 3265, which combines two male 3-pin connectors into one female 3-pin connector). The "Y" connector sends the same signals to both servos through the white or yellow wire and it powers the servos through the inner 5-volt wire and the black or brown ground wire. (The circuit board routes the 5-volts and the ground from the 3-pin ESC connection to the 3-pin servo connection.)

There is a complication with using two motors with two ESCs that each provides a BEC; it is important to cut the center (+5V) lead for one of them so that the one with a slightly greater voltage doesn't try to charge the other one. And if neither ESC has enough current capability for the servos, cut the center lead on both 3-wire connectors from the ESCs to the timer and use this second circuit.

The second photo shows the circuit board for ESCs that do not provide enough current for both the timer and the retract servos (such as the Phoenix ESCs, especially with the higher battery voltages), or do not provide any BEC at all (Schulze). The only difference is that there is another 3-pin connector for the external BEC, for example the 10A BEC offered by Castle Creations and available from most retailers; only two pins are actually used, the center pin for +5 volts and an outer ground pin. The circuit board routes the +5 volts and ground to both the timer chip and the servo(s).

With all these words, I think maybe you're right about a block diagram being needed...
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Will Hubin on December 22, 2010, 08:12:36 PM
Oops, it looks like the first photo, for ESC with a strong-enough BEC, got left off. I'll try again.
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Stuntflyn on December 23, 2010, 07:40:20 AM
Hi Guys,

Only have a few minutes now, but I'll get you some exact specs and photos when I get home from work today if I can. Have a little family Christmas party to attend later as well. I can give you some rough parameters on the weight and set-up of these E-Flite Retracts and their successful use to date.

I am not using a trike gear set-up, I am using conventional gear in a T-Rex we bashed into an electric T-Bolt. I then bashed some more once I ordered the retracts and started to install them. My brother Wayne helped out as two great minds are always better than one:)

For any who have not used retracts in either R/C or control line applications, one must spend a bit of time insuring the construction around the spar where you will mount your wheel wells is carefully considered. Control line applications also must deal with your lead out wires on the inbound wing. The "angle" of the gear must also be considered for placement (I think most recommend 12 - 13 degrees forward sweep in a conventional gear set-up). Let's just say these are all important factors to getting your ship back on the ground in one piece, so use care when planning the installation lest your wing retract instead of your gear. There are lots of good construction articles and plans for R/C aircraft which can help you here.

I have not yet weighed the Castle 10 amp BEC though it is not significant to much degree anyway. Think the wires and connectors hanging out both ends weigh as much as the actual BEC.

The two retract assemblies weigh about an ounce and a half each, probably add 3 ounces to your total weight compared to just wire gear.

A Schulze ESC, whether the discontinued 18.46K F2B or the newer 18.61K F2B do not have built in BEC units.

I'll include some pictures of the installation and show everyone how everything fits together. I will start a new thread here specifically on electric retracts since it seems retracts have a certain appeal to the masses (and the judges too I hope :)

Thanks again,

Jim Smith
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Will Hubin on December 23, 2010, 09:08:40 AM
Here's a block diagram of the connections for retracts that are using an ESC that provides a BEC with enough current capability to operate the retract servos. It is specific to the FM-9retract timer because it has the extra three pins for programming, but otherwise it is generic.
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Will Hubin on December 23, 2010, 09:10:26 AM
And here's the circuit when an external BEC is needed (as for the Schulze or for other ESCs that don't have enough current capability). Incidentally, Castle Creations gives the weight of their 10A BEC as 11 grams (0.39 oz).
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: John Cralley on December 23, 2010, 10:11:18 AM
Will,

Don't you have to shift the +5 V and GND down to the bottom two pins in the second diagram??

John
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Will Hubin on December 23, 2010, 03:04:32 PM
Oops! Thanks, John. (Sometimes I think I could learn to like computers...)
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Howard Rush on December 23, 2010, 07:11:51 PM
With all the extra power we have available, the drag of the fixed LG is not a big problem...
Even the extra battery capacity required, which is the number I'd be concerned about, is not a big deal.  Also, the drag of an imperfectly fitting fairing for the retracted gear may offset a significant amount of fixed gear drag.  If anybody would like to see how much drag his round-wire, exposed-wheel gear has, he could send me a stamped, self-addressed email message. 
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Mark Scarborough on December 23, 2010, 10:39:09 PM
Howard,
I have tried in vain to affix my stamp to my monitor, but when I hit send, the dang stamp stays here,,
Please advise,,
thanks
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Aaron Little on December 24, 2010, 08:43:36 AM

Bob looks really cool, I can't wait to see it with the nacells on it.
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Brett Buck on December 26, 2010, 03:05:48 AM
Even the extra battery capacity required, which is the number I'd be concerned about, is not a big deal.  Also, the drag of an imperfectly fitting fairing for the retracted gear may offset a significant amount of fixed gear drag.  If anybody would like to see how much drag his round-wire, exposed-wheel gear has, he could send me a stamped, self-addressed email message. 

  Here's a preview - it's A LOT.

    Brett
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: jim gilmore on December 26, 2010, 01:19:09 PM
I admit i have not read every post but i am curious where the engines will be ?
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bill Little on December 26, 2010, 04:32:22 PM
I admit i have not read every post but i am curious where the engines will be ?


Hi Jim,

Not sure if Bob posted pictures of the nacelles or not.  Lots of posts to go through! LOL!!  I have seen them "somewhere" and it will look sharp when all together!
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on December 26, 2010, 07:21:01 PM
Hi Jim:

Well, there will be no engines! There will be, however, motors!  ;D

If you read the above descriptions of the project you will find where I write about making extra long dummy nacelles and then attaching the motors, props and spinners to them to allow me to trim back the length of the nacelles until the proper CG range is achieved. In other words, the nacelles will be the last things to be made and installed before finishing. I'll reattach the photo of the side view of the ship here. That will give you some indication of what the ship will look like with the nacelles attached. Please understand that the photo of the drawing depicts an early rendition of the side view and certain elements have morphed a bit. An example would be the shape of the rudder...

Later - Bob
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Howard Rush on December 27, 2010, 05:50:47 AM
Quaint CAD system.
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on December 27, 2010, 07:45:28 AM
Hi Howard:

Yes, it's consistent with my foam bricks...

Bob
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Randy Powell on December 27, 2010, 10:15:35 AM
Wow, drawing on paper with a pencil ... a man after my own heart.

Looks very cool, Bob. Electric twin with retracts. Going after the whole enchilada. I like that.
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Dennis Adamisin on December 27, 2010, 11:54:21 AM
Quaint CAD system.

I'll bet he did all his calucations using a slide rule too..!   S?P  :o  n~  LL~  LL~  LL~

(sheesh, misspelled my own punchline)
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on December 27, 2010, 01:50:10 PM
Actually it's a sly rule...

Bob
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Dean Pappas on December 27, 2010, 06:50:27 PM
Quaint CAD system.
Okay Gang ...
show of hands here: how many of you working in CAD find that the swoopy curves you draw are somehow limited by what is easy to do with your drawing package?
later,
 Dean P.
 
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Mark Scarborough on December 27, 2010, 10:23:00 PM
Not limited by CAD, only by ingenuity to create those lines,, mixing ellipses, splines, polylines and arcs you can do pretty good,,,

that said, its pretty easy by comparison to generate a swoopy line,, with a pencil,,

The jpg is a plan I am working on for a classic pattern airplane,, LOTS of swoopy stuff,,

Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bill Little on December 27, 2010, 11:05:45 PM
Hi Mark,

That looks almost like an A-6 Intruder that I have been wanting to build as a stunter since 1969! LOL!! Really!  Haven't even tried to draw one up.......  Would like a 650-660 size plane.  Maybe make it an electric ducted fan job!  With everything else that electric can do, that seems possible!  Would do one of the A-6's that served on the Enterprise while my Dad was on board..  I don't think the planes in the Squadron that he was M&M Officer for would make a stunt ship! LL~ LL~ LL~ (E-2B Hawkeyes  :o )

My heart lies with Scale stunt, but I haven't done one in over 40 years.  I have gotten a P-51"B" (modified from Mr. Hunt's P-51D) almost ready to paint, though.  Just need to replace the compressor.  

My only real "foray" into "design" was taking Bob's Saturn and making it look like Billy's Juno!  But that one has worked out real well!  ;D

Wouldn't know how to boot up a CAD system, but Aaron does.
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Mark Scarborough on December 28, 2010, 09:12:50 AM
Bill,
its actually an 80's Dark Side Pattern bird. Old school ballistic pattern. I am rescaling it, reworking the structure, and making it electric , about a 30 sized airframe the way its turning out. I like the fuse so much I may use it for an electric CL stunter,, there is NO straight lines anywhere on the fuse, its cool,, along the era of the Bridi XLT
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Dean Pappas on December 28, 2010, 01:11:57 PM
Ah yes,
I built one of those Aurora from the MK kit. Sweet flyer, and fast too.

Actually, Mark, you are making my point, sort of! Nice tracing of the old Aurora plan ...
The combination of arcs, ellipses, splines and Bezier curves that make up a rakish ":swoop" of the pencil are not always intuitive.
It's the old "when you have a hammer, evrything looks like a nail" syndrome.
Sometimes, but not always, I find myself drawing with pencil and then later mangling those same elements to fit the original pencil drawn vision.
i'm still stuck in the 2-D CAD world for lack of silly-money to do something extravagant like buying a seat of Solidworks, but it sure would be nice to find an economical 3-D package.

I look at the majority of the recently published designs drawn from scratch in CAD, and they do suffer from line-and-ellipse-itis.
Have you noticed this too?
later,
  Dean P.
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on December 28, 2010, 01:46:49 PM
I have two drawing boards and will gladly sell one of them!  >:D

I know that CAD is the way of the future (Just like electric...), but I still enjoy drawing those long, swoopy lines on paper and then being able to look at the resulting drawing from many different perspectives to get an idea of what it will really look like. In other words the analog method of drawing still has its place..  y1

Recently I've been working with Bob Kruger, who is becoming very accomplished at making CAD drawings with the swoopy curves intact, and we've worked out a method of producing drawings in which I send him very accurate pencil drawings and then he scans them in and overdraws in CAD. The first of these that the modeling (or stunt) public will see is the Gene Schaffer designed "Oosa-Amma" (The original Stunt Machine - the one before the published one). Bob is doing the CAD plans and we will donate them to PAMPA to run along with an article on the Oosa-Amma that I am writing. I'm building an Oosa-Amma right now to provide some construction photos to go along with the article. I also have quite a few photos of the original plane, which I have just returned to its owner, Andrea Moore. Her husband, Ray Moore obtained the original and had it in his basement at the time of his passing. Andrea graciously lent the model to me to measure and draw.

The Oosa-Amma is Classic legal and is large enough (approximately 625 square inches) to utilize one of Randy's PA 40 R Ultra-Lite engines, and that's exactly what is going in mine. I know that it is politically incorrect to write about glow stuff here... Tough. In fact, I'll post a couple of photos of the original one that Gene designed in 1969. I'll also post a photo or two of some of the components of the one I'm building.

Later - Bob 
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Mark Scarborough on December 28, 2010, 01:57:47 PM
Dean,
You dont have any old pattern kits laying around do you? Would LOVE to get my hands on some,, especially the MK ones. I am building my "sport" flying airforce out of this sort of thing, My ugly stick and others are not as much fun to fly as my ballistic style Kaos! and my Pylon racers,,,, by the way its electric,,
The Aurora "30" will be electric too, goal, manuevarable at 100mph, should provide some fun at the club field!

 I have noticed a lot of that syndrome, funny thing though, even some manual drafting guys use a lot of ellipse shapes. In tracing the Aurora, virtually all of the formers when traced, related most perfectly to ellipse's. The top formers are perfect ellipse with axis on the wing centerline, the lowers are centered on a sloped line, lower in the back.
Bob, really sorry to hijack your thread, its not right, this is a fantastic effort, I feel bad now, all the ideas I have had for years are coming to reality,, ( in other peoples planes lol)
here is my effort to tie it into your thread,, the Aroura will use a set of the Eflight retracts,, and its electric,, ( does that help?) D>K
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: John Miller on December 28, 2010, 01:58:31 PM
Like Mark said, No problem with swoopy lines for me either. I've become quite adept with poly lines. I do use elipses occasionally too.

The nice thing with poly lines is they can be reshaped up to a point, then it's simply a matter of making a new one to use. H^^
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bill Little on December 28, 2010, 02:05:53 PM
I have two drawing boards and will gladly sell one of them!  >:D

I know that CAD is the way of the future (Just like electric...), but I still enjoy drawing those long, swoopy lines on paper and then being able to look at the resulting drawing from many different perspectives to get an idea of what it will really look like. In other words the analog method of drawing still has its place..  y1

Recently I've been working with Bob Kruger, who is becoming very accomplished at making CAD drawings with the swoopy curves intact, and we've worked out a method of producing drawings in which I send him very accurate pencil drawings and then he scans them in and overdraws in CAD. The first of these that the modeling (or stunt) public will see is the Gene Schaffer designed "Oosa-Amma" (The original Stunt Machine - the one before the published one). Bob is doing the CAD plans and we will donate them to PAMPA to run along with an article on the Oosa-Amma that I am writing. I'm building an Oosa-Amma right now to provide some construction photos to go along with the article. I also have quite a few photos of the original plane, which I have just returned to its owner, Andrea Moore. Her husband, Ray Moore obtained the original and had it in his basement at the time of his passing. Andrea graciously lent the model to me to measure and draw.

The Oosa-Amma is Classic legal and is large enough (approximately 625 square inches) to utilize one of Randy's PA 40 R Ultra-Lite engines, and that's exactly what is going in mine. I know that it is politically incorrect to write about glow stuff here... Tough. In fact, I'll post a couple of photos of the original one that Gene designed in 1969. I'll also post a photo or two of some of the components of the one I'm building.

Later - Bob 

Hi Bob,

I really like what you're doing with Gene's planes.  I can't think of a better person for the job!

Is there a whole lot of difference between the "Oosa-Amma" and the "real", not yet published, Stunt machine?  Other than Classic vis a vis Nos. 30 legality?

A few projects are ahead of either right now, but it would be interesting to know the "differences".

Quote
I know that it is politically incorrect to write about glow stuff here... Tough.
  LOL!! Being "Second in Command", I can allow a "touch" of lee way on topics in a thread! LOL!!  I can't really figure out what politically correct means, anyway..... 

Can't wait to see the "Dually" in action!

Thanks,
Bill
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on December 28, 2010, 02:32:20 PM
Hi Bill:

Actually there is quite a bit of difference between the Oosa-Amma (or first Stunt Machine) and the actual second Stunt Machine with which we are all familiar. The wing on the Oosa-Amma is much bigger and has less leading edge sweep than the second Stunt Machine. It also has longer moments and, of course, wing gear.

All of this is complicated by the fact that the plans for Stunt Machine that was published in Flying Models were not even remotely accurate to the original second Stunt Machine. Gene never built any model that was close to the plans that were published, but that's a story for another time.

I took great care when doing the drawings for the Oosa-Amma to get the wing airfoil templates dead accurate, as well as getting all the other dimensions dead on accurate. The only slight liberty I took was to increase the fuselage width at the elevator horn location just slightly to allow the use of modern horns with ball links. We are talking about a very minute change here and not one that makes this a better flying ship or one that looks different than the original. Every other dimension is exact!

Hopefully we will be presenting the Oosa Amma article in Stunt News by spring. It can be powered with anything from an Aero Tiger .36 to any of the light case .40 engines out there. It could (could, mind you) be electric powered! There, I brought this back to electric.... ;)

Later - Bob 
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Dean Pappas on December 28, 2010, 02:39:24 PM
I'll taunt Bob later ...
Funny about that Mark ... I was gonna ask you!
I did just recently score a kit of the old Kirkland Mustang 40X and was grovelling around to see if anyone has a reasonably fresh Tigre 46 they'd part with so I can make it "authentic" for nostalgia Pattern.
I just can't bring myself to electrify that one!

later,
Dean
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Mark Scarborough on December 28, 2010, 03:06:56 PM
LOL, There is a guy in California who is re-popping a bunch of the classic kits, among them is the Aurora, glass fuse, foam wing.

I have an HP 40 that needs a ring? or hmmm
I have a line on a 40 size Mach one that is haunting me,,
The Aurora I am redrawing is slated for laser cutting, then kits will be available with the glass belly pan, I am trying to engineer it so that both Glow and electric are feasible,, its a challenge. right now looking at a Hacker A30 on 4S 3000 mah packs. 500 in^2 and goal is less than 4 pounds using average wood. the only block will be at the vertical stab to fuse turtle deck transition. everything else will be molded balsa over formers instead of the standard MK machined blocks to carve.

I have a preflown glass fuse 60 sized pattern ship. No one seems to be able to tell me what it is. Looks a lot like a Dirty birdy, with anhedryl, but the canopy has a flatspot on the front,, sigh,,
It WONT be electric,, I have the Rossi helicopter engine with pipe to  put back in it after its refinished,,,

hmm how to bring it back on track again,, uh,, oh several other MK kits are in the works for resupply, in the 20 to 25 size, makes them very affordable for electric conversions,,
 H^^
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Randy Powell on December 28, 2010, 03:14:32 PM
If I ever get good enough with a CAD program to do swoopy lines, that would be cool, but but for now, I do my swoops with a pencil.
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Howard Rush on December 28, 2010, 07:22:30 PM
PT Granderson is the master of the swoopy line.  His name came up Sunday.  John Witt brought his electric ARC Impact over to show us.  He parked it under my glass coffee table.  The table has a curved, beveled edge, and the several overhead lights cast swoopy lines on the monochromatic plastic wing covering.  We agreed that it looked Grandersonian, and pictures were taken so the effect could be reproduced in the trim scheme. 
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: RandySmith on December 28, 2010, 07:43:04 PM
Okay Gang ...
show of hands here: how many of you working in CAD find that the swoopy curves you draw are somehow limited by what is easy to do with your drawing package?
later,
 Dean P.
 


Hi Dean

There is no limit to drawing curves, all curves, elipses etc.. and lines can be drawn in AutoCad and many many other CAD and Draw programs, I have very nice curves in my Eliptical Ships

Regards
Randy
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: ptg on December 28, 2010, 08:17:37 PM
Just a couple of the many 'swoopy doodles' in my puter.  I use a drawing program not CAD.  Can do very accurate drawings such as the Elroy's template for motor mount with cooling holes.
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bill Little on December 28, 2010, 08:28:50 PM
Just a couple of the many 'swoopy doodles' in my puter.  I use a drawing program not CAD.  Can do very accurate drawings such as the Elroy's template for motor mount with cooling holes.

Hi Phil,

I can use coreldraw pretty good, but I just don't have a clue as to what to "draw" when it come to Stunt Planes!  LOL!!  And I started out in college as an Art major.  hmmmmmmm middle linebacker/art major.  yep I got some strange looks! LOL!!

Big Bear
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Dean Pappas on December 29, 2010, 09:41:30 AM
Hi Dean

There is no limit to drawing curves, all curves, elipses etc.. and lines can be drawn in AutoCad and many many other CAD and Draw programs, I have very nice curves in my Eliptical Ships

Regards
Randy

Hi Randy,
Of course there is no limit, just a little effort required; but what I am talking about is how what is convenient has a subtle (and maybe unwelcome) influence on what gets drawn so often. I actually keep an old Windows 95/ "ME" machine alive just so that I can run my old copy of Visual Cad as well as Autocad, because VC has some killer curve drawing facilities, intended for use in cam drawing.

P.S. look for a PM

later,
   Dean
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Howard Rush on December 29, 2010, 12:21:49 PM
I use Visual CADD 4.0 on XP, but I draw no swoopy lines. 
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: PJ Rowland on December 29, 2010, 05:37:54 PM
Looking good bubba. Will it be ready for 2011 Nats?
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on December 29, 2010, 08:05:41 PM
Hi PJ:

You bet! I also have a new Crossfire that will be ready, so one or the other will be my "ride" in Muncie this coming year. Looking forward to spending some time with you. Robby has really enjoyed the email chats and perhaps I can get him to come out with me to the Nats.

I'm attching a shot of the new Crossfire Extreme that was taken a while back. It's in paint trim mode now...

Later - Bob
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bill Little on December 29, 2010, 10:48:37 PM
I've always loved the Crossfire, Bob.

Aaron has been texting back and forth with Robby quite a bit, so hopefully you can get him out to the NATS.

I don't know if you are aware of the "shock" Aaron, and i, am about to receive..........

Bill
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Randy Powell on December 30, 2010, 02:58:33 PM
Bob,

But I miss the tail cone pipe exit on the bottom.  It looked cool.  :'(
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: PJ Rowland on December 30, 2010, 08:53:55 PM
Gday bob.

Crossfire looks good - I cant wait to get over there - there is plenty I gotta tell you so defenetly pencil in a beer or few.. ive been trying to convince robby to get his bum off campus and join us for fun and games at the Nats. Who knows.... :)

He cant hide behind that wrist forever.

One slight drift, I saw you dominated the VSC - will you be flying in classic at the Nats?? Im at painting stage of my brand new purpose build classic beast. Its going to be one heck of a contest.

Look forward to more pics leading up to the contest. Ta ta

Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on December 30, 2010, 09:02:57 PM
Hi PJ:

I don't think I will be flying Classic at this year's (Next year's...) Nats, but that may change as I have a brand new Classic ship alomost ready to go into one piece. My main focus this year will be on making the twin fly competitively.

Looking forward to our chat. As we say over here, "Let's do lunch!"

Later - Bob
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: PJ Rowland on December 31, 2010, 03:41:52 AM
Hiya bob : See you there..

I think its smart you dont compete in Classic.  S?P You need to put all your focus on getting that Twin running, as always you will be prepared and it will be world class. Just dip your toe in the water with the twin, then after that go for a 4'er...

Keep us all posted so to speak ENJOY NYE Everyone.
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: wwwarbird on January 02, 2011, 06:47:15 PM
 Bob,

 Just wondering, on your new electric models here do you still plan to use dope finishes or?
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on January 03, 2011, 05:22:45 AM
Hi Wayne:

Well, I've been using a variety of finishing materials on my models for many years; even way before electric was on the horizon...

I have in the past used a dope base with .2 carbon fiber mat applied with dope. Then I typically use a dope based filler using Aero Products' Aero 1 filler (Finely ground Zinc Stearate). After sanding that I use a blocking coat made up of Polar Gray and White dope. Any flaws get addressed at that point as the blocking coat is sanded. Then I apply another, very thin coat of the blocking material. At this point in the past I've used White dope as the base coat for my models. This is changing now, as I have found the Base Coat/Clear Coat automotive systems (Specifically DuPont Chromabase) allow me to apply a very light (in weight...) color coat. This stuff covers in a whisper coat!

I've used, and will continue to use, a catalyzed urethane clear. With the DuPont paint I'll use the companion Chromabase clear. This stuff should only be used if you have all the necessary safety equipment and isolated environment in which to use it properly. Nuff said on that!

In the future I will be changing my finishing procedure somewhat and I'll publish about that when I confirm that it is viable and successful.

Later - Bob       
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bill Little on January 03, 2011, 08:06:51 AM
The base coat/clear coat systems for the color make painting a model a whole lot easier!  And it is much lighter!  Only problem I have seen is putting on the clear to "heavy".
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: wwwarbird on January 08, 2011, 09:40:56 PM
 Pretty quiet here, what's the latest Bob?
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Rudy Taube on January 08, 2011, 11:54:27 PM
Pretty quiet here, what's the latest Bob?

Hi Wayne,

I just talked to Bob today. His plate is too full right now to work on his twin as much as he would like to. Between working on our PAMPA STUNT NEWS MAGAZINE around 45 hours per month, and running two businesses, I can't imagine where he finds time to even touch his own models. But knowing Bob, he will somehow find the time and provide us with another progress report soon. I think we all owe Bob a lot for making the PAMPA SN such a great magazine that we all enjoy throughout the year. I am always amazed at how much time he donates to the PAMPA project on our behalf. Without his 45 hours per month volunteer work we would not have such a wonderful periodical and Bob would have the time to finish his twin much sooner.

Regards,  H^^
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: wwwarbird on January 09, 2011, 07:25:39 PM
Hi Wayne,

I just talked to Bob today. His plate is too full right now to work on his twin as much as he would like to. Between working on our PAMPA STUNT NEWS MAGAZINE around 45 hours per month, and running two businesses, I can't imagine where he finds time to even touch his own models. But knowing Bob, he will somehow find the time and provide us with another progress report soon. I think we all owe Bob a lot for making the PAMPA SN such a great magazine that we all enjoy throughout the year. I am always amazed at how much time he donates to the PAMPA project on our behalf. Without his 45 hours per month volunteer work we would not have such a wonderful periodical and Bob would have the time to finish his twin much sooner.

Regards,  H^^

 Points taken Rudy and all is good, just curious what the latest is on this exciting project. And yes, It's more important to me as well to see my next Stunt News finished with it's typical great content an arrive on time.

 Thanks Bob! H^^
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bill Little on January 10, 2011, 07:45:39 PM
I have no clue how Bob does it.  I believe he has actually cracked Einstein's theory and has set times where he turns the hands of his own clock back! ;D
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Randy Powell on January 16, 2011, 10:45:45 PM
Einstein said that time exist so that everything doesn't happen at once. Maybe Bob's found a way to do everything at once.
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Igor Burger on January 17, 2011, 12:50:56 AM
Einstein also said that if you are very quick, the time goes somehow slower  ;D
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Igor Burger on January 17, 2011, 06:29:09 AM
edit: sorry I did a mistake and posted message in wrong thread  ~^ ... it had to be in "early christmass"
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Shultzie on January 17, 2011, 09:45:58 AM
flying under too low ceing

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hRYlEeyy424

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l74uqL3_dAw

and over too high ground :- )))))

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wyzB1ul6R3c
CLP** BW@
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on February 08, 2011, 09:06:54 PM
Okay, we're back on track once again! I had to wait until I received the motors and the remainder of the retract units to make a pair of dummy/mock-up nacelles and figure out just where the CG will reside with everything on board. I put the battery in the middle of its adjustment range and put the nose gear retract unit in its well. I then taped the other retract units to the bottom of the dummy nacelles and also taped the two Horizon E-Flite Power 10 motors into the slots on the nacelles. I moved the motors fore and aft to achieve a CG that is just slightly nose heavy. I figure that the majority of the finish will go on aft of the CG and so the model should balance perfectly with no additional weight needed anywhere. The battery can be adjusted fore and aft over a two-inch range and that should be enough to compensate for any slight miscalculations.

Tomorrow night I begin designing the actual built-up nacelles and then start building them. Hopefully that will only take a few evenings and I can get this thing into final finish mode before leaving for VSC. By the way, the weight of the model with the battery, the motors and the retract units on board as pictured is 46 ounces! I should be able to bring this puppy in south of 60 ounces! I was planning on 63 ounces. That equates to a 57 ounce glow model without fuel on board. At, say, 58 ounces it equates to a 52 ounce glow ship without the fuel on board. On 670 square inches and with all that disc area, I should have a really buoyant ship here!

I'll post again when the real nacelles are under construction.

Later - Bob Hunt
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: wwwarbird on February 08, 2011, 09:38:22 PM
 Lookin' good. y1
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Dean Pappas on February 08, 2011, 09:57:43 PM
Yes ...
Mongo like!
   Dean
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Dwayne on February 09, 2011, 05:24:21 AM
Bob,

But I miss the tail cone pipe exit on the bottom.  It looked cool.  :'(

Ditto... y1 #^
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bill Little on February 09, 2011, 10:08:23 AM
Sweet!  BTW: what are you using to attach your CF veil?

Bill
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bill Little on February 09, 2011, 10:11:15 AM
Yes ...
Mongo like!
   Dean

hi Dean, I totally agree!

BTW:  On our NASCAR team they nicknamed me "Mongo" for some odd reason.......... there is actually a story about that one.... LL~  LL~

Big Bear
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Larry Renger on February 09, 2011, 11:25:16 AM
Looking at the photo of the model, there is room for a 3rd motor in the nose..... LL~ VD~ S?P
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on February 09, 2011, 11:38:28 AM
Hi Larry:

Yes, there is! But... one thing at a time - or in this case, two things at a time. There's plenty of time to add more later in another design... Obviously there will soon be a very sleek and stylish nose cone added to this ship.

To answer your question, Bill Little, I use very thin butyrate dope to attach the .2 carbon mat.

Bob

Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bill Little on February 09, 2011, 11:46:17 AM
Thanks, Bob.

Bill
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Dean Pappas on February 10, 2011, 11:18:43 AM
Hi Bill,
Isn't there always a STORY ?

Dean
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Andrew Borgogna on February 10, 2011, 01:59:48 PM
Hey Bob, I know where Larry is going he wants to build a 1/2a version of your plane. 
Andy
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Howard Rush on February 10, 2011, 03:52:31 PM
Obviously there will soon be a very sleek and stylish nose cone added to this ship.

I have been trying to come up with a suitable nose joke to no avail, but this reminds me of a story.  One time in 1968 I was in a Shakey's in St. Louis.  I saw a woman who looked very familiar.  Specifically, the profile of her nose looked very familiar.  I later realized that it was identical to the wing planform of the Concorde.
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bill Little on February 10, 2011, 04:01:51 PM
Hi Bill,
Isn't there always a STORY ?

Dean

Generally speaking.... yes.

"Mongo"
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on February 11, 2011, 08:43:05 PM
It's Nacelle time!

Now that the CG point has been found and the nacelle length has been determined for real, it's time to make the actual nacelles for this monster. I'm attaching a photo of the drawing of the finalized nacelle shape. Note the placement of the retracted main wheel; it's just in front of the leading edge.

The second photo is of the nacelle parts. There are four nacelle sides and four 1/32-inch ply doublers. I put as many holes in the doublers as I thought prudent. These parts weigh 1.5 ounces without the epoxy that will join them. The target weight of the bird was at first 63 ounces, but I guess I budgeted high because now its looking more like 58 or 59 ounces all up. I'll be very pleased with that!

As soon as I post this message I'll attach the doublers to the nacelle sides. Tomorrow I'll trim the doublers to match the nacelle sides and install the formers and make them up into two assembled nacelles. Hopefully by the end of next week I'll have all the woodwork done and be into finish. This has been fun!

Bob Hunt   
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Mike Scholtes on February 11, 2011, 09:33:06 PM
This may be putting the cart a tad before the horse, but are you considering kitting this spectacular beastie, maybe as a component group? Of course you will need to prove it flies well enough to satisfy your design goals but I think that is a safe assumption.
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Keith Renecle on February 11, 2011, 09:56:36 PM
Hi Bob,

This is one awesome design! I love the shape of these nacelles. In fact, the whole design is so stylish. When I looked at the drawing, for a minute the nose cone on the fuselage looked like a spinner. Maybe the upgrade will be a tri-motor?? I can't wait to see this one completed. Keep going!

