News:


  • May 22, 2024, 06:59:59 AM

Login with username, password and session length

Author Topic: Fox 35 breakin...  (Read 3837 times)

Offline Bootlegger

  • 22 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 2710
Fox 35 breakin...
« on: January 19, 2016, 11:45:25 AM »
 Guy's I am not sure where this goes, so here it is.  I have a couple of these engines with the alum piston and ceramic liners and here that they can be broken in with "blended" fuel (half& half) castor/synthetic, and others say to run them on all castor.
 Does it really matter one way or the other, and does it have to be run on all castor all the time?
 I don't want to ruin these set ups so I am gonna ask y'alls opinion  and why do you suggest this way?
  Hope that I made myself clear in this post...
8th Air Force Veteran
Gil Causey
AMA# 6964

Online Gerald Arana

  • 23 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 1536
Re: Fox 35 breakin...
« Reply #1 on: January 19, 2016, 12:01:52 PM »
I am NOT an expert engine guy. Having said that, I would run them on 22%, 50/50 synthetic/castor, and 5-10% nitro. I am currently running a 50TH anniversary Fox 35 on this blend and haven't had a problem.

That doesn't mean I won't in the future, but I don't care! Also I never run it lean if I can help it.

If you are getting burnt castor residue on the head you're running it to lean. (Hot)

Good luck, Jerry

PS: This is modern technology, Al/ceramic, I think.

PSS: Hey Randy, how about your opinion?

Online Dave_Trible

  • 24 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 6182
Re: Fox 35 breakin...
« Reply #2 on: January 19, 2016, 12:14:26 PM »
Gil I'm totally unfamiliar with the ceramic Foxes but in general most any NEW engine or nearly so that hasn't already had a castor vanish build up on it should be fine on blended oil fuel.  I run everything in my collection including Fox,  Torps,  McCoys,  O&R etc., on blended oils.  I usually start with a 20% blended oil fuel and add oil up to around 28% for the older slag style engines- most likely just castor.  For modern engines I continue blended oils up to whatever percentage I want.

Dave


AMA 20934
FAA Certificate FA3ATY4T94

Offline Jim Kraft

  • 2015
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 3412
  • AMA78415
Re: Fox 35 breakin...
« Reply #3 on: January 19, 2016, 12:27:38 PM »
If it was mine I would run 25% 1/2 & 1/2 synthetic and castor to keep the shaft, rod bearings, and wrist pin oiled. The wrist pin bosses on those alluminum pistons in Foxes do not have much meat.
Jim Kraft

Online Fredvon4

  • 24 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 2099
  • Central Texas
Re: Fox 35 breakin...
« Reply #4 on: January 19, 2016, 12:33:59 PM »
I tend to believe Breaking In with mostly Castor..(75/25%) or 100% castor Oil is a good thing even if the engine has so called modern metallurgy like the aluminum /ceramic of the Foxes you have

mostly I say this regarding 1950~1980s engines... all my more modern engines get exactly what the manufacturer recommends

Once the tight new engine has time on it switching to a 50/50 mix of oil or even thinner on the Castrol side should not damage or shorten the life if you are like most and do not frequently get a run away or lean it out too much...like combat guys do....for well controlled RPM launched stunt runs the over use of Castro oil is not really needed and has some detrimental effects like excessive slime...cold weather starting...carbon/varnish build up

On the other hand Castor oil has a real good property needed for the old skool Fox engine even with alu and ceramic....the case is still NOT a good heat sink ad the castor DOES shed a lot of heat

I don't have a version or two of the Fox ceramics so maybe I don't know enough to be a good bit of advice on that particular set up

I run the hell out of combat engines at WOT and use UCON 625 as my synthetic of choice with very little (5%) castor... I like to think my engines stay cleaner and will last a good long time with my oil choices
"A good scare teaches more than good advice"

Fred von Gortler IV

Offline RandySmith

  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *****
  • Posts: 13747
  • Welcome to the Stunt Hanger.
    • Aero Products
Re: Fox 35 breakin...
« Reply #5 on: January 19, 2016, 01:15:11 PM »
Guy's I am not sure where this goes, so here it is.  I have a couple of these engines with the alum piston and ceramic liners and here that they can be broken in with "blended" fuel (half& half) castor/synthetic, and others say to run them on all castor.
 Does it really matter one way or the other, and does it have to be run on all castor all the time?
 I don't want to ruin these set ups so I am gonna ask y'alls opinion  and why do you suggest this way?
  Hope that I made myself clear in this post...

Hi

Use 25 to 28% 1/2 synthetic fuel, for breakin and for flying.


