News:



  • May 20, 2024, 05:37:20 PM

Login with username, password and session length

Author Topic: Brushless motor drive waveform  (Read 497 times)

Offline Mike Alimov

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Commander
  • ****
  • Posts: 379
Brushless motor drive waveform
« on: February 25, 2020, 05:04:09 PM »
I'm posting this for informational purposes only.  What you see on this picture is an actual current (not voltage!) waveform that drives one of the phases of an electric brushless motor.  (Details: motor Atlas AM2909/20; ESC: Castle Thunderbird 36; load: Taipan propeller 9-4, battery: 3S; RPM: did not capture; throttle control via Spektrum DX8 radio; waveform captured by Keysight CX3324A waveform analyzer with CX1104 differential current probe).  Frankly, I'm not impressed with the waveform, but there is only so much we can ask of a hobby-grade sub-$100 ESC.  With a more efficient drive scheme, we could probably reduce battery consumption by 30-50%, and thus bring the overall weight of the electric powertrain on par with the combustion setups.

Offline Dave Rigotti

  • 24 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Commander
  • *
  • Posts: 347
  • "Electric...The future of anytime stunt"
Re: Brushless motor drive waveform
« Reply #1 on: February 25, 2020, 05:53:34 PM »
Mike,
What in the waveform is unimpressive to you?  "Inquiring minds need to know...."
Dave Rigotti
AMA 66859
Chesterland, Ohio

Offline pmackenzie

  • Pat MacKenzie
  • 24 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 766
Re: Brushless motor drive waveform
« Reply #2 on: February 25, 2020, 06:17:42 PM »
I doubt that anything you change in the ESC will give you 30%  - 50% efficiency increase.
Main problem is that we don't use very efficient design for our motors, geared in-runners can be in the high 90% range, versus low 70's for outrunners.

Having said that, you might find this interesting, these guys were working on a solar powered, continuously flying UAV, so needed high efficiency at part throttle.

There used to be a lot more info about this on line, but they must have decided not to give away all their secrets :)
MAAC 8177

Offline Tim Wescott

  • 2016 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 12821
Re: Brushless motor drive waveform
« Reply #3 on: February 25, 2020, 07:39:27 PM »
A triangular waveform like that causes about 33% more loss in the motor windings than a nice smooth constant waveform would -- but that's just loss in the windings, not bearing loss, or loss in the ESC, or iron losses in the motor, or inefficiencies in the batteries.

Making it more efficient means switching the ESC faster, which increases iron losses in the motor, and switching losses in the ESC -- you'd be lucky if you got any increase, but if you want to start making ESCs you're welcome to try.  I'm pretty sure I'm not the only circuit designer on this forum; I'll certainly give you pointers (starting with -- start with a VESC and downsize it; don't mess around with rolling your own from scratch).

Alternatively, you could use external inductors to smooth the current.  That would add weight to the system, and you'd have to custom-make an ESC to deal with the inductance (you couldn't just shove it onto an existing motor).  Again, you're welcome to try.
AMA 64232

The problem with electric is that once you get the smoke generator and sound system installed, the plane is too heavy.

Offline Fredvon4

  • 24 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 2099
  • Central Texas
Re: Brushless motor drive waveform
« Reply #4 on: February 26, 2020, 09:58:26 AM »
ESC designers and their companies are a very very competitive part of this universe

IF there was a definitive way to reduce battery consumption and or increase motor power or efficiency....those experts would be highly motivated ....I think
"A good scare teaches more than good advice"

Fred von Gortler IV

Offline Tim Wescott

  • 2016 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 12821
Re: Brushless motor drive waveform
« Reply #5 on: February 26, 2020, 06:24:43 PM »
ESC designers and their companies are a very very competitive part of this universe

IF there was a definitive way to reduce battery consumption and or increase motor power or efficiency....those experts would be highly motivated ....I think

It's a tradeoff.  I suspect you could, but only at the cost of a heavier, bulkier, more expensive ESC.  Whether the added ESC weight could be bought back with less battery -- I dunno.  Even if you could, it'd be a hard sell.
AMA 64232

The problem with electric is that once you get the smoke generator and sound system installed, the plane is too heavy.

Offline Wolfgang Nieuwkamp

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Commander
  • ****
  • Posts: 199
Re: Brushless motor drive waveform
« Reply #6 on: February 27, 2020, 01:42:18 PM »
Mike,
the waveform current that you showed, is typical for reduced power operation. At full pulse length, the voltage is trapezoidal, resulting is less losses. That is the reason for me to select the propeller that absorbs the maximum power when needed.
Screenshot provided by Castle.
Regards,

Wolfgang


Advertise Here
Tags:
 


Advertise Here