I agree with Warren. The annoying whine of a geared setup is reason enough not to use one. There are other reasons too.
Dorin, I can see why you would suggest a geared system. ..... Geared elec. systems are more efficient, they allow larger, slow turning props and fast turning motors (where both items are happy). They are tempting, but they have problems.
In the beginning (many yrs. ago) we all used geared setups in our RC fomies (1/2A size planes). We also tried geared setups in our 40 pound IMAC scale aerobatic planes, and all sizes in between. We loved the power that the very large props delivered! .... BUT:
PROBLEMS:
1. Like Warren said, annoying whine, NOT quiet. (defeating one of the important advantages of E power)
2. In the small indoor size, the gear system is very fragile. You would spend more time on maintenance than you would on flying.
3. Our large models needed constant lube for the gears but still had high wear. Belt systems have problems in models, but they are used in full scale electric planes with strong metal mounts.
4. One more item for "Murphy"
5. One more added expense
5. Motors got hot, needed cooling collar.
6. Not reliable enough for CL.
When outrunners became available, we all converted and are very happy campers!
If CL ever has an elec. "MAX LIFT" event, then a geared system would be perfect.
Here is what is now used in our IMAC planes today:
http://www.aero-model.com/Hacker-Brushless-A200-8.aspxThis would make one awesome indoor CL motor. Let's see, a 130" WS Nobler on 100' lines, AWESOME! ..... Dennis, do you have the Ph# for the Pontiac Dome?