Keith R
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: PJ Rowland on February 11, 2011, 11:02:35 PM
Looking great.
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on February 12, 2011, 07:19:30 AM
Hi Mike:

You're right; that is putting the cart way before the horse! But, thanks for the suggestion. If (and it's a big if right now...) this thing flies as well as I hope it will I will probably make plans and some of the components (Lost-Foam wing fixtures and molded shells) available. I really don't think that the stunt world in going to beat a path to my door over this one. It is a bit labor intensive; but not nearly as much as I originally thought it would be. It presented some interesting engineering problems, but so far all of them have been fairly easy to solve. Striking out  into unfamiliar territory can make a person tread slowly and carefully and expect the worse. Again, in this case (so far...) things have gone incredibly well. I'm waiting for the other shoe to drop...

Keith:

Thanks for the kind words on the styling! Anyone who knows me well knows that the styling part is why I really do this stunt thing to begin with. I just love sketching and drawing swoopy looking stuff and then translating those lines into balsa. A tri-motor? What ever made you think that there might ever be a tri-motor version of this?  VD~

PJ:

Thanks! Looking forward to seeing you at the Nats. That beer you were suggesting sounds interesting, but we can at least get together with a group and do some dinner. I might be persuaded to imbibe one beer's worth. I suppose it would have to be a Fosters...

I just took the weight off of the nacelles side/doubler sandwich and now all the parts weigh 1.6 ounces. I was budgeting 2.5 ounces per nacelle finished and I think I have a good shot at being at or below that number. I'll do a lot on it today.

Later - Bob 
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Ward Van Duzer on February 12, 2011, 08:52:26 AM
You're BOTH Mongos, ceptin' Dean-O is a little closer to the ground!

Ward-O
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: William DeMauro on February 12, 2011, 09:28:51 AM
I see you made some good progress on it this week. I can't wait to see it with the Nacelles on it they really bring the style out.As you know I'm looking forward to seeing it finished. Sometime this summer I will hit you up for a flight on it.
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on February 12, 2011, 09:46:22 AM
Hi Will:

No problem, but that flight will have to be after the Nats... ;)
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on February 12, 2011, 12:09:20 PM
Here's an update on today's work on the twin.

The nacelles are well underway. They have the doublers attached and have been joined with two formers each. The actual shapes of the nacelle sides were determined by cutting inner and outer core sections of the twin's wing and then covering them with the same thickness sheeting that was used on the actual wing. In this case that would be 1/16-inch thick balsa. The position of each of the nacelle sides was then scribed onto the "dummy" covered foam pieces and then they were band sawn chordwise to yield the exact shape of the wing where the nacelle sides will reside. They fit perfectly! Of course the nacelles will be final attached using a special fixture that will insure perfect alignment all around.

Here are a few photos from this morning's work. Later this evening I will make the motor mount plates and install them, mount the motors so that I can position the nose rings, and cut and fit the blocks that will be carved to achieve the final shapes of the nacelles.

Later - Bob
 
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bill Little on February 12, 2011, 03:25:25 PM
Ah ha!  The "Lost Foam technique" strikes again!  (sounds like how you made the nacelles/wing fitting) ;D

Bill
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Dean Pappas on February 13, 2011, 11:51:47 AM
You're BOTH Mongos, ceptin' Dean-O is a little closer to the ground!

Ward-O
A low CG is good ... better handling, you see.

On a note more tied to the discussion: I just love how the fixturing falls out of the construction process.
Way to go, Bobba!
  Dean
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: PJ Rowland on February 13, 2011, 04:05:50 PM
Quality of those Nacelles looks top draw. - Certianly one of the Highlights for me will be seeing this Machine doing its thing. It will certainly be impressive.

Bob:  y1 Certainly will have to organise something - Im not real beer drinker - More of a light Bourbon man myself. I would enjoy us all going out in decent sized group - table full of who's who ! I'd love to hear you say " I won a world champs before you were born love - now bring me a steak. "  LL~

I'l talk to you at the Nats and we can organize somethign there ( Where are you staying? I'm at the Comfort Inn ) - Robbie mentioned visiting - Id like to see your shop so I'l make a special trip when im near DC out to your place - but your twin build thread isnt the place to be doing it ! Enjoy the build I look forward to seeing the completed ship - and catching up again at the Nats - Keep us all posted on the goings on.

Does it have a Name yet? Did I miss that?
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on February 13, 2011, 06:20:32 PM
Hi PJ:

Yup, we'll find a way to get a group together and do some dinner for sure. Hopefully Robby will make it out to the Nats for at least one day.

Okay, got a lot done today. I designed the motor mount plates and made them from very high grade, 5-ply birch plywood and then coated them on both sides with .2 carbon mat applied with thin CA glue. I had to make up a special fixture that would allow the nacelle sides to sit parallel to the table and have integral vertical pieces that would insure that the motor mount plates were being installed perpendicular to the actual nacelle centerlines.

Once the plates were accurately glued to the nacelle sides I carefully marked and drilled through the nacelle sides and into the plywood mount plates in three places on each side of the nacelle assembles. I used round toothpicks with a bit of the tapered end snipped off as press-fit dowels and installed them with medium CA glue. Once the CA had set I snipped the ends of the toothpicks with a pair of diagonal cutters and then sanded the "pins" flush with the nacelle sides.

The units weigh 1.3 ounces total - that's both units! Unfortunately I cannot go much further until I get the 1/1/2 inch diameter spinners. I have to mount the motors, install the noserings and then fit the top and bottom balsa blocks for carving. I opted to use blocks in this case instead of molded shells because I can actually do the blocks quicker and I want to get this monster into finish as soon as possible.

That's it until later this week.

Thanks - Bob Hunt      
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: PJ Rowland on February 13, 2011, 06:40:00 PM
Its amazing how strong .02 Veil is once you hit it with Zap - Often I will coat the inner half of a Moulded Shell with Carbon Veil to keep it from loosing shape in lieu of using bulkheads.

Just need to watch out when it flashes off - can mess up your eyes like oinions !


Love the detail in the photos' I dont know how many people realise some of these photo's are taken specifically for our viewing purpose they are not simply workshop shap shots. Carefully set up, well pictured and uploaded - all that takes time - We all appreciate your efforts. - Photos make the forum alot of fun.

Keep up the great work. Its defenetly ATD compliant. ( Attention to detail. )
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Keith Renecle on February 16, 2011, 06:07:14 AM
Hi Bob, You asked:

Keith:

Thanks for the kind words on the styling! Anyone who knows me well knows that the styling part is why I really do this stunt thing to begin with. I just love sketching and drawing swoopy looking stuff and then translating those lines into balsa. A tri-motor? What ever made you think that there might ever be a tri-motor version of this? 

Any Questions??

Keith R

Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bill Little on February 16, 2011, 06:24:01 AM
A tri motor set up on electric would be just too cool.  I don't believe the wind would have much to say with the usable power that would be present.  And with the systems becoming "smarter" everyday, it appears, it would take more than a mild hurricane to ground the model! ;D

Great looking work, Brother!

"Mongo"
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Mark Scarborough on February 16, 2011, 09:21:00 AM
and with three props,, you could use smaller diameter props and still have MORE prop disk area,,
hmm that means an even lower slung undercarriage,, wo hoo, can you say low rider
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Larry Renger on February 16, 2011, 10:18:28 AM
I seem to have unleashed a Frankenfurter!   VD~
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: PerttiMe on February 16, 2011, 10:39:52 AM
Perhaps this is blasphemy but I was reminded of an Electric Twin R/C project I followed on rcgroups:
http://www.rcgroups.com/forums/showthread.php?t=1075719&page=23

Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on February 16, 2011, 11:31:24 AM
Isn't that a great looking RC twin? It's Mark Rettingers and I cut the wings for it! Yes, Mark and I spoke quite a bit about the similarities between our designs. They were both designed without either designer knowing of the work of the other. Mark is now selling plans for that ship and I have been chosen as the core supplier. Mark has several other very nice electric RC designs, including a nifty P-51. Yup, I cut the cores for that one too!  ;)

By the way, I've come up with a new name for my twin design. I'm going to call it (drum roll here please) "Second Wind."

Later - Bob Hunt
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: PJ Rowland on February 16, 2011, 03:05:29 PM
Second wind is a phenomenon in distance running, such as marathons or road running (as well as other sports), whereby an athlete who is too out of breath and tired to continue suddenly finds the strength to press on at top performance with less exertion. Some scientists believe the second wind to be a result of the body finding the proper balance of oxygen to counteract the buildup of lactic acid in the muscles. Others claim second winds are due to endorphin production, while still others believe it to be purely psychological.


Sounds like a great name to me.

3 x Prop version? I think you do a twin then progess to 4.. No baby steps.
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Dean Pappas on February 16, 2011, 03:33:06 PM
Wait a cotton-pickin' minute here!
I thought the whole point of the twin was to eliminate the trim problems caused by spiral airflow and GP with couterrotating props.
A trimotor ... SIGH n~

later,
  Dean P.

Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on February 16, 2011, 05:14:19 PM
Yeah, all that PJ said, and the fact that the twin has two motors and makes twice the amount of "wind." Twin motor; second wind... These things are never good when you have to explain them.

I thought when I first started designing it that it looked a bit like the COIN fighters from the Vietnam era and so floated the name COIN Return around. Man, nobody got that one!

Later - Bob Hunt 
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: PJ Rowland on February 20, 2011, 04:44:29 PM
Like this you mean??

(http://i56.tinypic.com/28rjd5i.jpg)

Would have been a very essoteric name - Second wind is cool.

Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on February 21, 2011, 07:17:38 AM
Hi PJ:

Yup, that's one of them. I had in mind the OV-10A Bronco when I thought of COIN fighters. I used to watch them fly around everyday when I was in the Army back in 1968. Very neat ships and the future will most certainly see an OV-10A derivative design for electric.

I got the spinners from Tru-Turn and they are beautiful! Very light and one of them has prop cutouts for a pusher prop and the other is cut for a standard rotation prop. I mounted the motors in the nacelles last night but did not get the nose rings cut and mounted. Hopefully I'll get to that tonight and then I'll post some photos of the blocks being fit to the nacelles for carving.

Later - Bob 
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: John Miller on February 21, 2011, 09:45:51 AM
Hey Bob, this project just seems to get better and better. I really like what you're doing. I'm soo looking forward to the flight reports on this one. I hope to be able to see it perform. Have you considered a trip to the NW Regionals? HIHI%%

I also plan on gleaning as much info, from you, on electric twins, for my next Twin PF.

Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on February 21, 2011, 11:30:29 AM
Hi John:

Thanks for the comments. I don't know how much I'll be able to help with twin technology. We could both learn a bunch from Gordan Delaney however... y1 I sure loved the way his Profile Pathfinder Twin flew!

Here's a shot or two of the nacelles with the motors mounted and the spinners on. I have not yet made the nose rings. Hopefully I'll get to that tonight.

Later - Bob
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: John Miller on February 21, 2011, 01:16:03 PM
Sharp Bob, It's looking good.

It's my good fortune that I live just down the road from both Gordan and Norm. What I hope to learn from you are settings, more towards the motors, and batteries, some esoteric  things like which is the best way to set up the counter-rotation, lefty-righty, or righty, lefty.

So far, all the twins I've flown have the props both rotating CCW. So my interest is high on the outcome, knowing how those previous twins have performed with them both going the same way. I'm hoping that my long held assumption that at our sizes, counter rotation is of little benifit, is false #^.
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Dave Adamisin on February 21, 2011, 01:43:05 PM
Wait a cotton-pickin' minute here!
I thought the whole point of the twin was to eliminate the trim problems caused by spiral airflow and GP with couterrotating props.
A trimotor ... SIGH n~

later,
  Dean P.


The center motor just needs a C-rot prop. Simple?? Yes I am.....
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Howard Rush on February 21, 2011, 01:45:46 PM
I sure loved the way his Profile Pathfinder Twin flew!

Me too!
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Tim Stagg on February 21, 2011, 03:06:45 PM
e-flite 10's huh Bob....I thought I was the only e-flite motor user out there, let me know how they work out for ya

Tim
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on February 21, 2011, 04:58:11 PM
Hi Tim:

Yup! That's what Deano said to use and that's what I'm doing. I wanted to use the Park 480 motors but the shaft size is so small in diameter (3mm) that we thought they might bend under the maneuvering loads of CL Stunt. Perhaps we can convince Pete Bergstrom to have a word with the fine folks at Horizon and get a version of the Park 480 with a 5mm shaft... Pete, you out there? Pete? Pete?

Actually E-Flite and Horizon have been extremely accommodating to us recently. Pete asked me about spinners recently. He wanted to know what sizes and styles that I thought the CL community might like. Not too long after that I received a few very nice spinners that had the collet mount assembly neatly built into the backplate of them. Outstanding quality! I'm quite certain that we will have a new product announcement about these spinners very soon. I know that I'm using the 1 3/4 - inch diameter spinner that he sent on my new Crossfire!

I have also tried the E-Flite Power 25 as an alternative to the AXI 2826-10 and it works extremely well. Again, the new Crossfire will have one of these Power 25 motors in the nose.

Later - Bob
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Larry Renger on February 22, 2011, 09:23:13 AM
gorillabobsrc.com has counter-rotating motor systems in a couple of sizes....  VD~
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Jim Pollock on February 24, 2011, 10:40:39 AM
And,

I'm supposing Bob's motors will be counter-rotating as well - right Bob???

Jim Pollock   ;D
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on February 24, 2011, 11:43:28 AM
Hi Jim:

Yup! I'll have them setup to turn opposite to each other in either of the two directions. I can test all four possible combinations (both turning to the left, both turning to the right, outboard turning left and inboard turning right and outboard turning right and inboard turning left) at the field and make comparisons. Should be fun!

Later - Bob
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Howard Rush on February 24, 2011, 12:46:00 PM
It will be even more fun when you get the props mixed up and take off. 
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Darkstar1 on February 24, 2011, 12:48:48 PM
Bob
Does E-flite plan to have spinner cutouts for pusher props for sizes up to 2.5 in.
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on February 24, 2011, 01:27:56 PM
Hi Darrell:

I'm not sure just how many sizes and shapes they will offer. I know that they have a 1 3/4-inch conical and a 2-inch bullet with the reverse pitch openings because Pete sent me one of each of those for evaluation and use. Again, they are absolutely beautiful and have the collet mount built right into the backplate. I assume that they will also have normal backplates for those who are using rear-mount motors.

I'll ask Pete what other sizes and shapes they intend to make the next time I speak with him.

Thanks for taking care of Tom Hampshire while he was down there; he said he had a great time with you and Frank Williams.

Later - Bob
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Larry Renger on February 25, 2011, 07:55:30 AM
How about contra-rotating motor systems for both nacelles.  No need to experiment then!   >:D  S?P  VD~  LL~
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on February 25, 2011, 10:26:35 AM
One thing at a time, Larry... Trust me, we've thought of your suggestion and a lot more configurations as well quite a while back. Electric flight allows us to innovate in design at a whim, but the best results should be attained by taking the next logical step and finding any of the potential pitfalls as we go. We can then design the next "outrageous" thing with a lot of confidence that it will be sucessful on the first try. Baby steps... (Just like in the movie "What about Bob").

Later - Bob 
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Keith Renecle on March 04, 2011, 01:12:43 AM
Hi Bob, I need to come back to my question that I asked earlier about how do you work out how much power to use on twins or multiple engined stunters. I seem to remember that Dean also said he would give it some thought. Your choice of E-Flite Power 10 motors seems like a good idea. When I checked the specs out on their website, they rate them as .10 glow engines. In C/L terms there is no way that these motors could be rated this way. They weigh 120 grams or so, and the size windings etc. indicate that they would at least be equivalent to a .25 to .30 glow engine.

PW's bomber used 4 x FP.15's but there is no way that multiplying this out to be a single .60 would fly a 2.8 kg. bomber. So, once again, it would be nice to know how you work this out. Maybe Howard has this figured??

Just by the way, what size props did you finally decide to use? Thanks.

Keith R
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: PJ Rowland on March 06, 2011, 02:27:25 AM
I dont know exactly what the formular is either..


Spitfire was : 6417 Lbs

Lancaster :  Empty 36,900 lbs, Maximum Takeoff 68,000

Both aircraft used the Merlin engine..

6417 X 5.6 = 36000

I just weighed a little model built for an OS 19 called an Aerobat. Typical 22 "  That weighs 20.5 OZ.
Doing the same maths
20.5 x 5.6 = 114 oz

So in theory that is the same power to weigh to lifting ratio..  - I don't have the required aerodynamic knowledge to explain why - once you go to 4 engines you can carry more weight that you think - and Yes your correct ..

4 x 15 = 60 and there is no way a 60 would pull around a 110oz aircraft.

The Lancaster proved the similar concept - running 4 x 19 = 76 and mine was heavier at 118 - 120 oz Interesting enough - Like PW - I found you can still do maneouvers on 3 engines - 8's squares ect..

The model will also fly on 1 engine - well - staying airborne is flying ..


Perhaps some of the more learned folk out there can expain the answer - Both bombers proved what the full sized counterparts found, that you can carry more weight. - I've read reports that the Lancaster was quite nimble in the air - I found the same - quite surprising..


I've never dabbled in twins - so I am also keen to read the expected answer into how do you select the engine size - and is it a similar ratio for twins as it is for 4's??

Does the math's halve when you run a twin..

Instead of 5.6 times - its reduced to 2.8 ?

Loaded weight: 17,700 lb Mosquito
6417  Spitfire

6417 x 2.8 = 17 967

Interesting............  y1

Going on that theory, im sure you can calculate what you would require.






Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Keith Renecle on March 06, 2011, 05:53:24 AM
Interesting data........thanks PJ.
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Mark Scarborough on March 07, 2011, 10:00:21 AM
I am NOT Bob, but I have thought about twins, ( and more) Were I to want to calculate this, My technique would be simply to look at the watts available for power. Pretty easy with electrics
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Dean Pappas on March 07, 2011, 10:02:15 PM
Hello Gang,
Hello Keith,
The more things progress, the more the basics don't change!
Stunters require between 0.6 and 0.7 Watt-hours of energy per ounce of weight to fly the entire schedule. An additional 33% of energy capacity is needed so that the battery is only 75% depleted.
Soo, if Bob builds the COIN/Second Wind/Passed Wind at 58 ounces, then it will require 37.7 Watt-hours to fly the schedule. (I used 0.65)
If he runs a 4S pack at 14.4V then this will result in 2.6 Amp-hours of consumption over 6 minutes. The average current will be 26Amps because 6 minutes is 1/10 hour.
The battery should be 3.5 Amp-hour capacity for safe margin, but some of us will be tempted to run the 3.3 Amp-hour battery at 80% capacity for the weight savings.

One prop ... two props ... three props with contra rotation thrown in, it's simply an energetics problem.
The plane and lines offer drag which depends largely on lap time, and the motor has to drag the ship's weight to the top of the circle the customary number of times per schedule.
Okay, contra-rotating prop assemblies would offer an improvement in efficiency!

Sorry if the math is boring,
  Dean
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: john e. holliday on March 20, 2011, 09:52:34 AM
Bobby is so great.  I talked to him at VSC a little.  Too many people at times to converse.  He told me he is completely sold on electric.   I guess being able to fly in the neighborhood at 0700 hours is good.  Yes he won Classic again and after the banquet he stated he was told to not bring the same plane again.   I think he said it was 9 years old.   After my experience again with needle settings maybe electric might be the way to go for all out competition.   But, I still like the sound of a good engine run in stunt.  I was kind of startled when the electric entry in Classic cast a shadow as it flew over head(really I was outside the circle).  I didn't even hear the prop noise.  But, Bob asked if I had been keeping up on this twin build.  That is why I am here reading it again on Sunday morn before Church.  Also waiting for the final result of his Oosama plane(chech spelling)  could be Usaama.    He is a power house and his little talk after receiving the Keeper Of The Flame Award was inspiring.   
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Ward Van Duzer on March 25, 2011, 12:50:30 PM
yep Doc,

It was "USA" on the inboard wing, and "AMA" on the outboard!

W.
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Howard Rush on March 27, 2011, 10:38:23 AM
Bobby is so great.  I talked to him at VSC a little.  Too many people at times to converse.  He told me he is completely sold on electric.   I guess being able to fly in the neighborhood at 0700 hours is good.  Yes he won Classic again and after the banquet he stated he was told to not bring the same plane again.   I think he said it was 9 years old.   After my experience again with needle settings maybe electric might be the way to go for all out competition.   But, I still like the sound of a good engine run in stunt.  I was kind of startled when the electric entry in Classic cast a shadow as it flew over head(really I was outside the circle).  I didn't even hear the prop noise.  But, Bob asked if I had been keeping up on this twin build.  That is why I am here reading it again on Sunday morn before Church.  Also waiting for the final result of his Oosama plane(chech spelling)  could be Usaama.    He is a power house and his little talk after receiving the Keeper Of The Flame Award was inspiring.   

It's Bob that doesn't cast a shadow.  You didn't see him near any mirrors, did you?  Same deal; he doesn't show up in mirrors. 
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on March 29, 2011, 06:45:53 AM
Hi Howard:

That might have something to do with my cousin, Bram Stoker... :-\

Bob Hunt

PS: Thanks, Doc, for the kind words. Was great to see you again in Tucson. - Bob
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on April 04, 2011, 10:44:15 AM
Okay, VSC is over and I'm getting caught up on wing orders at RVP, so it's time to get back to the electric twin, Second Wind!

I've fitted the blocks to the nacelles and even carved and sanded the top blocks on each nacelle. The bottom blocks were tack glued on last night and I carved and sanded one of them to near final shape. The other one was left un-carved to show the sequence of the work.

I cut the intake shape pieces from 1/64 plywood and then glued them permanently to the front of the cowl and right on the center line. I carve and sand to conform to the ply pieces and then remove the blocks and hollow them out and then open the hole in the plywood pieces and leave about a 1/32-inch wall to hold the edge of the opening and keep it clean. I should be able to get all of that done tonight.

I couldn't resist placing the nacelles in their approximate position of the wing for a mock-up photo or two. Seeing what it is going to look like keeps me going!

Enjoy the photos – Bob Hunt 
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Airacobra on April 04, 2011, 12:52:22 PM
I love to catch up on this thread Bob. I am excited to see each progression you make on this bird and I can't wait to see the final product. It certainly won't be your average stunter that's for sure.
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on April 04, 2011, 01:55:35 PM
Thanks, Keith:

Yeah, I'll be very upset if someone asks me if it's a modified Nobler... :-\

Bob
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Mark Scarborough on April 04, 2011, 03:54:25 PM
Thanks, Keith:

Yeah, I'll be very upset if someone asks me if it's a modified Nobler... :-\

Bob
anybody in their right mind can see that its a modified fancherized twister,, I mean come on! really,, sheesh,,,, LL~

seriously, it looks really sharp
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Matt Colan on April 04, 2011, 05:05:11 PM
Looking absolutely FANTASTIC Bob!!!!  Keep the pictures coming!
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Dennis Adamisin on April 04, 2011, 05:22:09 PM
Boldly going where no one has gone before...
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Tom Niebuhr on April 04, 2011, 05:46:00 PM
It's a twin. So, it is obviously a modified DC-3!

Looking great Bob. Keep the pictures coming.
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on April 04, 2011, 06:05:33 PM
"Boldly going where no one has gone before..."

Yeah, kind of like Evil Knievel... right off a cliff!  :)

Seriously, thanks for the comments. The thing that really has me spooked is that this has been perhaps the easiest and most trouble free build I've had in years. I keep waiting for the other shoe to drop.

I just finished carving and sanding the other nacelle bottom block. The next step will be to hollow the blocks and permanently attach the nacelles to the wing. I'm going to cover the wings first with polyspan. I want the covering to run under the nacelles where they attach to the wing for added strength. I really wanted to use silkspan for covering but I don't trust the old stuff that I have to not be rotten (It's made from vegetable fiber you know...), and the new stuff just sucks! The next twin will be a foamer for sure so that I can cover the entire wing with thin balsa and not have to deal with any covering material except the .2 carbon mat.

Hopefully I'll be able to attach the nacelles to the wing by early next week. Then it's just a matter of gluing the hollowed top blocks on the nacelles and installing the retract mounts. After that I'll make the main gear struts and get the mains retracting through appropriate wheel well openings. Then I can install the strut into the nosewheel retract unit and set the proper angle of stance. After that I can open the lower front fuselage shell and get the nosewheel retracting properly through it. After that its just a matter of fitting the lower front shell to the fuselage properly, fitting the upper forward hatch properly and making the nose cone and fitting it. Sounds like a lot, but it should only take a few days after the nacelles are glued on.

Perhaps the biggest job will be making the fixture that will hold both nacelles in perfect alignment as they are fitted to the wing.

I'm learning a lot on this project and I've already sketched out the next twin. It will make this one look like a boxcar! ;)

Later - Bob    
 
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: PJ Rowland on April 05, 2011, 03:57:24 AM
Looking smooth..

Must be easy being bob hunt........ cruise out win the vsc for the hundredth time, float home, keep working on a simple little project, electric twin with full retract system, and be as cool as ice doing it.

Pure class all the way.  y1


When do you hope to :

A: Start the paint prep work
B: Have it buttoned up for Pre-flight ?


Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on April 05, 2011, 05:42:20 AM
Hi PJ:

Ouch! My sides are aching from laughing so much over your post. My publicist must be doing his job if that's the perception people have of me. "Cool as ice" has never been a phrase that has been attached to me at any point during my modeling career. Trust me, I'm a train wreck that just happens to keep wrecking in a productive direction. None of this stuff is easy or even planned; it just sort of happens. I'm stubborn to be sure.

I've been meaning to post a note about your Pit Bull. That's a great look. It has the appearance of compact power and I predict that it will start a new design trend. In fact, I've already started sketching a similar ship with my own touches. I will, of course, take full credit for it as an original "look."  >:D If we only had time to build all the cool stuff we dream up...

One thing I just have to build (probably next) is a Mig 3 that I designed in the early 1990's. It has a wicked look (sort of like the Pit Bull), but it really needs to be built with retracts to achieve the proper effect. The nose shape also cries out for an electric motor so that a big old cylinder head doesn't stick down and ruin the subtle and sleek contours there. With the advent of the E-Flite retracts and Will's new retract timer system that includes a retract sequencing function, this is a cinch. This will be, of course, a "What it should have looked like" semi-scale model, not an AL Rabe "Make it look as real as possible" approach. Of course the retracts also make possible a very slick looking F-105 Thunderchief with drop tanks... Not enough hours left before the finish line... :-[  

Every morning I get up and pinch myself just to be sure I'm really awake and that electric power for stunt was not just a dream. This is by far the most exciting development I've ever seen in the hobby. The possibilities are virtually endless. The challenge will be to be first in trying out each new configuration.

Later - Bob Hunt      
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: PJ Rowland on April 05, 2011, 10:38:37 AM
HAHA ;)

I'm not really that familiar with the retracts thing - interms of how they intergrate with a model - so It will be interesting to see how they work with your twin and to see them 1st hand.

The perception I get (about you ) is from seeing the work - it looks orderly, organized, clean and consise - with a very slow deliberate methodical approach. Like you have all the time in the world to get things done! - I havent even painted my Nats model yet and I feel Im the only one "behind"

Re: the Pitbull - Thanks :) - Its what dad is going to fly in advanced - he likes it - As i wrote - its basically a nobler slightly modified with more of today's thinking design wise.

Hey you can credit a new design revolution .... and steal that from me - after all I stole - blatently I might add the caprice colour scheme just in Green /gold  ;D

I often check out this thread - Seeing this ship fly at the Nats is certainly in my top 3 things I want to do a the Nats.

Keep it up ,you continue to inspire everyone.
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bill Little on April 07, 2011, 05:10:24 PM
Like I said before, Bob has finally worked out how to implement Einstein's theory of time......... it just slows down for him. ;D 

Watching this project (and knowing that it will be successful beforehand!) is a joy.  Everyone knows to look out when Bob gets dedicated to something. y1

Bill
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on April 19, 2011, 03:24:53 PM
I got a lot done this week on the “Second Wind” twin project. I finished carving and sanding the nacelles and hollowed the blocks. The main thing that has been on my mind throughout this project is how would I accurately mount the nacelles to the wing? I wanted to insure that they would be accurate to each other and also accurate in respect to the rest of the airframe.

In looking at the nacelles I realized that there was a rectangular opening at the bottom of the nacelle crutches. I figured that I could make rectangular pieces of foam onto which I could mount the nacelles and then in turn mount the foam rectangles to a base board in the correct location for perfect alignment to each other.

In order to insure that the thrust line was parallel to the centerline of the airplane I used the fixture pieces that I made to align the motor mount plates to the nacelles and blocked them up to the appropriate height and the angled scribed lines on the foam rectangles in the proper locations. Then I glued pieces of wood to the sides of the foam rectangles along those scribed lines. When all of that was done I could simply drop the nacelles onto the foam rectangles and the bottoms of the nacelle sides would rest atop the angled pieces of wood and hold the nacelles in perfect alignment.

Next I measured the width of the fuselage at the front and back of the wing and halved that dimension. I marked either side of the centerline on the fixture with those dimensions and also computed how far aft the back face of the wing trailing edge was from the rear face of the rearmost nacelle former. I scribed a pen line across the fixture at that point to allow me to adjust the top view “skew.”

I know all this sounds a bit complicated, but it is not. My friend, Buddy Wieder and I engineered and built this entire assembly fixture in about two hours and had the airframe sitting in place for a final fit. We adjusted the airframe as required and measured all around several times to insure that the entire airplane was in virtually perfect alignment. It was accurate all around to well within 1/64 inch.

I will now finish working on the nacelles by installing the lower front chin pieces with the cooling baffles and installing all the required holdowns to the lower removable nacelle pieces that will cover the retract units. I’ll even dope and carbon the nacelles before placing them atop the fixture pieces and realigning the airframe atop them for permanent assembly.

The accompanying photos should make all of this clear. Hey, this is fun!

Bob Hunt   
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on April 19, 2011, 03:30:42 PM
And, just to be fair, here's one with Buddy Wieder and the Second Wind. Buddy helped me in engineering and making the assembly fixture. It's not fair, however, as he has hair!  ''

Bob Hunt
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Dean Pappas on April 19, 2011, 03:32:24 PM
Atsa nice!
Glad to see you put Buddy to work!
  Dean
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Dave Adamisin on April 19, 2011, 03:37:29 PM
Hi Howard:

That might have something to do with my cousin, Bram Stoker... :-\

Bob Hunt

PS: Thanks, Doc, for the kind words. Was great to see you again in Tucson. - Bob

Stoker or Stroker??
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: wwwarbird on April 19, 2011, 06:16:17 PM
 Very cool plane Bob and it's looking great. Looks like most of the "hard" work is done. Glad to see your back on it. What's your timeframe goal to have it done?

 I also caught your Mig 3 mention above. I've always thought that plane would make a super cool model but yeah, gotta keep that sleek nose to have it look "right". y1
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: PJ Rowland on April 19, 2011, 06:23:41 PM
What's your timeframe goal to have it done?


