News:



  • June 20, 2025, 06:34:56 AM

Login with username, password and session length

Author Topic: Best technique for starting inverted, piped PA engines?  (Read 3117 times)

Offline Jim Oliver

  • 25 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 1414
Best technique for starting inverted, piped PA engines?
« on: January 03, 2017, 01:15:11 PM »
The title says it all........any help will be appreciated.  I know a couple of techniques but believe that there must be a better way.
Jim Oliver
AMA 18475

Offline Steve Helmick

  • 24 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 10265
Re: Best technique for starting inverted, piped PA engines?
« Reply #1 on: January 03, 2017, 01:41:42 PM »
What material are the props? Unless they're glass/nylon, I would avoid chicken sticks like the plague. The guys that are really good with their particular engine do the "spinner flip". It's impressive, but I don't know what their backup plan is. I hate trying to hand flip 3+ blade props.

I just use an electric finger. With a pipe, I can't hear well enough to tell when the engine is gurgling as reaches "that place" where it's a one-flip start. However, I also don't like to "burp" the engine at the start of the day's flying. Until I get a plug-in glow system setup (mini-phone jack, Resinger-style clip at the glowplug, etc.) installed in a new plane, I use a DuBro glow igniter. To make it safer to remove the igniter, I just start the engine with the plane inverted...knees and back don't like kneeling or bending over, so we do it standing.

I had exactly the same "issues" starting my PA .51 as the OS .46VF AAC I've been flying for many seasons. I usually don't get it wet enough, so I slip my index finger over the venturi while it's spinning over on electron power. A quick tap or two will usually get it done. Ain't skeered! LL~ Steve 
"The United States has become a place where professional athletes and entertainers are mistaken for people of importance." - Robert Heinlein

In 1944 18-20 year old's stormed beaches, and parachuted behind enemy lines to almost certain death.  In 2015 18-20 year old's need safe zones so people don't hurt their feelings.

Offline Jim Oliver

  • 25 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 1414
Re: Best technique for starting inverted, piped PA engines?
« Reply #2 on: January 03, 2017, 03:45:16 PM »
Thanks, Steve. 

No chicken sticks for me.....with two blade props I use a leather "driver glove" or one a bit thicker.  Not afraid of the engine but the T.E. of some of the props will cut badly if the engine is too wet.

Don't like inverted starting on 50/60 size planes, too big to easily flip them over after engine starts although I have done it.

Easiest, safest way for me (so far) is to invert the model, prime a bit, flip prop through several times then set it on wheels and hand flip to start.  If stubborn or at contest just use electric starter after being POSITIVE that there isn't a flooded
(hydraulic lock) condition.
Jim Oliver
AMA 18475

Offline Steve Helmick

  • 24 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 10265
Re: Best technique for starting inverted, piped PA engines?
« Reply #3 on: January 03, 2017, 04:06:43 PM »
Yes, starting the engine with the plane inverted is definitely a two-man job. But with a crew of two, it really doesn't matter much how large it is, or how large the engine is. Takes some experience and teamwork.  It is best to have a signal system. With a new guy, I tell them to just hold it still until I point straight up, then they are to point it straight up. I then take it from them, turn it over and set it on the ground. They take control of it, and I tach/set NV, and off we go.

If you're going solo off a stooge, then I like your sequence. Gotta hook up the stooge before starting the engine. I did this a lot with the G.51 and DS .60, with a "digital" starter. But I was also using 2 blade props, either wooden or glass/nylon. I'm mostly using 3 blade CF props now...they have a reputation around here, so I'm pretty cautious with them. Besides, they're too expensive to abuse with digits.  y1 Steve
"The United States has become a place where professional athletes and entertainers are mistaken for people of importance." - Robert Heinlein

In 1944 18-20 year old's stormed beaches, and parachuted behind enemy lines to almost certain death.  In 2015 18-20 year old's need safe zones so people don't hurt their feelings.

Offline Brett Buck

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • ******
  • Posts: 14475
Re: Best technique for starting inverted, piped PA engines?
« Reply #4 on: January 03, 2017, 07:24:36 PM »
The title says it all........any help will be appreciated.  I know a couple of techniques but believe that there must be a better way.
   

   I assume you burp it first, with the airplane held inverted, with a helper (or not if you are super-cool like David and I). With a PA, unless you have been very careful since the last flying sessions, you more-or-less can't started it on it's feet. Same with the OS. You have a chance with a RO-Jett, but I still never do it.

