Author Topic: Fiorotti Timer (Read 51343 times)

Ken Culbertson · « **Reply #100 on:** February 08, 2023, 07:18:03 AM »

Quote from: Dwayne Donnelly on February 08, 2023, 06:00:07 AM

I would by 10% and reset to 1 minute flight time just be safe.

Man after 60+ years of running IC, having to learn everything all over again is, well FUN! Thanks, I am going to do just that!

Ken

Dwayne Donnelly · « **Reply #101 on:** February 08, 2023, 10:50:19 AM »

Quote from: Ken Culbertson on February 08, 2023, 07:18:03 AM

Man after 60+ years of running IC, having to learn everything all over again is, well FUN! Thanks, I am going to do just that!

Ken

No kidding...lol Be ready though, as you said the timer is supposed to detect cell counts so reducing the value could reduce the rpm, please let us know how it goes.

Ken Culbertson · « **Reply #102 on:** February 08, 2023, 07:19:04 PM »

Quote from: Dwayne Donnelly on February 08, 2023, 10:50:19 AM

No kidding...lol Be ready though, as you said the timer is supposed to detect cell counts so reducing the value could reduce the rpm, please let us know how it goes.

Crist Rigotti runs the same rig I do and he thinks it will not affect the RPM's too but alas, we may never know. Turns out that the 6s that I have are equipped with XT-60's and the ship in question has Deans. Such is life.

Ken

Brent Williams · « **Reply #103 on:** February 08, 2023, 08:58:48 PM »

Quote from: Ken Culbertson on February 08, 2023, 07:19:04 PM

Crist Rigotti runs the same rig I do and he thinks it will not affect the RPM's too but alas, we may never know. Turns out that the 6s that I have are equipped with XT-60's and the ship in question has Deans. Such is life.

Ken

These are handy.
https://www.amazon.com/Venom-XT60-Deans-Battery-Adapter/dp/B007S8FE76/ref=sr_1_13?keywords=xt60+to+deans+adapter&sr=8-13

Fred Underwood · « **Reply #104 on:** February 08, 2023, 09:55:05 PM »

Quote from: Ken Culbertson on February 08, 2023, 07:19:04 PM

Crist Rigotti runs the same rig I do and he thinks it will not affect the RPM's too but alas, we may never know. Turns out that the 6s that I have are equipped with XT-60's and the ship in question has Deans. Such is life.

Ken

I didn't think that it changed rpm, but you seemed to indicate that it did when you switched before. Easy to check with a tach, 5s and then 6s and then not waste flying time at the field. The adapters would make it possible to check and see what you get before investing in batteries or changing plugs.

Ken Culbertson · « **Reply #105 on:** March 25, 2023, 01:45:05 PM »

Could this ESC be used by the Fiorotti timer? Does anybody have experience with it on any timer?

https://www.ebay.com/itm/195005061663?_trkparms=amclksrc%3DITM%26aid%3D1110006%26algo%3DHOMESPLICE.SIM%26ao%3D1%26asc%3D20201210111451%26meid%3D2d29362b41494b9db359905cfa068cea%26pid%3D101196%26rk%3D5%26rkt%3D12%26sd%3D134391259328%26itm%3D195005061663%26pmt%3D1%26noa%3D0%26pg%3D2047675%26algv%3DSimplAMLv5PairwiseWebWithBBEV2bAndUBSourceDemotionWithUltimatelyBoughtOfCoviewV1%26brand%3DUnbranded&_trksid=p2047675.c101196.m2219&amdata=cksum%3A1950050616632d29362b41494b9db359905cfa068cea%7Cenc%3AAQAHAAABMIep8YrnpoI5Ip1Fr26ya5Zdwg2V78Yl01uYLsdPZcFTvxKxDts2M2LiSIpUM3yyPCg4I%252FI%252F%252BBr%252B3lbC%252BxYqInYGBmzIxc4EMw3YF0EDxTKyDXYEffo6WPiYU3tSSaN17H65XWvDWa8bn1XlynKkcdf7ZazQit4FemQ0b5Ce88Fg%252FtCJJHRjOkyTmyKlVTueT%252FkhpBDTUQ233I020NlHu5w30xSnhObNQGS9eFPSNJRBeL%252BYf%252BCepZYRqFStJyUenTa%252FhtBBvOFAyZbgYr18gXJObm%252FPL6BKcDlx2zqzLfwByGCtb5wr3Dwrmz81gDGqpAgYs3aujzxtrfUp8G3XQYOZk%252BHrLvvfbgLoWKa1cFTK8NSsAT0cNNyHv%252FUlQlfvogVX2g9p%252BsqGO0vpKTQ4wOk%253D%7Campid%3APL_CLK%7Cclp%3A2047675