4th July I would imagine :)  y1
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on April 19, 2011, 06:27:16 PM
Thanks for the kind words, Wayne. I'm hoping to be into finish by the end of next week. I'm pretty energized by getting past the problem of accurately mounting the nacelles. Hopefully I will be able to keep the juices flowing right on through finishing.

Phil Granderson gave me a great paint trimming idea that picks up many of the cues from my Genesis and Caprice schemes. Yes, there will be some bronze on it!  y1

The Mig 3 just may be the next one up on the bench, although I am starting to like the looks of twins! We'll see. If I do build the Mig, it will have retracts!

Later - Bob  
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: PJ Rowland on April 21, 2011, 06:01:26 AM
Twins are a great place to cut your teeth for the more serious multiengine stunters your 1/2 way there.

It looks GREAT - really really impressive- as far as design ,style and cues are concerned, its the best looking most stylish twin I've even seen. ( ive seen a few)


Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on April 21, 2011, 06:30:57 AM
Thanks, PJ, I think...

I'm pretty sure that I'll be happy to stay with twins for a while, although I have given some thought to a tri-motor set-up with counter-rotating props on the motors in the nacelles on the wing and contra-rotating props on two motors in the fuselage (four motors and four props...). Of course a dual pusher-puller contra-rotating setup on the wing (front and back...) one contra-rotating setup in the nose of the fuselage (if you are counting, that would be ten separate motors and props...) might be a doable option.

Yes, the men in the white coats are scheduled to arrive at any moment... n~

Later - Bob
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Crist Rigotti on April 21, 2011, 06:39:50 AM
Looking very good Bob. 
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: PJ Rowland on April 22, 2011, 07:15:28 PM
It was meant as a compliment....

Most twins I've seen were scale style jobs...... the french twin at the worlds.. windys' twin's - and a few other twins which escape my mind ( Gordon delaney perhaps... I cant QUITE recall.. ) I think it was called Too much - or Too trouble... Soryr for being vague on that.

What i mean was classical AMA Stunt ships have flowing lines and stylish cue's this is the first time I've seen a twin that takes its styling lines from classical ship shapes. - Very impressive.
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: wwwarbird on April 22, 2011, 07:43:18 PM

I'm pretty sure that I'll be happy to stay with twins for a while, although I have given some thought to a tri-motor set-up with counter-rotating props on the motors in the nacelles on the wing and contra-rotating props on two motors in the fuselage (four motors and four props...). Of course a dual pusher-puller contra-rotating setup on the wing (front and back...) one contra-rotating setup in the nose of the fuselage (if you are counting, that would be ten separate motors and props...) might be a doable option.

 I want to see someone try to launch that one! ;D
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on April 25, 2011, 08:56:43 AM
Okay, over the weekend I got a bit done on the Second Wind.

I decided to do as much as possible on the nacelles before installing them on the airframe. I figured that it is much easier to do intricate work on such small parts with them off the airplane. I installed the forward chin pieces with the airscoop openings completed (Done in the same manner as the cowling I used as an example in my recent MA CL Stunt column...), and applied three coats of dope to the nacelles. Last night I covered the nacelles with .2 carbon mat, applied with very this dope. This morning I lightly sanded the carbon and applied another coat of dope.

I put the nacelles onto the alignment fixture and slid the airframe in place for some progress report photos. Note the lower cowl pieces that are positioned in front of the airplane. Obviously, with the nacelles on the alignment fixture, I could not also install the cowl pieces. Trust me; they fit very nicely!

I also stuck on a rough template of the possible nose block shape. The jury is still out on that shape and size, and I will try several different shapes until one just "jumps out at me."

Both Phil Granderson and Steve Buso came to the rescue with some "good" 00 silkspan, and tonight I will cover the outer wing panels. As soon as they are covered and have had a few coats of dope applied, I'll permanently mount the nacelles and install the main gear retract mounts. The nose gear retract mount is already in.

After that it is just a matter of cutting a nose gear strut and wheel clearance hole in the lower nose shell and also cutting clearance holes for the main gear struts and wheels in the lower nacelle cowl blocks. The last things that will be required before all out finishing can proceed is to decide on a nose block shape and carve and hollow that and then fit the forward top access hatch with the simulated forward canopy section in place and install hold down magnets or screws. (I lean toward screws for added security...)

If all goes as planned, I'll be into finish by the weekend!

Later - Bob Hunt    
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on April 25, 2011, 09:06:53 AM
Here's one more photo of the carboned outboard nacelle. You can see the caowl opening shape in this shot.

Later - Bob
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: John Miller on April 25, 2011, 10:56:48 AM
Great build sequence Bob. I like your solution for aligning the nacells. You are absolutly corect in paying great attention to the alignments with multi engined stunters.

Gordan came up with a method for doing the alignment, that was slightly different, but worked fine. I don't think his twin would have flown as well if the alignments weren't right.  H^^
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on April 26, 2011, 07:10:32 AM
It was meant as a compliment....

Most twins I've seen were scale style jobs...... the french twin at the worlds.. windys' twin's - and a few other twins which escape my mind ( Gordon delaney perhaps... I cant QUITE recall.. ) I think it was called Too much - or Too trouble... Soryr for being vague on that.

What i mean was classical AMA Stunt ships have flowing lines and stylish cue's this is the first time I've seen a twin that takes its styling lines from classical ship shapes. - Very impressive.

Yup, I know it was a compliment; I just have a weird sense of humor - perhaps, warped is a better word...  %^@

I had the same feeling about twin design; I always thought that we could "stretch" classic stunt design cues onto a twin format. While this one is satisfying to me aesthetically, I have since come up with a few sketches for what I believe are far better looking examples of that notion. Alas, there are only so many hours in the day!

Looking forward greatly to our dinner at the Nats and to chatting with you about "stuff." 

I got the wing outer bays covered last night with "00" silkspan. I almost went the Polyspan route, but I was able to get some good, "old" silkspan, so I decided to just one more time go with "paper." It's a recapturing of youth kind of thing... :-\
 
By the way, my good friend, Rich Giacobone gave me a bunch of Kim Chi jars (Kim Chi is a type of Korean Cole Slaw) that have extremely wide openings. They are just perfect for our use as dope jars. It's very easy to fill the brush and clear the top of the jar.

Later - Bob   
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Allan Perret on April 26, 2011, 09:01:15 AM
Looks like some "seckret potion" you got in that there jar.

Seriously now, you use nitrate or buty to attach the carbon fibre ?  
Also can cf be worked around compound curve wingtips (and your nacells in this case), or do you have to piece it ?  
Would there be any benefit to putting a layer of cf on top of the silkspan, or is that a bad idea ?
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Crist Rigotti on April 26, 2011, 09:22:02 AM
Bob,
What's the little note pad for on the bottom of the holding fixture?
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on April 26, 2011, 09:23:17 AM
Hi Allan:

Well, I used to use nothing but nitrate dope to attach the carbon and the silkspan, but I had a bad batch or something one time and it scared me back to butyrate, and I've been very happy since. I do custom "adjust" the shrink of the butyrate with a plasticizer (I use Dave Brown's Flexall). That's a trick that Billy Werwage taught me...

I find that the carbon will go around a moderate compound curve, but will require slicing and overlaying if the curve gets too extreme. No worries as you can easily sand any overlap humps out. I like it way better than silkspan for solid surfaces for just that reason. If you overlap silkspan you will have a hard time making the surface smooth again with no overlaps showing.

I do not see any need to put CF over the silkspan on the covered wing. I do, however, carbon the entire wing prior to covering with silkspan. I remove the carbon from the open bay areas by sanding against the edges of the cap strips and the wing framing (LE and TE sheeting) to insure that there are no "sharp" edges that might later cut though the silkspan. The carbon adds very little in weight and it adds tremendous strength. I know that others do not believe that the carbon adds much strength. I feel that it adds a lot of torsional rigidity to the airframe. I also feel that all the planes I've covered with the .2 ounce carbon mat fly better in the wind than did models that I've owned that were not carbon covered. The carbon adds much stiffness.

Later - Bob Hunt  
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on April 26, 2011, 09:28:26 AM
Bob,
What's the little note pad for on the bottom of the holding fixture?

You are very observant, Crist!

I used to use this fixture to hold my electric Genesis Extreme at the field for changing batteries (it was a bottom loader then - I've since changed it to a top loader...). Back then I was using a proprietary timer/sequencer that Dean Pappas and Andy Kunz had designed. It had specific scripts that could be loaded loaded into it to time and sequence the motor run. The little pad was actually a clear plastic protector that allowed me to slip in a sheet of paper that contained the script that was currently in the plane. It was just a reminder.

With the advent of Will Hubin's wonderful timer and programmer, this is now not necessary. Thank you once again, Will!

Later - Bob Hunt  
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Crist Rigotti on April 26, 2011, 09:59:18 AM
Ahh, I see.  I usually keep notes on where I am in regards of how many coats of dope have been applied, etc.  The older I get the more notes I use.   H^^
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on April 26, 2011, 10:04:08 AM
Wow! That's a great idea! Now I can use that little protector again!

Bob
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Allan Perret on April 26, 2011, 12:26:54 PM
I do not see any need to put CF over the silkspan on the covered wing. I do, however, carbon the entire wing prior to covering with silkspan. I remove the carbon from the open bay areas by sanding against the edges of the cap strips and the wing framing (LE and TE sheeting) to insure that there are no "sharp" edges that might later cut though the silkspan. The carbon adds very little in weight and it adds tremendous strength. I know that others do not believe that the carbon adds much strength. I feel that it adds a lot of torsional rigidity to the airframe. I also feel that all the planes I've covered with the .2 ounce carbon mat fly better in the wind than did models that I've owned that were not carbon covered. The carbon adds much stiffness.
Later - Bob Hunt  
I was thinking a layer of cf on top of the silkspan would add a lot of puncture resistance for a small weight gain.  I recently got careless while handling one of my models and poked a hole in it, and it is covered with polyspan (regular)..      I tried the lite version of polyspan a while back after talking with you, but I didnt like it.  Took too many coats to get it filled, seemed like more work for little if any weight saving.   Why did you choose silkspan for the twin vs polyspan ? 
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on April 26, 2011, 01:38:47 PM
Hi Allan:

I'm pretty sure you would be sorry that you covered over silkspan or Polyspan with carbon. However, if you do try it and it works out for you, please report on it here!  y1

I used silkspan over Polyspan just because I've had good results with the "old" silkspan and wanted to do it just one more time. The new stuff just stinks! It is weaker than the old stuff and sags with each coat of dope. Yes, it usually pulls up tight, but it scares me.

New stuff: I just finished installing the nacelles permanently. Before I glued them on in the fixture that Buddy Wieder and I made, I opened the holes to access the balsa tube that is nestled in the leading edge of the cuffed section. I made the holes larger enough to allow an Ultra Deans connector to pass through easily. The wire harnesses for the motors and the main gear retracts will pass through these holes.

Tomorrow I can start installing the main gear retract mounts.

Getting close!  #^

Bob 
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Matt Colan on April 26, 2011, 03:42:24 PM
Bob this plane is so cool to read about and all the cool things about it!!!  I'm really anxious to hear how the gear are going to retract!  #^
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: John Paris on April 26, 2011, 05:02:29 PM
 
By the way, my good friend, Rich Giacobone gave me a bunch of Kim Chi jars (Kim Chi is a type of Korean Cole Slaw) that have extremely wide openings. They are just perfect for our use as dope jars. It's very easy to fill the brush and clear the top of the jar.

Later - Bob   

[/quote]

Bob,
That particular jar held a medium sized radish "kimchi".  A lot chunkier than cole slaw, plenty of spice and pretty delicious.
John
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on April 26, 2011, 05:19:12 PM
Hi Matt:

Thanks for the comments; I like seeing the photos of your new ship, too!

The retracts for this one are very simple. The mains retract forward into the nacelles and the wheel nestles just in front of and slightly below the leading edge. There is about 1/8 inch clearance between the wheel and the wing when retracted. The nose gear goes straight back. I will have narrow fairings on the gear legs to give them some shape (Nothing more unsightly than a piece of plain music wire sticking down...) and small doors that will fit into the opening after the gear is up.

The operation of the gear is simplicity itself, The E-Flite units are electric and have a motor attached to a worm gear. The Hubin 2-channel timer allows me to sequence the gear up around 10 seconds after full power-up and then extends them 5 seconds before the motors shut off. Dean Pappas and I had them working to perfection on the bench a few weeks back and they went up exactly on time and down exactly on time as programmed. They run off of the actual flight battery, so it's a matter of hook them up, sequence them and, well, forget them (at least that's the plan...).

Here's a shot of the bottom with the nacelles installed.

Later - Bob
    
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: wwwarbird on April 26, 2011, 06:12:04 PM
 Looking good Bob! It's always one of the most satisfying parts of a build when you're finally able to permanently attach the major components and it starts to look like an airplane. y1

 Maybe I missed it elsewhere, is that Polyspan on the open bays?
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on April 26, 2011, 06:21:14 PM
Hi Wayne:

You are sooooo right! It seems like this one took forever to come together, but it is now moving very quickly.

I used good old 00 silkspan to cover the open bays. I have two very good friends who sent me a few sheets each of the "good" stuff. (Thanks again to Phil Granderson and Steve Buso)

I'm done for tonight on the twin, but tomorrow morning I will make and fit the main gear retract mounts. Shouldn't take too many more sessions until I'm into full-blown finish mode.  <=

Later - Bob
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: wwwarbird on April 26, 2011, 06:29:42 PM
 10-4 Bob, I'll be watching. Even though it's "only" electric, it's still really cool! :## ;D :##

 I'm just taking a break myself at the moment between the final coats of clear on my Umland "Super Combat Streak", another satisfying step! y1
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Allan Perret on April 26, 2011, 06:58:38 PM
I'm pretty sure you would be sorry that you covered over silkspan or Polyspan with carbon.  
 
Why is that, because of the extra weight ?
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on April 26, 2011, 07:04:19 PM
I just don't think it would fill well and be sandable afterwards like it is when you put it on the airframe prior to covering with silkspan or Polyspan. I could be wrong...

Later - Bob 
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on April 26, 2011, 07:13:42 PM
By the way, I just weighed the airframe with the nacelles and the spinners on and the wing covered with silkspan and one coat of dope, and with the stabilizer, elevators and flaps covered with carbon... Drum roll here please... It weighs 25 ounces! I'm ecstatic!  #^

I'm on target at this point to have a 58 to 60 ounce ship, with the battery (fuel) on board! That's equivalent to a glow model at 52 to 54 ounces without fuel on board!  y1

Bob
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on April 27, 2011, 08:48:29 AM
Today I started in earnest in doping the wing to fill the silkspan. I found out something neat about twins: I can put the model inverted on the holder and brush a coat of dope on the bottom of a wing panel and then turn it over and let it sit on the table supported by the bottoms of the two nacelles and by the bottom of the ventral fin and brush a coat on the top of the same wing panel immediately, without having to hold the model with one hand while brushing with the other. I feel it is important to apply dope to both sides of a wing panel in rapid succesion to prevent any warps that may be induced by uneven drying.

Later - Bob
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Allan Perret on April 27, 2011, 11:22:51 AM
Thats cool.
What about when you get to the spraying stage,  you gonna set up a special holder ?
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on April 27, 2011, 11:26:22 AM
Actually, Buddy Wieder came up with a great idea for holding electric ships for spraying. He made a fixture that keys into the battery mount. The same idea will work on this ship as the battery is in the same place as it is in a single motor plane.

Later - Bob
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Howard Rush on April 27, 2011, 07:41:53 PM
That is a great idea.  Thanks.
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: PJ Rowland on April 27, 2011, 09:31:02 PM
25 oz...

Im shocked as to how you manage to get it down that low...

I stuggle to get sub 60oz Ships consistantly. - I know what i add in finish, which is normal but WOW 25 oz airframe is incredbile...

Maybe over dinner you can share your tips :) - I look forward. - Back to sanding for me..
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on April 27, 2011, 09:43:55 PM
Hi PJ:

Remember, that is the airframe weight with the wing covered and the nacelles attached and the spinners taped in place. My projected all-up weight with the battery on board (In the same state as a glow powered plane with a full tank of fuel on board...) is 58 to 59 ounces. Take away a nominal 6 ounces that would be the weight of the glow fuel required for this ship and it would weigh 52 to 53 ounces. Still quite light I think.

I have always been a light builder. My influences in building were also known as light builders. I grew up around Red Reinhardt and Larry Scarinzi, and they were two of the lightest builders of all time. I guess some of it wore off on me.

The fact that the Second Wind has a Warren Truss built-up wing with molded leading edges, and all molded fuselage shells might have something to do with the light weight. I also have a selection of very light wood... That might also be a factor!

I did not get to the retract mounts today, but I'll get the gear issues done over the weekend and be ready to button up the front end with a nose cone and properly fit the canopy/hatch with holdowns. After that it is sand and dope and prime and paint. It will be done in time to get some practice before the Nats!

Later - Bob  
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on May 01, 2011, 08:46:24 PM
I didn't get as much done this weekend as I had hoped to, but I did get the main retract gear mounts made and fit. I made supports from 3/16 inch thick balsa and epoxied them to the sides of the nacelles where the main gear mount plates will reside. Next I cut the mount plates from 1/8-inch birch ply and fit the gear to them and marked the mount holes for drilling. I mounted the blind nuts and cut recesses to clear them in the balsa supports. I'll seal the wood beneath the mount plates with a thin coat of epoxy resin and then glue the mount plates in permanently tomorrow.

The following photos show today's work...

By the way, the holes in the back of the nacelles will be fitted with simulated turboprop exhaust pipes that will serve as air outlets. I think that will look neat!  #^

Later - Bob Hunt
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Howard Rush on May 01, 2011, 11:01:23 PM
Twins and retracts.  I'm so far behind.
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on May 02, 2011, 05:52:17 AM
When the wheels go up
Scores should erupt
But they’ll say I’m a clown
If they don’t come down

Bob Hunt <=
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: PJ Rowland on May 02, 2011, 07:14:36 AM
Twins and retracts
Im so far behind
I paint my plane orange
for the Judges I blind.

Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Tim Wescott on May 02, 2011, 09:27:36 AM
When the wheels go up
Scores should erupt
But they’ll say I’m a clown
If they don’t come down
If the judges were managing to be completely objective, retracts would only make a difference in as much as they affect the aerodynamics of flight (and if they make it worse -- oops).  I suspect that if you get any points from the "wow" factor, it'll wear off as the judges get used to seeing the wheels go up.

I'm sure you're already thinking about this, but it sure seems that you'd want to think carefully about when you want the gear to go up.  Too soon and the "wow" factor is of entirely the wrong kind.  Too late and you don't get nearly as much "wow" as you'd like.  Just right, from a purely aesthetic point of view, would be to start a slow retract right as the wheels leave the ground -- but that really flirts with 'too soon' if anything delays takeoff.

I'd be concerned with the retracts messing up the airflow when I'm trying to achieve a smooth takeoff and level flight (actually, I'm a rank beginner -- I can't reliably achieve level flight yet, so retracts would just give me something to blame other than myself).  At worst, you could time things so that the wheels went up after your two laps of level flight, but that would certainly remove a lot of the "wow".  At best, any bobbles from the wheels going up would be slow, and could be timed for the climb phase of the takeoff where they'd hopefully get subsumed in the overall climb.
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Crist Rigotti on May 02, 2011, 10:40:56 AM
Trust me, Bob will have them go up at precisely the right time, every time.   BW@
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on May 03, 2011, 08:20:57 PM
If the judges were managing to be completely objective, retracts would only make a difference in as much as they affect the aerodynamics of flight (and if they make it worse -- oops).  I suspect that if you get any points from the "wow" factor, it'll wear off as the judges get used to seeing the wheels go up.

I'm sure you're already thinking about this, but it sure seems that you'd want to think carefully about when you want the gear to go up.  Too soon and the "wow" factor is of entirely the wrong kind.  Too late and you don't get nearly as much "wow" as you'd like.  Just right, from a purely aesthetic point of view, would be to start a slow retract right as the wheels leave the ground -- but that really flirts with 'too soon' if anything delays takeoff.

I'd be concerned with the retracts messing up the airflow when I'm trying to achieve a smooth takeoff and level flight (actually, I'm a rank beginner -- I can't reliably achieve level flight yet, so retracts would just give me something to blame other than myself).  At worst, you could time things so that the wheels went up after your two laps of level flight, but that would certainly remove a lot of the "wow".  At best, any bobbles from the wheels going up would be slow, and could be timed for the climb phase of the takeoff where they'd hopefully get subsumed in the overall climb.

Hi Tim:

My little poem was meant as humor, not as a prediction as to what the judges might like. I've been competing in this event for more than 45 years and well know how judges think. I've judged more than 10 Nats and/or FAI Team Trials as well, so I'm familiar with what judges think from that perspective as well. Judges are impressionable, just like anyone else, but there is no telling just what might impress them... I'm doing the twin for personal reasons and because I believe that it may offer many distinct advantages from a flying perspective. That may yield a better pattern, and I do think that judges might be impressed by that.

I've been toying with the idea of retracts since 1976. I actually started building my Nats ship (The Genesis 46 Mk III that ultimately did win that Nats...) with retracts. My father, James A. Hunt, voiced some of the same concerns that you mentioned.  I've recently been working on a book about the Genesis series of airplanes and that story is included in the text of that book. Instead of retyping it here, I'll just drop that segment in here now:

Excerpt from Genesis book:

The really great thing about CL Stunt is that there is always a next season. The great thing about CL Stunt people is that they are always willing to give you another chance. The really great thing about a bad plane is the fact that you can build a new, better one!

And that's just what I did. Over the winter of 1975-’76 I evaluated my entire program and decided that my basic design airplane was good. I just needed to execute every aspect of the program with more thought, energy, commitment and enthusiasm. The enthusiasm part almost got out of control…

I decided to make a real statement and put retractable landing gear in my 1976 Genesis 46 Mk III. This decision was made after talking with my father about practical methods of triggering the retraction and extension of the gear in a two-wire CL system. We discussed some pretty wild and outlandish systems, but then he hit on one that really sounded doable.

Dad told me about bi-metal switches. The idea was to use a bi-metal switch that would be located in the muffler (remember, this was way before we had tuned pipes…). As soon as the engine was started the bi-metal switch would separate or close, depending on how it was setup, and the signal would be given to a servo to retract the landing gear. Of course we would need a delay in the system to allow the model to become airborne before the retraction process would begin and he suggested a simple pullout Free Flight type timer switch to do this. So, all the pilot would have to do is signal the holder to start the timer and launch the plane. When the FF timer bottomed, the circuit to the servo would be completed and the gear would go up. At the end of the flight the engine would shut off and hence the heat source that was keeping the bi-metal switch closed would be gone, and the bi-metal would click in the other direction, reversing the circuit and extending the gear. I know, it sounded a bit complicated to me at first too, but I soon bought into the concept when my father demonstrated how quickly a bi-metal set would heat up and trigger and how fast it would reverse when the heat was removed. I was sold!

Dad even designed our own retractable landing gear units. They were based on very light aluminum frames and a simple but positive toggle lock system. This was used to insure they would not try to extend during flight do to “G” loads. 

I went to work making a foam wing core for the new Genesis and devised an accurate mounting system in which I installed 1/8-inch thick Lite-Ply half ribs from the leading edge back to the full-depth spar at the high point of the wing. These ribs had a “land” cut into them to accept a landing gear mount plate. The thought was to capture the retractable landing gear units in a strong structure. Up to that point we had all been gluing a section of the front core piece back into the wing and simply sinking a landing gear block into that piece of foam with a lot of epoxy to hold it in place. That system was heavy, weak and messy. I wanted something that was strong, simple, light, accurate and easy to repeat. That was the first use of the landing gear mounting system that became the norm in the following years for use in foam core CL wings by all of the manufacturers in the United States.

In those days I was covering my wing cores with .045 (3/64) balsa sheeting. I had saved some very light sheeting for this ship and it paid off; it was an extremely light wing! I also continued the use of foam flaps that were cut as a one piece unit with the foam wing core and then covered along with the wing core. Of course the actual sheeting that was used on the flap had the grain running parallel to the leading edge of the flap. The wing’s sheeting ran parallel to the leading edge of the wing core.

I had the wing complete and ready to install in the fuselage when someone asked me if there would be enough drag with the landing gear retracted to prevent the model from “whipping up.” I hadn’t even given that any thought. I decided to take the landing gear out of the 1975 Genesis 46 MkII and have my dad hand-launch it over some lush grass at the field so that when I landed it there would be no chance of scratching the finish.

Well, the first thing I noticed when the plane was airborne was that it flew as if it weighed many ounces less than it actually did. I had felt this to a point years earlier when I flew profile models with the gear off, but this larger ship without the gear was an eyeopening experience. It also turned absolutely equally in both directions and was much easier to transition in the intersections of the figure eight maneuvers. Over all it just flew much, much better than it did with the normal landing gear attached. I was giddy; right up to the point when we flew it in some significant wind without the landing gear. Then the model demonstrated a lot of acceleration in maneuvers. And, that was the deciding factor in scraping the idea of retractable landing gear until we could come up with a method of keeping the model from speeding up when the gear is up. Oh well…

But wait; the wing had already been made to accept the retract units! That’s when I came up with the landing gear plate system that I’m still using to this day in my personal wings and in the wings I produce commercially. The old system had the groove for the landing gear wire exposed along the exterior of the wing, more or less like the systems seen in RC sport planes. The torsion portion of the wire ran in the exposed groove and then bent upwards into the wing where it was anchored in a maple “spur” block. A pair of metal or nylon straps held the wire in place in the grooved block. The new rib system allowed me to install a recessed plate that had a groove running down its center. The same type of anchor spur block was used, but now it could be designed to not only sit atop the plate, but also butt up against the Lite-Ply rib, giving it a tremendous amount of strength with even less weight than with the old system. An added benefit was that now I could craft a form-fitting cover plate and make the entire system virtually invisible. It was lighter, stronger, and more attractive than the old way of doing it. And, it was actually discovered/developed by accident! That’s what I call serendipity. (end)


I hope the above story was entertaining and even instructional about how much thought and research go into new technologies.

Later - Bob Hunt
 
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Howard Rush on May 03, 2011, 10:03:02 PM
I should introduce you guys.  Bob, meet Tim. Tim, Bob.  Bob is a former US National and World stunt champ.  He also either built a good chunk of our airplanes or taught us how to do it ourselves.  Bob is a good guy.  Tim is an electrical engineer who does motor control systems for a living.  We are learning things from him, too.  Tim is also a good guy. 
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Tim Wescott on May 04, 2011, 01:14:44 AM
It sure seems that with a wide selection motors and props, that you should be able to get more braking in he down lines.  You may need to go with some combination that's too aggressive at braking when the gear is down.

And I didn't want to say anything that would stop you: I'm just mentioning points that you may have not yet pondered, or have skipped over lightly.
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Howard Rush on May 04, 2011, 03:52:46 AM
It sure seems that with a wide selection motors and props, that you should be able to get more braking in he down lines.  You may need to go with some combination that's too aggressive at braking when the gear is down.

And I didn't want to say anything that would stop you: I'm just mentioning points that you may have not yet pondered, or have skipped over lightly.

Since that experience in 1976, Bob pioneered tuned pipes in stunt planes.  Now he's known for having one of the best regulated electric powerplants.  He'll be OK if he doesn't get the polarity on the props and motors mixed up:

motor 1 rotation   motor 2 rotation   prop 1  prop 2  outcome
        L                       L                  L         L         OK
        L                       L                  L         R         bad
        L                       L                  R         L         bad
        L                       L                  R         R         bad
        L                       R                  L         L         bad
        L                       R                  L         R         good
        L                       R                  R         L         bad
        L                       R                  R         R         bad  
        R                       L                  L         L         bad
        R                       L                  L         R         bad
        R                       L                  R         L         good
        R                       L                  R         R         bad
        R                       R                  L         L         bad
        R                       R                  L         R         bad
        R                       R                  R         L         bad
        R                       R                  R         R         OK

I wouldn't risk it.
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: John Witt on May 05, 2011, 12:00:15 AM
Just feel for breeze in the right direction behind each engine, then let go. <=

John
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on May 05, 2011, 05:44:25 AM
Yeah, John, that's pretty much my plan for the first flight!  ;D

Bob
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Dean Pappas on May 05, 2011, 07:47:52 AM
Actually, Bob is just covering up our efforts at creating the first Stealth Heli-Stunter. :!

In a semi-reenactment of Bob and Jim Hunt's efforts back in '76, I created a one-off control system that would control retracts via the lines but without having to insulate them. We called it FRED for Functional Retracts Eliminate Drag.
Right after Toledo in '89, I drove to Werwage's place and we spent 36 almost nonstop hours cutting retrcats into his old Tiger 46 powered Blue Max (really just another USA-1). Cutting Retract wells into an I-beamer was a joy! A few weekends later Bob, Bill and i flew the ship in turbulent air and the results were similarly astounding. We never had runway wind conditions to fly in, and the entire program was put on the back burner before they were available.
Regards,
Dean P.
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Randy Cuberly on May 05, 2011, 05:24:18 PM
I didn't get as much done this weekend as I had hoped to, but I did get the main retract gear mounts made and fit. I made supports from 3/16 inch thick balsa and epoxied them to the sides of the nacelles where the main gear mount plates will reside. Next I cut the mount plates from 1/8-inch birch ply and fit the gear to them and marked the mount holes for drilling. I mounted the blind nuts and cut recesses to clear them in the balsa supports. I'll seal the wood beneath the mount plates with a thin coat of epoxy resin and then glue the mount plates in permanently tomorrow.

The following photos show today's work...

By the way, the holes in the back of the nacelles will be fitted with simulated turboprop exhaust pipes that will serve as air outlets. I think that will look neat!  #^

Later - Bob Hunt


Incredible stuff Bob.  I wonder where stunt would be without the innovators like you.  Thanks for keeping things moving forward, even though it does create a little envy!
Personally I expect great things from your current effort.

Randy Cuberly
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Howard Rush on May 05, 2011, 06:58:03 PM
Personally I expect great things from your current effort.

But you know how Bob gets hot when his current effort meets with resistance.
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on May 05, 2011, 09:30:14 PM
Thanks, Randy!

It's been fun, and putting the photos up with a running log of the work has kept me going with the project when sometimes all I wanted to do is kick back and relax.

Howard, your comments make me Ohm sick... :'(

Bob <=
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: PJ Rowland on May 05, 2011, 10:18:28 PM
Come on guys, Bob needs Positive comments, Negative ones dont help.  ;)

I dont blame you Bob, Id want to relax also with all of this verbal battery from your fellow fliers.

You have the capacity to make this project amazing.

Your conduct in staying on track is most admirable.

Phase 1 : Conception
Phase 2 : Build

Now your so close to PHASE 3 - Paint.

I think you might have an un farad vantage flying Second wind

My resistance to post further in this thread has been overcome by my capacitance to reason clearly.


Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: wwwarbird on May 11, 2011, 09:45:20 PM
 Watt's up Bob? ;D
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on May 12, 2011, 10:43:47 AM
Well, it looks like real life is going to win another one and keep me from finishing the twin on schedule to go to the Nats with it this year. I teach Motorcycle Safety and our classes are overflowing this year due to the gas price crunch. It seems that everybody wants a Motorcycle License to allow them to buy a small and fuel efficient bike for commuting and for errands. That's actually a very bad reason to buy a bike... Anyway, I'm teaching people to ride mornings, evenings and weekends. Add to that my foam wing work schedule and there is no time available to me to work on my own stuff. I guess I could give up sleep, but I'm already sort of doing that!

I will not ruin this ship by rushing it to finish. I'll finish up and fly my new Crossfire instead this year and work on the twin for next year's Nats. I should be able to put on a well detailed and glossy finish with that much time to work with.

I feel really bad about not getting it done, but, on the other hand, it is a fun project and I don't see a need to rush it. I'm enjoying the build! y1 

Later - Bob Hunt
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: wwwarbird on May 12, 2011, 06:41:13 PM
 Sounds wise to me. y1 How about a pic of the Crossfire?
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: PJ Rowland on May 12, 2011, 06:42:36 PM
Dissapointing... I wonder If its too late for me to refund me airline ticket......


I thought the crossfire was at the same stage of finish?
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bill Little on May 15, 2011, 11:10:44 AM
Hi Bob,

Bummer, but you know what's best and we all know that not rushing the project at this late stage is best.  It will still be an awesome plane when finished!  And you will have a great deal more time to get it all sorted out before next years NATS, that's for sure.  You should be well settled into the plane by next year.  It would have definitely been a time crunch to get it ready and you probably would not have had much time to really get the trim and other dealings with the set up, etc., really worked out.  Good Luck with the Crossfire!

Bill
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Tim Wescott on May 15, 2011, 12:12:42 PM
It seems that everybody wants a Motorcycle License to allow them to buy a small and fuel efficient bike for commuting and for errands. That's actually a very bad reason to buy a bike...
I sometimes consider buying a motorcycle for just that reason, then I reflect on the fact that I have totaled not one, but two bicycles by rear-ending cars and I change my mind.

I doubt that I'll make it to the nats before your twin is worn out, so when you get it flying would you please post a movie or two -- maybe one walk-around, and another flying?
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Air Ministry . on May 18, 2011, 02:55:43 AM
I guess youd run two throttle settings for take-off then ' gear up ' . to keep speed even ?

A rubber Turbo Goose (Gruman) and the P-38 Lockheed run the props opposite to initial logic ,
i.e. std rotation inboard , L.H. outboard .I guess it gives favourable bias on rear stabilisor, when
its set above thrust line .

Now I guess there going to allow timers for Gas Engines , or you guys will need to fly till your
batteries run out . :!, otherwise its not gonna be a ' level playing field . !  <= or we'll all need
to fit electric spark , & throttles .  ~^
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: PerttiMe on May 18, 2011, 04:37:02 AM
I sometimes consider buying a motorcycle for just that reason, then I reflect on the fact that I have totaled not one, but two bicycles by rear-ending cars and I change my mind.
You need to put a front brake on your bike ... and learn how to use it ;)

There's a reason why cars and motorcycles have bigger brakes in the front  y1
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: john e. holliday on May 20, 2011, 09:37:05 AM
Bob, I haven't been here for a while.   Looks like it is coming together.  I like your statement of it is not anoter Nobler.   It is a very sleek design.   Now about your side kick,  I going to say the reason he has more hair is that he doesn't think as much as we do. LL~ LL~ Now I know he is going to kick my behind.   Now I need to get in gear on my projects.  Want to get the ISW in the air for VSC 2012. H^^
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: wwwarbird on September 02, 2011, 09:29:07 PM
 It's been quite a while Bob, what's the latest??? ;D
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on September 03, 2011, 02:04:52 PM
Hi Wayne:

The Second Wind twin took to the back burner while I finished up my Crossfire Extreme for the Nats. I plan on starting on it again sometime later this month (September) and having it ready for finish by the end of October.
Don't worry, I haven't lost interest in it; I just want it to be as good as it can be and that means finding some time to focus on it completely.

Later - Bob
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Dick Pacini on September 03, 2011, 04:09:51 PM
At the '73 NATS, I was new like a puppy
Bob Hunt was there, flying his Guppy

We both made the finals, but he did much better
I came in last, like an old Irish Setter
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: PJ Rowland on September 26, 2011, 09:56:12 PM
"I plan on starting on it again sometime later this month (September)"


Well ? Updates... we need updates.....

27 Sept..
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on July 09, 2012, 08:32:16 PM
Hi all:

As Arnold is famous for saying... I'm back...

I have had a lot of requests for more information on the Second Wind twin that I am building. It has been on the back burner for a while as I refinished my Crossfire that was broken at the Nats last year when a dust devil picked it up and slammed it into the ground. It was and still is a great flying ship, and I'm very glad I took the time to rebuild and refinish it.

I've started work on the twin again and have the main retract units installed and have the nacelle covers opened to allow the gear wires and wheels to retract without any clearance problems. The next step is to fit the nose gear, adjust the axle position to yield the proper stance angle and then fit the lower molded chin cowl, the nose block and the top hatch. It will then be ready for finishing.

Hopefully it will be ready for paint by September.

I'm attaching a few photos to show where I am on the project, and also a couple of the rebuilt and refinished Crossfire Extreme.

Later - Bob Hunt
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Randy Powell on July 09, 2012, 09:04:03 PM
But eventually, you'll finish it. right Bob?
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Jason Greer on July 09, 2012, 09:07:34 PM
The Crossfire refinish looks wonderful!

Will you be in Muncie next week? 

Jason
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Crist Rigotti on July 09, 2012, 10:16:28 PM
Bob,
There's something about a red, white, and blue airplane!  Beautiful job.  All the best with it next week.
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Matt Colan on July 09, 2012, 11:02:29 PM
Looks fantastic Bob!!! Best of luck with it next week at the NATS!
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Derek Barry on July 10, 2012, 05:57:45 AM
The Crossfire looks awesome Bob! Very cool paint scheme. I love the look of the nose and rudder.

Derek
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Allan Perret on July 10, 2012, 06:59:38 AM
Wow, the twin's gear installation is some kind of cool.  
The only thing that could top that would be full funcioning gear doors. (but I wouldn't even think about going there).

Hey Bob:
  
What is the setup of the thrust lines on the twin,  motors and stab relative to the wing ?

Are you going to setup the motors counter-rotation ?    If so, what props are you thinking about ?

Sorry if these have been covered earlier.  If so, let me know and I'll go back and re-read the whole thread.




Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on July 10, 2012, 07:14:18 AM
Hi Randy:

Well... yes, I fully intend to finish and fly this beast eventually.  :-\ I started it as an experimental design and one that was really not intended to be used in competition unless it flew really well. The jury is still out on that aspect until we, well, fly it. I think it's going to work well because it is light and straight and has gobs of disk area. I don't feel the need to rush this project, however, as it is a fun thing for me. I'll work on it when I'm in the mood to do everything right. There is no rush to get it to the field. I feel the pressure from others, however, to get it done and I appreciate that. Please be patient; it will get done fairly soon.  y1

Jason, Crist, Matt and Derek:

Wow! Thanks for the comments about the Crossfire!. Phil Granderson called and told me that he was coming to the Nats to protest this ship, because it was evident to him that I didn't build or finish it as it has no visible bronze or copper paint on it!  >:D Actually thanks go out to Phil for once again bailing me out with beautiful painting stencils for the letters and numbers.

Derek, I like the treatment on the front end and the rudder/fin too! Must give credit where credit is due on this (that seems to be more important than ever on this forum...) aspect of the trim scheme. My good friend, Sina Goudarzi - a graphic artist who works in Adobe Illustrator among other things - helped me to get the effect I was searching for. I told him that I wanted to take the Thunderbird scheme to a new level, using a lot of the color and design cues, but taking it to a totally new look. We exchanged a gazillion emails and he was extremely patient with me as I asked him to adjust the scheme about 50 times (literally!). Finally Sina packed up his computer and came to my house to work with me for a full day and get the look I was looking for. I must confess that I was stubborn and it took Sina a while to convince me on some of the elements, but he was usually right! In fact, the scheme I’m using on this ship is only part of the total scheme that Sina and I agreed on. Time was short, so we abbreviated it for this year. Next year, on my two new Crossfires,  the scheme will be expanded to include a very stylish Crossfire logo on the top of the wing and on each side of the fin, and an amazing “Thunderbird” on the bottom of the wing. The time it would have taken to do those elements on this ship would have pushed me back at least a week. I felt the practice time was more important on this occasion. By the way, your new ship looks awesome as well. You have far more patience than I do for detail…  n~

Later - Bob
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Tom Niebuhr on July 10, 2012, 08:04:20 AM
Bob,
Just had to say again that the rebuilt Crossfire is awesome. I am glad that you will be continuing to expand the T-bird's scheme in the future.  Many thanks to Sina Goudarzi from all of us.

Oh.. please don't use the brown, bronze, copper on the twin. I am sure that Sina can help you.

Good flying at the Nats!
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: john e. holliday on July 10, 2012, 09:03:33 AM
Now how are we going to know which is Bob's planes?     Really Bob, the scheme looks great.   Have fun at the NATS and don't be too hard on the kids. H^^
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Derek Barry on July 10, 2012, 09:54:53 AM
Hey Bob,

I am not sure if it is far more patience or far more insanity. n~ Either way, thank you and see ya soon.

Derek
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on July 10, 2012, 10:05:54 AM
Derek:

I'm fairly certain we are both equally insane, along with many, many others in this event. In fact, that's why I like it!  y1

See you in Muncie! Bob
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: PJ Rowland on July 10, 2012, 10:43:57 AM
Derek, you could learn alot from Bob - those wheel pants came out of his workshop that way the same day the model was painted.

 S?P
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Derek Barry on July 10, 2012, 11:29:28 AM
Derek, you could learn alot from Bob - those wheel pants came out of his workshop that way the same day the model was painted.

 S?P

Yea yea yea, Mine are painted now   ::)

Derek :)
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bill Little on July 10, 2012, 05:11:19 PM
HI Brother Bob!

The refinished Crossfire does look awesome.  And the Second Wind is coming along.  I believe it will be very competitive once you work into it.

A thanks from us all for your tireless efforts to make this hobby/sport a better place.  And good luck in Muncie!

Bill
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on July 10, 2012, 06:34:47 PM
Thanks, Bill!  #^
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: James Mills on July 10, 2012, 07:27:47 PM
Bob,

The Crossfire looks very nice, looking forward to seeing it next week.

James
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: PJ Rowland on July 11, 2012, 10:10:13 PM
Bob - did you fix that tracking error with the rebuild?
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on July 12, 2012, 09:17:02 AM
Tracks like a freight train!

Bob
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Randy Powell on July 12, 2012, 02:47:12 PM
Glad to hear it, Bob. The new Crossfire paint scheme is awesome. Have fun in Muncie!
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: PJ Rowland on July 12, 2012, 05:57:58 PM
Awesome....
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on July 12, 2012, 06:32:49 PM
Thanks, Guys! I'm very pleased with the re-build and re-finish, but I doubt that I'll ever attempt that again; it's actually easier to build a new ship! I just thought that this model deserved a better destiny than the one it almost had to live (die...?) with. It flies much better than it did before the refinish, so I guess it was worth it.

It's off to Muncie!

Later - Bob
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Chris McMillin on July 12, 2012, 09:42:19 PM
That Crossfire looks awesome, Bob. I love that canopy shape, a bit like the original Hanson Tipo's.
Really neat, good luck at the Nats.
Chris...
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: PJ Rowland on July 12, 2012, 11:17:58 PM
Randy and I both went through total refinishes..... they are hell.

I wont do it again - and I've done 3 of them.... problem is you *think* it will be easier than it is.. despite doing it before..
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on September 04, 2012, 08:03:21 AM
I got a chance to work a bit on the Second Wind twin over the weekend. I installed the front retract gear unit and then adjusted the axle position to yield a 0-degree stance for thew ship as per Dean Pappas' suggestion. I personally would have given the ship about a 1/2 degree down in the nose stance, but Dean's logic prevailed.

I fit the lower chin block and opened the area required to allow the nose gear to retract and extend through it. The next step was to fit and sand the nose block. I used two pieces of wood here and tack glued them together and then tack glued the assembly to the front of the fuselage. I just now finished sanding and shaping the nose block, although I might do just a bit more sanding to give it an even "swoopier" look. The next step is to remove the nose block, split it apart and hollow it and make provisions for an air intake hole in it. It will then be permanently installed on the nose and the fitting of the molded top hatch can be tackled. After that, it's ready for finish!

Later - Bob
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Crist Rigotti on September 04, 2012, 08:27:37 AM
Wow, that's coming along very nice. 
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: john e. holliday on September 04, 2012, 08:40:18 AM
That is awesome.   Start a new trend in electric and leave in in clear or primer. LL~ LL~ LL~
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bill Little on September 04, 2012, 08:46:29 AM
It's really coming along Brother Bob!  I can't wait to hear your flight reports!

Bill
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: John Cralley on September 04, 2012, 01:54:24 PM
Hi Bob,

I wonder if you are planning on counter-rotating, two pusher or two tractor props. If you are doing counter-rotation which is going to be which?

Thanks and OH yes it looks awesome so far!
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on September 04, 2012, 02:08:08 PM
Hi John:

Dean Pappas is working up a trim flow chart for this ship. We will try all permutations of prop direction possibilities. There are lots more things to think about with a twin than you might imagine. For instance, we will probably run the outboard motor just slightly faster than the inboard motor because at the point at which the outboard motor is mounted to the wing is traveling a greater distance than the point at which the inboard motor is mounted on the inside wing. There's more, and I'll cover that when we get to it...

Thanks to everyone for the kind words and encouragement! y1

Later - Bob Hunt
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Wynn Robins on September 04, 2012, 05:32:03 PM
stunning work!!! 
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Derek Barry on September 05, 2012, 04:45:53 AM
Hurry up and finish it, I want to see that thing fly!!!  :o

Looks awesome Bob.

Derek
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on September 05, 2012, 06:37:20 AM
Thanks Wynn and Derek!

Hopefully I will get all the woodwork done this weekend and have it in finish by next week. Not too sure about the trim scheme yet, but I'm going to work a bit with Sina Goudarzi to come up with something "special."

I'm thinking about offering a CD with all the construction photos that have been taken along the way on this project. There are lots and lots of them! Does anyone have any interest in this?

Later - Bob
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Mike Ferguson on September 05, 2012, 07:36:44 AM
I'm thinking about offering a CD with all the construction photos that have been taken along the way on this project. There are lots and lots of them! Does anyone have any interest in this?

Absolutely.  :)
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on September 05, 2012, 08:03:35 AM
These would, of course be high res files, not the reduced resolution files that were posted online. Nominally the files would be 2 MB in size.

I'd have to get enough interest in this in order to put the photos in chronilogical order and then have them burned to CDs. I'm guessing that the price on such a CD would be $5.00, plus shipping.

I don't really see this project becoming a full fledged construction article, but I may make the plans available along with the photo CD. Those who might possibly have an interest in building this ship probably already know how to build a model... ;)

Later - Bob


Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: john e. holliday on September 05, 2012, 08:42:30 AM
Count the old DOC in on a CD.
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bill Little on September 05, 2012, 10:20:16 AM
(snip)
I'd have to get enough interest in this in order to put the photos in chronilogical order and then have them burned to CDs. I'm guessing that the price on such a CD would be $5.00, plus shipping.
(snip)
Later - Bob


HI Bob,

I believe you can ship the CD mailer through USPS for less than $5 so a price of $10 shipped might be feasible?

I would be in for one!
Bill
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Matt Colan on September 05, 2012, 11:35:29 AM
Simply Amazing Bob!!!! And count me in on a CD as well!

Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on September 09, 2012, 10:09:20 AM
Did a bit of work on the twin this morning. The photos may not reveal all that was done, but I "popped" the nose block off, split the halves apart, hollowed them, gluded the halves back together and glued the assembly onto the front of the plane permanently. I also fit the to hatch and sanded the edges of the fuselage sides to match the hatch piece. I had to make a custom beveled piece at the front to allow the hatch to be removed. It was a tight fit, but it is fine. The next step is to install the hatch holdowns, and I'm off to do that now. By this evening (Sunday, September 9) I should be doping the fuselage in preparation to carbon the fuse. After that its fillets and finish!

I'm hoping to get this thing done in time to make a few test flights before the weather "closes in," but I will not rush it to conclusion' its coming along too well and there is too much work involved to get impatient now.

Later - Bob Hunt   
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: RandySmith on September 09, 2012, 10:40:34 AM
Thats a really really nice piece of work, what size are the spinners?

Randy
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on September 09, 2012, 10:50:08 AM
Thanks, Randy! I feel that this may be my best work to date. I had the state of mind from the beginning of this project that I would not rush it and I would not work on it unless I was fully motivated to do so. It has taken a looooong time, but I think it just may be worth it.

The spinners are Tru-Turn 1 1/2 inch diameter, needle nose units. One has a tractor cut out in the cone and one has a pusher cut out. Looks like I will be using either 9,5 or 10 inch diameter props on it, although it has clearance to accept a full 11 inch prop.

The next big decision is what paint scheme to use... I'm working with Sina Goudarzi on this, and I think we will come up with an appropriate scheme. Twins are difficult to design trim schemes for, because the nacelles break up the long leading edge lines and limit the choices. I have great faith in Sina's ideas and abilities, however, and I'm sure he will help me to flesh out an idea that I have for the scheme. He did wonders with my Thunderbird 3000 scheme that is on the rebuilt and refinished Crossfire...

Phil Granderson has also suggested a scheme for the twin and it is stunning. It may take me a while to make up my mind on the paint...

Later - Bob 
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Howard Rush on September 09, 2012, 07:53:40 PM
Paint is not the only stunning scheme
Plotted by the Jive Combat Team.
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on September 09, 2012, 07:59:38 PM
The JCT is quite eclectic.
Even more so now that they've gone electric.
Paint and powder improves their image.
But it doesn't help in a glow vs electric scrimage.
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Wynn Robins on September 09, 2012, 08:22:01 PM
just dont paint it red white and blue
 any other colour combination will do

Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on September 09, 2012, 08:26:17 PM
What's wrong with red, white, and blue? I'm a very patriotic kind of guy and those have become my new airplane colors. Everyone seemed to like the red, white, and blue on the Crossfire... #^
 
Hey, at least it won't be bronze... n1
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Tim Wescott on September 09, 2012, 08:34:16 PM
What's wrong with red, white, and blue? I'm a very patriotic kind of guy and those have become my new airplane colors. Everyone seemed to like the red, white, and blue on the Crossfire...

A white base with red and white trim look pretty good, too.  Depending on how much of the white gets painted over with red and blue, you can pretty much make it as loud and intrusive, or as subtle, as you want.
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on September 09, 2012, 08:50:21 PM
Well, as a refresher, here's the Crossfire that I used at this year's Nats. I like it!
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Crist Rigotti on September 09, 2012, 08:59:16 PM
Count me in for red, white, and blue!
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on September 09, 2012, 09:06:26 PM
Nice Crist!

It seems to me that now, more than ever before, we need to remember what the red, white, and blue stands for. I'm proud to have it on my plane. There may come a time when it is illegal to do this... Stranger things have happened recently...

Bob Hunt
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: James Mills on September 09, 2012, 09:51:45 PM
Nice Crist!

It seems to me that now, more than ever before, we need to remember what the red, white, and blue stands for. I'm proud to have it on my plane. There may come a time when it is illegal to do this... Stranger things have happened recently...

Bob Hunt
Bob and Crist, ditto that on the Red, White and Blue.  The new twin looks very cool.

James
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Chris_Burgess on September 10, 2012, 06:26:18 PM
Add me to the Red White and Blue, crew too.
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Wynn Robins on September 10, 2012, 08:44:51 PM
What's wrong with red, white, and blue? I'm a very patriotic kind of guy and those have become my new airplane colors. Everyone seemed to like the red, white, and blue on the Crossfire... #^
 
Hey, at least it won't be bronze... n1

coz all you 'mericans use red white and blue........  

our flag is red white and blue too - so are the flags of Australia, England,France,  Russia, Netherlands, Serbia, Slovakia, Croatia, Iceland............it conts.
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Wynn Robins on September 10, 2012, 08:49:27 PM
BTW- I like your bronze planes!!!!!!!!!

Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: john e. holliday on September 11, 2012, 08:38:21 AM
Maybe we need to paint the wing up like the flag,  with bars and stars.   I know its been done before.
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: PerttiMe on September 11, 2012, 01:31:28 PM
hmmmm, I think a touch of yellow/gold, in addition to red, white, and blue, is a nice touch on Igor Burger's electric World Champion ship.

 S?P
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on September 11, 2012, 04:06:08 PM
Actually, I think Igor's ship is just beautiful. Perhaps Sina and I can juice up the Red, white, and blue scheme with some other colors as well.

Bob Hunt
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on September 11, 2012, 04:07:40 PM
Add me to the Red White and Blue, crew too.

That's very nice, Chris. What plane is that at the right in the photo? Looks like either a Panther or a Cougar.

Bob Hunt
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Darkstar1 on September 11, 2012, 05:30:43 PM
That's very nice, Chris. What plane is that at the right in the photo? Looks like either a Panther or a Cougar.

Bob Hunt

Bob,
Take a closer look I don't know what It is either. But it looks like a twin boom job with the nose missing.
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on September 11, 2012, 05:57:28 PM
Aha! You are right Darrell. I think I know what plane that is! My guess is that it is a Jean Pailet Pegasus that was modified to have wing gear. Am I right Chris?

Bob Hunt
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Tim Wescott on September 11, 2012, 06:21:00 PM
Maybe we need to paint the wing up like the flag,  with bars and stars.   I know its been done before.

Here's Bruce Hunt with a flag-ish scheme:

(http://www.flyinglines.org/sco.12.pf.bruce.jpg)

Taken at the Dick Scobee memorial contest: http://www.flyinglines.org/scobee.12.html
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Howard Rush on September 11, 2012, 09:05:33 PM
That man was painting an airplane in my garage this very afternoon.
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Chris_Burgess on September 15, 2012, 02:35:34 PM
That's very nice, Chris. What plane is that at the right in the photo? Looks like either a Panther or a Cougar.

Bob Hunt

That right there is a Pegasus, with the nose missing... which was a rather unfortunate incident, but it has retracts in it...
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Will Hinton on September 15, 2012, 03:46:41 PM
Red, white and blue is a definite choice for me, especially, as you said Bob, during this time in our lives.  Count me in for a CD and likely for a twin sometime after my next bipe!
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: James Mills on September 15, 2012, 05:02:07 PM
Bob,

Count me in for a CD as well.

James
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: William DeMauro on September 15, 2012, 05:07:13 PM
I always liked patriotic designs and went back to red, white and blue on my SV22 refinish. Sina was a huge influence on that refinish. I am also working with Sina on a patriotic finish on my new stunter,Voltron.
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: James Strickland on September 17, 2012, 12:32:03 AM
Hey Bob, Definately put me in for a CD please.  Red, White, & Blue is also A must for me in these TRYING world event times, especially for my first 2 electrics that are under way now, a Ringmaster & A Profile Cardinal will absolutely need a Patriotic touch in their finishes. I'm actually doing 2 each, one IC. & one Elec. each so I can do a direct comparison between IC. & Elec. I thought that would be a great way to do it H^^.

                                                                Thanks,
                                                                         James
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Serge_Krauss on September 17, 2012, 08:03:04 PM
Here's Bruce Hunt with a flag-ish scheme:

I like it! Simple, elegant too.
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: paul winter on November 02, 2012, 09:20:06 AM
hi BOB

just need to know what size battery are you going to use

paul
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Air Ministry . on April 01, 2013, 11:12:51 PM
Right ; Well Then ; Where were we .  R%%%%
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on April 02, 2013, 05:27:30 AM
Right ; Well Then ; Where were we .  R%%%%


? - Bob Hunt
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Air Ministry . on April 02, 2013, 06:17:39 PM
just wondrin how its doin , where its at . One thing with electric , theres no oil to hasten painting before flight .  ;D
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on April 05, 2013, 08:48:57 PM
Well... That time I was actually serious... %^@

By the way, the twin is now ready for fillets and should be in primer next week. Bout time, eh? HB~>

Bob Hunt
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on April 07, 2013, 06:35:03 AM
Hi Motorman (I'd sure like to address you by your real name, but it is not on your profile...):

The distance between the shaft center lines is approximately 15.5 inches. Not sure that's enough to allow the motor speed differential to make a difference, but it's worth a try... Just one more potential advantage of a twin and of electric power... :)!

New stuff! This morning I laid in the fillets on the bottom of the Second Wind. I use the Super Fil product for fillets and have had great success with it. It is strong, easy to apply and sandable. Last week I applied the .2 carbon mat to the fuselage, applied a few coats of non-tautening nitrate dope and sanded the mat between coats. I'm hoping to have this model and my new Crossfire Extreme XLTC in primer by the end of the week. Then it will be a few days of excruciatingly detailed sanding before the ChromaSeal coat goes on.

I know this project has stretched out over a long period of time and some of you have questioned my commitment to finishing this ship. All I can say is, this project was not about reaching a speedy end; it was about enjoying the designing and building journey. This model was not slated to be a competition model for a specific season; it was something that I worked on when I felt like working on it. In the interim I've designed, built, finished and flown other models. I'm sort of looking at the twin as my masterpiece. I hope I can sustain that feeling all the way through the finishing process.

Later - Bob Hunt    
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Frank Imbriaco on April 07, 2013, 08:10:16 AM
Bob,
Fillets look great ! A real art form , indeed !
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on April 07, 2013, 06:03:21 PM
Do you think Super Fil would be a good compound for making propeller molds? Does it smell as bad as bondo?

Thanks,
MM 8)

I think it is too soft a material to be used as a prop mold and expect any significant life from the mold. It has very little odor at all, however, and that's one of the good things about it. I think that an aluminum filled epoxy would be a better bet for a prop mold.

Later - Bob Hunt
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Randy Powell on April 07, 2013, 07:36:07 PM
Yes. For molds (at least ones that you are only planning to use a few times), Tap Plastics makes two three different materials. I use QwikMold for most of the molds I make, but it's a prototyping material and while it's pretty hard, it will chip after awhile. Good for pulling 3 or 4 pieces.
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Air Ministry . on April 07, 2013, 09:22:29 PM
 " it was about enjoying the designing and building journey " .

this makes it a SAGA , like ' Gone with the Wind ' ,  LL~ S?P and all the better for it .
these young blokes are all in a rush these days .  S?P

"  I hope I can sustain that feeling all the way through the finishing process. " !

at least it wont get oil all over it to impeed the paint adheshion , if you fly it before the graphics are applied .  H^^

found with a bit of keel area , the inner outter bits not a lot of worry , running a booming 25 & a yapping 19 together .
At times the inner wants to chime in , or NEEDs to . Uphill Vertical in gusts .


one should avoid this effect though . with control line .

"in 1951 when he flew the ground attack version of the Meteor with a
demonstration of a new manoeuvre that he had developed and dubbed the 'Zurabatic
Cartwheel'."

a bit of tipweight can be usefull

Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: wwwarbird on April 07, 2013, 11:27:26 PM

 Bob, did you mask for your fillets? Just curious...
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on April 08, 2013, 05:18:46 AM
Bob, did you mask for your fillets? Just curious...

Hi Wayne:

Yes, I do mask the model in the required areas for filleting. The following text and photos will, hopefully, show the technique that I (and many others) use to install fillets.

Photos 1 and 2 show the model (my new Crossfire Extreme XLTC in this case...) taped off and ready for the fillets. I place the tape on each surface back far enough to allow the full radius of the fillet to be formed.

Photo 3 shows a few of the many custom fillet tools that I have made. You can custom-size the radius that you want. I make these from 1/32 or 1/16-inch thick plywood.

Photo 4 shows the Super Fil material being rough formed. You need to "glop in" enough Super Fil to form the entire fillet before you do the final shaping.

Photo 5 shows the fillet smoothed to its finished shape with the fillet tool, but with the tape still in place.

Photos 6 and 7 show the tape removed

I install all of the fillets on the bottom of the plane and let them cure. Then I install all the fillets on the top of the plane.

Hope this helps.  ;D

Later - Bob Hunt
  
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: john e. holliday on April 08, 2013, 08:50:45 AM
I see I am going to have to quit being a cheap skate and get some Super Fil.    Also the twin is looking great.   I wouldn't be surprised if it flies as well as or better than some of your other designs.
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Tom Niebuhr on April 08, 2013, 09:47:45 AM
Doc,
I've been using Super-Fil for about 15 years now. Bill Werwage got me on to it. Bobby explained the application perfectly. I used other items for fillets in the past but Super-Fil is the only one that is trouble free.

The quantity is good for at least 4 or 5 stunters, so it is really cheap.

Bob,
Can't wait to see the airplanes coming out of the production spray booth this week. I also think the twin will be very competitive.
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: MarcusCordeiro on April 08, 2013, 11:43:32 AM
I'll be back when I find words to express what I can see in those pics, right now, it's just a blank.
Maybe state-of-the-art??
I feel like I'm a beginner...
Simply "A"mazing.

Marcus
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on September 26, 2013, 09:08:21 AM
Randy Powell's progress on his fantastic new electric ship has shamed me into getting back to work on my Second Wind Twin (Don't want to rush into these things...).

Yesterday I made the trip to Buddy Wieder's spray booth (his garage) and shot the primer onto the airframe. Note in the photos that I masked off the open bay areas so that no primer could get onto them. The primer I use takes a bit of effort to sand off, and I didn't want to "go through" on the silkspan covered  areas when sanding. Those areas have been sealed and sanded using dope and Aero-1 filler. They are ready for the Chroma-Seal coat to be applied.

I plan to sand a few hours each week on this thing until it's done. Rushing at this point would be foolish.

The ship is coming out very light and I have high hopes that it will fly well.

Later - Bob Hunt  
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: RC Storick on September 26, 2013, 09:32:41 AM
Definitely looks cool! You are a true craftsman. Only 1 question. What is the hole on both sides of the main fuse on top?

Also a idea I will be steeling is the taping off of the open bays to save weight and time sanding.
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on September 26, 2013, 10:43:20 AM
Hi Bob:

They are cooling air outlet holes. You can't see it in the bottom shot, but there is a cooling air inlet hole in the bottom of the nose cone on the fuselage. I needed a way to get that air out...

Yeah, taping off the open bays was a Homer Simpson moment for me... Doh!  n~

Later - Bob   
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Derek Barry on September 26, 2013, 10:50:12 AM
No kidding, I always try to keep away from the open bays but there is always some overspray to sand off. Good idea! I have been hesitant to use the Chroma Base paints because I do open bays on most of my planes. Let me know if you learn any new tricks when you do yours.

By the way, It looks wicked awesome!!!!

Derek
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: MarcusCordeiro on September 26, 2013, 04:40:58 PM
Way cool!!!

Marcus
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Randy Powell on September 26, 2013, 08:57:12 PM
Man, that thing is just cool. It oozes cool. A flashy paint scheme and it will be simply awesome in the air.

