I'm planning a step up from 40s. I'm familiar with LA46s. I have used them. How do Suptertigre 46s compare? What is your preference? Why?
I have run many Supertigres throughout the time I found my first one way back in years, when they were first imported here, around 1960 or so.
In all the changes I liked the older ones the best. I ran .23 .35 .40 and .46 in CL. In RC I have used .23, .40, .46, 51, 60, 75, .90. I have one of the big 1.25 for years but still in box. The.23, the .46, the .51, the very old .60s, and the .75 have always been great. I have not been very much in love with the rest. The .90s -- I have several -- always seem to have problems. Lots of others have fussed about the .90 in RC.
In CL. the .46 has always been a real jewel. In RC my .51s were top dog when they were in suitable models. The .75s have always been great and I fail to understand why the .60 could sometimes be a booger while the .75 was so easy to maintain and run in anything. Btw that little ST. 23 always thought it was a .35. It could move a .35-40 size model with strength.
BTW, the ST 40 and 46, that I used in CL stunt were retro-fitted with an OS or Enya needle valve and the spray bar turned for the hole to be facing straight back. In that set-up, dynamic pressure is at its most while static pressure is at its lowest. Makes for good flying.
That's my story and I'm sticking to it.