Crist Rigotti · « **Reply #106 on:** March 25, 2023, 01:49:37 PM »

Quote from: Ken Culbertson on March 25, 2023, 01:45:05 PM

Could this ESC be used by the Fiorotti timer? Does anybody have experience with it on any timer?

https://www.ebay.com/itm/195005061663?_trkparms=amclksrc%3DITM%26aid%3D1110006%26algo%3DHOMESPLICE.SIM%26ao%3D1%26asc%3D20201210111451%26meid%3D2d29362b41494b9db359905cfa068cea%26pid%3D101196%26rk%3D5%26rkt%3D12%26sd%3D134391259328%26itm%3D195005061663%26pmt%3D1%26noa%3D0%26pg%3D2047675%26algv%3DSimplAMLv5PairwiseWebWithBBEV2bAndUBSourceDemotionWithUltimatelyBoughtOfCoviewV1%26brand%3DUnbranded&_trksid=p2047675.c101196.m2219&amdata=cksum%3A1950050616632d29362b41494b9db359905cfa068cea%7Cenc%3AAQAHAAABMIep8YrnpoI5Ip1Fr26ya5Zdwg2V78Yl01uYLsdPZcFTvxKxDts2M2LiSIpUM3yyPCg4I%252FI%252F%252BBr%252B3lbC%252BxYqInYGBmzIxc4EMw3YF0EDxTKyDXYEffo6WPiYU3tSSaN17H65XWvDWa8bn1XlynKkcdf7ZazQit4FemQ0b5Ce88Fg%252FtCJJHRjOkyTmyKlVTueT%252FkhpBDTUQ233I020NlHu5w30xSnhObNQGS9eFPSNJRBeL%252BYf%252BCepZYRqFStJyUenTa%252FhtBBvOFAyZbgYr18gXJObm%252FPL6BKcDlx2zqzLfwByGCtb5wr3Dwrmz81gDGqpAgYs3aujzxtrfUp8G3XQYOZk%252BHrLvvfbgLoWKa1cFTK8NSsAT0cNNyHv%252FUlQlfvogVX2g9p%252BsqGO0vpKTQ4wOk%253D%7Campid%3APL_CLK%7Cclp%3A2047675

I was just looking at these earlier today! Looking for a programming card though.

Fred Underwood · « **Reply #107 on:** March 25, 2023, 02:10:29 PM »

When I started with the Fiorotti timer, I tried a Castle ESC. It worked in the sense of powering up and flying, but the response was too slow for changing rpm, so the acceleration and deceleration were slight behind needed. It worked at a sport level, but not for competition. That is a basic problem for accelerometers. It will likely take someone trying it to find out, but my guess is that it will be too slow. On the other hand, the price is not bad for a trial.

Programming looks to be RC transmitter only at least for now. Some of the brands share programming cards, again found by trial and error. In the print, the seller say that multiple parameters can be set by remote control and then the defaults can be restored by remote control, presumably meaning RC transmitter.

Howard Rush · « **Reply #108 on:** March 25, 2023, 05:04:40 PM »

Could be worth the price just for the copper.

Robertc · « **Reply #109 on:** March 26, 2023, 02:00:38 PM »

Is there an equal to the Jeti Spin 66 - non pro for the active timers?

Ken Culbertson · « **Reply #110 on:** May 19, 2023, 08:26:37 AM »

Just hoping someone might know if a Fiorotti is DOA if it no longer sends an arming signal to the ESC. I am unclear whether this is hardwired or firmware. I suspect it is hardwired on the circuit board so I am SOL but it is worth asking. At least it can be used to test mount in a new plane along with the burned up motor I have.

In a fit of stupidity, I didn't check the plugs and got the power lead on the wrong pin. At $90+shipping @ it may be worth trying to fix, if it can be fixed.

It is a shame that we can't make the cable connections "fool proof". It really isn't that hard.

