News:


  • May 22, 2024, 11:22:23 PM

Login with username, password and session length

Author Topic: New Design, ET-???  (Read 3193 times)

Offline Tim Wescott

  • 2016 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 12822
New Design, ET-???
« on: July 06, 2015, 03:25:04 PM »
Inspired by Larry's ET-2, but made to fly more like a Sig Skyray or other of the innumerable little planes of my youth.  It's already been crash tested!  My wife tried it, and ripped the bellcrank mount off -- the one in the picture is the newer, stronger one.  Aside from that, the thing took no other damage.

It's made from less than $1 worth of dollar-store foam.  It's a 24 inch wingspan electric with a 100 watt motor, with an RC car radio from Hobby King for speed control -- the elevator is regular control line.  It'd work great with a KR governor-timer.  The most expensive single item on the airframe is the bellcrank.  Motor, battery, radio and whatnot bring the cost up to $65 or so, but most of that should survive crashes and work on the next plane.

It took me four hours to build this thing, while designing it in my head.  Construction is almost entirely foam board and hot glue, with just a few bits of lite-ply around the motor and bellcrank.  A design from plans should take much less time -- it'd be a good design to bring to a scout group along with a pile of foam board and one set of electronics: each kid could build his airframe, have it flight tested, fly it, and take it home sans electrics (and then start lobbying mom & dad for parts!!).

Significant inspiration came from Larry's ET-2, and from Flight Test's Bloody Wonder: http://flitetest.com/articles/FT_Bloody_Wonder_Scratch_Build.  You could probably just build a Bloody Wonder instead, with a bellcrank replacing the radio, but I like the looks of my version better.

I'm still playing with props and elevator throw; I'll report more if it works and if there's interest.
AMA 64232

The problem with electric is that once you get the smoke generator and sound system installed, the plane is too heavy.

Offline Larry Renger

  • 21 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 4002
Re: New Design, ET-???
« Reply #1 on: July 07, 2015, 08:52:38 AM »
Excellent! I'm delighted to see interest in getting back to efforts to lure in new blood.
Think S.M.A.L.L. y'all and, it's all good, CL, FF and RC!

DesignMan
 BTW, Dracula Sucks!  A closed mouth gathers no feet!

Offline Randy Powell

  • 21 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 10478
  • TreeTop Flyer
Re: New Design, ET-???
« Reply #2 on: July 07, 2015, 09:38:43 AM »
Nice airfoil.
Member in good standing of P.I.S.T
(Politically Incorrect Stunt Team)
AMA 67711
 Randy Powell

Offline Tim Wescott

  • 2016 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 12822
Re: New Design, ET-???
« Reply #3 on: July 07, 2015, 10:35:07 AM »
Nice airfoil.

It's a KFm3 KFm4 (oops), which ought to be better than the 1/8" balsa on an all-sheet 1/2-A jobbie.

Edited with correct airfoil designation
« Last Edit: July 07, 2015, 03:13:54 PM by Tim Wescott »
AMA 64232

The problem with electric is that once you get the smoke generator and sound system installed, the plane is too heavy.

Offline Brent Williams

  • 24 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 1268
    • Fancher Handles - Presented by Brent Williams
Re: New Design, ET-???
« Reply #4 on: July 07, 2015, 02:57:16 PM »
Nice plane Tim.  The foam board method has its merits.  It is fun to blast out a construction idea for a dollar.  Foam and hot glue seems so naughty!

On that same line of thinking, I recently built a foam board/hot glue version of the Ambush and I used the KFM-4 airfoil.  As this will have a Cox engine on the front, I will probably cover the entire thing in clear laminating film and use some zpoxy and fiberglass around the engine mount, ect.  I have a large roll of DK PET LIT GS film which is very much like SLC film in thickness and properties. 