Congrats Bob, the thing is top shelf.
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Matt Colan on September 26, 2013, 10:32:32 PM
Looks awesome Bob!!
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: wwwarbird on September 26, 2013, 11:12:42 PM
 Looks awesome Bob, glad to see that you're back on it. I've got a hunch that you'll surprise even yourself with the performance.

 Got that copper paint stirred up? S?P
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on September 27, 2013, 05:29:16 AM
Wow! Thanks to everyone for the kudos!  ;D

I still think it will look like a boxcar if placed next to Randy Powell's new electric machine (Check out the "New Build" thread on the building forum here if you haven't seen Randy's masterpiece yet...).

I was concerned about the "numbers" in this one for a while. It was mostly designed by peering over my thumb at the end of a deftly outstretched arm while repeating the phrase, "That looks about right" over and over. Hey, it's a time tested method... I had the chance to fly Gordan Delaney's Pathfinder Profile Twin while at VSC one year and was amazed at how well it flew. Really, that is one of the finest flying models it has ever been my pleasure to put through a pattern!

Having flown Gordan's amazing ship I was very concerned that my twin would not fly nearly as well because it just had to be "different" in numbers due to my design method. I recently called Gordan to get his twin's "numbers" in order to start again and build a "proper" twin. He got his twin down and started measuring. Each dimension he gave me was checked against my twin to see just how far I was off. I won't keep you in suspense; my twin was within 1/8-inch all the way around!  #^ Talk about being relieved! That's the main reason behind my sudden surge of energy on this project. I'm now convinced that it will be a great flying ship. Buddy Wieder has been telling me that since he saw the initial side view drawing...

I'm going to attack the sanding of the primer this weekend and hopefully have it ready for the Chroma-Seal coat next week. After a detail sanding of the Chroma-Seal coat (Most of it will come off...), it will be time for a whisper-coat of white Chroma-Base paint and the canvas will be ready for whatever Sina Goudarzi and I come up with for a trim scheme. Wayne, trust me, it will not include anything in the copper/bronze/metallic brown family...  n1.

Sina asked me to send him top view and side view photos. He used them to come up with a two-view drawing on which I could sketch out some  ideas with which he could start work on a new trim scheme. This is a tough assignment; don't want to miss the opportunity to have something "special" for this one. I'm attaching Sina's two-view so that you can see what he's done. Perhaps this might help you in trimming your next plane.

Later - Bob Hunt

    
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Tom Niebuhr on September 27, 2013, 09:10:56 AM
Bob,
This airplane is a winner already!
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Avaiojet on September 27, 2013, 05:37:49 PM
Bob,

Your model is really shapping up, you do good work. "SO." Standing ovation! CLP**

Posted a 2-view ta boot. What a guy!!

Plans? Kit in the works?

I'm looking forward to your progress.

Charles
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on September 27, 2013, 06:14:57 PM
Thanks, Tom for the kind words. You too, Charles! <=

To answer your questions, Charles, no there will not be a kit in the offing for this one. I might consider drawing plans for it and offer a Lost-Foam wing fixture for it in the future. Let's see how it flies first! I'm afraid that the kit market for this type of plane would be extremely limited.

Later - Bob Hunt

 
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Tom Niebuhr on October 02, 2013, 07:19:06 AM
Is the color scheme settled yet?
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on October 02, 2013, 07:32:28 AM
Hi Tom:

Not yet, but I did have a long conversation with Sina Goudarzi yesterday about some ideas that we each have. Phil Granderson also sent me a suggestion of a scheme that is very interesting and attractive. I'm not rushing into this one; too much at stake!

Later - Bob
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Derek Barry on October 02, 2013, 08:40:53 AM
As long as you get it done before the Joe Nall. I want to see this plane fly!

Derek

P.S. I would like to take it for a spin too! ;)
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Robby Hunt on October 03, 2013, 12:14:06 PM
As long as you get it done before the Joe Nall. I want to see this plane fly!

Derek

P.S. I would like to take it for a spin too! ;)

You're gonna have to get in line! ;)
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Tom Niebuhr on October 17, 2013, 08:12:38 AM
Progress report????
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Keith Renecle on October 25, 2013, 01:22:46 AM
Hi Bob,

The twin looks great so far, and thanks for the regular updates. Have you settled on the power system yet....motors, props and batteries? I know that I asked this before, but no-one gave a clear answer to how to work what size motors to use for a twin of similar size to a single motor/engine stunter. I would seem like the motor size is smaller than just dividing by 2. For example on Paul Walkers' B17 he used 4 x .15 engines and that sort-of works out to an equivalent .60. That huge bomber would most likely have need a .75 or bigger to perform like that, so it would be nice if someone has a basic formula for doing this. Thanks and keep going with this project.

Keith R
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: wwwarbird on November 09, 2013, 11:13:45 PM

 What's the latest Bob? D>K
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: PJ Rowland on December 03, 2013, 02:00:00 AM
Keith :

For example on Paul Walkers' B17 he used 4 x .15 engines and that sort-of works out to an equivalent .60. That huge bomber would most likely have need a .75 or bigger to perform like that, so it would be nice if someone has a basic formula for doing this.


Im sure Paul will chime in a little more, but the ratio doesnt work out to be " equivilant " to a .60. The B17 was close to the 100oz mark and its unlikely that a regular .60 in the nose would do the same job. The combination of the 4 engines in total is far stronger. When I did the Lancaster ( weighed in at 120 oz )- Paul mentioned the 4 x 15's were going to be more than enough, however we opted for 4 x Enya .19's which would be a .76 in displacement just for some headroom - but again performance was far greater than any .75 + sized engine.

Without having any aero degree background I do not know the specifics or the Math going on. I can only comment on what I found during that project.


BOB : Never seen fillets being taped up - Im stealing that one...  Looking awesome.
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: John Rist on December 03, 2013, 07:50:34 AM
On the multi engine equivalent issue it could have something to do with the smaller the engine the more HP per CI.  Also the tip of the prop does most of the pulling.  On a multi engine setup you have increased the prop tip area.  It's the same reason sale plains have long skinny wings. increases the efficacy. I should ask my Son - he is a real engineer.
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Larry Renger on December 03, 2013, 08:31:43 AM
I think that if you calculate the swept blade area for 4 8" props vs a single 14" prop, you will see why you need less total displacement. In addition, the smaller engines run at higher rpms, generally.

It calculates out that a 14" prop sweeps 147 sq.in. While four 8" props sweep 201 sq.in.
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Keith Renecle on December 03, 2013, 10:34:26 PM
Thanks guys, I did realize that you can't simply add up the displacement, hence my question on how to work out what sort of power you need for multi-engine models. Larry's point on the prop swept blade area is also valid. In my next life I need to do an engineering degree! It will be interesting to see what motors, props and batteries Bob ends up with.

Keith R
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Larry Renger on December 03, 2013, 10:55:41 PM
Another thing occurred to me, with a 14" prop the wash covers 14" of wing, with 4 8" props, it is 32", over double!  ;D
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on December 04, 2013, 06:40:37 AM
I've always believed that the "artificial" airspeed provided by the prop disk is what makes our planes fly the way they do. Not only does the air blast from the prop make the wing more efficient, but the elevators as well. How do I know this? I once made a canard with the prop aft of the elevator. I needed to more than double the size of the elevator to get the model to perform properly. The elevator was only seeing the air flow provided by the airspeed of the model; it was not getting the benefit of the additional prop blast. The light went on...

Since that time I figured that a twin was the optimum platform for CL stunt... if only I could get consistent engine runs. Let's face it, it's difficult enough to get one engine to run perfectly all the time; two engines running perfectly all the time is both a dream and a joke. With the advent of electric power I realized that all those sketches I made of twins over the years were suddenly practical possibilities.

As mentioned earlier in this thread, I had the opportunity to fly Gordan Delaney's Pathfinder Profile twin. That ship is powered by two 15's and is fitted with two 8.5-inch diameter props. It has effectively 17 inches of prop disk span providing a huge amount of that (as I call it) artificial air blast. Gordan's model was among the very best flying models that I've ever had the pleasure to pilot. It had plenty of line tension (but not excessive) everywhere; it flew at virtually one speed everywhere, and it was easy to fly anywhere on the hemisphere. I was sold at that point.

I know my twin has taken a long time to reach completion; I have had no time schedule for this one. It will fly in the spring. I've learned tons during the building process about engineering a model to be light, strong, and accurate. There were lots of challenges and that was the fun part. With what I've learned, we've already begun work on a totally new, and larger, twin design. In fact, we have a test bed almost ready for flight and it should fly later this week. I'll throw in a few photos of the testbed twin at the end of this response.

Power system? Well, we originally were going to use E-Flite Power 10 motors. The Kv was a bit high on those and so, my friend Will DeMauro did a bit of research and found the Cobra 2820-14 motor, which is a bit lighter than the Power 10, has a much larger main bearing and a lower Kv (850). Both of these motors - and the retracts - will run off one 4S 4,000 mAh Hyperion battery. Two Phoenix 35 ESC's are being used and a Castle Creations BEC is being used to power up the retracts. Will Hubin has provided a brand new Twin Timer that has separate ESC ports, a retract port and a pot with which one motor can be made to run faster or slower than the other motor. That promises to be a great trim tool...

The Cobra motors will be fitted with either 9-inch or 10-inch (Obviously we will try both...) props. We have obtained a number of matched sets of tractor/pusher props and will try all possible permutations to determine which setup works best. If the 10 inch props end up being the choice, that will yield 20 inches of prop disk span, covering a great deal of the span of the model. The wing should be lively... If we use the 9 inch props, we will only have a paltry 18 inches of disk span.  >:D

I'm making no predictions, but if this project reaches fruition anywhere near my hopes for it, I'll have a weapon like I've never had before.

Enjoy the photos of the new testbed... This model has 672 square inches of wing area and looks to be ready to fly with battery on board at 63 to 65 ounces. Buddy Wieder and I have put about a month of work into this one.


Later - Bob Hunt
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Tom Niebuhr on December 04, 2013, 08:53:43 AM
Bob,
Looking Good!

1) Why are the nacelle noses in two pieces and then ply plates over them?

2) I love the method of mounting a motor in the nacelle

3) The nose gear mounting looks great. I'll remember that for my McDonnell Banshee

4) The blue foam looked awful heavy, but it looks like the foam is hollowed out.

5) How are you going to finish it realizing that it only has to be sealed so it is protected from dirt?
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Lauri Malila on December 04, 2013, 09:58:21 AM
That ship is powered by two 15's and is fitted with two 8.5-inch diameter props. It has effectively 17 inches of prop disk area..

Just being picky.. The disc area of 2 x 8,5" props equals disc area of one 12" prop.

:)

Lauri
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on December 04, 2013, 10:52:48 AM
Yes, but the span of the combined disk is 17 inches, and that's what I'm looking for...

Bob Hunt
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: john e. holliday on December 04, 2013, 11:00:42 AM
This is beyond awesome.   Is the Blue Foam Molding bucks or will they be glassed?
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: MarcusCordeiro on December 04, 2013, 12:37:06 PM
And then you get to see someone like Bob Hunt saying he's learned tons of stuff about building.
See the pics, and then start calculating how many eons it will take me to even come close...
Doc, i bet my b@lls it's for molding...
Hey Bob, you really make us look bad... LL~ LL~
AWESOME!!!!

Marcus
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on December 04, 2013, 02:48:04 PM
I've got bad news for you, Marcus... You're going to be singing soprano from now on. LL~ Those blue foam blocks are the actual blocks that are attached to the plane; this one will not have molded shells.

Okay, I sort of sprang this one on everyone without proper explanation. This is a testbed model designed to allow us to try different thrust line placements. There are two sets (so far...) of nacelle front ends; one with the thrust line on the wing's centerline, and one with the thrust line 1/2 inch lower than the wing's centerline. The rear halves of the nacelles are permanently attached to the wing and the front halves are removable/interchangeable.

We used the same technique to build the wing for this testbed model as we did for the Joe Nall Cadet models. We call this construction the  "Lost-Sheeting method." There is no balsa sheeting on the wing. The wing is a solid foam core made from 1-pound density foam. There is a slot cut in the center of the wing cores to allow the leadouts to get to the tip and have some adjustment. There are slots cut into the top and the bottom of the wing at the high point to accept 1/2 x 1/8- inch basswood spars. The spars run the full span of the wing. There are several shear webs imbedded in the core between the spar slots to prevent the spars from "racking." That is the technical term for what the spars want to do on either side of the wing during maneuvering. In an inside maneuver the top spar in in compression and the bottom spar is in tension. If there were no webs between them, they would try to "clap hands" under stress. The webs prevent the spars from trying to move and hence impart a tremendous amount of strength. Enough not to break under maneuvering loads by themselves? Not quite. After the spars are glued into the slots and are firmly glued to the vertical grain shear webs, we apply .2 (two tenths ounce per square yard) carbon mat using water thinned Titebond wood glue. The carbon is first applied from the back of the spar on the top, around the leading edge and ends at the back of the spar on the bottom. A thin carbon strip reinforces the trailing edge area, and an additional piece strengthens the entire center section area. Even the flaps are 1 pound foam covered with two layers of the .2 carbon mat. They are extremely rigid and absolutely straight.  

This process yields a wing that is extremely strong and yet quite light. Can this method be used in a "front line" model and have a front row finish? No; it is great for trainers and testbed models, however. If you have an idea for a new design that needs testing before you invest a lot of time and money into it, then this is a great way to test your theories quickly and cheaply.  

We wanted to have a model that had the correct fuselage volume and "looks." A profile fuselage would have been prone to twisting and we wanted a model that would look and fly like a real front line ship. To quickly and cheaply achieve this goal we used Dow Flotation Foam for the blocks on the top and bottom, and for the hatch areas as well. This is NOT the type of foam you might find at one of the home improvement houses; it is a very special type of foam and is quite difficult to find. It is used in making floating docks. This foam carves and sands like butter. We normally use it for the mold bucks on which we mold our fuselage shells. This time we carved and sanded it to shape, and then hollowed the blocks to about a 1/8-inch wall thickness. All the blocks carved and hollowed in this manner together weighed about an ounce. To finish the surface we brushed on a coat of Z-Poxy finishing resin and then let it sit for a few minutes to soak in a bit. Then we wiped off all the excess. When the epoxy had cured, we sanded the surface smooth with 220 no load paper. There will be no additional finish applied to the testbed. We believe that this method could be used in a front line model with the addition of a coat of .2 carbon, so long as the paint used did not affect the foam. There are a number of finishes that we intend to try on this floatation foam and we will report the success or lack thereof somewhere down the road. You could produce quite exotic shapes in an extremely short amount of time if this works out... #^

All the exposed balsa has been sealed against moisture with a thin coat of polyurethane clear. The exposed foam is being left raw; there is no fuel residue to worry about. Again, all of this was proved out in the Joe Nall Cadet models that we built to teach new modelers with at the Joe Nall Fly-In.

The testbed is fitted with E-Flite 10-15 size retracts, and it is a tricycle gear system. We wanted to know just how much differently a twin would fly with the gear up...  

This testbed will allow us to do a lot of propeller experimentation and motor run experimentation before putting the system into our new front line competition twin designs. Better to find out potentially bad things with a model that doesn't have a competition finish... :-\    

This model is almost ready to fly and our target is sometime next week. We're hoping for a fairly warm and calm day for the test hops.

Later - Bob Hunt
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Rodrigo Mansano on December 04, 2013, 05:11:58 PM
Bob, I think I had a intuition about the soprano thing....

Rodrigo Mansano
Brazil
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: David_Stack on December 04, 2013, 06:23:21 PM
Good Evening Bob;

You said that flotation foam 'carves like butter...'  Curious, did you not try and hot-wire cut it?  I would think you could fabricate bulkhead templates at the front and rear of the turtledeck (for example) and cut it out in short order.  Does it not cut well?

No concerns about it not providing the necessary torsional stiffness that a molded balsa deck would (or is there additional structure in the fuselage to compensate for any structural rigidity lost due to the foam)?

r/
Dave
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on December 04, 2013, 06:36:49 PM
Hi Dave:

The Flotation Billet foam hot wire cuts extremely well also. Cutting compound curves with a hot wire is another story entirely... n~ This foam works so easily that I could virtually carve and sand the entire fuselage by hand in the time it would take me to make front and rear cutting templates for a straight taper block... These blocks have pronounced compound curves; especially the top block in the canopy area.

The flotation foam is extremely rigid when the coat of epoxy has been applied, and further bracing of the fuselage would probably not be necessary. Having written that, we did install cross-grain 1/16 balsa in alternating 45 degree patterns on both the top and the bottom of the fuselage crutch after the wing and tail were installed and the controls hooked up. That step made the fuselage extremely stiff, and the foam blocks just enhanced that rigidity. Trust me, this fuse will not flex or twist under load.  ;D

Later - Bob Hunt



 
   
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on December 04, 2013, 07:32:04 PM
The first photo here is a photo of the nacelle treatment. There are at this point two sets of nacelles. One has the thrust line on the centerline of the wing and the other has it 1/2 inch below the centerline of the wing. Yes, we remembered to make the prop clearance using the lower ones...  %^@

The other  two photos show how the nacelles fit into the nacelle stubs that are permanently affixed to the wing.

Later - Bob Hunt 
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Shawn Lenci on December 04, 2013, 08:58:52 PM
Bob...Not sure those wheels are going to roll to well with all that wire hanging down..... ;D

Shawn
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: wwwarbird on December 04, 2013, 09:40:28 PM

 Holy smokes Bob, my brain hurts! n~
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: PJ Rowland on December 04, 2013, 11:28:58 PM
So you built a second second wind test bed ?

wow...

Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Howard Rush on December 05, 2013, 01:31:10 AM
This airplane looks suspiciously like a trimotor.
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on December 05, 2013, 04:17:02 AM
Howard: You are evil... I may have to adopt you.  >:D

Shawn: You are very observant; I'll look into that...  ::) Still immensely enjoying the Jackson Browne concert DVD you sent me.  #^

Wayne: I supply aspirins free of charge with my posts... ;)

PJ: Wait until you see the proof of concept twin we are building to ensure that the testbed will work...  LL~

Bob
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Mike Ferguson on December 05, 2013, 04:44:18 AM
PJ: Wait until you see the proof of concept twin we are building to ensure that the testbed will work...  LL~

This is suddenly turning into stunt's version of the movie "Inception"!

Outstanding work as always, Bob.
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on December 05, 2013, 04:55:21 AM
Hi Mike: If only I had Leonardo DiCaprio's hair... :-\

How's your Crossfire project going?

LAter - Bob
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: john e. holliday on December 05, 2013, 07:50:06 AM
Hey Bob, I don't worry about hair any more as it seems the females like the bald look.   Also don't have to worry about  it blowing into my eyes while flying.   By the way, you guys are geniuses.  I like the removable motor mount.
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Keith Renecle on December 05, 2013, 08:59:13 AM
Hi Bob,

Thanks for all of the finer details on the power package and props. I love the test-bed idea and the way you've constructed it. I'm really excited now to see the tests and of course the final twin project flying!

Keith R
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Dan Bregar on December 05, 2013, 05:21:24 PM
 Hi Bob

You used to be a very talented young man. Now your a very talented mature gentleman.  ;)  Thanks for sharing all that you do.  You inspire lots of people  ;)  The Hunt Skunk Works is going strong as usual. You are the best.  :)

Dan
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: MarcusCordeiro on December 05, 2013, 05:24:58 PM
Well, let's sing the soprano then... :P
 LL~ LL~ LL~

Amazing Bob!

Marcus
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Rodrigo Mansano on December 05, 2013, 05:29:11 PM
Marcus, when Bob told us that it was a test bed... i really thought that the blue stuff was not intended for moulding.... after that i almos saw some balls freeeeeeee but the soprano thing was the bestttttt
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: MarcusCordeiro on December 06, 2013, 05:33:35 AM
Marcus, when Bob told us that it was a test bed... i really thought that the blue stuff was not intended for moulding.... after that i almos saw some balls freeeeeeee but the soprano thing was the bestttttt

You better keep this story under wraps, or instead of balls, some wires will get cut, like the ones from the bzttery in a certain model??? LL~ LL~

Marcus
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Rodrigo Mansano on December 06, 2013, 06:34:54 AM
Keep calm Marcus, I´ll keep it with me.... I don´t want my model batteries wire to be cut.......

 ;D
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: john e. holliday on December 06, 2013, 09:03:47 AM
Now you've both done it.  We need the rest of the story now. LL~ LL~ Yes Bobby Hunt is a genius when it comes to stunt planes, but he listens a lot to other ideas.   He has a lot of great friends to keep him on track.  Can't thank Bobby enough for his contributions. H^^
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on December 06, 2013, 05:58:20 PM
Hi Doc:

Marcus bet a couple of vital spherical body parts that the blue foam pieces depicted on the testbed twin were actually mold bucks and not actual "flying" parts. Well... he lost that bet; those are "flying" parts... I pointed that out to him in a subtle fashion, and his friend, Rodrigo, is making Marcus's life a bit miserable over his lost whimsical wager. All in fun, of course... >:D

Thanks, Doc, for the very kind thoughts. I appreciate them, even though I have never felt anywhere near a genius. Just trying to make logical decisions and try as many new things as the time I have left on this orb allows. I am more than glad to share any findings that might help or inspire others. Call it "paying forward" of that which was given to me.

Later - Bob

 
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: MarcusCordeiro on December 07, 2013, 07:36:53 AM
Yeah, never jump to conclusions... LL~ LL~
Bob, you really tricked me... LL~ LL~ LL~

Marcus

Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on December 08, 2013, 07:51:49 PM
Got a bit more done on the testbed twin this weekend. The motors are mounted (yeah, I know, big deal...), the retracts have been mounted and the struts sized and the wheels installed, the hatch holdowns have been installed and I painted on a simulated canopy to give this thing some shape.

If everything goes as planned - and the weather cooperates - we will fly this monster later in the week. Pretty cold and wet outside right now... :-\

Later - Bob Hunt
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: 55chevr on December 08, 2013, 08:16:02 PM
Looks fast sitting still ...


Joe
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Air Ministry . on December 09, 2013, 06:27:37 AM
Looks like it might do something .  H^^
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Rodrigo Mansano on December 09, 2013, 06:42:03 AM
This "testbed" is much better lookint than my models! Congrats Bob, and good luck!
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on December 09, 2013, 08:03:55 AM
Thanks Joe, Matt, and Rodrigo!  H^^

This has been a fun project for Buddy Wieder and me. We've learned a lot already about how to make an electric powered twin, and I'm sure there is a ton of stuff yet to discover. As they say, "The longest journey begins with a single step."  y1

Bob

 
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: john e. holliday on December 09, 2013, 08:15:22 AM
Looking at the pictures of the plane without paint using the different materials, I kind of like the color scheme that has come about.   I know it has to fly great as two of the best are getting there heads together on this.   I like it as it sets.
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on December 09, 2013, 08:31:05 AM
Hi Doc:

Yeah, it has a certain business-like look about it without a "real" finish. With a bit of thought, the carbon on the wing could be applied more neatly and yield a more pleasant "look." We started out with the idea of producing a very spartan-like ship that no one would ever see. It was to be a pure testbed, but as we got going on it, several new ideas popped up, and it just sort of evolved into what you see in the photos. It will make a great motor/timer/ESC/retract test machine, and hopefully it will fly well enough to give us some information as to what to keep and what to change on the actual competition twins, which are next to build.

I have the first twin (the subject of this thread...) in primer and it is almost fully sanded and ready for the ChromaSeal coat and then another sanding before the thin coat of color goes on. That one will for sure be ready for early spring test hops. Hopefully we'll also have the new twins ready for the season.

As my good friend, Dick Sarpolus would say, "Hey, Twins are fun!"

Later - Bob 
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Avaiojet on December 09, 2013, 09:02:05 AM
Bob,

Nice project! Great lines, good looking airplane!!

Spinners!?

You have two nice ones there.

Please, what size are they and where did you get them?

Charles
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on December 09, 2013, 09:35:11 AM
Hi Charles:

The spinners are Tru-Turn 1 1/2-inch diameter units with cuts in one cone for tractor props, and cuts in one for pusher props. This will allow me to try two different rotation schemes. I plan on purchasing another set of spinners just like the ones I have, and that will allow me to experiment with both props turning in the same direction, or in different directions and all the permutations available. I want to know once and for all what configuration is best for our purposes (or at least for my twin designs...).

Later - Bob
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Robby Hunt on December 09, 2013, 03:53:19 PM
If everything goes as planned - and the weather cooperates - we will fly this monster later in the week. Pretty cold and wet outside right now... :-\

Later - Bob Hunt

I may get to see the maiden voyage after all!
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Tom Niebuhr on December 10, 2013, 11:27:53 AM
Bob,
Even the test bed makes the Tucker on the wall look like it is 200 years old. Your inputs are sure helping me myMcDonnell Banshee project.
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Dan Bregar on December 10, 2013, 05:35:33 PM
Dear Mr. Hunt

Very, very cooool !  Lots & lots of potential to say the least....  We are all staying tuned for further reports. If it ever warms up you could fly it pretty soon, no ?   :)
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on December 10, 2013, 05:49:03 PM


Dan: Yeah, it's almost ready to fly. I just have to run a few wires and do some test run-ups before heading for the field. I write a flight report here as soon as we fly it. There are a number of people getting in line here to get some handle time of this one. I predict that we will be seeing a lot of twin electric powered models in the near future. Heck, there are two more starting construction here this week in my shop alone!  n~

Tom: That Tucker has been renamed. It's new moniker is "Frankentucker." It has a new electric nose and a new flap (the old one had a curl in it that was making trimming a nightmare. It's working way better now! Robby has taken custody of this ship and he's flying it very well indeed. He's due back from college for Christmas break later this week. Hopefully we'll get enough good weather to fly the twin and have him put a few patterns on Frankentucker.

Glad our experiments have helped on your Banshee project. Lots of new ground to break... ;D

Later - Bob
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Crist Rigotti on December 10, 2013, 07:20:31 PM
Wish I were closer to you so I could to get in line Bob.  Watching real close.  Of course a smaller ship would fit me better!  Go get 'em Bob.  

Glad to see Robby will be home for Christmas and get some handle time.
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on December 10, 2013, 07:28:16 PM
Hi Crist:

You are in luck; the next twin (after the ones Buddy and I just started building...) will be a classic 35-size ship with two smaller motors and no retracts.  The really neat thing is the world of new designs that has been opened by twins. We have a couple of really slick new ones drawn and lots more in the idea stage.

Later - Bob
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Crist Rigotti on December 10, 2013, 07:38:22 PM
Hi Crist:

You are in luck; the next twin (after the ones Buddy and I just started building...) will be a classic 35-size ship with two smaller motors and no retracts.  The really neat thing is the world of new designs that has been opened by twins. We have a couple of really slick new ones drawn and lots more in the idea stage.

Later - Bob

Wahoo!
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: jfv on December 12, 2013, 10:51:11 AM
Hi Bob:

I have been following this thread closely and am intrigued by the design and the methods of construction.  While the idea of using this minimalistic construction for a test airframe is great, I believe that, as an unintended consequence, for those who might like to try their hand at designing or scratch building, the construction methods offer a really wonderful way for them to get started.  In fact, I have been inspired by your Joe Nall Cadet minimalistic construction to design a new profile using a similar technique.  Keep up the fine work. 
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on December 12, 2013, 02:06:24 PM
Hi Jim:

"Unintended consequence?" Perhaps you meant, unintended benefit, or unintended bonus...?  S?P

I totally agree, and I'm well into the project of bringing the Joe Nall Cadet - and other beginner/intermediate designs to fruition as semi-kits that use the "Lost-Sheeting" method of building. It's light, quick and inexpensive!

Later - Bob
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: ptg on December 12, 2013, 02:14:27 PM
This is a 'sport flyers' dream construction.  As you know I will soon do something similar for my (Ahem >:D) RC designs.
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Air Ministry . on December 13, 2013, 02:58:18 AM
HOWS the WEATHER .

"  You are in luck; the next twin (after the ones Buddy and I just started building...) will be a classic 35-size ship with two smaller motors and no retracts.  "

are we allowed guesses .  :!

(http://casadabalsa.com/DigitalPlans/img/p/8/5/5/855-large_default.jpg)

?
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: 55chevr on December 13, 2013, 08:30:36 AM
I have 2 young student pilots that would benefit from the JN Cadet ... These will build well especially with Bob Hunt's wing cores and electric power ... want a couple when they are available.



Joe
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: john e. holliday on December 13, 2013, 08:48:53 AM
This is a 'sport flyers' dream construction.  As you know I will soon do something similar for my (Ahem >:D) RC designs.

Egads, don't tell me you are going to the twiddly sticks of model planes? ??? ???  Well I did play with them for a few years until I got bored and started flying CL more often. H^^
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: wwwarbird on January 09, 2014, 09:45:22 PM

If everything goes as planned - and the weather cooperates - we will fly this monster later in the week. Pretty cold and wet outside right now... :-\

Later - Bob Hunt

 Well?  #^
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on January 10, 2014, 06:48:39 AM
Well... It's still pretty cold and wet outside!  HB~>

Bob
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: 55chevr on January 10, 2014, 09:33:49 AM
Bob,

It is warm and wet inside at the job.   The warming temperatures are thawing the frozen and cracked pipes in the sprinkler system. 

Joe
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Duke.Johnson on January 10, 2014, 10:34:20 PM
Hey Bob
Is this the Cadet you mentioned when we talked? I've never built a swept LE wing, might be beyond my building ability.  It is a cool looking plane.  My son and I were wondering when you might have the kits ready and how much they are going to cost.
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on January 11, 2014, 10:33:38 AM
Hi Duke:

There is no "building" really to be done on the wing; it's a foam core. Piece of cake! I'm hoping to find some time this month to finish the plans and get the semi-kit ready for market.

Later - Bob
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Duke.Johnson on January 11, 2014, 07:58:06 PM
Thanks, I'll keep my eye on this thread
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Larry Wong on January 26, 2014, 08:59:58 PM
Bob How or what do you use to apply the carbon matt. to the foam?   ???
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: David_Stack on January 27, 2014, 08:22:16 AM
Good Morning Larry;

  Back in post #354, Bob discusses the construction of the wing, what her terms his "Lost-Sheeting method"

  Requoted here:

  "We used the same technique to build the wing for this testbed model as we did for the Joe Nall Cadet models. We call this construction the  "Lost-Sheeting method." There is no balsa sheeting on the wing. The wing is a solid foam core made from 1-pound density foam. There is a slot cut in the center of the wing cores to allow the leadouts to get to the tip and have some adjustment. There are slots cut into the top and the bottom of the wing at the high point to accept 1/2 x 1/8- inch basswood spars. The spars run the full span of the wing. There are several shear webs imbedded in the core between the spar slots to prevent the spars from "racking." That is the technical term for what the spars want to do on either side of the wing during maneuvering. In an inside maneuver the top spar in in compression and the bottom spar is in tension. If there were no webs between them, they would try to "clap hands" under stress. The webs prevent the spars from trying to move and hence impart a tremendous amount of strength. Enough not to break under maneuvering loads by themselves? Not quite. After the spars are glued into the slots and are firmly glued to the vertical grain shear webs, we apply .2 (two tenths ounce per square yard) carbon mat using water thinned Titebond wood glue. The carbon is first applied from the back of the spar on the top, around the leading edge and ends at the back of the spar on the bottom. A thin carbon strip reinforces the trailing edge area, and an additional piece strengthens the entire center section area."

r/
Dave
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Larry Wong on January 27, 2014, 08:49:45 AM
Thanks I miss that part ,I guess water base paint would work ok.
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Mike Ferguson on February 14, 2014, 07:52:28 AM
I blame Bob for the current Polar Vortex Snowpocalypse (TM) that's hit the Northeast.