Ken

Vitalis Pilkionis · « **Reply #111 on:** July 19, 2023, 01:41:37 PM »

Can someone who actually uses Fiorotti Timer tell me if there is possibility to adjust braking intensity independently from acceleration? The goal is to make braking to kick much earlier and harder than accelerating.
Thanks for your input!

Ken Culbertson · « **Reply #112 on:** July 19, 2023, 05:34:25 PM »

Quote from: Vitalis Pilkionis on July 19, 2023, 01:41:37 PM

Can someone who actually uses Fiorotti Timer tell me if there is possibility to adjust braking intensity independently from acceleration? The goal is to make braking to kick much earlier and harder than accelerating.
Thanks for your input!

I don't think there is. There is only one setting for sensitivity. I have to admit, it would be nice. I have two places that the brake kicks when it shouldn't. The 4th corners of the Wingover and the Hourglass. If I hit them hard the motor nearly stops for a split second. I just live with it because it is not causing any real problem.

Ken

Crist Rigotti · « **Reply #113 on:** July 20, 2023, 06:26:00 AM »

Maybe in future updates that will be available.

Vitalis Pilkionis · « **Reply #114 on:** July 20, 2023, 07:21:59 AM »

Quote from: Crist Rigotti on July 20, 2023, 06:26:00 AM

Maybe in future updates that will be available.

Please make that ASAP. Standard symmetrical adjustment of sensitivity is not enough, because some people (like me) doesn't have quick reaction and therefore require much more time to control trajectory in the bottom part of maneuvers.

Crist Rigotti · « **Reply #115 on:** July 20, 2023, 07:25:13 PM »

Quote from: Vitalis Pilkionis on July 20, 2023, 07:21:59 AM

Please make that ASAP. Standard symmetrical adjustment of sensitivity is not enough, because some people (like me) doesn't have quick reaction and therefore require much more time to control trajectory in the bottom part of maneuvers.

I don't have anything to do with programming the timer. I am just a user. Maybe let Fiorotti know your feelings.

Rogerio Fiorotti · « **Reply #116 on:** July 21, 2023, 06:39:31 AM »

Friends,

Decreasing the RPM_Max setting will solve most of the above cases. I can add two Sensitivity adjustments "Acceleration and Deceleration or Brake" without any problems. The current setting already has a differential where it accelerates more than it brakes with the same setting.

I got great help from Fred Underwood with writing the manual, my English is bad. Attached manual to help everyone.

For sending a private message rogerio@cltimer.com

Rogerio Fiorotti

Ken Culbertson · « **Reply #117 on:** July 21, 2023, 08:27:55 AM »

This is exactly why I use this timer. Thank You!

Ken

dc stunt · « **Reply #118 on:** July 21, 2023, 07:38:33 PM »

I have been using Fioratti 6.5v and I am
Loving it . G force can be independently adjusted where as 6.4 the brake/Acc is equal.
Play with min setting and also go to esc Manuel braking to change braking strength and speed of brake plus
Using a higher c battery. Hope this help, cheers.

Vitalis Pilkionis · « **Reply #119 on:** July 24, 2023, 03:46:32 AM »

Quote from: Rogerio Fiorotti on July 21, 2023, 06:39:31 AM

I can add two Sensitivity adjustments "Acceleration and Deceleration or Brake" without any problems.

Yes, that would be really nice to have.
Thanks, Rogerio.

Vitalis P.

Vitalis Pilkionis · « **Reply #120 on:** September 10, 2023, 11:55:33 AM »

Has anyone got new version of the timer with separate sensitivity adjustment for acceleration and deceleration?
Is there any way to upgrade firmware without sending it to Brasil?

Ken Culbertson · « **Reply #121 on:** October 10, 2023, 11:37:31 AM »

I am considering using a cheaper ESC for a project. Will the timer work correctly with the BadAss 35? The project will be a twin and the prospect of putting 2 Spin 33's in it has my wallet vibrating.

Ken

Oh - can someone answer Vitalis question in the last post?

Ken Culbertson · « **Reply #122 on:** March 22, 2024, 09:22:28 AM »

OK, the wallet survived the Spin 33 dual ESC's. Now I have a specific Fiorotti question that I have posed on other threads but I am hoping to get an answer from the Fiorotti community. If you are using two ESC's in a twin it is suggested that the following be done:

#1 The On/Off switch for EXC#2 be left in the Off position permanently.
#2 The power lead (red wire) from the #2 BEC be cut.
Is this correct? Inquiring minds want to know. And:
#3 Will the ESC or Timer be damaged if the Red Wire is Not cut?
#4 Does the Jeti box connected to the timer #3 set of pins (bottom set) get it's power from the center pin?

