News:  
CLICK HERE---->    <----CLICK HERE



  • January 20, 2026, 07:50:24 AM

Login with username, password and session length

Author Topic: Lippo C Rating  (Read 635 times)

Online Motorman

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • ******
  • Posts: 3914
Lippo C Rating
« on: September 09, 2025, 08:54:25 PM »
I know the C rating is how fast the battery can safely discharge. Is the battery able to exceed that number or, is that the upper limit of what it CAN do?

If I push the load and the rpm way up will the battery be self limiting at the C rating or will it supply the extra power and burn up?

Thanks,
MM :)
Wasted words ain't never been heard. Alman Brothers

Online Ken Culbertson

  • 26 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 7535
Re: Lippo C Rating
« Reply #1 on: September 09, 2025, 11:09:12 PM »
I asked Bing Copilot: "Is a LIPO battery able to exceed it's "C" rating or, is that the upper limit."  Got a thorough answer that boils down to "Yes you can but you really don't want to".  Give it a shot, the AI's are slowly getting better.

From what I read in Bing's answer, we are really abusing our batteries.  The "Bing" calculator estimated that I could be pulling as much as 70 amps in a reverse wingover.  So why are my batteries only warm and my Spin 44 ESC acting normally after three years of abuse?  Obviously we do not pull that much.  So how much do we pull?  Bing's static watt figures matched what my 3520-810 pulls on the ground so I am curious why their "boost" figures were so high 35-50c in moderate maneuvers (do we have any of those) and as high as 70 in demanding maneuvers.  This is almost like say that I am flying 140' diameter circles on 55' lines. 

Is there a place I can go to see telemetry readouts from timers that support it to learn a bit more about the amp draw pattern as we fly the pattern?

Ken
AMA 15382
If it is not broke you are not trying hard enough.
USAF 1968-1974 TAC

Offline Brent Williams

  • 26 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 1404
    • Fancher Handles - Presented by Brent Williams
Re: Lippo C Rating
« Reply #2 on: September 10, 2025, 01:58:35 AM »
I don't think most control line stunt guys will have good data for very hi drain situations.  You might look around other forums for the battery data for applications like racing quadcopters or other stuff that really draws high amps.  If the packaging (or rules allow), more voltage from a higher cell count cures many ills.

I data log many of my flights on my plane just for fun.  Here is a flight log from a few years ago using BA 2826/690, APC 12x6e, 6s2600 li-ion, FM-9 timer, Castle Edge-Lite 50 in Hi-Gov, 64oz, 690sq. 
Definitely not stressing out over the 20amps it pulls at max draw during the wingover and overheads. 

« Last Edit: September 10, 2025, 08:38:56 AM by Brent Williams »
Laser-cut, "Ted Fancher Precision-Pro" Hard Point Handle Kits are available again.  PM for info.
https://stunthanger.com/smf/brent-williams'-fancher-handles-and-cl-parts/ted-fancher's-precision-pro-handle-kit-by-brent-williams-information/

Offline Igor Burger

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • ******
  • Posts: 2217
Re: Lippo C Rating
« Reply #3 on: September 10, 2025, 03:11:00 AM »
I know the C rating is how fast the battery can safely discharge. Is the battery able to exceed that number or, is that the upper limit of what it CAN do?

If I push the load and the rpm way up will the battery be self limiting at the C rating or will it supply the extra power and burn up?

Thanks,
MM :)

Good question, I am actually writing an article about our equpment, here is part about it .... but to your question, no, the C rate is not self limiting and it is also not upper limit, you can always go higher .... on cost of battery life ... or to the point when electric converts to internal combustion  VD~

so the part from article:

The C-rate is a convenient way to express discharge capability, but it is really just a reflection of internal resistance. In practice, manufacturers calculate the continuous C-rate from the cell’s internal resistance using a formula of the form:

C = 0.4 / ( Ri * capacity )

The constant 0.4 in the C-rate formula corresponds to an expected voltage drop of approximately 0.4 V across the cell’s internal resistance during discharge.

For example, a LiPo cell with 2700 mAh capacity and an internal resistance of 6 mΩ gives C=0.4/(0.006*2.7)≈25, which matches its 25C rating. Burst C-rates are often quoted even higher (25C-50C), but they simply represent short-term "burst" currents the cell can supply before heating and voltage sag become excessive. This calculation always applies to a single cell, for packs in series the C-rate stays the same.

Offline spare_parts

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Commander
  • ****
  • Posts: 145
Re: Lippo C Rating
« Reply #4 on: September 10, 2025, 06:16:54 AM »
At extremely high currents, there is no real way to tell what performance will be like without actual testing. The label rating means nothing. You can dead short a battery, the only thing limiting current is internal impedance of the battery. It will put out as much current as it can, until it burns up in spectacular fashion. This question must arise from the speed project?
Greg

Online Ken Culbertson

  • 26 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 7535
Re: Lippo C Rating
« Reply #5 on: September 10, 2025, 06:51:27 AM »
I don't think most control line stunt guys will have good data for very hi drain situations.  You might look around other forums for the battery data for applications like racing quadcopters or other stuff that really draws high amps.  If the packaging (or rules allow), more voltage from a higher cell count cures many ills.