Ever since you wrote that you were hoping to fly the twin testbed "in a week or so" in December, it's been nothing but snow, snow, snow ...

#kidding  ;)

Serious, hope you get to fly it soon, Bob ... and that good weather's around the corner.
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Robby Hunt on February 15, 2014, 10:01:29 AM
I blame Bob for the current Polar Vortex Snowpocalypse (TM) that's hit the Northeast.

I blame all things vortex related on PJ.
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: wwwarbird on March 25, 2014, 05:19:32 PM

 Any new news on the twin? ???
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on March 29, 2014, 06:59:44 AM
Hi Wayne:

Yes! There is some news to report on for both of my twins (counting the test-bed, I now actually have three of them here!). I'm just about done sanding the primer coat on the Second Wind (the first twin...), and I just installed the wing in the Wildfire twin. I'm attaching a few photos that depict how I install and line up the wing.

The top and bottom shells are also done and ready to install once the wing and tail are in place and the controls hooked up. The tail assembly is done and covered with .2 carbon, so the progress should go fast this week.

Later - Bob
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: john e. holliday on March 29, 2014, 08:31:07 AM
I bet your foam supplier loves you>   Great idea on the lining up the wing and fuse.
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on March 29, 2014, 08:37:13 AM
I bet your foam supplier loves you>   Great idea on the lining up the wing and fuse.

Yeah, they send me Christmas presents and everything...   H^^

Seriously, I am just small potatoes to them. I buy half billets several times a year. A half billet is 37 x 48 inches x 8 feet! That's half a billet... A full billet is 16 feet long! When I go to pick up foam I see hundreds of full billets lined up and curing. It's a big building!  %^@

Later - Bob  
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on March 30, 2014, 01:33:53 PM
Got quite a bit more done on the new twin. I glued the bottom molded shell on yesterday and sanded it into the fuselage sides. The stabilizer went in today. I use a Johnson Angle Finder and custom fixtures to accomplish this very accurately. The fixture that holds the stabilizer is made from Lite-Ply and accepts different top plates to suit various stabilizers. It has fore and aft slides that are anchored with 4:40 screws and elastic stop nuts. I intend to make this fixture available in kit form as a new product from Robin's View Productions. I've used this fixture a few times now and I'm very pleased with how easy it makes a difficult job.  I set the incidence in the stab to be about a half degree positive in the leading edge. I just don't want any negative incidence!

The photos below should tell the story well... H^^

Later - Bob Hunt
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on March 30, 2014, 01:58:44 PM
Here are the custom made horn retainers that I make. They are fitted beforehand to insure that the horn will center on the stabilizer rear face. I make these retainers from 1/16-inch thick plywood. I install them after the stabilizer is glued in place.

Later - Bob Hunt
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: wwwarbird on March 30, 2014, 08:45:36 PM

 Thanks for the update Bob, everything looks great. Waiting for some paint... S?P ;D
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on March 31, 2014, 06:34:32 AM
Hi Wayne:

Yeah, I'm anxious to see some paint as well. I spray my ships in Buddy Wieder's garage. Buddy "winters" in Florida each year and he is coming home this week. The Second Wind twin is virtually ready for the ChromaSeal coat, then bit of sanding and then the color coats. It should be finished by the end of April, but no promises...  :-\

The big push now is to get the new twin caught up. As you can see from the photos, this one is coming along fast. It incorporates all the lessons learned from the building of the Second Wind, so there was not too much new "engineering" to do. It's coming together just as fast as I can build; no down time for thought...

The top shell goes on the new bird tonight, and then it's just a matter of details and the nacelles. The nacelles will be the last thing to be built and installed. Buddy and I built the test bed twin (photos earlier in this thread) to determine just where the thrust line should be located. Once that is resolved, the nacelles should take only a few days to build and mount.

I'm really enjoying this new build (so far at least). Everything is coming together as I had hoped and better.

Later - Bob Hunt
  
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: 55chevr on April 01, 2014, 09:05:33 AM
Looks fast sitting still ... has a very "aero" appearance.  Beautiful.


JD
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on April 06, 2014, 06:12:44 PM
Thanks, Joe!

Today I got a bit done. I punched holes in the top shell formers to allow airflow through the fuselage, and to lighten the shell a bit. The cooling air for the battery actually passes through the fuselage and out an opening in the tail cone. I've been doing this with the Crossfire series very successfully.

The cross bracing pieces went in earlier this week. I double checked everything in the fuselage and then installed the top shell permanently. Tomorrow I'll sand the top shell to match the fuselage sides and then the tail cone will be fit and installed. After that the front end blocks will be fit, carved and hollowed and the nose gear retract mount will go in, along with the battery mounts.

I also finished designing the nacelles today and will start on them tomorrow or Tuesday.

Later - Bob Hunt   
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on April 17, 2014, 06:01:39 PM
Got a bit done this past week on the new twin. I was ready to take a bunch of photos of the ship as it sits now, but after one shot the battery in the camera went dead. So, here's just a teaser of what the nose of the main fuselage will look like. You just sort of have to picture it in your mind with my normal "Crossfire-Like" canopy.

By Sunday the ship should be ready for the nacelles to go on and then it's just a short bit of work until the finish goes on. This one has me excited! #^

Later - Bob Hunt
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: 55chevr on April 18, 2014, 06:02:07 AM
Bob - I love the look of the "TwinFire".     I want to this fly. 
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: 55chevr on April 18, 2014, 06:16:38 AM
Insert Quote

Bob - I love the look of the "TwinFire".     I want to see this plane fly.
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on April 19, 2014, 02:18:58 PM
Yeah, me too, Joe! :P

Got some done today. I hollowed the nose blocks (top and bottom) and made a fin and rudder, The ventral fin (bottom fin) is just a silhouette to find the right shape; it may change a bit...

I taped everything together for a "hangar flying" session. Tonight the nose wheel retract mount goes in and tomorrow the bottom block goes on permanently. Then the fuselage will be sealed and carbon covered. After that it's just fitting the nacelles and we are into finish.

The tentative name for this beast is "Wildfire." That may change, too... ;D

Later - Bob Hunt 
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on April 19, 2014, 06:30:12 PM
Got a bit more done this evening. Here are a few photos of the front retract mount and how it fits in the front of the fuselage. The bottom cowl just fits over this assembly. Later tonight I'll seal all the wood in the front end with a very thin coat of Z-Poxy Finishing resin to ward off moisture.

Later - Bob Hunt
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Mark Scarborough on April 19, 2014, 07:05:06 PM
Bob, those retracts are something huh,,

I have been reading some stuff on them,, it might be a good idea to make some form of strain relief for the wire exits,, I have heard of a few problems with wires fatiguing at the exit point,, MOSTLY on nose gear as a result of the steering portion from what I gather,, but it may be a good idea to be safer than sorrier,,

:)
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on April 19, 2014, 07:24:57 PM
Hi Mark:

I'm not using the stock struts. I have had special ones made that are more robust. Also, I'm not using an actual E-Flite nose gear in the nose of this ship; it is a standard gear with no steering capability. I've researched these retracts quite a bit and am confident that they will perform well in this application. As a safeguard I might put "whisker skids" at all three gear points to protect the model in case of a malfunction. Of course these would only be used in practice; I'll remove them for appearance point judging and actual competition flights.

Thanks for your concern!  H^^

Later - Bob   
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Mark Scarborough on April 19, 2014, 09:36:39 PM
Hi Mark:

I'm not using the stock struts. I have had special ones made that are more robust. Also, I'm not using an actual E-Flite nose gear in the nose of this ship; it is a standard gear with no steering capability. I've researched these retracts quite a bit and am confident that they will perform well in this application. As a safeguard I might put "whisker skids" at all three gear points to protect the model in case of a malfunction. Of course these would only be used in practice; I'll remove them for appearance point judging and actual competition flights.

Thanks for your concern!  H^^

Later - Bob   
knowing how hard you work on your finish,, Just thought I would pass it on,,
I agree, they are pretty well made units,, and of course,, it makes sense not to use a steering retract,,
Aside from the minor issue with the servo wire fatigue,, ( not the strut wire) I think they are pretty darn reliable from what I have seen,, I too have a set in the drawer,, waiting,,,,,,
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: wwwarbird on April 19, 2014, 11:12:48 PM
Aside from the minor issue with the servo wire fatigue,, ( not the strut wire) I think they are pretty darn reliable from what I have seen,,

 How about a little fillet of silicone around the servo wire lead to help support it?
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on April 20, 2014, 07:49:16 AM
Hi Wayne:

It is my understanding (please someone correct me if I'm mistaken...) that silicone emits a substance when it cures that will corrode wiring. Back when I was flying RC Pattern, I was told to never put any silicone anywhere near any electrical components.

I'd like to take this opportunity to say Happy Easter to everyone, to ask for God's blessings on us all, and to thank God for His gift of His Son, Jesus.

Bob Hunt
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on April 20, 2014, 09:38:12 AM
More to report:

One of the less glamorous chores to accomplish when building a twin -- but a very necessary one -- is to determine just how long the noses of the nacelles must be to achieve the proper CG range when the model is complete. This is made easier by making "dummy" profile nacelles that have an adjustment range for the motor mount positions. The nose gear retract must be put in place, along with the battery and the motors. I position the battery as far aft in its compartment as it will go, and then check the CG. More finish will go on aft of the CG than ahead of it, so I adjust the model to be slightly nose heavy during this test. If the CG shifts aft when the plane is done, I can simply adjust the battery forward a bit. There is one battery; a 4000 mAh 4S Hyperion. We might be able to get by with a 3300 mAh 4S, and if so, I'll have to shift it quite far forward in the battery compartment. This is all sort of a well-educated guess at this point, but by checking the approximate CG with the "dummy" nacelles, it's a more well-educated guess! %^@

Here are some photos of the plane with everything taped in place for the CG check. The "real" nacelles will be built-up units and I'm starting on them just after I finish this post!

Later - Bob Hunt 
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Crist Rigotti on April 20, 2014, 11:55:12 AM
Bob,
Very cool.  I would think you'd have the spinners and props installed also when doing this sorta check?
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on April 20, 2014, 12:04:45 PM
You're absolutely right, Crist; I just threw the motors in place for the photos and I'll add the props and the spinners and check the CG before starting the drawings of the actual nacelles. I just had a few moments to take those last photos before having to go carve the bird for dinner... Some things take priority!  <=

Later - Bob
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: MarcusCordeiro on April 20, 2014, 08:16:10 PM
Fabulous!!!

Marcus
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Crist Rigotti on April 20, 2014, 08:26:39 PM
You're absolutely right, Crist; I just threw the motors in place for the photos and I'll add the props and the spinners and check the CG before starting the drawings of the actual nacelles. I just had a few moments to take those last photos before having to go carve the bird for dinner... Some things take priority!  <=

Later - Bob

I hope you and your family had a very happy Easter and wonderful dinner.
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: RandySmith on April 21, 2014, 02:51:35 PM
Hi Wayne:

It is my understanding (please someone correct me if I'm mistaken...) that silicone emits a substance when it cures that will corrode wiring. Back when I was flying RC Pattern, I was told to never put any silicone anywhere near any electrical components.

I'd like to take this opportunity to say Happy Easter to everyone, to ask for God's blessings on us all, and to thank God for His gift of His Son, Jesus.

Bob Hunt

Hi Bob

You can use Silicone but you need to "sleeve" the wire or part, just use a piece of plastic tube, or heatshrink will also do, the just put the silicone on the part the sleeve covers, let air dry in "OPEN" ventilated space.
The substance or gas it emits is acetic acid, or vinegar taken to the next step.
Randy
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on April 22, 2014, 08:21:39 PM
Thanks, Randy; I'll look into that... :)

New stuff: I designed the nacelles armed with the CG information from the "dummy nacelle" procedure outlined above. Since this model has a leading edge "cuff," the two nacelle sides are quite different where they attach to the wing. In order to get absolutely accurate shapes for the nacelle sides I made two ribs from the Lost-Foam fixture set from which the wing for this model was built. When I designed the wing I laid out a rib 1-inch from either side of the meeting of the inner and outer wing panels. By making another of each of these ribs, and then covering them with a layer of 1/16-inch balsa (which is what the wing is covered with...). I was able to achieve a perfect shape for the nacelles and insure that they will fit the wing and line up with each other at the front.

The next step was to make a template of the inner and outer nacelle sides and then use those templates to lay out the actual 1/32 inch plywood doublers. The balsa nacelle sides were then molded to the proper top view shape in custom cut foam fixtures. This process allows the sides to flow into the spinner shape without inducing an tension in the nacelle sides.

Here are a couple of photos. I'll try to get a few taken that depict the entire process described above.

Later - Bob

     
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on April 23, 2014, 08:43:28 AM
The nacelle sides came out of the forms this morning and I trimmed them and test fit them on the wing. All good so far!  #^

Note the top view shot of one of the nacelle sides attached below; it clearly shows the curve that was molded into the side to allow it to flow into the spinner shape without having to draw the nacelle sides together with pressure.

Later - Bob Hunt
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on April 24, 2014, 02:15:12 PM
More done today:

The nacelle sides with doublers were removed from the molds and trimmed. The next step was assembly of the nacelle crutches. The accompanying photos should tell the story of how this was done.

Tonight I'll make the G-10 motor mounts and install them.

Getting close to completion of the construction! My target date for that is May 1. Looks like I'll hit it with a couple of days to spare... #^

Later - Bob Hunt
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on April 26, 2014, 11:27:36 AM
More done today:

I made a 1/32-inch thick plywood template of the desired motor mount plate and then used it to scribe two G-10 mount plates. The plates were cut from a sheet of G-10 using a motorized hand-tool fitted with a 1/8-inch diameter carbide bit.

The plates were brought to exact width dimension using a disk sander.

The plates were then fitted to the model using the nose ring as a fixture with which to perfectly position the mount plate. This is the same method as is described in my Hardnose Motor Mount Manual. That manual is available at no charge in PDF form. If you would like a copy, please email me at robinhunt@rcn.com

Once the mount was positioned properly, I used a small amount of medium CA glue to hold it in place. The plates will be more securely fastened to the plywood doublers with front and rear bracing that will be installed with long-curing epoxy and microballoons.

More later ...

Bob Hunt
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Allan Perret on April 26, 2014, 04:25:46 PM
So what brand of long-curing epoxy do you use/like ?
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on April 26, 2014, 04:52:01 PM
Hi Allan:

Well, these days it is difficult to find any 3-hour epoxy; that's what I'd really like to use... I just loved the old HobbyPoxy Formula III 3-hour glue (24 hour complete cure). These days I'm using either a 45 minute epoxy from Great Planes, or the 30-minute Zap brand. I avoid using 5-minute and 15-minute epoxies; they just don't penetrate well. I always use epoxy glue with microballoons mixed in for gap filling properties and extra strength.

Later - Bob
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on April 26, 2014, 09:04:06 PM
Long day...

Here is the last stuff for tonight.  <=

The first two photos show the filler piece that fits between the front of the motor mount plate and the nose ring. There will also be supports behind the mount.

The last photos depict the templating and installation of the nacelle bottom block. Tomorrow morning I'll tack the top blocks in place on the nacelles and begin the carving process. If all goes well I should be able to install the nacelles onto the wing late tomorrow or at worst by Monday evening.

Good night - Bob 
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on April 27, 2014, 02:53:33 PM
Carving day!  :P

Spent the afternoon carving and sanding one of the nacelles to shape. I'll tackle the other one after dinner. Lemon Chicken! Yum...  #^

Later - Bob Hunt
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on April 27, 2014, 03:37:07 PM
Couldn't resist fitting the one carved and sanded nacelle to the wing just for a quick "hangar flying" session.

Oops; Marianne is calling me for dinner!  ;D

Bob Hunt
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: James Mills on April 27, 2014, 04:00:48 PM
Very cool Bob, look forward to seeing it in person.

James
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Noel Corney on April 27, 2014, 04:17:20 PM
Bob , You are using micro balloons in your epoxy as GAP filler!!!! I didn't think that at your level of craftmanship you would have those, But as for making the epoxy stronger I have avoided using it except when absolutly necessary as my understanding was that it weakend the joint!!! TIA . Noel.
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on April 27, 2014, 04:29:12 PM
Hi Noel:

Actually a man I know that worked in the adhesive/chemical business told me to never use epoxy glue without a binding agent such as milled glass fibers or microballoons...

Later - Bob
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: wwwarbird on April 27, 2014, 06:33:42 PM
Hi Noel:

Actually a man I know that worked in the adhesive/chemical business told me to never use epoxy glue without a binding agent such as milled glass fibers or microballoons...

Later - Bob

 Hmm, really? How about when laminating?
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on April 27, 2014, 06:33:44 PM
Last stuff for today...

I carved and sanded the other nacelle and test fit them both to the airframe. Tomorrow I'll start hollowing the blocks and should be ready to install the nacelles by Tuesday or Wednesday. The next photos will be of the installation process.

G'night - Bob 
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on April 27, 2014, 09:14:40 PM
Hmm, really? How about when laminating?

That seems to be the one caveat. But, then again, typically we don't use epoxy "glue" for laminating; we use epoxy-based finishing resin.  

Later - Bob
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Robby Hunt on April 27, 2014, 10:59:10 PM
Lookin' badass Bubba!
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Noel Corney on April 27, 2014, 11:41:24 PM
Thanks Bob,I have been wary of using micro balloons in my epoxy, Makes it easier to use in my opinion. Are there any ratios recommended?? Noel.
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Allan Perret on April 28, 2014, 07:33:02 AM
Good info at West Systems about use of fillers in epoxy:

http://www.westsystem.com/ss/filler-selection-guide/

http://www.westsystem.com/ss/adding-fillers/

Microballoons is a good filler for fillets/fairings, but there are better fillers for joint strength. 
I have a container of the 410, the stuff is so light you have to be careful not to breath when you open it up.
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on May 06, 2014, 05:32:11 PM
That is good information, Allan; thanks!

Got a bit done over the weekend and today:

I covered the fuselage with carbon and installed the dorsal fin and rudder. I also doubled the carbon covering in the area on the wing halves where the nacelles will reside. Next I made the fixture that holds the nacelle crutches in proper alignment and taped them to the fixtures. The airframe was then slid into place and aligned in all axis. Finally, the nacelles crutches were glued to the wing. Doesn't seem like a lot, but it was quite time consuming.

The next step is to glue the nacelle tops in place and make the main gear retract mounts and install them in the nacelles. After that it is just a matter of fitting the lower nacelle blocks in place and installing hold downs for the lower access hatch on the nacelles.

Later - Bob
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Larry Renger on May 06, 2014, 05:57:02 PM
This is the third one, actually, isn't it? Whatever became of the first one and the test one? Or am I losing track?  n~
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on May 06, 2014, 06:02:46 PM
This is the third one, actually, isn't it? Whatever became of the first one and the test one? Or am I losing track?  n~

Yup; this is the third one. The first one is in the finish process and I'm trying to get the new one caught up to it so that I can paint them both on the same day. The test bed was built to test motors, retracts, props, etc. It will fly next week. Dean Pappas just finished wiring up the harness for that ship. We will test all the harnesses in the test bed before installing them in the actual competition ships.

Yes, this has been a long project, but I'm not counting days... just knowledge and experience in making these things. I hope to very soon be learning about how they fly. I just thought that the building process of these ships might be of interest to the readers on this forum.

Later - Bob 
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Larry Renger on May 06, 2014, 06:05:30 PM
Absolutely interesting! I guess we have less patience than you do.  :##
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: wwwarbird on May 06, 2014, 10:23:59 PM
I just thought that the building process of these ships might be of interest to the readers on this forum.

Later - Bob 

 Yup, very much so. Sure am anxious to see some color though! ;D
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on May 07, 2014, 04:33:24 AM
Gee Wayne, it has dark gray on it now... LL~

Trust me, I'm working just about as fast as I'm able to. In fact, this one is coming together faster than any plane in the past for me. It's a very complex subject, however, and I really need to "eat this elephant one bite at a time" just to be sure I don't forget anything or rush through anything and get it wrong.

I couldn't resist taping the nacelle parts to the crutches for a hangar flying session... #^

I'm going to carbon the fin and rudder today, and also work on the front main access hatch holdowns, and glue the nacelle top pieces on permanently. My hope is to be in full finish mode by the weekend.

Later - Bob
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on May 07, 2014, 05:04:53 AM
Here are a couple of shots of the bottom that show that nacelles to good effect. The main retract gear mounts will also go in today or tomorrow.

Later - Bob
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Allan Perret on May 07, 2014, 06:59:45 AM
That nacelle alignment process is pretty impressive.  And it does look like a lot..

Just curious, when doping the cf on the rudder/fin do you have a fixture to hold model with wing vertical so the rudder surfaces are horizontal. 

I use a cardboard box about 3ft tall, and the 20" x 20" top opening is lined with foam pipe insulation to protect model.  Works great.   
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on May 07, 2014, 12:56:22 PM
Hi Allan:

My holding fixture is pretty simple. I clamp two 3/4 x 2-inch pine strips to the edge of my bench and then cushion them with a couple of layers of microfiber towels. Easy and quick...

Later - Bob
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: wwwarbird on May 07, 2014, 09:36:08 PM
Gee Wayne, it has dark gray on it now... LL~

Trust me, I'm working just about as fast as I'm able to.

Later - Bob

 Just keepin' ya on your toes Bob! ;D
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: MarcusCordeiro on May 08, 2014, 10:17:59 AM
 8) 8) 8) 8) 8) 8) 8) 8) 8)

Marcus
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on May 14, 2014, 09:49:37 AM
Okay, I got a bit more done.

The retract mount supports were made from 1/16-inch plywood and they get installed against the rear inner faces of the nacelles. Next, a 1/8-inch plywood retract mount was installed on the supports. Note that there is a hole in the rear of the mount that will serve as the holdown for the nacelle hatches.

I've spent a lot of time getting the top hatch to fit perfectly and all the parts are now carbon covered. The primer will be shot on this weekend. #^

Later - Bob Hunt
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Tom Niebuhr on May 14, 2014, 10:14:39 AM
Thanks for another update. Looking goooooood!

I hope that you don't run out of time to fly the twin at the Nats.
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on May 15, 2014, 02:34:29 PM
Thanks, Tom!

Got a bit done last night and this afternoon. The fillets are in and I made a fixture to hold the plane while priming and painting. Primer goes on Sunday!

Later - Bob
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: MarcusCordeiro on May 15, 2014, 03:14:29 PM
Such a beautiful job!!

Marcus
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Chris Cox on May 15, 2014, 06:25:55 PM
Great fit on the gear doors Bob.  They are virtually invisible  >:D
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on May 15, 2014, 07:45:42 PM
Great fit on the gear doors Bob.  They are virtually invisible  >:D

The bomb bay doors are also a great fit, Chris...  VD~

Marcus: Thanks for the kind comments! #^

Bob %^@
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: wwwarbird on May 15, 2014, 09:55:20 PM
Primer goes on Sunday!
 

    #^ o2oP CLP** (PE**) (051) DV^^ HH%% #^
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Chris Cox on May 15, 2014, 11:04:13 PM
All kidding aside Bob, it looks great!  Can't wait to hear how it flies.

That said, the bomb door idea isn't too bad!
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Alan Resinger on May 16, 2014, 07:51:49 AM
Bob,
What size props are you going to use?  I know a guy that might be able to supply you with a RH and LH pair for the project.
Alan
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: john e. holliday on May 16, 2014, 08:32:38 AM
With that carbon finish it reminds me of some of the military jets that are flying.   It's looking great and I hope is worth the effort. H^^
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Tom Niebuhr on May 16, 2014, 09:14:45 AM
Bob,

Remember that AMA does not allow things dropping off airplanes during official flights....so......keep the bombing runs for demos only!!!!!
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Tom Niebuhr on May 16, 2014, 09:47:02 AM
Bob, Chris,

Now that the real purpose of this magnificent project has been revealed, a name change is in order.  Electro Bomber; Hi Voltage Bomber; Electron Bomber; Shocking Bomber:???????????????
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Robby Hunt on May 16, 2014, 11:08:46 AM
"Voltage Drop" anyone? Haha.
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bill Little on May 16, 2014, 03:11:10 PM
Hi Bob,

As usual your workmanship is awesome.  I hope it flies beyond your expectations!  Looking forward to seeing it in paint and hearing the flight reports.

Bill
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Tim Wescott on May 16, 2014, 03:16:06 PM
I think that electric planes have been around long enough that we don't need to have electron-themed names for the things.

Lesse -- twin engine, looks like a mosquito but it's not.  Musquito, bug, interesting bug, interesting flying bug -- lightnin' bug!
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Robby Hunt on May 17, 2014, 11:38:15 AM
I think that electric planes have been around long enough that we don't need to have electron-themed names for the things.


Are you positive? Don't be negative.
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Tom Niebuhr on May 17, 2014, 02:03:27 PM
Tim,

Bob mentioned the bomb doors in jest. I have known Bob since we were both in our teens. Certainly Robby knows his dad pretty well. So Robby, Chris and I are having some fun at Bobby's expense, and I am sure he is laughing with us.

So like Robby suggested, don't be negative.

I sort of like Robby's "Voltage Drop". After all, Bob said it is a bomber! Maybe someone else can come up with another name.
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Robby Hunt on May 17, 2014, 02:23:41 PM

Lesse -- twin engine, looks like a mosquito but it's not.  Musquito, bug, interesting bug, interesting flying bug -- lightnin' bug!

I'd say Tim is right there too!
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: wwwarbird on May 17, 2014, 10:44:34 PM
 Since it's a twin, having two "thrust generators",  I think Bob's "Second Wind" name is really cool and actually applies to the entire project. Beyond that, it may take Howard to resurface here to come up with a topper. ;D
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Dean Pappas on May 19, 2014, 09:51:20 PM
Are you positive? Don't be negative.
I ought to say something clever about staying grounded during these discussions ... but I won't.
Dean
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Robby Hunt on May 20, 2014, 05:33:50 AM
I ought to say something clever about staying grounded during these discussions ... but I won't.
Dean

Uncle Dean, I know deep down you're still pulling for "Fred" in the name game, but surely you won't impede. ;)
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Shawn Lenci on May 20, 2014, 04:06:51 PM
Since Bob designed the "Hole Shot"...how new twin being called the "Double Shot"?  :)

Shawn
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Eric Viglione on May 21, 2014, 06:06:03 AM
I think that electric planes have been around long enough that we don't need to have electron-themed names for the things.

Lesse -- twin engine, looks like a mosquito but it's not.  Musquito, bug, interesting bug, interesting flying bug -- lightnin' bug!

Tim, Bob could just go with the thread title, but I do like your wind idea...so... how about "New Electric Wind Twin" ? The best part of this name is obviously that we would get to call it "The NEWT" for short. :)
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: MarcusCordeiro on May 21, 2014, 11:11:22 AM
Bob

Only the truth....
It's threads like yours that get us, normal people, motivated to dare try to build something that vaguely resembles what you and the other top builders do here.
If I am a better builder now, I owe it all to the people who post here.


Marcus
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: wwwarbird on May 21, 2014, 10:39:38 PM

 Bob,

 Did the primer happen last Sunday?
Title: Re: Is this going to be Nats Ready ?
Post by: PJ Rowland on May 21, 2014, 10:50:02 PM
I've seen a lot of talk, and a lot of Photo's - as impressive as this is.. I just want to know if its NATS Ready ?

And if so - will this be the year ? Only a few more weeks.....

Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on May 22, 2014, 03:42:11 AM
Hi PJ:

Well... no, this one will not be at the Nats. I was trying hard to make that deadline, but some unforeseen and amazing circumstances in my work have made it impossible for me to spend the time on this project that I had hoped to.

I have come upon a deal that netted me an incredible amount of balsa wood, plywood, sheet butyrate plastic, fiberglass. music wire, maple, and spruce, and I had to get it transported from where it was to my shop. I have to grade it all out and get it ready to market. It has left me with virtually no time to finish the new twin. I am hoping to have the older "new twin" ready for the Nats as it is much closer to fruition. Sometimes real world issues just take precedence.

Sorry - Bob :-\     

Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Larry Renger on May 22, 2014, 08:30:09 AM
Fly it in primer if you have to, I bet you still get 10 points for appearance! It's beautiful in just carbon veil!
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Dean Pappas on May 22, 2014, 08:29:34 PM
F.R.E.D. shall rise again!  H^^
Dean
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Robby Hunt on May 22, 2014, 09:12:15 PM
F.R.E.D. shall rise again!  H^^
Dean

I retract my jest. ;)
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: PJ Rowland on May 22, 2014, 11:23:17 PM
Sometimes real world issues arise ?

I got married, and am coming over on a Honeymoon to fly in the Nats - From Australia.. dont tell me you can't get that finished.

PRIORITIZE !!!!!

:-)

Im sure you will take your time and have something amazing.
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Kerry Ewart on May 24, 2014, 03:21:02 PM
A twin with retracts,,the limitations are endless I say,,,
Counter rotating props Bob ?????
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on May 26, 2014, 12:32:09 PM
Hi Kerry:

Yup; counter-rotating, not contra-rotating... ;D
 

Wayne: I know you've been wanting to see color on the twin. Well, I've put the new twin on the back burner until after the Nats, but I've continued on with the original twin. It's a bit smaller, but it should be fine. I sprayed on the Chroma Seal coat today. I'll sand it tomorrow and it will be ready for the base white coat by Wednesday.

Later - Bob
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Tom Niebuhr on May 27, 2014, 10:09:11 AM
Bob,
I am confused. What is the difference in the two twins. I know you had a test twin with profile nacelles. Are their two full bodied twins. Am I losing track of all your projects?
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on May 27, 2014, 11:03:24 AM
Bob,
I am confused. What is the difference in the two twins. I know you had a test twin with profile nacelles. Are their two full bodied twins. Am I losing track of all your projects?

Hi Tom:

I don't know if you are losing track of my projects, but I'm pretty sure that I am... :-\

The "new" new twin is just too far out to complete for possible use at the Nats. The "old" new twin is much further along and could be flying in about two weeks if I hustle. I had a major distraction happen in the midst of my Nats push that put everything on the back burner for a couple of weeks. Unavoidable...