Ken
Oh - still waiting for an answer to Vitalis question below. FYI I have one of the newer timers but have not used it yet.

Paul Richardson1 · « **Reply #123 on:** May 22, 2024, 04:34:45 PM »

I have a question about the G Force parameter settings?
With the version 6.5 timer there is adjustment for both positive and negative, The "I" and "D" values.
Which value controls positive G forces ? I want the power to increase more pull ups. (I find the instructions not very clear on this.)
Overhead power is fantastic with the nose up parameter. I just want to understand the timer more.
Also can anybody explain the G number in the top R/H corner? how and what does this parameter change?
Thanks :-)

Fred Underwood · « **Reply #124 on:** May 22, 2024, 04:55:53 PM »

You can have Increase (boost) and Decrease (braking) RPM at your set values. On the older versions, there was one value, so the same amount of Increase and Decrease. A good starting place is 5 for each and then adjust to your style.

The actual number for G-force, the value in the R corner, is calibrated when you fly in the first 3 -3.5 laps. Flight should be level while calibrating, noted by a rapidly flashing light. Recalibration is done in those first laps automatically if you change the set or base RPM.

In V6.5, you can manually set a G-force which will also be recalibrated back to the timer when changing set RPM. IF you change the setting for G-force manually, then the timer will try to get to that setting and will adjust its rpm as needed, meaning that it may need to change your rpm even in level flight. That could mean different lap time and battery usage. My recommendation for now is to leave it to the timer to calibrate, don't manually set it.

Paul Richardson1 · « **Reply #125 on:** May 22, 2024, 05:16:55 PM »

Thanks Fred, That's very helpful

Ken Culbertson · « **Reply #126 on:** August 08, 2024, 06:28:47 PM »

I have an access issue for the accelerator pad on my twin. I need access in order to level it but I have no access to the bottom of the plane near the CG. If I mount it about 1-2 inches forward of the CG am I going to have setting issues? I will have to cut an access hatch in the bottom of the plane otherwise.

Second question. Normally my timer sits just in front of the wing on the inboard fuselage side and is pretty far from the ESC and other things. In this one it is going to be right next to the esc and one set of motor wires. Am I going to have interference issues? I suspect not but I am far from expert in electronics.

Ken

Fred Underwood · « **Reply #127 on:** August 08, 2024, 06:44:13 PM »

I've flown another's airplane with the sensor in the ESC area, so, low in the plane and forward. Another placement for the sensor was high in the battery compartment at the wing bulkhead accessable through the hatch. I could not tell any difference between those sensor mounts and mine in the standard rear of the CG area. I haven't tried other timer locations, but it doesn't seem like they would matter unless you get vibration, heat, or electrical interference enough to affect the chip. Seems like what you need should work. Of course ESC type extensions to get Jeti box connection in a convenient area.

Ken Culbertson · « **Reply #128 on:** August 19, 2024, 04:42:41 PM »

Another question, or perhaps the same question reworded. I have always used ESC#2 on the timer for the Jeti box. I run a patch cable from it to the side of the plane where I put the male connector through the fuselage flush with the side. This lets me plug in the Jeti for programming without opening anything or taking anything off. So now I have an ESC on the #3 set of pins so to program the timer I have to take that lead off and put the Jeti on then do the opposite when I am done. Two opportunities to screw up.

What I want is a micro AB switch so that I can wire the ESC and the Jeti port and toggle between them. Only one opportunity to screw up. I can't find one anywhere.

Ken

Ken Culbertson · « **Reply #129 on:** August 24, 2024, 02:00:12 PM »

I have been following the threads discussing Shark Week and one of the things that has bothered me about the Fiorotti is that I can't seem to get the cornering boost to come on while I am still in the corner. It could be that the Spin Pro is too slow, or it could be that I am not setting one or all of the settings to produce it. I want the boost to come on as close having reached the apex as possible. Right now, I get it just as I hit the flat and if I am not careful, I will get a bump as it kicks in.

Will the timer work with a Spin instead of a Pro and would that make a difference? Is there another ESC that is as fast as the old Spin?