   Once it is burped, if the engine has cooled from the last run, fill tank, pull through with finger over the intake 3-4 times (choking) , then remove finger and flip through forwards immediately, about 5-6 times (aerate). Hold on to prop to attach the battery. Once the batter is connected and the helper is holding, bump the engine up against compression backwards, should start right off. Try a few more times. If you get nothing, no pops, then hold prop, remove battery, repeat choke procedure, repeat aeration procedure, hold prop, attach battery, back-bump.

    If it is still hot, fill tank, pull through compression once or twice, aerate, hold prop, attach battery, bump backwards. My PA61 and most PAs need at most one choke when hot, and 3-4 when cold.

    Note that back-bumping is not flipping it backwards through compression, you never flip it through compression in either direction, unless you have some spare fingers. Just turn it CCW until it starts to come up on compression, then fling it backwards up against compression in the CW direction. Don't use a chicken stick or anything like that. If you are doing it correctly, your fingers are not on the prop or spinner when it pops.

    You have to experiment to know how much to choke under different conditions. Usually, you can tell by the sound it makes when you are aerating it. It should sound slightly juicy, more than it you were going to flip it through forward. Any excess will be blown out. It will take much more choking when the engine is cold than when it is hot. If the engine is in an intermediate state, it may be very difficult to start because you have to choke it, and the cold fuel will get on the underside of the piston and shrink it, and leave the sleeve hot, so the compression will sort of go away. If this happens, aerate many times until you feel the compression start to come back.

     NEVER attach the battery without holding the prop, and NEVER flip it with fuel in it unless someone it holding it. The engine can start without the battery pretty easily, once you get the perfect mixture. It can also start spontaneously when you attach the battery. These are extremely powerful engines with very strong razor-sharp propellors, and have such good piston fits that they can start in conditions when you do not expect, once it is choked and aerated properly.

    Brett

Offline Mike Scholtes

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • ******
  • Posts: 1199
Re: Best technique for starting inverted, piped PA engines?
« Reply #5 on: January 03, 2017, 10:22:27 PM »
Thanks for the tutorial Brett. Gotta say, I always cringe when seeing you or David or anyone holding the model inverted in one hand and starting it on the prime with the other, solo. Maybe the coolness factor negates the bad juju. Anyhow, does this protocol apply to the PA40UL? I need to learn to do it right starting very soon here so as not to embarrass myself in public. I have heard that the 40 is a different animal from the bigger PAs, though Randy's instructions with the motor are the same as for the 61 and 65.

On the subject of safety, is there any good argument against using a remote glow igniter connection like mentioned above? I used to do this all the time with RC engines that were hard to reach, especially large 4-strokes.

Offline Steve Helmick

  • 24 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 10265
Re: Best technique for starting inverted, piped PA engines?
« Reply #6 on: January 04, 2017, 02:20:04 PM »
"On the subject of safety, is there any good argument against using a remote glow igniter connection like mentioned above? I used to do this all the time with RC engines that were hard to reach, especially large 4-strokes."

I don't see a problem except for the potential for getting the "extension cord" (attached to a power panel on the other end) caught in the prop or aeroplane. Which brings up a question I've wondered about for awhile. Will the power panel/glow driver be smart enough to adjust for the long wire's resistance? I'm guessing that one would need to crank up the "hot" dial for a longer wire. But then, I have one power panel that is automatic...and worked fine while I used it...but I didn't think to try it with a longer wire. Sorry for the thread drift.

The magic gurgling sound seems harder for me to hear with CF piped engines in general, probably because the outlet is much farther away. I also haven't bench run or practiced starting procedures with either the PA .51 or OS .46VF, because they were purchased used and long since flyable. Did I mention that I hate benching engines?  ~> Steve
"The United States has become a place where professional athletes and entertainers are mistaken for people of importance." - Robert Heinlein

In 1944 18-20 year old's stormed beaches, and parachuted behind enemy lines to almost certain death.  In 2015 18-20 year old's need safe zones so people don't hurt their feelings.

Offline Brett Buck

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • ******
  • Posts: 14475
Re: Best technique for starting inverted, piped PA engines?
« Reply #7 on: January 04, 2017, 03:02:52 PM »
Thanks for the tutorial Brett. Gotta say, I always cringe when seeing you or David or anyone holding the model inverted in one hand and starting it on the prime with the other, solo. Maybe the coolness factor negates the bad juju. Anyhow, does this protocol apply to the PA40UL? I need to learn to do it right starting very soon here so as not to embarrass myself in public. I have heard that the 40 is a different animal from the bigger PAs, though Randy's instructions with the motor are the same as for the 61 and 65.

On the subject of safety, is there any good argument against using a remote glow igniter connection like mentioned above? I used to do this all the time with RC engines that were hard to reach, especially large 4-strokes.