I will not ruin the "new" new twin by rushing it; it's just too good for that. As Jackson Browne wrote, "Time is the conqueror." Boy howdy... n~

Later - Bob
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Tom Niebuhr on May 27, 2014, 11:58:41 AM
Bob,
So is there a "Third Wind" which is which???
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Mike Ferguson on May 27, 2014, 12:21:02 PM
The thread started with the "old new twin" (the Second Wind, which you can see in photos has a built up Lost Foam wing).

The testbed first was mentioned here (http://stunthanger.com/smf/index.php?topic=19749.msg336721#msg336721).

The "New new twin" is the Wildfire (http://stunthanger.com/smf/index.php?topic=19749.msg352878#msg352878) (which you can see in photos has a sheeted foam wing.)

Pictures of all three (old new, new new, and testbed) are here (http://stunthanger.com/smf/index.php?topic=19749.msg353161#msg353161).
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on May 27, 2014, 02:18:41 PM
Egads! Mike's sorted it all out! ;D

Hey Mike, I do believe that you are the one person who might be able to balance my checkbook... %^@

Later - Bob Hunt
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: wwwarbird on May 27, 2014, 10:06:58 PM

 Nice to see some progress with the finish Bob, hopefully we'll see it all wrapped up and flying soon. #^
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: MarcusCordeiro on June 06, 2014, 07:00:27 AM
Wow, wow, and wow!!!!.... :D 8) 8) 8)

Marcus

Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: PJ Rowland on June 06, 2014, 07:59:21 PM
I just noticed looking at the photo of the twin in Chromaseal that you have in the background exactly what I'm looking for :

I'm in the middle of making the worlds biggest game of monopoly - and I need giant Dice.

 
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on June 15, 2014, 08:15:31 PM
I spent Father's Day applying the red trim and a bit of the blue trim. Also got the canopy on. One more long day should do it!

Later - Bob Hunt
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: wwwarbird on June 15, 2014, 08:41:00 PM

  NOW we're talkin'!!! o2oP CLP** o2oP

  I like how you went with a straight line over the top for rear portion of the "canopy", it looks more realistic than the Crossfire type. y1 
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Tom Niebuhr on June 16, 2014, 05:23:44 AM
Looks great!

Now the final work and graphics, clear coat and flight.  The NATS are getting very close. I know that you have very good airplanes ready, but I hope that this will be your NATS plane.
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Tom Niebuhr on June 16, 2014, 09:10:20 AM
Here is the new Huntmobile!
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on June 16, 2014, 11:47:08 AM
 NOW we're talkin'!!! o2oP CLP** o2oP

  I like how you went with a straight line over the top for rear portion of the "canopy", it looks more realistic than the Crossfire type. y1  

Thanks, Wayne:

The Crossfire canopy treatment is meant to simulate many of the modern jets that have such shaped canopies. The twin is supposed to be more of a private plane look. Although it's always madness on my part, there is often method associated with it.  n~

Later - Bob Hunt
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: wwwarbird on June 16, 2014, 06:09:27 PM
The Crossfire canopy treatment is meant to simulate many of the modern jets that have such shaped canopies. The twin is supposed to be more of a private plane look. Although it's always madness on my part, there is often method associated with it.  n~

Later - Bob Hunt

 Yup, gotcha. :)
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: James Mills on June 19, 2014, 09:37:00 PM
I spent Father's Day applying the red trim and a bit of the blue trim. Also got the canopy on. One more long day should do it!

Later - Bob Hunt
Bob,

Looks nice, look forward to seeing the finished product.

James
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Air Ministry . on June 20, 2014, 07:04:13 AM
Wel l , That was quick . :P Like good wine , I suppose .  ;D H^^
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: wwwarbird on June 29, 2014, 10:37:14 PM

 How's the paint coming along Bob?
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on July 03, 2014, 07:51:17 AM
Everything on the twin has come to a pause until after the Nats. I really wanted to get this thing done for the Nats, but everything in my life conspired to make that impossible for this year. I will finish it after the Nats and then get to work finishing up the new twin as well.

My thanks go out to everyone who has been following this long-running thread, and to those who have posted comments and questions. Trust me, these projects will reach fruition.

Later - Bob Hunt
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: john e. holliday on July 03, 2014, 09:36:01 AM
I'll be waiting.   Have fun at the NATS.
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Air Ministry . on July 24, 2014, 02:14:34 AM
RIGHT .

No Impediments NOW . ! n1

Test Flight DUE . . . . ;D

 H^^
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Tom Niebuhr on July 24, 2014, 07:29:45 AM
I little bird told me that the first twin will be in the air, possibly in less than a week, weather permitting.

Looking forward to the first flight report and pictures.
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on August 11, 2014, 09:12:19 AM
Okay, big news! Buddy Wieder, Tom Hampshire and I flew the testbed twin this morning! #^

Good stuff for sure and a few very minor glitches: First the good stuff. The motors ran perfectly throughout all 10 flights this morning. We flew a couple of one minute flights to be certain that everything was adjusted properly, and then flew some 4 minute flights. Trust me, you will not want to arm wrestle with Buddy and me after next year's season...  y1

It was neat to be able to trim the amount of degree tangent to the circle that the airplane flew with the adjustable pot on the timer. We made the inboard motor run just about 100 rpm's faster than the outboard motor. We may be able to dial that back a bit since we have more than adequate line tension. Just wanted to be safe for the first few flights...

The wings are not yet perfectly level and I suspect that I may have a curl in the outboard flap. The flaps are raw 1-pound foam covered with .2 ounce/sq.yd. carbon, attached with thinned Titebond. They are a bit too flexible I think and I'm going to retrofit genuine balsa sheeted units.

The ship turns dead equal in both directions, grooved like a freight train, and is extremely easy to fly through maneuvers. It tracks beautifully through rounds, and it turns and locks on target for the legs of the squares, The bottoms are flat and predictable. It really flies like a great stunt trainer! ;D

The only problems encountered was with the timer - which is an experimental/beta test unit from Will Hubin. It ran the motors perfectly, but when the 5-second drop in RPM occurred, the motors kept on running for a full minute instead of for just five more seconds as usual. That's just a minor programming issue for Will, I'm sure. There was also a programming glitch in the retract timer; I could not set it to extend the gear past  the 59 second mark. Again, just a minor thing and I'm confident that Will will quickly remedy that. For obvious reasons we did not experiment with the retracts this morning...

All in all it was a fantastic session. Buddy and I each flew several flights with the ship and we are very encouraged by the results.

The 9 x 6 APC props are turning just over 10,000 RPM, and the rotation is set to have the tips of the props turning towards the canopy. We will, of course, explore all the possible prop rotation options as we proceed. We'll also try larger props. We can go all the way to 11-inch props! Of course then my arm will just pull clean off and fall to the ground... ^-^

After a 4-minute flight I just put nominally 1400mAh back into the 4S 3300 mAh Hyperion packs. We should be able to fly complete 5 minute and 45 second flights, operating the gear up and down, and still be safely under the 80 percent rule! H^^

It's been a long time coming, and I appreciate everyone's patience and interest in this project. With a bit more testing we are confident that our "real" twin ships will be successes.

Later - Bob         

 

 
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: David_Stack on August 11, 2014, 10:07:02 AM
Congratulations on the successful maiden flight (and then some) Bob!

You mention flaps that are less than ideal from a torsional stiffness perspective...  What about using a different form of carbon material instead of the carbon veil, something with some 'grain' to it?  You could orient the fibers on a bias to help prevent the twisting.  There are some awfully light carbon weaves being produced now, and in use in the R/C discus-launched glider community.  Something along the lines of what is being discussed here: http://www.rcgroups.com/forums/showthread.php?t=2161133&highlight=vlad+tow

r/
Dave
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Dan Bregar on August 11, 2014, 10:58:21 AM
Fantastic !  Way to go Bob.  I'm staying tuned for the next chapter !  ;D

Dan
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Tom Niebuhr on August 11, 2014, 11:10:10 AM
Bob,
Great progress to date.

I know that you had to make adjustments for the vertical c.g.

How much is that going to change with the gear up?
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Matt Colan on August 11, 2014, 02:09:03 PM
Awesome Bob!!!

I think having the props turning in towards the fuselage will be best since it will eliminate having a critical engine. I'd imagine having a critical engine on an electric twin wouldn't be that huge of a deal because of the timer.
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: MarcusCordeiro on August 11, 2014, 04:35:57 PM
Plain and simple: NICE!!!!!

Marcus
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on August 11, 2014, 05:43:42 PM
Thanks to all who posted about the maiden flights. It's going well ahead of our projected schedule! I'm going to make new flaps from balsa covered foam and then carbon them as well.

I'm attaching a few photos of the building process of this test bed. I've posted some of these here before, but here they are in more or less chronological order. The raw foam wing with 1/8 x 1/2-inch basswood surface spars and carbon mat over the leading edge and the center section technique (That I'm calling the "Lost-Sheeting method...) has worked out extremely well. The wing is super stiff and it is light as well. The all-up weight, including battery and retracts is just over 65 ounces. The ship has a 670 square inch wing area, so it's not too bad. With all the disk span it flies like it's very light!

Enjoy the photos. It may take several postings to get them all up.

Later - Bob Hunt
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on August 11, 2014, 06:00:46 PM
More photos...
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on August 11, 2014, 06:04:46 PM
More photos yet...
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on August 11, 2014, 06:06:21 PM
Last ones! :P
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Dan Bregar on August 12, 2014, 05:22:42 PM
Wow !  Fantastic work !  You are the best Bob !  I really like your stab jig too !  What adhesive did you use to put the carbon onto the foam ?  Thinned white glue maybe ?

Dan
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Randy Powell on August 12, 2014, 05:36:00 PM
Man, Bob, you do awesome work. That is just unbelievable. I like it a lot.
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: David_Stack on August 13, 2014, 06:11:02 AM
Dan;

  Back in post #354, Bob discusses the construction of the wing, what her terms his "Lost-Sheeting method", and the adhesive used.  You are correct in what you surmised regarding the adhesive used...

  Requoted here:

  "We used the same technique to build the wing for this testbed model as we did for the Joe Nall Cadet models. We call this construction the  "Lost-Sheeting method." There is no balsa sheeting on the wing. The wing is a solid foam core made from 1-pound density foam. There is a slot cut in the center of the wing cores to allow the leadouts to get to the tip and have some adjustment. There are slots cut into the top and the bottom of the wing at the high point to accept 1/2 x 1/8- inch basswood spars. The spars run the full span of the wing. There are several shear webs imbedded in the core between the spar slots to prevent the spars from "racking." That is the technical term for what the spars want to do on either side of the wing during maneuvering. In an inside maneuver the top spar in in compression and the bottom spar is in tension. If there were no webs between them, they would try to "clap hands" under stress. The webs prevent the spars from trying to move and hence impart a tremendous amount of strength. Enough not to break under maneuvering loads by themselves? Not quite. After the spars are glued into the slots and are firmly glued to the vertical grain shear webs, we apply .2 (two tenths ounce per square yard) carbon mat using water thinned Titebond wood glue. The carbon is first applied from the back of the spar on the top, around the leading edge and ends at the back of the spar on the bottom. A thin carbon strip reinforces the trailing edge area, and an additional piece strengthens the entire center section area."

r/
Dave
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Dan Bregar on August 15, 2014, 08:50:23 AM
Thank you very much David.  :)

Dan
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: David_Ruff on August 17, 2014, 05:52:51 AM
Nice photos of construction.  It helps me figure out how to convert my ARC Oriental to ECL.
Was wondering what the service ceiling was on engine out?
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Dean Pappas on August 19, 2014, 01:45:30 PM
70 feet, of course!
later,
  Dean P.
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on August 26, 2014, 12:41:11 PM
Okay, lots to report on about the second day out with the twin test bed... and it's all good!

First off, the timer problem that I thought I had was not a glitch in Will Hubin's programming. I just neglected to fully read the programming instructions. We adjusted the timer as per Will's instructions over the phone, and now the "Full Monty" is working.

On the first day we flew several five minute flights and then checked to see how much battery we were using. It turned out to be 2,450 mAh. Note, this was with the gear extended. Today we retracted the landing gear and flew a five minute flight and recharged the battery to find that we only used 1,800 mAh! Approximately 25 percent less! That should once and for all answer the question about landing gear drag... We then upped the flight time to the normal 5:45 setting and flew several patterns. I have not yet charged any of those batteries (too anxious to make this report...), but I will later today and report back.

We opened the handle about 1/2 inch per side (one inch total wider spacing of the lines) added just a touch of tail weight (about a quarter ounce), and added a bit more tip weight. The ship came alive with these changes and in now capable of an honest 45 degree pattern, although we still took it a bit easy... The ship turns just a bit better inside than outside, but it feels like the flap and that elevators are not yet in perfect alignment, so we'll experiment with that until the turn is equal. Inside loops are very clean and it tends to slide the tail just a bit on outside turns. The flap/elevator adjustment should remedy that.

This thing is not hurting for thrust. We flew the first few patterns today at about 5.6 to 5.8 second laps. Then we upped the RPM a bit and flew around a 5.4 second lap. Again, no power or thrust problems. The ship tracks through round loops beautifully and it transitions nicely. Again, it will get better with the aforementioned adjustment and even a bit more speed.

My son, Robby, took some quick time videos, but I have no clue as to how to upload them here. I'm sending them to Bob Storick and he'll post the link in another message on this thread (Thanks, Bob...).

Remember, this is just the second day out with the ship, and the very first full pattern flights that also had the gear going up and down (That part works flawlessly by the way...). Unfortunately, the videos are short and don't show too much of the pattern. I think you'll enjoy the "spool up" video, however... >:D

Later - Bob Hunt
http://youtu.be/zK26Ix6Ux84
 
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Derek Barry on August 26, 2014, 02:52:02 PM
Very cool! ;D

Derek
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Dennis Adamisin on August 26, 2014, 03:39:38 PM
U B twinning!
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: RC Storick on August 26, 2014, 04:00:32 PM
Hey Bob who's the old guy holding your airplane?

(http://stunthanger.com/smf/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=19749.0;attach=150236;image)
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on August 26, 2014, 04:05:13 PM
Hi Bob:

Not sure; but he looks a lot younger than the guy who built your Minado... LL~ LL~ VD~

Bob ;)
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Paul Taylor on August 26, 2014, 04:17:53 PM
Way Kewl Bob!
Spool up sounds great!
 H^^

And old guys rule!
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Randy Powell on August 26, 2014, 04:41:40 PM
bob,

Yea, something I noticed (with my neophyte knowledge) flying my electric last weekend. The thing pulls like a truck but is easy to fly corners and maneuvers. With an IC plane pulling that hard, it would take hydraulics to make a turn.
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Dwayne on August 26, 2014, 04:45:07 PM
If 5 years ago you'd have told me I'd be watching this I would have laughed. What a time for C/L stunt we live in, outstanding!!! y1  #^ ~>
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on August 26, 2014, 06:08:45 PM
Yeah, how about it, Dwayne!  #^

Okay, I charged one of the batteries that we used for a complete pattern flight, with the gear retracted. You are just not going to believe this... I put back in 1,859 mAh! That's just amazing! It was hot and relatively calm. That's when the most juice is used in my experience. On a windy day the usage is even less.

Tomorrow we are going to try the 10 x 5 APC props that are matched left and right hand rotation. We are also raising the elevator a bit to equal out the flap travel. That should get rid of the slight unequal turn rate and the slight tail slide in outside maneuvers. Additionally we will be moving the battery aft to move the CG back a bit and get some more turn rate.

Obviously we are extremely pleased with the progress so far (only two sessions), and believe that there is much more performance to come as we try various trim changes and prop rotation and size options. I can tell you this much, it ain't boring at the field right now... %^@

Later Bob Hunt
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Dean Pappas on August 26, 2014, 07:24:53 PM
"So much time and so few experiments to do ... wait, reverse that."
With apologies to Willy Wonka,
  Dean P.
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Dan Bregar on August 26, 2014, 08:50:49 PM
Man, I just loves it !!!  Fantastic.  And to think it's only going to get better !  #^

Dan
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: James Mills on August 26, 2014, 10:01:44 PM
Bob,

Ben said that was very cool.

James
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Shawn Lenci on August 26, 2014, 10:52:43 PM
Very nice Bob...wish I could find a parking lot like that out here in CA to fly in.

Shawn
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on August 27, 2014, 05:34:40 AM
Hi Shawn:

Here's a lesson in problem solving... Move here!  LL~

Bob  VD~
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bill Little on August 27, 2014, 06:35:28 AM
Looks good in the air, Bob!  I know the "real" bird will be better!

Bill
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on August 27, 2014, 09:39:48 AM
We just returned from our third session with the twin. Made some huge gains. Unfortunately we didn't take any video today. We will next time  I promise.

The ship seemed to turn slightly better insides than outsides and it was sliding the tail through round outsides. We checked the flap/elevator neutral and found that the flaps were slightly down when the elevator was at neutral. I used the turnbuckle on the pushrod to raise the elevator a bit. Then, when I readjusted for neutral, the flaps were level as well. It made a huge difference and the plane is now turning dead equal in both directions and the tendency for the tail to slide through the outside rounds is completely gone.

I also moved the battery back 3/4-inch and that gave more turn. I also opened the handle a bit and added just a tiny bit of tail weight. Now the ship turns freely and is easy to fly at 45 degrees or even smaller if desired.

We noticed that in verticals and the up legs of the squares that the motors tended to "bog" a bit. We are switching from the 9 x 6 APC props to 10 x 5 props for tomorrow (or the next time we get out to fly...). That should correct that issue.

Each trim change we have made has yielded better performance. There are still a lot of things to try, but at this point I'm ready to declare this experiment a success and move forward with the new "real" stunt twins. Buddy's new twin is in the paint shop and should be ready for test flights in a month or so. My original, smaller twin is in paint and I'm going to try to have that ready to fly in about a month as well. My new, bigger twin will not be finished until next spring, and I intend to go all out on paint and surface detail to make that one very special.

I've already received requests for plans for the testbed twin. I'll try to get to those soon, but I have a ton to do right now at my job (making wings), and in getting Stunt News closer to being shipped on time. Needless to say the Lost-Sheeting method of building quick testbed or practice models is also a great success.

Robby is home for a few weeks and I'm spending as much time as possible with him at the field. Life is good.  #^ #^ #^

Later - Bob Hunt  
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Tom Niebuhr on August 27, 2014, 09:56:42 AM
Bob,
Thanks for the very exciting reports.

It is a little hard to see the gear up and down for landing. I am sure that the small and larger twins will be a work of art.

We will all be anxious for more reports and for the flights of the new twins from you and Buddy.

This also gets me excited about getting back to work on my new electric stunter with retracts.
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: john e. holliday on August 28, 2014, 09:11:16 AM
Bobby, I am so excited to hear of the success you are having with the twin.   I guess the electrics is the big secret.  Tell Robby hi from the old man.
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: David_Ruff on September 01, 2014, 03:12:53 AM
Thank you very much David.  :)

Dan

Nice...sort of how Phil Cartier makes wings...
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on September 10, 2014, 05:08:18 AM
Time for an update!

Buddy Wieder and I have been flying the test bed twin for a while now and we have several full patterns on the bird. We had hoped to be able to get away with a 3,300 mAh battery to run both motors and power the retracts. And, as I wrote in my last update post here, we did go from the 9 x6 props to the 10 x 5 props. The bigger props worked much better, but there was still a "bog" at the tops of the maneuvers. Turns out we needed a 4,000 mAh pack and higher Kv motors.The first motors we used were too low in Kv, and the motors "bogged" on the tops of maneuvers. We consulted with Dean Pappas and he suggested going to the 4,000 mAh pack, and 1100 Kv Power 10 motors, and even predicted the exact amount of mAh we would use for a 5 minute, 30 second flight.

We put in the 1100 Kv Power 10 motors and the 4,000 mAh Hyperion pack and flew the ship. The bog was totally gone! The new motors and battery combination worked to perfection. And, Dean's prediction on power usage was absolutely spot on to the exact number he said we'd use. We are now putting 3,000 mAh back into a 4,000 mAh battery. That's exactly on the 75 percent rule! Dean is just flat amazing...

Okay, at this point the problem became the CG. With the 3,300 mAh battery it was a bit far forward. With the 4,000 mAh battery it was way too far forward. We added 1 1/2 ounces of tail weight to get the model to turn properly, but that produced an inertial effect and made the tail swing past the turn point noticeably. Rats.

We decided to rearrange the wiring to allow us to move the battery back 2 1/2 inches. That allowed us to take out the tail weight entirely and achieve a very nice corner without the tail slide. Main problem solved!

At this point we are down to fine tuning the flight trim of the ship. It appears that the outboard flap is a bit too effective and it is lifting the outboard tip in both inside and outside maneuvers slightly. We have installed an area tab on the inboard flap and we are heading out to the field for some test flights. Interestingly, we have pretty much forgotten about the motor runs and the retracts. All that is working perfectly and now we are just down to trimming this behemoth for proper flight trim just as we would any other stunt model.

I'll try to get a post in later today to update everyone on the flight trim. The main objectives for this test bed have been met, and I'm ready to declare that "Electric Twin Stunt" is here to stay and it will become a major factor in this event in short order. I've received many requests for the plans for the test bed model, and if I get some free time (yeah, right...), I'll draw them up in pencil and make them available along with a list of powertrain components.

Later - Bob Hunt  
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on September 10, 2014, 10:07:17 AM
We are just back from the most productive field session yet. We got in 11 flights today. In fact, we are now just practicing maneuvers with the test bed twin in preparation for the Palisades Park meet this weekend. Buddy and I have decided to both fly the twin at that meet just for fun.

All of today's trim changes worked. The area tab on the inboard flap solved the flaring up of the tip in both inside and outside maneuvers. In fact, we were able to take out about a half ounce of tip weight! The ship is now flying extremely clean through all maneuvers and is about as easy to steer and place as any model I've ever flown; maybe better!

When we started out today it was chilly and we were turning 5.2 second laps. As the heat increased, the ship eventually slowed down to a 5.3 and change lap time. It still pulled like the Queen Mary out there... :P

I'm in love with twins! (Don't tell my wife!  %^@)

Later - Bob 

Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Randy Powell on September 10, 2014, 10:35:06 AM
>>It still pulled like the Queen Mary out there<<

That's something I noticed with mine. The pulls like a truck. With IC planes, when the pull like that, they are usually quite hard to turn from level flight. Takes a ton of stick pressure to get them to want to turn. With this new electrical beast, it was pulling quite hard but turned very easily and precisely. I found that odd.
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on September 10, 2014, 10:48:38 AM
Hi Randy:

Yeah, how about it! :o

Actually I have found that the swept forward trailing edges that I use on most of my models yield very little stick pressure. The models may pull outward quite hard, but there is little to no stick pressure needed to make the model turn, even in very heavy wind. Sort of like having your cake, eating it too, then going out for a big desert and having something sweet when you get home... #^  

Later - Bob
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: MarcusCordeiro on September 10, 2014, 01:00:25 PM
I've watched all the vídeos and liked them a lot....

Oh, the ship too.... I love it!!!

Marcus
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Randy Powell on September 10, 2014, 02:32:24 PM
>>Actually I have found that the swept forward trailing edges that I use on most of my models yield very little stick pressure.<<

Well, there may be something to that. My current plane has some forward sweep to the trailing edge. Only way I could get enough flap area with the elliptical wing.

Now, if I can just get out the slight hunt, I will be pretty happy with my new bird.
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Howard Rush on September 11, 2014, 12:06:09 AM
Now, if I can just get out the slight hunt, I will be pretty happy with my new bird.

Haven't you heard?  All electric planes do that.
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Larry Wong on September 11, 2014, 07:48:18 PM
>>It still pulled like the Queen Mary out there<<

That's something I noticed with mine. The pulls like a truck. With IC planes, when the pull like that, they are usually quite hard to turn from level flight. Takes a ton of stick pressure to get them to want to turn. With this new electrical beast, it was pulling quite hard but turned very easily and precisely. I found that odd.

Randy I notice that all my electric planes also pull like a truck, I think the pusher prop I use cause it but they fly so well that I just can't make myself try a tractor prop. to see what happens. ???
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Randy Powell on September 12, 2014, 11:08:36 AM
Larry,

I thought the same thing. I may try a tractor prop on it just to see what happens, but haven't yet.
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: wwwarbird on September 12, 2014, 08:25:12 PM

 Did I miss it, or has the full meal deal original not flown yet?
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on September 13, 2014, 07:18:51 AM
Hi Wayne:

Not yet. We wanted to work out any "bugs" that might be in the motor or retract systems before flying one of the "serious" ships. Buddy is almost done painting his new twin, which is the same size and aerodynamics as the test bed we are now flying. My smaller, original, twin is about halfway through the paint process and will hopefully be done and ready for a test flight or two before the snow flies... Even if it isn't finished by winter, my experiences with the test bed have calmed my nerves about twins in general. I'll finish both of the twins I now have underway, and then I'm going to draw up and build yet another one (or several...) that will incorporate a lot of new ideas that I've had since starting this venture.

Randy and Larry:

There is a reason why the swept forward TE ships have less stick pressure. A few years back, Bill Werwage wrote about this in his Vulcan article in Model Aviation. Here's what he had to say...

Excerpt from Vulcan article:

“The most significant thing that was different about the Vulcan was the high amount of forward sweep in the trailing edge. This was done with two thoughts in mind. I wanted to keep the center of pressure (CP) from moving aft on the wing when the flaps were deployed. With the forward swept hinge line, the average flap position is ahead of the point where it would be on a straight hinge line model, and therefore when deployed the flaps would not move the CP as far aft. The effect this has is to not over stabilize the model by moving the CP too far back from the center of gravity. In other words the model would not become as nose heavy with the flaps deployed. One of the major benefits of this arrangement is that the stick pressure felt in the handle, especially in high wind conditions, is dramatically reduced. When the flaps are moved either up or down, the airfoil is changed to an undercamber type, which increases the wing’s lift. But it also changes the point of the center of the lift, which is also known as the center of pressure.
“On a straight trailing edge model, when the flaps are deployed, the CP moves a much greater distance, and over stabilization occurs. The result is more stick pressure and a model that requires more input to achieve directional change. In calm conditions this is almost unperceivable, but in heavy wind it can be dramatic!

“Another benefit of the forward sweep in the trailing edge hinge line is the effectively longer tail moment. The moment is now measured from the average of the flap’s position in relation to the stabilizer/elevator hinge line.”

There may even be more to all this. In a discussion I had with Dean Pappas about the Crossfire design he gave me some thoughts on the relative position of the quarter chord points on the root and tip airfoils. I asked him to write up his thoughts for inclusion in the book I'm writing about the Crossfire. Here's what he had to offer...

Dean's thoughts:

“First off, just to point out the happy hopelessness of this discussion, a stunt ship flying maneuvers on the surface of the hemisphere in steady runway wind is a horrifically complicated system to describe completely (Don’t even get me started about flying one of these in turbulence…).

“From an aerodynamic standpoint, wing sweep is measured along the quarter chord line. An un-swept, tapered wing has a trailing edge rake that is three times the leading edge rake angle. So, recognize that all stunt ships, including Bill’s and Bob’s, have swept wings. Airplanes with straight flap hinge lines actually have lots of sweep. If you take a swept wing and fly it yawed to incoming air (like a CL Stunt ship always does…) then a rolling moment will be produced. In the maneuvering area the airplane is always flying with the relative wind coming from the left side of the nose. The airplane is yawed to the right. Every time the airplane is G loaded in a maneuver the rolling tendency will ‘bang’ the outboard tip. Side note: If you’ve ever taken tip weight out to trim for a runway type wind, now you know why! This also explains why some of those older, constant chord designs, such as the Chief, fly much better than you’d expect in wind.

“The second thing that happens with a swept wing, especially if you have half-span flaps, or if you have full-span flaps that interfere with the wing tip vortices, is that the center of lift of the wing will move inboard and outboard with changes in flap deflection and G loading. On a swept wing this also means that the center of lift will also move fore and aft.

“If all you did was fly in heavy wind, you would still be stuck with a compromise between control system geometry and the undesirable effect of wing sweep. And, bad control system geometry and/or construction can trash all of this. Say what you will, but a straight flap hinge line is easier to construct properly. The Crossfire has .75 degree of sweep along the quarter chord line, including the flap. Compare that to what you are flying today.”

Thanks to Dean for that. I did check the sweep in the quarter chord line in several "average" stunt models and found it to be around 4.5 to 4.75 degrees of sweep. Compare that to the .75 degrees used in the Crossfire... I truly believe that this is a major factor in why ships with this feature turn easier (less stick pressure) in wind.

Later - Bob Hunt





Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on September 14, 2014, 04:44:53 PM
Today was the best day yet with the new test bed twin. It won its first contest!

Buddy and I decided to give it a try at the Palisades Park/GSCB contest. We put both of our AMA numbers on the wing and we both flew it in competition. I had originally thought that we would enter and fly and then disqualify ourselves because we both flew the same ship, but the other competitors wanted us to "fly for the record," and so we did. I was fortunate enough to win the contest, and felt that my high scoring flight was the best flight I'd put on the plane to date. Good time to do it... H^^

Everyone seemed to like the way it presented, and everyone certainly liked the retracts!  #^

I still have some things I want to try on the test bed to improve its performance, but, hey, it ain't bad just as it is now.  <=

The whole day was ruined when my New York Giants got beat... again... badly...  :'(

Peaks and valleys...  n~

Bob Hunt
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: john e. holliday on September 14, 2014, 09:30:44 PM
That is great news.  I can't wait to see what happens when you get the other twin done.
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on September 15, 2014, 05:50:28 AM
Thanks, Doc.  ;D

Yeah, I'm pretty excited about getting the twin done that I've been working on for the past five years. The new one (the one that's the same size as the test bed twin) was built over last winter and it's also in finish, so I can build them faster than everyone thinks...  LL~

By the way, Robby is leaving tomorrow to go back to Seattle. He says hi!

Later - Bob
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: john e. holliday on September 15, 2014, 10:07:28 AM
I hope he has a safe trip.   Also for him to say to the guys from the old DOC.
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Motorman on September 18, 2014, 12:39:07 PM
Next build?  http://invitaminerva45.blogspot.com/2011/10/o-dewoitine-338.html


MM
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Serge_Krauss on September 18, 2014, 01:10:54 PM
Hi, Bob-

This is a great thread, and I'm much impressed with the e-twin! 'hope you can make it to our area this weekend for the annual Akron/Cleveland Area contest at MAPS.

SK
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on October 06, 2014, 08:42:28 AM
Hi Serge:

Thanks for the kudos on the twin. Sorry I could not make the Akron meet; Tom Luciano and I were going to drive out (leaving here at 1:00 AM on Sunday...) to attend, but the weather report we checked at the last minute showed some pretty harsh conditions expected at the site. We opted to sleep in instead...

Will Hubin flew in last Monday for a visit. Will owns a beautiful Super Decathlon, and there is an airport less than a mile from my home, so it was an easy hook up. Will wanted to see the testbed twin fly in person. Will is the designer of the special twin timer for the bird. That timer has a retract function and a pot on the board that allows us to make one motor run incrementally faster than the other. That feature works great and has allowed us to achieve the proper amount of run differential to give great line tension without any attendant yaw issues.