Ken

Paul Richardson1 · « **Reply #130 on:** August 25, 2024, 06:55:55 AM »

Quote from: Ken Culbertson on August 24, 2024, 02:00:12 PM

I have been following the threads discussing Shark Week and one of the things that has bothered me about the Fiorotti is that I can't seem to get the cornering boost to come on while I am still in the corner. It could be that the Spin Pro is too slow, or it could be that I am not setting one or all of the settings to produce it. I want the boost to come on as close having reached the apex as possible. Right now, I get it just as I hit the flat and if I am not careful, I will get a bump as it kicks in.

Will the timer work with a Spin instead of a Pro and would that make a difference? Is there another ESC that is as fast as the old Spin?

Ken

Ken, could it be that the sensor is mounted too close to the CG ? If the sensor was mounted as far back from the cg as possible maybe it would detect more rotational movements earlier?
Just a thought 😁👍

Ken Culbertson · « **Reply #131 on:** August 25, 2024, 09:28:24 AM »

Quote from: Paul Richardson1 on August 25, 2024, 06:55:55 AM

Ken, could it be that the sensor is mounted too close to the CG ? If the sensor was mounted as far back from the cg as possible maybe it would detect more rotational movements earlier?
Just a thought 😁👍

And a good thought. I have it mounted just forward of the CG. From what I have been told that is where it should go. I have another plane where it is mounted 6" behind the CG and it does the same thing. I have also been told it doesn't matter much along as it is oriented properly and leveled.

Ken

Crist Rigotti · « **Reply #132 on:** August 25, 2024, 06:30:52 PM »

What do the instructions say where to mount it? I would think that would be more definitive than word of mouth!

Fred Underwood · « **Reply #133 on:** August 25, 2024, 08:23:53 PM »

On an old set of instructions for V4, the sensor was shown 30 - 40 mm behind the bellcrank pivot. I could not do this in my first plane, a profile with the sensor in the fuse. It ended up several inches behind the CG and pivot. It worked fine, and I discussed it with Rogerio years back. Since, I use similar position a few inches back of the bellcrank pivot for convenience. I have flown a friends who tried a couple of different mounts, including inside the battery compartment at about the leading edge of the wing. A very convenient positsion for any adjustment. I could not detect a difference from mine, nor could he. He also tried the original suggested position and could not tell a difference. But, as they say, your mileage may vary. Ken's word was probably from my mouth :-).

My understanding is that the sensor and timer are acting on nose up angle, acceleration for sensitivity, and force for G-force, not directly on rotation or rate of change of rotation.

Ken Culbertson · « **Reply #134 on:** August 25, 2024, 08:40:20 PM »

Quote from: Fred Underwood on August 25, 2024, 08:23:53 PM

Ken's word was probably from my mouth :-). THEY WERE! I couldn't find it anywhere in the instructions.

My understanding is that the sensor and timer are acting on nose up angle, acceleration for sensitivity, and force for G-force, not directly on rotation or rate of change of rotation.

I have communicated with Rogerio on the late boost out of a corner and he suggested leveling the sensor pad with the nose down a few degrees. He says that should make the boost come sooner. It makes absolute sense since most planes fly at a slight positive AOA in level flight. He also said that the programming knows the difference between upright and inverted with this change and it would work both ways. I hope it works.

Ken

Paul Richardson1 · « **Reply #135 on:** August 25, 2024, 11:44:50 PM »

Quote from: Ken Culbertson on August 25, 2024, 08:40:20 PM

I have communicated with Rogerio on the late boost out of a corner and he suggested leveling the sensor pad with the nose down a few degrees. He says that should make the boost come sooner. It makes absolute sense since most planes fly at a slight positive AOA in level flight. He also said that the programming knows the difference between upright and inverted with this change and it would work both ways. I hope it works.

Ken

Ken, This Idea sounds good, however to my understanding (I could be wrong) If the sensor is not level this would change the lap speed between upright and inverted?
It would be easy to flight test and figure out?
Very keen to hear your findings :-)

Ken Culbertson · « **Reply #136 on:** August 26, 2024, 12:02:15 AM »

Quote from: Paul Richardson1 on August 25, 2024, 11:44:50 PM

Ken, This Idea sounds good, however to my understanding (I could be wrong) If the sensor is not level this would change the lap speed between upright and inverted?
It would be easy to flight test and figure out?
Very keen to hear your findings :-)

I asked Rogerio the same question in a different way and he implied that it wouldn't. Even if it does, I would gladly sacrifice even lap times on the 6 laps inverted to move that boost further back in the corner. Hope it works.

