Thanks Randy,
I vaguely remember Stan Powell telling me that the I-beam plane had a little higher aspect ratio wing than the others which would help account for the smaller wing area. ( I could be wrong about that memory, after all these years) I also think that the smaller plane might have been a better match to the K&B 40 power, that Les was using.
Randy, could you imagine a Stiletto 700 retro-fitted with a PA 51-61 with your pipe setup in that deeper fuselage. Man, that should be some sweet ride for guys who love the Stiletto!!
Power appeared to be an issue with the ST 46, that prompted a move to the 660 size plane, but your setup should make the "700" really come alive, by giving it the power it really needs. What do you think?
I agree, that Les's Stiletto's were always Cool ,eye-catching, drop-dead beautiful airplanes, with a great finish.
Randy, You are one of the "go-to guys" for Stiletto information and I thought you might have some information about these different airplane's specifications. This is interesting.
Maybe I need to call Les and consider writing up a "Stiletto History" as "verified' by Les. There still seems to be a lot of interest in the subject here on the forum , but there also seems to be some gaps of information, out there in general knowledge of modelers today, like the rarely mentioned "700" version, that I posted pictures on.
Randy, The Stiletto XL plans, that you and Tom Dixon sell, do they include the larger tail That Bill Little said that Les recommends for the 660?
If the "Nostalgia 79" event catches on, at more southeast contests ,then there may be a resurgence of Stiletto's showing up at flying fields here in the southeastern US.
Randy, I appreciate your usual insightful input , thank you so much!
Pat Robinson