News:



  • June 16, 2024, 08:41:09 AM

Login with username, password and session length

Author Topic: Tank height, or something else?  (Read 1047 times)

Offline Steve Thomas

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Commander
  • ****
  • Posts: 373
Tank height, or something else?
« on: December 28, 2010, 06:10:22 PM »
I was out yesterday flying my Enya SS35 - powered Chizler  (;D ;D ;D. ).   What I had was a nice 4-cycle in upright flight and inside manoeuvres, but a break into a 2-stroke when inverted or during outsides.   Now this is great for vertical eights and during the 3rd loop of the clover, but obviously not ideal overall (though I was still having plenty of fun with it).  

My first thought was that the tank obviously needed to be lowered a bit - but if that is the case, wouldn't the thing also have been breaking into a 2-stroke when climbing vertically, due to the much lower fuel head? (It wasn't.)  Might it instead be something happening with the fuel/air mix inside the crankcase?  

Would muffler pressure be likely to help?  Or should I just stop mucking round with 4/2 breaks and run the thing in a wet 2, which is how I expected to be running it in the first place?

Cheers
Steve

Offline Tim Wescott

  • 2016 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 12832
Re: Tank height, or something else?
« Reply #1 on: December 28, 2010, 06:18:34 PM »
The wet 2 run still depends on mixture to work right, and you'll still be leaner inverted than upright.

I'd fix the tank first - if the 2-4 break makes it more obvious, I'd use that as a tool, then proceed to other settings if it seemed indicated.
AMA 64232

The problem with electric is that once you get the smoke generator and sound system installed, the plane is too heavy.

Offline Jim Thomerson

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • ******
  • Posts: 2087
Re: Tank height, or something else?
« Reply #2 on: December 28, 2010, 07:04:15 PM »
How is your tank vented, standard or uniflow?

Offline Steve Thomas

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Commander
  • ****
  • Posts: 373
Re: Tank height, or something else?
« Reply #3 on: December 28, 2010, 09:47:01 PM »
Uniflow

Offline Jim Thomerson

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • ******
  • Posts: 2087
Re: Tank height, or something else?
« Reply #4 on: December 29, 2010, 01:59:25 PM »
With uniflow, you should be able to fix your problem by moving the tank.

Offline Steve Thomas

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Commander
  • ****
  • Posts: 373
Re: Tank height, or something else?
« Reply #5 on: December 29, 2010, 02:53:26 PM »
I'll try that then - but I'm still a bit mystified why it doesn't break into a 2-stroke when pitched into a vertical climb, considering the position of the fuel relative to the engine.

Offline Brett Buck

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • ******
  • Posts: 13792
Re: Tank height, or something else?
« Reply #6 on: December 29, 2010, 03:21:18 PM »
I'll try that then - but I'm still a bit mystified why it doesn't break into a 2-stroke when pitched into a vertical climb, considering the position of the fuel relative to the engine.

   Because the breaks don't have much to do with the fuel pressure (or the mixture, for that matter).

    Brett

Offline Steve Thomas

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Commander
  • ****
  • Posts: 373
Re: Tank height, or something else?
« Reply #7 on: December 29, 2010, 04:21:01 PM »
Which would mean that the tank height isn't the issue here, Brett?

(Edit - just read your comments on the 'Wet 2' thread.)

Offline Bill Little

  • 2017
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 12671
  • Second in COMMAND
Re: Tank height, or something else?
« Reply #8 on: December 29, 2010, 10:40:16 PM »
Which would mean that the tank height isn't the issue here, Brett?

(Edit - just read your comments on the 'Wet 2' thread.)

I "might be wrong" (it does happen once every millennium or so), but I don't think that's what I read from Brett's post.

I think a change to the tank height is needed.  The "break" will be determined by other factors, like "load".

And I am sure Brett will correct me if I am wrong! ;D

Big bear
Big Bear <><

Aberdeen, NC

James Hylton Motorsports/NASCAR/ARCA

AMA 95351 (got one of my old numbers back! ;D )

Trying to get by

Offline RandySmith

  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *****
  • Posts: 13747
  • Welcome to the Stunt Hanger.
    • Aero Products
Re: Tank height, or something else?
« Reply #9 on: December 30, 2010, 02:39:40 PM »
There are many many  things going on with model engines and fuel delivery systems,
 However if you raise the tank the motor will go richer, i
f you lower the tank the motor will get leaner,
Most ALL times if you slide the tank way back in the model, the motor will break harder and  more often, Sliding the tank forward towards the motor will lessen this effect.
If you add pressure to the fuel system the motor will get richer, if you add suction ..or restriction it will get leaner.
If you add heat to the fuel system while running the motor will go richer also.

There are so many other things it would take a large paper to write about them all.

Randy

Offline Steve Helmick

  • AMA Member and supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 9956
Re: Tank height, or something else?
« Reply #10 on: December 31, 2010, 07:49:07 PM »
Has anybody tested  to see if muffler pressure significantly increases fuel temp? Since there's no real flow of hot exhaust through the tank, I can't see it being a big increase. A minute flow into the tank is all that happens...same amount as the fuel volume what's leaving via the NV. Probably a bunch less temp increase than would be caused by a header or muffler installed in the same compartment, I bet. In fact, I'd be so bold as to bet a dollah that it's less.  y1 Steve
« Last Edit: January 01, 2011, 04:20:43 PM by Steve Helmick »
"The United States has become a place where professional athletes and entertainers are mistaken for people of importance." - Robert Heinlein

In 1944 18-20 year old's stormed beaches, and parachuted behind enemy lines to almost certain death.  In 2015 18-20 year old's need safe zones so people don't hurt their feelings.

John Leidle

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Tank height, or something else?
« Reply #11 on: January 02, 2011, 08:37:55 AM »
  Steve, muffler pressure raising fuel temps??? Never occurred to me & I doubt anyone else. It's the first I heard of it... you might be a genius after all great thought.
    John

Offline RandySmith

  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *****
  • Posts: 13747
  • Welcome to the Stunt Hanger.
    • Aero Products
Re: Tank height, or something else?
« Reply #12 on: January 02, 2011, 11:42:43 AM »
Has anybody tested  to see if muffler pressure significantly increases fuel temp? Since there's no real flow of hot exhaust through the tank, I can't see it being a big increase. A minute flow into the tank is all that happens...same amount as the fuel volume what's leaving via the NV. Probably a bunch less temp increase than would be caused by a header or muffler installed in the same compartment, I bet. In fact, I'd be so bold as to bet a dollah that it's less.  y1 Steve

Hi Steve

Yes it does raise the temp inside the fuel tank, You can put a running engine setup on a bench with a clear plastic tank and see how much hot gas goes back into the tank. I had this setup and when you look at the fuel on suction it is clear and you can see the fuel level,,hook up the muffler pressure line and the tank will immediately go into a seething mass of white foam, you cannot tell the fuel level and all you can see is bubbles everywhere into the tank. I was surprised on how much flow goes into the tank from a tongue mufflers, Even more from a tube muffler...and a pipe puts even more flow back into the fuel tank. I will also unfortunately put debris back into the tank from things like dirt ,sand, bugs, grass or whatever gets into the intake of the motor, and some times burned hard carbon bits from the exhaust system,as well as burned hot oil.

Randy


Advertise Here
Tags:
 


Advertise Here