  I have been asked many times to help explain why we have  so many things that can affect the run quality of Stunt engines. I will touch on a few of them , and hopefully help to eliminate some of these problems . Among them are tanks and fuel systems, glo plugs , fuel ,and overheating
  What are things that make for a  great, or  bad engine run. We see these things most every weekend, and it is  a very big point of frustration to many modelers. We all want our engines to run right, and it is  nice when it goes through the pattern smoothly, coming on and off, exactly when and where you want it.  Unfortunately, a lot of times, they growl , belch, shut off ,seem to have a mind of their own ,and are a total pain to deal with.  One of the biggest causes of this that I have seen is improper fuel.  Fuel is one of the most critical aspects in running model motors.  Use the right fuel and you will probably notice nothing; the wrong fuel will have you grumbling, or worse, will have your motor screaming, belching and running with absolutely no consistency whatsoever.

Most fuels on the market today use a synthetic base and are blended for the R/C sport flier.  These are typically very low on oil content, usually in the 12% through 15% range.  This is never acceptable for our use in C/L Stunt.  There are many reasons but the most important is the fact that we normally do not run our engines in a peaked two cycle, but rather a broad range of four cycle and rich two cycling.  Any time you run with the motor set to come on and off in the maneuvers (like a typical 4-2 break) you are not only asking the fuel to lubricate the motor, it also has to cool the engine.  The only way you can run in a 4-2 is to heat and cool the parts in the combustion chamber very rapidly.  This makes the oil content critical, because it’s the unburned oil that helps carry away the heat.

Years ago, most fuels had only one oil ,castor.  This is still a very good oil with many good but some bad points.  Some of its good points; it carries heat out of the motor and gives a good plating action on all surfaces, especially when they’re hot. It also has tendencies to move toward hot surfaces, helping to protect them.  A few of its bad points; it burns and sticks to the piston sides and the ring groove and all other parts that are hot enough, and will carbonize the chamber. It will stick rings in their grooves, freeze wrist pins and build up ridges on sleeves.  This causes excess friction and heat and will ruin your motor in time.

The alternative to castor is synthetic oil and almost all fuels have these in them; the vast majority has all synthetic.  Virtually all fuel manufactures use one type of synthetic; these are normally polyalkylene glycol based oils.  They are mostly made up of alcohol started linear polymers , of oxypropylene groups.  These are made by several companies and are available in a large range of molecular weights and viscosities.

This group of oils is the modern version of the old Ucon oils and also have good and bad points.  Some of the goods points; they are very good lubes without containing any wax; they have outstanding load carrying capacity, film strength, anti-wear properties, are resistant to sludge formation, and will help keep your engine clean.  The bad points are they give no rust protection by themselves, they don’t plate hot surfaces as well as castor and they burn at high heats.

As you can see, both oils have advantages and disadvantages to them; it’s for these reasons that they work much better blending together than they could ever work alone.  Throughout many years of flying ,testing and other research have proven this to me beyond any doubt; plus you can see this for yourself.  Recently, a friend of mine had a motor that would go into the pattern and lean out and act very inconsistently.  The only change that was made was to substitute one tank of my fuel in the model.  The results were drastically different; the motor now ran very smoothly, going into a two cycle instantly when the nose was raised and back into a four cycle instantly when the plane was leveled.  This was tried back and forth both fuels; his and mine.  The results were  the same every time. I see this type of thing happen much too often, and it is extremely frustrating for Flyers to deal with. They often blame these fuel problems on cooling, cowlings, motors ,fuel filters, and unfortunately some don’t have a clue how to recognize or  solve this problem. This is  a frustration that you can live  without!

I would like to tell you there is one Stunt fuel formula to run in all motors, I said I would like to tell you that…unfortunately this is not the case, and will never be as long as we have such a wide range of motors and running styles.  What I will tell you is a good formula for the most common types of engines.  Make sure you pick a fuel supplier who will give you consistent fuel day to day ,and will blend fuel for your motor needs or has fuel to match your needs.  Stay away from any supplier who will not tell you the oil percentage, or who say one type works for all motors. I see this  much to  often also, It is unfortunate, but a lot of fuel manufactures will try to fool you about the oil and nitro percentage. One trick is to measure  by weight and not volume. Doing so, they can claim that the fuel is  for example 18 % oil , when in reality it is only 14.9 % oil content. Using weight  for ingredient , they can put in a  lot less oil and nitro . Other things are changing oil types, going to cheaper Nitro’s, and adding in other types of Nitro parrafins.