Ken

Ken Culbertson · « **Reply #137 on:** August 26, 2024, 12:36:31 PM »

Quote from: Ken Culbertson on August 26, 2024, 12:02:15 AM

I asked Rogerio the same question in a different way and he implied that it wouldn't. Even if it does, I would gladly sacrifice even lap times on the 6 laps inverted to move that boost further back in the corner. Hope it works.

Ken

I have mixed results. The change in the sensor did move the boost in corners back some but not as much as I had hoped. I think only a faster ESC will get me where I want to be. Lap times were about the same 5.4 vs 5.3 so there was a small change but that small amount doesn't bother me. Air was so dead that I was getting wake turbulence in level flight. Overhead boost was the same. Next stop is going to be the sensitivity setting.

Ken

Crist Rigotti · « **Reply #138 on:** August 26, 2024, 05:24:11 PM »

The fastest ESC is the Jeti Spin. Which isn't made anymore but can be bought with an Igor timer.

Ken Culbertson · « **Reply #139 on:** August 26, 2024, 07:09:33 PM »

Quote from: Crist Rigotti on August 26, 2024, 05:24:11 PM

The fastest ESC is the Jeti Spin. Which isn't made anymore but can be bought with an Igor timer.

Are you using the Fiorotti in "Agenda"? Spin or Spin Pro?

Crist Rigotti · « **Reply #140 on:** August 26, 2024, 08:02:01 PM »

Quote from: Ken Culbertson on August 26, 2024, 07:09:33 PM

Are you using the Fiorotti in "Agenda"? Spin or Spin Pro?

Fiorotti, Spin Pro.

Next timer will be Igor's new one with a Spin 66.

Ken Culbertson · « **Reply #141 on:** August 31, 2024, 04:22:11 PM »

I flew my Trifecta in a contest today and experienced my first IC like day with a timer. It all started when I got hammered into the ground on the second Triangle of my first official of the day. The plane was banged up but flyable. From then on I was getting boost where I should have brake, massively different inverted and upright speeds and boost on the backside of rounds. Anything over 45 was fine. The sensor on the timer has calibration settings that tell the timer when it is flying level. If they are off then lap times will be off and/or inside/outside turn RPM's will be unequal. Assuming the sensor has been leveled and the calibration laps flown, what else could be wrong? I have checked the videos of the plane and its AOA in level flight is just enough tail low create lift. Although I doubt that the timer's neutral setting takes that into account it would not be enough to cause what I experienced. Can timer or ESC settings be changed by smacking the plane into the ground? This was a dramatic drop in RPM between level and inverted and a similar drop on outside turns. Almost like it was trimmed with the sensor setting reversed (it wasn't). It will be interesting to see what the settings are after the NTSB investigation.

Ken

Dwayne Donnelly · « **Reply #142 on:** September 01, 2024, 06:36:15 AM »

Quote from: Ken Culbertson on August 31, 2024, 04:22:11 PM

I flew my Trifecta in a contest today and experienced my first IC like day with a timer. It all started when I got hammered into the ground on the second Triangle of my first official of the day. The plane was banged up but flyable. From then on I was getting boost where I should have brake, massively different inverted and upright speeds and boost on the backside of rounds. Anything over 45 was fine. The sensor on the timer has calibration settings that tell the timer when it is flying level. If they are off then lap times will be off and/or inside/outside turn RPM's will be unequal. Assuming the sensor has been leveled and the calibration laps flown, what else could be wrong? I have checked the videos of the plane and its AOA in level flight is just enough tail low create lift. Although I doubt that the timer's neutral setting takes that into account it would not be enough to cause what I experienced. Can timer or ESC settings be changed by smacking the plane into the ground? This was a dramatic drop in RPM between level and inverted and a similar drop on outside turns. Almost like it was trimmed with the sensor setting reversed (it wasn't). It will be interesting to see what the settings are after the NTSB investigation.

Ken

Are you using G-Force?

Ken Culbertson · « **Reply #143 on:** September 01, 2024, 07:19:26 AM »

Quote from: Dwayne Donnelly on September 01, 2024, 06:36:15 AM

Are you using G-Force?

Yes. It was working perfectly. Over 45 the plane was a well trained showdog. One possibility is that the sensor was way off. Best we could do at the field was eyeball and I got second opinions.

Ken