As most of you know, Will is a fantastic photographer, and he took a bunch of shots of the twin in flight. Attached are three of the shots Will took that day. Buddy Wieder and I each flew a demo flight for Will.

Later - Bob  
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: john e. holliday on October 06, 2014, 02:54:43 PM
That twin still looks awesome.
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: wwwarbird on October 06, 2014, 07:14:41 PM

 Cool stuff, can't wait to see the finished "full meal deal". #^
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on October 14, 2014, 02:22:33 PM
Buddy and I took the testbed twin out yesterday and did a lot of fine tuning and trimming. We found a ton of performance improvement with those changes!

The model had been turning faster insides that outsides to a degree, and we had adjusted the elevator down a bit to fix that a while back. The model was still turning slightly faster insides and so we took another swipe at lowering the elevator in relation to the flaps at neutral. That did the trick! We are also using a bit more handle spacing to get the control in a bit faster and increase the turn rate. We had moved the battery back a full 2 3/4 inches and that certainly helped the turn rate, but didn't cause the ship to be too tail heavy. I think we've just about optimized the pitch trim at this point.

We had added an area tab to the inboard flap because the outboard wing was lifting just a bit on both insides and outsides. The tab fixed 90 percent of the problem, and so we are making an even larger tab. Hey, if you make an adjustment and things get better, but not perfect, just keep going in the direction that made things better... until things get worse again!  H^^

Again, all the changes we are making now are just normal airframe trim issues; the power train and the retract system continue to work flawlessly. This thing is just a gas to fly! %^@ (Oops, perhaps I should have said that I get a charge out of flying it... <=)

Attached are a few more of the photos that Will Hubin took during his visit. These photos were taken before the re-trim of the elevator. Note the slightly tail low upright flight attitude and the slightly tail high inverted flight attitude. This was all fixed with the trim changes we made yesterday. Before those changes were made, the ship grooved and locked extremely well; it grooves and locks even better now!

I've received a number of requests for the plans and building manual for this design. If there is enough genuine interest I will do a set of decent building plans and make all the photos of the building process available on a CD along with some detailed instructions  

Later - Bob Hunt  
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Allan Perret on October 14, 2014, 03:52:08 PM
Put me down for the plans & CD.
In the last picture there is a lot yaw out relative to lines.  Looks like you are at top of wingover.  Normal ?
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on October 14, 2014, 04:00:00 PM
Hi Allan:

Not sure if that is normal. I do know that we have a bunch of line tension. I'm planning on dialing back the RPM on the inboard motor a bit. It is currently turning about 25 RPM faster than the outboard motor. Pretty sure that will cure the angle to the lines issue. On the plus side, there is no perceivable yaw anywhere with this ship, so that may be a good thing... ::)

Later - Bob
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on October 26, 2014, 09:17:33 AM
The test bed twin (Perhaps we should call it the "TBT") continues to be a great learning tool. We now have more than 60 flights on it (pretty much shared between Buddy and me. Although I do have a few flights more than he does...), and we have tried a bunch of trim mods in an effort to make it fly better and better. Here's a report on where it is now, and what changes we are making.  
  
First off, the TBT flies just great as it is now. However, I know that there is even more performance to be gained. It was a bit nose heavy as it came off the board and I attribute that to the fact that there is really no appreciable finish on this ship; just a thin coat of Polyurethane to seal the wood against moisture. The "real" twins will have full competition finishes on them, and much of the weight of such a finish will be concentrated behind the CG of the ships. We had to add a bit of tail weight to the TBT, and we also moved the battery (a 14 ounce Hyperion 4S 4,000 mAh 25C unit) a full 2 1/2 inches rearward. That helped a lot, but the ship was still slightly nose heavy for my taste. I added a bit of tail weight (about a half ounce) and it got a lot better, but I still would prefer the CG to be just a bit further aft. We are currently using two 1,100 Kv E-Flite Power 10 motors that weigh in at 4.3 ounces a piece. I’m switching over to two Cobra 2814/16 motors (1050 Kv) that weigh 3.8 ounces each. That’s not too much of a savings in weight, and since the motors are not positioned right at the nose of the ship, the changeover probably won’t move the CG aft too much. Every little bit helps, however. I don’t want to add too much more tail weight as the inertial effects of concentrated weight that far aft tends to cause the tail to slide past the turn point to a small degree. Sort of a minor “fishtail” effect…

We have also tried a handle with a wider spacing between the lines, and that helped a lot. We can get the control input in much faster and the result is a much better turn. Interestingly, even though we keep moving the CG aft, the groove and lock continue to be superb. We think that the effect of the props turning in opposite directions help promote good groove and lock.

In future twin designs I will shorten the length of the nacelles a bit to help achieve a far enough rearward CG without the need to add tail weight.
I also used a somewhat slower control system in the TBT, and that inhibits getting the control input in as fast as I feel it needs in this ship. I’ll put faster controls in the next twin I build. I’ll also make provisions to be able to use much more elevator deflection than flap deflection.

We had a problem with the outboard tip flairing up in both turn directions. We added a bunch of tip weight, but that didn’t fix the problem of the flairing, but it did cause other problems. An area tab on the inside wing fixed the problem, and today I removed the tab and cut the outboard flap down in span at the tip by 3 ˝ inches and made the short tip section adjustable as a trim tab.

Buddy and I did a lot of experimentation with flap/elevator neutral adjustment, and we think we had found the optimal setting for that; the ship now turns crisply both inside and outside, and there is no feeling that the ship is “sliding” through the corners in either direction.

Future experiments include trying the props turning the other way. Right now the tops of the props are turning towards the canopy. We’ll try it with the tops of the props turning away from the canopy the next time out. This is a simple matter of switching any two wires on each motor and then switching the props and spinners.  I guess, to cover all the bases, we should also try turning both props in the same direction just to be certain that we’ve left no stone unturned…

I’m convinced that there are major advantages to the twin concept, and for the foreseeable future that’s all I intend to build and fly. I think Buddy feels the same way…

Later – Bob Hunt    
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: RC Storick on October 26, 2014, 12:20:28 PM
Here is a novel idea to at least try. One pusher and one tractor. I have no clue what it would do.
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: MikeCoulombe on October 26, 2014, 12:54:30 PM
Very nice Bob, I too would be interested in plans and c/d.
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on October 26, 2014, 02:09:37 PM
Here is a novel idea to at least try. One pusher and one tractor. I have no clue what it would do.

"You keep thinking, Butch, that's what you're good at..." - Sundance

By the way, that's what we have on there now...

Bob
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: RC Storick on October 26, 2014, 03:06:03 PM
I didn't think of it. Oh well we know that works LL~
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Howard Rush on October 26, 2014, 09:17:52 PM
Future experiments include trying the props turning the other way. Right now the tops of the props are turning towards the canopy. We’ll try it with the tops of the props turning away from the canopy the next time out. This is a simple matter of switching any two wires on each motor and then switching the props and spinners.  I guess, to cover all the bases, we should also try turning both props in the same direction just to be certain that we’ve left no stone unturned…

I feel the need to repeat the advice I gave you on page 5:

motor 1 rotation   motor 2 rotation   prop 1  prop 2  outcome
        L                       L                  L         L         OK
        L                       L                  L         R         bad
        L                       L                  R         L         bad
        L                       L                  R         R         bad
        L                       R                  L         L         bad
        L                       R                  L         R         good
        L                       R                  R         L         bad
        L                       R                  R         R         bad 
        R                       L                  L         L         bad
        R                       L                  L         R         bad
        R                       L                  R         L         good
        R                       L                  R         R         bad
        R                       R                  L         L         bad
        R                       R                  L         R         bad
        R                       R                  R         L         bad
        R                       R                  R         R         OK

I wouldn't risk it.
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on November 10, 2014, 04:11:24 PM
Buddy Wieder and I had another good "epiphany" day with the Test Bed Twin. Up to this point I thought I had the leadouts positioned right where they belonged, but a suggestion from my flying buddy, Tom Hampshire made me rethink their placement. The ship was pulling like a freight train in level flight and seemed to have good tension everywhere else too. Tom flew it and said that he thought the line tension decreased a bit through maneuvers and especially in the vertical and overhead maneuvers. It still had lots of tension, just variable to a degree.

I moved the leadouts a good 3/8 to 1/2 inch forward of the most forward previous position, and flew it. It still pulled like the Queen Mary in level flight, only now it pulled that way through all the maneuvers as well. There's a lesson here; try everything that makes sense, and everything that doesn't as well!  %^@

Recently we removed the area tab that we had taped to the inboard flap and cut the span of the outboard flap to approximate the area differential that seemed to be working. I hinged the cut off section and made an adjuster to enable it to be a trim tab as well. I think I made that section to big, however, and today we added a small area tab to the end of the outboard flap. That seemed to do the trick, and Buddy and I will be modifying our "real" twins this week to reflect that change. The Test Bed Twin has proven to be a very valuable research tool.

Later - Bob Hunt



 
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Tim Wescott on November 10, 2014, 04:38:58 PM
Do you have any pictures of these area tabs of yours in this little thread?  Or have I missed them somewhere?
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on November 10, 2014, 04:48:31 PM
Hi Tim:

Yeah, I thought the crop was a bit too tight on those previous photos to show everything to good effect... mw~

These should do the trick. The tabs are simply two pieces of 1/32 inch thick plywood glued together at one edge. They slip on over the TE and are taped in place. Easy peasey to install and adjust... <=

Later - Bob
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Allan Perret on November 11, 2014, 07:37:26 AM
For a fast & easy temporary tab I use a piece of manila folder stock.  Fold it half, cut to size and tape it on. 
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on January 04, 2015, 10:41:05 AM
Buddy Wieder and I took the opportunity a week or so back to go to the field and fly the test bed twin. The weather cooperated and blessed us with a 55 degree day with no appreciable wind. We each flew four or five flights. Every time I fly the twin (and I think I can also speak for Buddy here...) I'm more and more convinced that the twin format is what I'll continue with from here to the finish line (although there may also be a four-motored ship in there at some point...).

Up to this point we have built each of our twins (there are four of them in various stages of building or finishing) without the use of formal/permanent fixtures on which to construct the nacelles. We did make up a neat fixture to hold the assembled nacelles in proper alignment to each other while we installed the plane onto the nacelles. That took a bit of thinking, but it worked perfectly.

In order to insure that the nacelles are constructed absolutely accurately, and in turn will fit onto the above mentioned alignment fixture, I decided to take a bit of time to engineer, design and build an assembly jig around which to build the nacelles.

The attached photos should be self explanatory. Future nacelles will be designed to fit onto this jig. If we opt to go to a longer or larger nacelle for some reason, we will simply build another of these jigs.

As I assemble the first nacelles on this jig I'll take photos and then present them here so everyone can follow the entire process.

Obviously, all this means that I have started on another new twin. Let the flames begin... %^@ I enjoy designing and building at least as much as I do flying, so this is therapeutic for me...  The new twin is a bit smaller than the last one, and it was designed loosely around the aerodynamic "numbers" of the Gene Schaffer-designed Oosa-Amma (Stunt Machine I). I've named the new twin design, "Turning Point." I'll throw a photo of the fuselage side view, sans nacelles, in here as well.

Happy New Year - Bob Hunt
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on January 04, 2015, 01:07:14 PM
Okay, I finished the nacelle building fixture, and, well, built the nacelle crutches. To say I'm happy with the process would be a monumental understatement!

The nacelle sides are different because of the taper of the wing. It's important to get them to seat properly on the wing panels and be square in all planes. The front of the nacelles when mounted on the wings should be dead square to the center line of the fuselage and the tops of the nacelles should be aligned perfectly as well. To get all these aspects dead perfect was a tall order. In the accompanying photos you will see that all criteria have been met.  #^

The next step is to install the nose rings and then the motor mounts. I'll use the very same procedure that is depicted in my Hardnose Motor Mount Instruction Manual. Again, this manual is in PDF format and is available for free to anyone who wants it. Just email me and I'll send it to you.

Enjoy the photos! - Bob Hunt
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Larry Renger on January 04, 2015, 02:39:14 PM
So, when are you going to do the forward swept canard twin?  VD~
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on January 04, 2015, 02:50:40 PM
Next!  ;D

Bob
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: MarcusCordeiro on January 07, 2015, 03:04:01 PM
I love this thread...

Marcus
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on January 20, 2015, 08:28:21 AM
Thanks, Marcus; it's been fun for me, too!

Got a bit more done on the Turning Point twin on Sunday. While watching the football games I cut the top and bottom blocks to size and tack glued them to the nacelle crutches. Then I carved and sanded the blocks to shape. I suppose I could have molded these parts, but I love to carve and don't get much chance to do that these days with all the molded components I use.

Couldn't resist the urge to take a few shots of the carved nacelles taped in place on the wing. I still have to pop the blocks off and hollow them, and then fit filler blocks in the areas where I carved through the nacelle sides to blend the spinners into the air inlet areas. The next step will be to install the bellcrank and join the wing panels.

Later - Bob

 
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Crist Rigotti on January 20, 2015, 10:21:34 AM
Here I thought the holes were for needle valves!  Very nice Bob.
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Larry Renger on March 08, 2015, 09:14:08 AM
Anything new on this project?  ???
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on June 26, 2015, 01:03:23 PM
I had a surge of energy and finished up the original twin. It finished up at 68 ounces with battery on board and with the retracts and wiring. A bit more than I wanted, but it should perform well with the two E-Flite Power 10 motors and the one 4s 4,000 battery. It's been a long haul...

Bob Hunt

Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: jfv on June 26, 2015, 01:10:56 PM
Very nice Bob.  This twin thing is catching on.  Watched Rick Huff kick butt at Brodak in Intermediate with his Pathfinder twin.
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Allan Perret on June 26, 2015, 01:22:38 PM
Plans, we need Plans.  How many sq.in. wing area for that 68oz ?
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on June 26, 2015, 02:15:44 PM
Plans may be a while yet...

It has 650 square inches of area, but remember, I've quoted the battery on board weight. A glow twin with two .15 size engines would require 8 ounces of fuel (two four ounce tanks), and fuel weighs nominally an ounce per fluid ounce, so it's equivalent to a 60 ounce glow twin without that eight ounces. With the 20 inches of disk span, providing a lot of artificial air blast over the surfaces, and the greatly decreased drag with the retracts, it should do okay.

Later - Bob
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Larry Renger on June 26, 2015, 04:46:03 PM
You know, you can get a counter-rotating power setup that would be perfect in the nose of the fuselage!  If some is good, more is better, and too much is just right!  VD~
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Allan Perret on June 26, 2015, 04:47:24 PM
Plans may be a while yet...

It has 650 square inches of area, but remember, I've quoted the battery on board weight. A glow twin with two .15 size engines would require 8 ounces of fuel (two four ounce tanks), and fuel weighs nominally an ounce per fluid ounce, so it's equivalent to a 60 ounce glow twin without that eight ounces. With the 20 inches of disk span, providing a lot of artificial air blast over the surfaces, and the greatly decreased drag with the retracts, it should do okay.

Later - Bob
You using .014 solids or .018 cables ?
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on June 26, 2015, 05:45:12 PM
The solids for sure; that's all I ever fly on...

Bob
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Brent Williams on June 28, 2015, 01:35:36 AM
Very nicely done, Bob!
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Airacobra on June 30, 2015, 01:33:51 PM
Great looking plane Bob. I hope I have the opportunity to see it fly.
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: wwwarbird on June 30, 2015, 06:15:05 PM

 It's DONE!  :o

 Just in time for the NATS Bob!  ;D
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on July 03, 2015, 01:33:45 PM
Here are a few more photos. One is of Buddy Wieder holding his new "Ryan's Evil Twin" ship and me holding the Second Wind at our practice field.

Later - Bob Hunt
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Shawn Lenci on July 04, 2015, 08:08:44 AM
Bob,

Glad you are feeling better.  Really nice stuff in those photos.  Beautiful airplanes, both of them. H^^  I'll bet they look fantastic in the air.  Good Luck in Muncie!

Shawn
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on July 04, 2015, 08:26:53 AM
Thanks, Shawn.

Wish you could make it to the Nats. We usually have an evening of guitar playing with Jeff Traxler and Bill Werwage; you'd fit right in!

Later - Bob
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Jeff Traxler on July 04, 2015, 12:06:40 PM
I'll have guitars in tow....... #^ #^
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on July 07, 2015, 10:31:02 AM
I just got a new Nikon camera and took a few photos during today's practice session. Indulge me... ::)

Later - Bob Hunt
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on July 07, 2015, 10:37:27 AM
...and here's one of Buddy with his Ryan's Evil Twin design at the practice field... H^^

Bob
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Randy Powell on July 07, 2015, 11:44:20 AM
Bob, that is just cool. Great achievement.
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on July 07, 2015, 12:30:25 PM
Thanks, Randy... Although next to some of your amazing designs, this one looks like a box car... :-\

Later - Bob
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Randy Powell on July 07, 2015, 01:21:55 PM
Bet it flies better. Betcha.
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on July 07, 2015, 01:35:35 PM
LOL! I won't touch that bet, because I'm very pleased with the Second Wind's flight performance (I still hold my breath at the end of the flight until the gear comes down...).

Later - Bob
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Robby Hunt on July 07, 2015, 02:27:29 PM
Deuces are wild...here we see a pair of conspirators, double down on rudders (200% more than a Genesis mind you), and of course, Bubba flashing the international sign for twins...
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on July 07, 2015, 03:22:58 PM
Of course - and you probably didn't know this - Robby was flying electric CL long before any of us. Here he is in 1980 or so, practicing for the Nats... LL~ LL~

Dear old dad...
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Robby Hunt on July 07, 2015, 03:46:55 PM
Ahh, the early days...back then the trick was to keep the batteries from rotting...
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Dean Pappas on July 09, 2015, 02:49:55 PM
Deuces are wild...here we see a pair of conspirators, double down on rudders (200% more than a Genesis mind you), and of course, Bubba flashing the international sign for twins...

Troublemakers, all ... Would you buy a used Stunter from these guys?

Have a great NATs, everybody,
   Dean P.
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Howard Rush on July 13, 2015, 09:33:53 PM
Saw Bob's and Bud's twins today at appearance judging.  Very pretty.  I lectured Bud on the perils of motor direction and prop direction matching.
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Larry Renger on July 13, 2015, 09:47:28 PM
Troublemakers, all ... Would you buy a used Stunter from these guys?  In a heartbeat!  #^
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on July 25, 2015, 05:03:55 PM
"Lately it occurs to me, what a long strange trip it's been." - Robert Hunter

With its appearance at the 2015 Nats, the long and strange saga of the Second Wind twin has finally reached an end. I've been working on this ship for more than seven years. There were times when I doubted if it would ever be finished and flown. I know that some of you who have been following this marathon thread had similar thoughts...

I finished the Second Wind a week before the Nats and was able to get two full patterns on it before leaving for Muncie. For the record, I finished in eleventh place in Open Stunt with it, and at the end of the Nats it had a grand total of 17 flights on it! Considering that there were pilots there who had hundreds (or, in some cases, even thousands) of flights on their ships, and put in as many as 25 flights a day in preparation, I don't feel too bad. In fact, I feel great.

The ship flew virtually "off the board." There are still a couple of minor trim changes that need to be made, and lots of motor/prop experiments that need to be done, but, overall it was a resounding success. The ship turns great and has an excellent lock after corners. It tracks very well and grooves through rounds extremely well.

I was determined to get this ship to the Nats in spite of the debilitating back problems I was having. Massive physical therapy sessions helped me to get back on my feet long enough to finish the bird and get it to Muncie. The week was long and grueling, but I made it through in pretty good shape.

My thanks go out to all who followed this thread and the progress of the Second Wind twin. Thanks also go out to my "crew," who went above and beyond the call of duty to help me through the rigors of the past few months. That crew consisted of (in alphabetical order)  Ken Armish, Rich Giacobone, Tom Hampshire, Frank Imbriaco, Tom Luciano, Frank McMillan, Mark Weiss, and Buddy Wieder. These guys are just the best!

And now, an announcement: This was my final Nats in Open Stunt competition. I have decided that the flying of the electric, retract-gear twin in competition is a fitting exclamation point to my long career. I will be going through a lot of surgeries in the future, and will not have the mobility that I've enjoyed for most of my life. I will continue to design, build, and develop new models, and I'll always share my findings with all of you. I have lots of new ideas, and most of them are for things that will help the beginner, intermediate, and advanced fliers to achieve better stunt performance. Naturally, I'll post about them here.

My most heartfelt thanks go out to all who have supported me and have befriended me over the years; they are too numerous to list here, but they all know who they are. I love you all.

Without the inspiration, guidance and help of my father, none of this adventure would have happened. Without the love and support of my wife and family it would not have either.
 
Mostly I want to publicly thank and Praise the most important entity in my life, my Lord and Savior, Jesus Christ. Without Him I'm nothing.  

I'm signing off on this thread with the posting of a few great photos of the Second Wind that Will Hubin took at the Nats. Hey, I think it looks pretty good in the air!

Fair winds - Bob Hunt  

      
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Crist Rigotti on July 25, 2015, 07:59:56 PM
Well done thy good and faithful servant!

All the best.
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Jim Oliver on April 24, 2016, 10:05:38 PM
Bob,
Trust you're still checking in---any news on plans for the Second Wind?

Thanks,
Jim
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on April 27, 2016, 08:59:17 AM
Hi Jim:

I'd love to be able to get a set of plans done and available for the Second Wind twin, but right now I just don't have the time to do it. I have a lot of Robin's View orders to get through, and I practice guitar at least two hours every day. I will not give that up...  Hopefully, in the future I'll have the time to finish the plans and make them available.

Later - Bob
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Will Hinton on May 07, 2016, 02:49:50 PM
What guitar ya playing the most these days partner?  Wait 'til you see the fretboard Trax brought to me at the end of his last trip your way - many hours of inlay happening to it!
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on May 08, 2016, 07:24:34 AM
Hi Will:

The playing time is pretty evenly split these days between my Taylor 516 CE and my newly acquired Taylor 2011 Spring Limited, all mahogany Grand Concert with a short scale neck. I got it at a very good price, and it is a collectors item. It has an ebony fingerboard, head stock plate and bridge. It is easily the best sounding and easiest to play guitar I've ever owned (and, I've owned a bunch...). It's a fingerpicking type guitar, and hence has no pick guard. It has a transparent cherry stained finish and is just gorgeous! Many think it is heresy that I live less than three miles from the Martin Guitar Company and yet play Taylors. Hey, the Taylors are just easier to play and generally sound better in my opinion.

Yeah, Jeff picked up a lot of stuff at the Martin outlet while he was here. He got a bunch of necks and some fingerboards.

I'm making progress on the D-28 replica that I'm building, and just recently inlaid the rosette rings (after Jeff walked me through the process on a piece of scrap spruce...). I'll hopefully have this one in one piece by fall. I haven't forgotten the Gibson J-200 mold that I promised to send you... Just been really busy of late. I'll get to it.  ;D

Later - Bob Hunt
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Will Hinton on May 08, 2016, 04:27:56 PM
No hurry at all on the mold, my current one is still good.  Jeff brought me back half a dozen necks and fretboards the last trip, I can't make them for the price he gets them for!
Taylor for sure at my end too, except that I play my own instead. But if I weren't building guitars, I would be playing Taylor's.  If I were to be honest about it, I mostly use Taylor specs for my setups.  H^^
On my electrics I use PRS specs.  (And folks wonder why my instruments play so easily.)
That Grand Concert is one fine piece of work.  Congrats on that one.
To get back to the control line part of our lives, it is almost total history for me, too, at this time.  I hope to revitalize my interest soon, but it's nearly impossible right now.  NO guys, I AIN'T selling my PA's!!  Or anything else for that matter, I do plan to come back and qualify to fly expert at some time in my life.
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: john e. holliday on May 08, 2016, 05:04:00 PM
I'll keep watching for yah. LL~ LL~
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on September 07, 2017, 09:33:35 AM
Just bumping this to the top. I've had a lot of questions about my Second Wind twin of late and this thread should answer most of those questions.

By the way, both of my twins -- the Second Wind and the not-yet-finished American Spirit twin -- are for sale. The Second Wind is complete with motors and retracts; it's easy to fly. The American Spirit needs about a month of finishing work. Contact me if you are seriously interested; I'm not giving them away...

Later - Bob Hunt 
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Brent Williams on September 07, 2017, 12:51:22 PM
If these are up for sale, what are you flying these days?
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on September 07, 2017, 01:53:12 PM
Hi Brent:

Nothing; I'm retired!  ;D

Bob
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Allan Perret on September 07, 2017, 02:04:55 PM
I'm seriously interested, in plans.  Would pay a premium price for this plan..  Any chance of that happening ?
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on December 04, 2019, 07:53:53 AM
I'm bumping this topic to the top because of the many questions I've received about my electric twin projects.

I'm currently building two more very updated electric twins, and will either add to this thread with the progress on them, or start a new thread for them soon.

Later - Bob Hunt
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on October 21, 2022, 03:13:05 PM
I'm bumping this to the top for a friend who asked a lot of questions about the processes included in this topic.

Later - Bob Hunt
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Howard Rush on October 21, 2022, 05:08:13 PM
Worth a bump to call attention to post #575, relevant to a recent discussion with Tim Just about twins.
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Rick_Huff on October 22, 2022, 02:11:25 PM
Howard,
Thank you for your chart.  It saved me many very embarrasing experiments!
Rick
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on October 26, 2022, 07:23:31 AM
To all who might be reading this thread for the first time (and for the many who followed it from the beginning...), it is probably apparent that I did not go through with my retirement plans. The lure of flying stunt, and even more important the lure of designing new ships and learning more about how to make them fly better, drew me back in for the duration. I have come to the conclusion that the back issues that I've had all my life will never completely go away, and so I've decided to just ignore them and press on; this stunt stuff is just too much fun to let something as trivial as pain stop me from participating.

As many of you may have seen in other threads on this forum, I have been busy producing a few new twins. One is a fixed gear twin named the Wildfire (Crossfire, Wildfire... get it?), and the other one is the Turning Point, which will have retracts. That one is still in the paint shop. The Wildfire is nearing the end of the flight trim process, and my thanks go out here to Rick Huff for the amazing amount of help he provided in getting me up to speed on using the Fiorotti active timer in the twin environment. Thanks also to Saramarie Huff for her great coaching inputs on the trim flights. Thanks also to Tom Huff for providing a great practice field and for introducing me to a small deli near that field that makes the best sandwiches I've ever tasted!

So, along with the "Lost-Sheeting" testbed small twin that is nearing completion, I have three new twins. I'll post some photos of each of them here just for reference.

I am convinced that the twin concept will soon be a major force in competition CL Stunt. A fact substantiated by Rick Huff's Rookie of the Year performance at last year's Nats with his gorgeous BF-110 twin stunter. For the record Rick placed 14th in his first top 20 appearance!

I know that this thread has been long and has covered many years, but it does serve to chronicle the work a few of us have been doing to bring the electric twin to fruition as a weapon for CL Stunt competition. 

Later - Bob Hunt   
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on October 26, 2022, 07:34:07 AM
And here are a few photos of the Turning Point twin in the paint shop.

Bob

Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Dwayne Donnelly on October 26, 2022, 12:08:14 PM
I like the tail of the Turning Point and by chance would not retiring  mean you'll be cutting cores for us to buy again?  #^
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Ken Culbertson on October 26, 2022, 01:06:14 PM
It is OK by me if you don't get back into the core business.  We need you innovating not replicating.

Ken
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on October 31, 2022, 07:26:54 AM
I like the tail of the Turning Point and by chance would not retiring  mean you'll be cutting cores for us to buy again?  #^

LOL! Hi Dwayne:

As you probably surmised the "not retiring" comment was meant about my flying career. There is a chance I might get back to cutting cores at some point on a limited basis, and even making Lost-Foam fixture sets with which to make built-up wings, but never covered wings again due to the balsa situation. Balsa of the required density is just not available in any quantity these days, and even if it was available the cost would be astronomical, and that would drive the price of the wings through the roof. I provided covered, sanded and cored out foam core wings to this community for 53 years; it's time for a bit of a rest...

Later - Bob 
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on May 03, 2023, 11:43:12 AM
I'm bumping this to the top because of a lot of recent interest in electric twins. There was a discussion on a Monday night At the bench chat that stirred some interest. A lot of the information in this thread is somewhat dated, but most of the construction stuff is still very relevant.

I'm just now finishing up my Turning Point twin, and will be shooting clear on it this coming Friday (5/5). My plan is to have it ready for the upcoming Nats.

Thanks to all who have expressed interest in this thread and in the electric twins that a few of us have built and flown.

Later - Bob Hunt

 
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on May 03, 2023, 11:55:18 AM
Here are two more photos of the Turning Point ready to head for the paint booth to get cleared.

Bob

Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Crist Rigotti on May 03, 2023, 04:14:02 PM
Really nice work Bob!
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on May 03, 2023, 04:23:46 PM
Thanks, Crist!

Bob
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: John Skukalek on May 03, 2023, 06:12:17 PM
Ultra Classy Bob.
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: john e. holliday on May 03, 2023, 08:33:04 PM
Bet t looks even better in person.  But, family and knees keep me home plus other stuff. D>K
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on May 12, 2023, 05:30:01 AM
Bet t looks even better in person.  But, family and knees keep me home plus other stuff. D>K

Hi Doc:

Thanks for the comments. Yeah, I get the knee pain stuff for sure. If you ever do get the opportunity to come "East" rest assured you have a place to stay. Be glad to have you here for a few days to build and BS.

Be well old buddy - Bob
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: john e. holliday on May 12, 2023, 01:27:33 PM
Thanks for the offer Bob, but even if the family let me I would be a pain. H^^
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on May 12, 2023, 03:20:22 PM
Hey, I'm a pain... Just ask my wife.  ::)

Bob
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Air Ministry . on May 16, 2023, 11:15:02 PM
Looks a bit like a ' Space age ' version of this . Thought the picture a bit evocative .

(https://www.goodall.com.au/australian-aviation/gemini/MGemini-BLN-Timber-Creek-50-Jack-Slade-via-BD-coll-KOM.jpg)
CRIPES ;
(https://acesflyinghigh.files.wordpress.com/2016/03/ikarus-451-1.jpg?w=640)

any Volunteers ? .
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: Bob Hunt on May 18, 2023, 07:45:45 AM
Whoa! That "lay down" twin looks very interesting Air Ministry. It opens up a bunch of new styling ideas. There are so many looks to be explored and so little time left to design and build them.

I'm actually thinking about just designing a whole bunch of new twins on my existing "mannequin" of "numbers" and let others build them if they are interested. Truth be known, I like designing (or styling if you will...) and building more than I do flying. There are just too many twins that are waiting to be drawn! When the time come, please throw some drafting vellum, a pencil and an eraser into the box with me; that will keep me occupied... LL~ LL~

Later - Bob 

 
Title: Re: New Electric Twin project back on track
Post by: bdt-m on June 06, 2023, 07:52:44 AM
Bob Hunt:

Check your messages.

Thanks