   So what percentage do you try? For motors like Fox .35s, OS Max 35s or the old McCoy’s and K&B’s, use a fuel with 26 to 28% oil content; preferably half castor and half synthetic, up to 75% castor  is OK. These  motors have very small bearing surfaces, and are subject to much wear and heat, most are all plain bushing motors and most have unbushed rods. They need a lot of  oil  to help cool the engines. Since these motors run hot, they need  extra oil to keep them lubed,clean, and to carry out heat . If you have one of these that is  in very good  shape but, is  just starting to get some brown or black varnish plating on it, the synthetic mix will clean it  up for you, resulting in increased life.  Do not use the synthetic  blend in an old motor that has a lot of time on it with all castor fuels; the synthetic will remove the castor varnish off the piston and sleeve and will in some cases, leave you with the worn-out motor that had to start with.  Also always try to NOT use  prop shaft extensions with these engine, as it adds a  lot of  wear on the crankshaft bearing.

Offline Motorman

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • ******
  • Posts: 3275
Re: Fox 35 breakin...
« Reply #6 on: January 19, 2016, 04:27:59 PM »
You can get away with running anything if you keep it rich enough. The problem with synthetic in a Fox is it's a poorly made engine and it will eat the big end of the rod.

MM

Offline RandySmith

  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *****
  • Posts: 13747
  • Welcome to the Stunt Hanger.
    • Aero Products
Re: Fox 35 breakin...
« Reply #7 on: January 19, 2016, 08:00:47 PM »
You can get away with running anything if you keep it rich enough. The problem with synthetic in a Fox is it's a poorly made engine and it will eat the big end of the rod.

MM

No It will not, I ran Fox 35s with synthetic castor mix for years 1000s of flights I still have the FOX 35s  they have very little wear, not sloppy tight bushings and the rods and pins are much much much better than the ones that ran all castor.

And NO you can run just anything, even rich I have seen some fuels wipe out a FOX in one run, There are major brand fuels thaat Hobby Shops sold to guys to use in the FOX, they were 14 % and 12% total oil... so bad in those type engines my Buddy Scott named it Cruel Power

Randy

Offline Brett Buck

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • ******
  • Posts: 13754
Re: Fox 35 breakin...
« Reply #8 on: January 19, 2016, 11:19:49 PM »
You can get away with running anything if you keep it rich enough. The problem with synthetic in a Fox is it's a poorly made engine and it will eat the big end of the rod.
'
   Not to pile on (because Randy, as usual, has covered it) but synthetic oil is generally a *much* better lubricant than castor. Castor is somewhat useful in the "hot" end of the engine, mostly to just fill space and carry away heat. But the cool parts of the engine are much better off with synthetic. It also reduces the oil drag in the plain bearing section, which can have tremendous beneficial effects on the ability to switch from 4-2 and back. If you run straight or mostly castor (like a stock Fox including the piston/cylinder) you want the front end to be very loose, to the point that it might seem worn out so it will run free enough.

    The very best 4-2 break engines have the most free bottom/front end. Phil Granderson has some McCoy 40's that were set up by Dick McCoy for some world championship and no break-in (maybe for Dick Williams) and they have extraordinary 4-2 action. You can rock the prop tips back and forth maybe 1/4" and oil goes everywhere, but they run *perfectly*.  The very best 4-2 break engine ever is probably the Discovery-Retro, and the bottom end on that is almost remarkably free to move. It's almost uncanny how free it moves, almost like an FAI speed motor. I honestly don't know what they do to make it that way, but it stands out even compared to other very good stunt engines.

    Brett


p.s. Also interesting - one thing that happens with the 20/25FP and the 25LA is that while they are safe enough to run straight out of the box, they also have a dramatic break-in where they start out taking heroic amounts of fuel and drastically reduce their fuel consumption over the first 20 or so flights. To the extent that the engine goes dramatically rich as it loosens up in-flight, and you run out of fuel in the square 8 on 3.5 ounces on the first flight, and it gets through an entire flight on 2.2 ounces later the same afternoon. The plain-bearing section also gets burning hot on the first 10 flights, even though it was almost quitting rich by the end of the early flights. That goes away and it remains cool to the touch when it is broken in. The reason seems to be that the vast majority of the break-in is going on in the plain-bearing section, rather than the piston/cylinder. I think the same thing happens, to lesser degree, on most engines - which explains no matter how long you run your PA/RO-Jett on the ground, ou still have to fly it and get load on the bearings for 20-30 flights before it runs correctly.


