One thing in all these engine/prop/fuel/plane comparisons is density altitude. Ground altitude, +, +. +, temperature, and humidity combine to make big differences. That explains why one combo will work for one flyer, but not so well for another flyer in another place, or why one engine to can do fine with a particular plane some place and not others.
On the other hand, there is not arguing that a properly developed engine with ball bearings, AAC or ABC piston and liner, and top quality machining will, for a price, outperform a relatively inexpensive mass- produced engine on some instances.
One big advantage of the LA series has been relatively good performance in right-sized planes for very competitive prices. They also adapt easily many different sizes of planes. OS quality, even on it's budget engines, is way above what we all accepted from Fox years ago.
Unfortunately we're all looking for something else since OS isn't building them anymore.