I data log many of my flights on my plane just for fun.  Here is a flight log from a few years ago using BA 2826/690, APC 12x6e, 6s2600 li-ion, FM-9 timer, Castle Edge-Lite 50 in Hi-Gov. 
Definitely not stressing out over the 20amps it pulls at max draw during the wingover and overheads. 


Thanks, it is comforting to see that we really do not pull that much in what you might call the Fox 35 setup of electrics.  The 3515 is a rough equivalent to the 2826 as to what planes it is appropriate for.  What was missing was the weight it was pulling, and the pattern would be quite different using the Fiorotti timer but probably not the extremes and still the numbers are nowhere near what the "Bing" answer suggested.  I would think that the ESC and Timer have survival limits that prevent them from asking for more amps than they can process, but that would be logical, and we do fly PA. n~

Ken

AMA 15382
If it is not broke you are not trying hard enough.
USAF 1968-1974 TAC

Online Ken Culbertson

  • 26 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 7535
Re: Lippo C Rating
« Reply #6 on: September 10, 2025, 06:56:20 AM »
Good question, I am actually writing an article about our equpment, here is part about it ....

Thanks - looking forward to the full article!

Ken
AMA 15382
If it is not broke you are not trying hard enough.
USAF 1968-1974 TAC

Offline Douglas Bykoff

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Lieutenant
  • ***
  • Posts: 72
Re: Lippo C Rating
« Reply #7 on: September 10, 2025, 10:48:53 AM »
As Master Igor said, the "C" rating is another way of referring to the battery's internal resistance.

The big problem is that, when drawing high currents, the battery voltage will drop according to Ohm's law. The lower the C (and the higher internal resistance), the greater the voltage drop when the motor is under load during maneuver.

In simpler models and ESCs without a governor, the difference between a 30C and a 100C battery is dramatic.

In models with an ESC with governor and active timers, there won't be as much of a difference, but a high-C battery will run cooler than a low-C battery.

High-C batteries are heavier and more expensive.

Douglas


Offline Tim Wescott

  • 25 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 13057
Re: Lippo C Rating
« Reply #8 on: September 13, 2025, 05:48:32 PM »
As Master Igor said, the "C" rating is another way of referring to the battery's internal resistance.

That's partially true -- the C rating is about a combination of the battery's internal resistance, it's ability to shed heat, the internal temperature that it can withstand, and how much of a s**t the manufacturer gives about your battery lasting a long time.

Certainly for similar chemistry and similar capacity batteries from the same manufacturer, the internal resistance is going to roughly track the reciprocal of the C rating.

But the Reputable Battery Manufacturing Company and the Fly by Knight Battery Manufacturing Company may sell you batteries made of exactly the same cells with markedly different 'C' ratings, because RBM wants you to be a satisfied customer forever, and FbK just wants to take your money and run.
AMA 64232

The problem with electric is that once you get the smoke generator and sound system installed, the plane is too heavy.

Offline Frank Imbriaco

  • 24 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 969
  • At the 69 Willow Grove NATS with J.D. FALCON II
Re: Lippo C Rating
« Reply #9 on: September 18, 2025, 06:18:44 AM »
Technical stuff aside, I was always told by folks a lot smarter than me to stick with a "C" rating of 25 for our purposes.

Offline Steve Manganelli

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Ensign
  • **
  • Posts: 25
Re: Lippo C Rating
« Reply #10 on: October 20, 2025, 05:54:57 PM »
That's partially true -- the C rating is about a combination of the battery's internal resistance, it's ability to shed heat, the internal temperature that it can withstand, and how much of a s**t the manufacturer gives about your battery lasting a long time.

Certainly for similar chemistry and similar capacity batteries from the same manufacturer, the internal resistance is going to roughly track the reciprocal of the C rating.

But the Reputable Battery Manufacturing Company and the Fly by Knight Battery Manufacturing Company may sell you batteries made of exactly the same cells with markedly different 'C' ratings, because RBM wants you to be a satisfied customer forever, and FbK just wants to take your money and run.
Amen Brother! Too many R/C batteries have C-ratings set by the marketing department! All the batteries in my battery drawer (mostly for R/C but some CL) are 70C to 80C. The less cells, the higher C rating you'll need for a desired power level. Then the right prop, right governed RPM and some RPM "headroom" . Random pack out of the drawer : 6S3400, 80C. That's 272 amps if you believe the nameplate rating. Would I push it that hard? No way! But at a reasonable 55 amps, they have noticeably more "headroom" for the needed power (R/C pattern, sorry), come down way cooler at a higher voltage (after 2 R/C sequences) and in theory, will last a lot longer. Smaller capacity needs higher C rating for the same current. Higher C rating (if from a reputable company) are better IMHO.
CL means never losing your plane in flight : look in the direction the lines and there it is!


Advertise Here
Tags:
 


Advertise Here