Hi Guys,
I know that it's no real problem, but what I am trying to establish is just how close your setting is to the maximum rpm. For example, if you're running at 9000 and the max is 11000 then you have too much headroom and the motor's torque is below optimum. My governor program will not be as solid as it would be with a higher rpm. In startup mode, I need to run the motor up briefly before the governor mode kicks in, so I set it to run up to the pulse width of the last stored rpm in program mode. Now, if the rpm is a little on the low side, the governor will try to bring it up to speed quickly and it overshoots a lot more that it would for a setting that is closer to its maximum setting.
If you try the motor without the prop in program mode, you will see what I'm talking about. The motor will run at the programmed rpm with no load on the shaft, but the pulse width to the esc will be right down low at maybe 1.2 ms. Now grab the shaft and let it go. Th rpm will zoom up and then come back down again. Sort of like "rubber-banding". If you you now slowly add pressure on the shaft (use a cloth) the governor will work a lot better. In practice when you're flying the system, the pulse width will be closer to the top end and the motor will be developing a good torque. I have tried a tighter control as per the PID math system, but it slows things down a bit more. After many flight tests, the present system just feels better.
The reason for it shutting down if you program it full blast, is because the low rpm detection trigger point is now very close to maximum and because there is no headroom for the governor to work, it soon drops low enough to shut down the motor. The low rpm shut down works well if the prop is jammed and also if your battery pack starts running low. This is something that I always look for ways to improve. As I said before, I'm about 95% happy with the way my system works, so I keep trying to improve it. I saw a quote from Einstein once that said "Try to make everything as simple as you can, but don't make it simpler" Maybe there's some sense in that!
Keith R