   Burping your engine by yourself is a stupid idea and I will look a lot less cool when I have 50 stitches in my face.

    There's nothing much wrong with a remote glow adapter. I just never tried one.

     As far as I can tell, the same basic process works for all engines, it's just a matter of experimenting with how much choke and how much aeration is required. I have started Uncle Jimby's airplane with the PA40UL and didn't do anything different to get it going. All of these engines are *very* easy to start due to the excellent piston fits, compared to the good old days.

     Older engines with weak compression may have to be flipped through forwards. The 40VF that I eventually wore out (after something like 10 years of weekly use) had to be started forwards. But, it also was pretty easy to flip through compression so it wasn't so daunting. No way do I want to try to start something like a PA75 or one of my Jett 61s by flipping it forwards.

      BTW, I find it *far* easier to start these engines inverted than upright, aside from burping the oil out of them in the morning, and it's even harder to start old engines with them upright. I find the Fox almost impossible to start upright, even in ideal conditions. Or at least by choking alone, I can get it to work if I prime it through the exhaust, but that's very difficult since I always run a muffler. By the time it's choked enough to get a pop, it has too much fuel in the crankcase, and when it does pop, it sucks up all the excess and puts out the fire.

      Brett
« Last Edit: January 04, 2017, 06:57:01 PM by Brett Buck »

Offline Steve Helmick

  • 24 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 10265
Re: Best technique for starting inverted, piped PA engines?
« Reply #8 on: January 04, 2017, 07:01:15 PM »
   Burping your engine by yourself is a stupid idea and I will look a lot less cool when I have 50 stitches in my face.

    There's nothing much wrong with a remote glow adapter. I just never tried one.

     Brett

If I see anybody burping their engine single-handed, I jump in there and hold onto it. Sometimes get told to "bugger off", in which case I tell them I'm ready to call 911 for them.

Alan Resinger and Keith Varley used remote battery on their last IC planes. Not sure if Chris Cox did or not. Alan devised a very cute and easy to make clip that beats the snot out of anything you can buy! For contest use, we do need a backup plan, such as one of the typical glow igniters. Might even want to practice using the backup?  n1 Steve
"The United States has become a place where professional athletes and entertainers are mistaken for people of importance." - Robert Heinlein

In 1944 18-20 year old's stormed beaches, and parachuted behind enemy lines to almost certain death.  In 2015 18-20 year old's need safe zones so people don't hurt their feelings.

Offline Jim Oliver

  • 25 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 1414
Re: Best technique for starting inverted, piped PA engines?
« Reply #9 on: January 05, 2017, 08:12:16 AM »
Thanks for all the input.

I have used the "back bump/flip" technique on lots of engines, including the PAs.

It would be good for me if there was/is a procedure that doesn't require the model to be inverted for burping, etc. 

Hmmmm, does Epower require inverted burping? Not going there.... Gotta stop thinking like that HB~>
Jim Oliver
AMA 18475

Offline Allan Perret

  • 2017
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 1892
  • Proverbs
Re: Best technique for starting inverted, piped PA engines?
« Reply #10 on: January 05, 2017, 09:02:13 AM »
In place of chicken stick, I really like using a slip on finger protector.  Don't know who makes/sells the black one (has FK stamped on it); but I prefer to use piece of silicone tubing, same tubing we use for pipe coupling.  Good snug fit over 1st joint on index finger, and two cuts halfway lets it open up to fit over 2nd joint.
Allan Perret
AMA 302406
Slidell, Louisiana

Offline big ron

  • 24 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Commander
  • *
  • Posts: 206
Re: Best technique for starting inverted, piped PA engines?
« Reply #11 on: January 06, 2017, 06:57:09 AM »
the black one is a KAVAN finger guard. Sig has them in stock.
John Blanchard
Brusly, Louisiana
 AMA 1054488

Offline Brett Buck

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • ******
  • Posts: 14475
Re: Best technique for starting inverted, piped PA engines?
« Reply #12 on: January 06, 2017, 10:40:38 AM »
Thanks for all the input.

I have used the "back bump/flip" technique on lots of engines, including the PAs.

It would be good for me if there was/is a procedure that doesn't require the model to be inverted for burping, etc. 

     My RO-Jett 61 is the only piped engine I have had that seems to be able to tolerate being carried nose-down without loading up with oil, even hanging nose-down for months. All the others seem to load up, the 40VF being particularly bad about it, to the point I always had to remove the glow plug and put fuel right in the cylinder to get it cleaned up enough to burp.

      Brett

Tags: