News:


  • April 26, 2024, 01:34:26 PM

Login with username, password and session length

Author Topic: blank  (Read 2003 times)

Offline Motorman

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • ******
  • Posts: 3260
blank
« on: May 12, 2018, 09:02:13 AM »
blank
« Last Edit: October 17, 2021, 11:14:21 AM by Motorman »

Offline Dennis Moritz

  • 22 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 2464
Re: OS Max LA 46 Drinks it
« Reply #1 on: May 12, 2018, 10:06:51 AM »
You can fit a 6 ounce on a Tanager. Using a setup similar to one you describe proved repeatable and controllable on a Tanger. Engine hung a tongue muffler. Run characteristics were very similar. I used a six ounce clunk plumbed for unifo. Every bit of 6 ounces was consumed. A stunt friendly run.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Offline RandySmith

  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *****
  • Posts: 13747
  • Welcome to the Stunt Hanger.
    • Aero Products
Re: OS Max LA 46 Drinks it
« Reply #2 on: May 12, 2018, 10:31:17 AM »
I've got a Sig Banshee with a Brodak 40 and 4oz tank. It flys the full pattern with, I don't how many laps after but, it's allot.

I put a well worn LA46 on a Tanager with a 4oz uniflow tank and it cuts out right after the vertical eight.

Fuel 10% 50/50
prop APC 12.25x3.75
venturi .281 with Tiger spraybar
Full Webra silverline muffler with .350 hole
Lap time 4.9
run, full 4 stroke with a slight break
Lines 63' prop shaft to handle

I figure the engine is putting out too much power even though it's dead rich. So my plan is to install a new piston/sleeve, make a smaller venturi use a MAS 12x4 prop that actually measures 3 pitch and I have another similar muffler that's got a baffle. I figure I'll have to lean it down some after those changes, don't 'cha think.

Thanks for reading,
Motorman 8)

Why don't you just simply run  5%  nitro fuel?  they typically use  4.5 ounces of  fuel, which is  not much for a  46

Randy

Offline Tim Wescott

  • 2016 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 12808
Re: OS Max LA 46 Drinks it
« Reply #3 on: May 12, 2018, 03:26:09 PM »
4.9 second laps is too much speed (if not power), yes.  That, and dead rich means that the venturi is too big for that setup, no matter what the next guy over is flying.  I'm surprised it's not running away on you (well, more so than already).

My recipe for the 46LA (and 25LA) is to start with the right prop and fuel, then keep restricting the engine until it flies right.  You can either do this with a smaller venturi, or by piling on nylon mesh (find it in the wedding dress section at your local fabric store, or ask at your local florist).  Hold it on with a rubber band or O-ring.  The nice thing about mesh is that you can tune it at the field, by adding or subtracting layers.

If it runs away, there's not enough restriction.  If it "thins out" in maneuvers instead of staying authoritative, there's too much restriction (because you have to launch lean to get the power you need).  For either one, the motor may need a good cleaning, or even a rebuild.  If you just can't get there from here with that motor/prop combination, reduce overall available power with a bigger prop (go toward the APC 12.25x3.75) or increase overall available power with a smaller prop (go toward the APC 11x4).

Figure that whatever else you do, a heavier plane is going to use more fuel when it's working properly.  My Fancherized Twister, at 54 ounces and 5.2 second laps, uses 4 ounces of Powermaster GMA 10% fuel (with 22% oil, 50/50, and doctored with a bit of Coleman camp fuel).  My Walker Atlantis, at 64 ounces and 5.3-5.4 second laps, uses 6 ounces of the same fuel to do the same thing.  I have some 40-45 ounce trainer planes that use Tower 40's and APC 35's that only need 3 - 3.5 ounces of fuel for a complete pattern.

I do not think that you should just make one more venturi and try it -- if you're not going to tune things with mesh, then make three venturis in the 0.270 size range and see if going up or down in size helps.  Then make more as needed, either smaller or larger.  (Brett Buck has some recommendations on how many to make, and what sizes -- I looked at that, thought "ugh!" and kept to my bright purple nylon mesh).
AMA 64232

The problem with electric is that once you get the smoke generator and sound system installed, the plane is too heavy.

Online Brett Buck

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • ******
  • Posts: 13740
Re: OS Max LA 46 Drinks it
« Reply #4 on: May 12, 2018, 03:52:25 PM »
That might not be a bad idea, have you seen the price of nitro lately? $78 gal.

How small can I go on the venturi .270"?

    That is not small. That is right in the range we used for other 40/46 engines, including the 46VF for which that prop was originally requested. You are running a very powerful modern engine on a relatively small "35-sized" airplane, it is not at all surprising that you might want to run less power than possible.