It has turned out quite light and stiff.  If I can keep it reasonably fuel proofed, it should be a great plane.
Laser-cut, "Ted Fancher Precision-Pro" Hard Point Handle Kits are available again.  PM for info.
https://stunthanger.com/smf/brent-williams'-fancher-handles-and-cl-parts/ted-fancher's-precision-pro-handle-kit-by-brent-williams-information/

Offline Brent Williams

  • 24 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 1268
    • Fancher Handles - Presented by Brent Williams
Re: New Design, ET-???
« Reply #5 on: July 07, 2015, 03:03:05 PM »
Laser-cut, "Ted Fancher Precision-Pro" Hard Point Handle Kits are available again.  PM for info.
https://stunthanger.com/smf/brent-williams'-fancher-handles-and-cl-parts/ted-fancher's-precision-pro-handle-kit-by-brent-williams-information/

Offline Tim Wescott

  • 2016 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 12822
Re: New Design, ET-???
« Reply #6 on: July 07, 2015, 03:16:01 PM »
It has turned out quite light and stiff.  If I can keep it reasonably fuel proofed, it should be a great plane.

Epoxy paint, if it used a thinner that's compatible with the foam, would do the trick.  I want to hear whether your film does the job!
AMA 64232

The problem with electric is that once you get the smoke generator and sound system installed, the plane is too heavy.

Offline Tim Wescott

  • 2016 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 12822
Re: New Design, ET-???
« Reply #7 on: July 24, 2015, 06:26:01 PM »
Off to the flying field tomorrow to see if it works, and if my wife can get to the point of level flight (at which point I suspect she'll start learning fast).

As pictured it weighs 9.1 ounces.  Hopefully if she does smack it (I, of course, won't do so :)) the motor will be unscathed and we'll repair at the field and fly again.
AMA 64232

The problem with electric is that once you get the smoke generator and sound system installed, the plane is too heavy.

Offline Target

  • C/L Addict
  • 2019 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 1692
Re: New Design, ET-???
« Reply #8 on: September 07, 2015, 11:37:38 AM »
Any updates, Tim?
Regards,
Chris
AMA 5956

Offline Tim Wescott

  • 2016 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 12822
Re: New Design, ET-???
« Reply #9 on: September 07, 2015, 12:19:43 PM »
Any updates, Tim?

My student stopped crashing, and complained about fast lap times -- so we've moved on to bigger planes.

We have crashed the pusher version, and got it back into the air immediately, which is an improvement over motor-front version.  However, I ran across someone on Stunthanger who flies 15-sized 'lectric trainers using a prop saver and a higher class of motor (with a hardened motor shaft) who reports no problems with bending shafts.

I think if I were going to continue development on this I'd make two versions -- this one, as the absolutely rock-bottom priced airplane, and one with about a 36" span, with maybe a real airfoil (which can be done by folding Dollar Store Foam), and a commensurate increase in the motor and battery size.
AMA 64232

The problem with electric is that once you get the smoke generator and sound system installed, the plane is too heavy.

Offline Target

  • C/L Addict
  • 2019 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 1692
Re: New Design, ET-???
« Reply #10 on: September 07, 2015, 04:54:40 PM »
Copy all, sounds like a positive result, congrats!
Regards,
Chris
AMA 5956

Offline Randy Powell

  • 21 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 10478
  • TreeTop Flyer
Re: New Design, ET-???
« Reply #11 on: September 07, 2015, 06:18:26 PM »
So, are you coming to the Raider Roundup?
Member in good standing of P.I.S.T
(Politically Incorrect Stunt Team)
AMA 67711
 Randy Powell

Offline Tim Wescott

  • 2016 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 12822
Re: New Design, ET-???
« Reply #12 on: September 07, 2015, 06:28:49 PM »
So, are you coming to the Raider Roundup?

Almost certainly not -- work presses.
AMA 64232

The problem with electric is that once you get the smoke generator and sound system installed, the plane is too heavy.


Advertise Here
Tags:
 


Advertise Here