Offline bob whitney

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • ******
  • Posts: 2246
Re: Fox 35 breakin...
« Reply #9 on: January 20, 2016, 11:33:51 AM »


i agree with Brett, most of the fox break in is in the crank area.i took a stock fox 35 ,honed the case and polished the crank .then ran one tank full of fox fuel in it rich and raced it in fox racing with no problems
rad racer

Offline RandySmith

  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *****
  • Posts: 13747
  • Welcome to the Stunt Hanger.
    • Aero Products
Re: Fox 35 breakin...
« Reply #10 on: January 20, 2016, 11:54:16 AM »

i agree with Brett, most of the fox break in is in the crank area.i took a stock fox 35 ,honed the case and polished the crank .then ran one tank full of fox fuel in it rich and raced it in fox racing with no problems

While Brett is correct about the  OS engines and crank breakin,   when it comes to the FOX 35 ....not so much with the FOX, the FOX piston material grows, sometimes too much too fast, the piston/sleeve needs very careful breakin, if you want a decent seal and good performance, sometimes this can take an hour or more. I have seem a huge number of FOX 35s  that had a very tight piston fit, and some needed hand lapping before trying to break them in.
I have also seen them seize in mid run on breakin, and they were NOT running lean, you really need to be very careful to NOT get the piston too hot on the first several runs.
This problem is not as bad as it was in earlier years, but still is a problem you must watch for
The OS and other engines with silicone/aluminum pistons, are very stable and have little to no growth

Randy

Offline Brett Buck

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • ******
  • Posts: 13754
Re: Fox 35 breakin...
« Reply #11 on: January 20, 2016, 07:25:26 PM »
While Brett is correct about the  OS engines and crank breakin,   when it comes to the FOX 35 ....not so much with the FOX, the FOX piston material grows, sometimes too much too fast, the piston/sleeve needs very careful breakin, if you want a decent seal and good performance, sometimes this can take an hour or more. I have seem a huge number of FOX 35s  that had a very tight piston fit, and some needed hand lapping before trying to break them in.
I have also seen them seize in mid run on breakin, and they were NOT running lean, you really need to be very careful to NOT get the piston too hot on the first several runs.
This problem is not as bad as it was in earlier years, but still is a problem you must watch for

    I meant the ABC Fox, not the stocker.

     Brett

Offline RandySmith

  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *****
  • Posts: 13747
  • Welcome to the Stunt Hanger.
    • Aero Products
Re: Fox 35 breakin...
« Reply #12 on: January 20, 2016, 08:27:28 PM »
    I meant the ABC Fox, not the stocker.

     Brett

Yep I knew what you meant, I just didn't want anyone thinking the piston/sleeve needed no breakin.  I know you know about breakin on the iron one.
 The iron one can be very tricky and time consuming, many have  been ruined with first runs.
And actually the ABC does need breakin time,
 the FOX 35 they called the ceramic P/S one, needs very little breakin time , this one had a Alum sleeve and piston, it is fitted more like a  LA or FP engine, with not much pinch, the older ABC brass liner chromed, al piston had much more pinch
These 3 FOX 35s are really pretty differant engines from each other.


Randy

Offline Dennis Moritz

  • 22 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 2464
Re: Fox 35 breakin...
« Reply #13 on: January 21, 2016, 02:06:44 PM »
Fox modified the classic Fox 35 over the years. Piston Liner fits have been machined to different tolerances and configurations. It's my understanding that 40th Anniversary Fox 35s have a tapered liner, pinching some at the top, same as most ABC engines. As the engine runs the tapered liner is heated by combustion expanding the top of liner. Theoretically this results in a better P/L alignment as engine powers aircraft. If the pinch is too tight in new engines, it can be very difficult to run the engine in using the conventional approach of breaking in engine either on the bench or while flying on a plane. Heating up and seizing a common and frustrating issue. Hand lapping by one who knows how is the best remedy I've seen.

In the Philly Fliers we use many Fox 35s. Any given good weather fly day will see 7 or 8 of these anachronisms powering stunt and sport models. We use Powermaster 5% and 10% nitro, 22% oil (50/50 castrol and synthetic) in these engines. Our members run these engines in every conceivable way. 2-4 break, 2-stroke rich/leaner, all out 2 stroke. Foxberg Foxes in our club will turn over 14 thou. These engines are long lasting when not racing. Racing engines work well but, for obvious reasons, wear out. We have not found the need to increase oil content above %22.

Dan Banjock is a Fox 35 enthusiast. His Galloping Comedian Fox 35 power has won and placed high in many contests. When conditions are right it is competitive in Classic, including at the NATs where it has placed as high as third (if I remember correctly). Not bad for an Old Time no-flap design. He has won many contests with various Ringmasters powered by Fox35s. Including local events where he has flown Ringers in Classic. Powermaster fuel, as I have described, is always the fuel of choice.

We don't have experience with the ceramic liner/aluminum piston engines. Powermaster fuel should work. I imagine these engines would run cooler and be more stable metallurgically than classic Fox 35s.
« Last Edit: January 23, 2016, 03:27:50 AM by Dennis Moritz »


Advertise Here
Tags:
 


Advertise Here