     Brett

Offline Dan McEntee

  • 23 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 6868
Re: OS Max LA 46 Drinks it
« Reply #5 on: May 12, 2018, 05:07:52 PM »
   I'm having trouble seeing a 4.9 second lap on 63 foot line with an engine  "in full four stroke." That would be in the 8000 RPM range with that prop, maybe 9000 and it would be pulling much at that RPM and you are not near the best part of the power band for an engine like that. It was designed to pull at much higher revs. On a small model, with an LA.46, I would try some 11 -4 props, with narrow blades. Something you have to lean out a bit to get the speed you want/need to get to and also get it up on the power band a little more. I don't think a .270 or even a bit smaller on the venturi is out of the question either.
   Type at you later,
   Dan McEntee
AMA 28784
EAA  1038824
AMA 480405 (American Motorcyclist Association)

Online Brett Buck

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • ******
  • Posts: 13740
Re: OS Max LA 46 Drinks it
« Reply #6 on: May 12, 2018, 06:04:47 PM »
   I'm having trouble seeing a 4.9 second lap on 63 foot line with an engine  "in full four stroke." That would be in the 8000 RPM range with that prop, maybe 9000 and it would be pulling much at that RPM and you are not near the best part of the power band for an engine like that. It was designed to pull at much higher revs. On a small model, with an LA.46, I would try some 11 -4 props, with narrow blades. Something you have to lean out a bit to get the speed you want/need to get to and also get it up on the power band a little more. I don't think a .270 or even a bit smaller on the venturi is out of the question either.
   Type at you later,
   Dan McEntee


     For about a 5.3 second lap, I would expect that prop to require something around 10500-10800 rpm in-flight, which might be around  9500-9600 on the ground. With the .281 venturi, I can believe that its in a 4-stroke in level flight and 5-ish second laps with a really strong example of a 46LA. The airplane is small.

   8000 rpm is likely out of the question, that would be vastly too slow with 3 3/4" pitch.

     Brett

Offline RandySmith

  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *****
  • Posts: 13747
  • Welcome to the Stunt Hanger.
    • Aero Products
Re: OS Max LA 46 Drinks it
« Reply #7 on: May 12, 2018, 07:08:09 PM »
That might not be a bad idea, have you seen the price of nitro lately? $78 gal.

How small can I go on the venturi .270"?

OS makes the small one  at 255   so you could start there, and open it up to 260 or 265  ,  whatever is needed

Thunder Tiger  Cyclone  11 x 4.5  would be  great for that setup

Randy

Offline Steve Helmick

  • AMA Member and supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 9941
Re: OS Max LA 46 Drinks it
« Reply #8 on: May 12, 2018, 10:48:23 PM »
Less prop load = less fuel consumption. If the TT 11x4.5 doesn't get it done, try an ounce of Coleman fuel in a quart of 5% nitro. Have you read Randy's pinned articles, about a bigger muffler outlet making the engine think the venturi  is bigger? Your muffler's outlet sounds pretty large, at .350".  My .46LA has a .271" restrictor with a .156" spraybar, and the 11.5x4 APC is my choice...but I also haven't tried the TT on it.  D>K Steve
"The United States has become a place where professional athletes and entertainers are mistaken for people of importance." - Robert Heinlein

In 1944 18-20 year old's stormed beaches, and parachuted behind enemy lines to almost certain death.  In 2015 18-20 year old's need safe zones so people don't hurt their feelings.

Offline phil c

  • 21 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 2480
Re: OS Max LA 46 Drinks it
« Reply #9 on: May 14, 2018, 11:08:21 AM »
I've been using an LA 46(not worn out), a stock muffler, in a Brodak Original Smoothie.  A .250 venturi, an OS through the venturi needle valve, and a 10/5 Master Airscrew 3 blade prop.  It runs smoothly at 10,300 on the launch and does a nice 4-2 break in maneuvers.  Lap time on 60 ft. lines is about 5.2 seconds.  The tank is a bit too high so it goes a bit rich upside down and on outsides.  I need to fix that.

I may try a cut down 11/5 MA 3 blade to get a little more thrust up high.

You might take a look at the main bearing.  If it is engine is well worn in may be leaking some fuel out the front.  If you can see more than an occasional drop of fuel coming out that can be enough to leak out half an ounce or more of fuel in a flight.

phil Cartier

Offline Steve Helmick

  • AMA Member and supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 9941
Re: OS Max LA 46 Drinks it
« Reply #10 on: May 22, 2018, 08:36:52 PM »
Jeez, I ran a .272"/.156" combo in my .25LA...same in the .46LA last I flew it, and that was only to improve mpg, and it wasn't enough to allow using 10% nitro. Didn't know about the Coleman fuel trick then. In short, I don't think you'll like the power.  D>K Steve
"The United States has become a place where professional athletes and entertainers are mistaken for people of importance." - Robert Heinlein

In 1944 18-20 year old's stormed beaches, and parachuted behind enemy lines to almost certain death.  In 2015 18-20 year old's need safe zones so people don't hurt their feelings.


Advertise Here
Tags:
 


Advertise Here