stunthanger.com

Classic Designs => Classic Planes => Topic started by: Balsa Butcher on March 10, 2009, 09:10:20 AM

Title: Sheeks Ryan SC
Post by: Balsa Butcher on March 10, 2009, 09:10:20 AM
Well, here 'tis.  From Flying Model plans.  About five flights so far, some trim issues but nothing that a little "tweaking" can't fix. Power is an OS 35S but may be changed to a Brodak 40. 8)
Title: Re: Sheeks Ryan SC
Post by: Airacobra on March 10, 2009, 10:06:16 AM
Pete, well done, one of my Sheeks favorites. I have often thought of building that myself. Did the plans show an I beam construction?
Title: Re: Sheeks Ryan SC
Post by: Balsa Butcher on March 10, 2009, 11:35:11 AM
Aww, you got me there.  I started out building it as an I-Beamer but it soon became evident that my skills were not up to the challange.  It became a question of abandoning the project or converting it to a configuration that I was more comfortable with.  Soooo, out came the spar, wing cut-outs were made in the fuselage sides and the wing was converted to a C-Tube configuration.  Airfoil is the same though.  I know purists will scoff but what the heck, Jack built some planes this way, however this was not one of them.  8)
Title: Re: Sheeks Ryan SC
Post by: Dalton Hammett on March 10, 2009, 12:11:26 PM
***********************************************
Very nicely done --  colors look great on it!!!


Dalton H.
Title: Re: Sheeks Ryan SC
Post by: Airacobra on March 10, 2009, 12:46:32 PM
Pete, you do nice work and I love your rendition of the plane. I know Jack built many I-beamers and conventional wings. I am glad you continued the project as it is a unique plane not often seen. More of these type of models need to be built, Great Job Pete!
Title: Re: Sheeks Ryan SC
Post by: Matt Colan on March 10, 2009, 02:12:02 PM
looks great Pete.  :)

Title: Re: Sheeks Ryan SC
Post by: Dennis Adamisin on March 10, 2009, 05:32:10 PM
PETE!

yeah yeah yeah!!!!! That looks GREAT.  I see you made the turtle deck cross section better than what the plans show too.

Great colors too.  THat is goining to look great in the air.

WAY TO GO!  8)  ;D  y1  #^  :)!  CLP** BW@ HH%%
Title: Re: Sheeks Ryan SC
Post by: John Miller on March 10, 2009, 07:18:57 PM
Hey Pete, the Ryan looks sweet. Hope to see you at Tucson next week. H^^
Title: Re: Sheeks Ryan SC
Post by: Clancy Arnold on March 10, 2009, 08:38:56 PM
Pete
I took a copy of the picture of your Ryan SC and your posts to our local CL club meeting tonight.  Every one there likes your color choices and Jack said it should fly good the way you built it.

P.S.  The Club meeting was at Jack Sheeks house.

Clancy
Title: Re: Sheeks Ryan SC
Post by: Balsa Butcher on March 10, 2009, 08:50:21 PM
Thanks all, I appreciate the positive comments. Special thanks for showing the pic to Jack, I'm glad he approved.  The paint scheme is very close to his original although the colors are different. Brodak 40 has been installed and I'm hoping to have the bugs ironed out for VSC.  8)
Title: Re: Sheeks Ryan SC
Post by: Clint Ormosen on March 10, 2009, 10:24:58 PM
Oh man! Looks great, Pete. Not sure my plane is worthy of riding in the same car to AZ. Great choice of colors!
Title: Re: Sheeks Ryan SC
Post by: john e. holliday on March 13, 2009, 12:42:17 PM
Well I hate to be the bearer of bad news, that makes you inelligeble for the I-Beam award.  It is still eligible for the Jack Sheeks award tho.  Just put in a better pattern than the rest.  Haverly had it sewed up last year until he trimmed himself outof contention.  He did get the beauty award tho.  I have my award hanging where Jack keeps an eye on my building.  Plane looks great and hope to see it in person.  DOC Holliday
Title: Re: Sheeks Ryan SC
Post by: Balsa Butcher on March 13, 2009, 01:12:36 PM
Hi Doc, I never intended this airplane to be in contention for the I-Beam Trophy.  I'm just happy to be able to attend, support the event and compete with a design that I have admired and wanted to build for many years.  y1
Title: Re: Sheeks Ryan SC
Post by: Clint Ormosen on March 13, 2009, 07:47:45 PM
I like these rarely built models. I think more models like Petes' need to be built. It sure is a nice change form the usual Nobler/Ringmaster/Thunderbird Classic lineup seen at most contests. And Pete built his from plans!. That is something I rarely do because I'm lazy.
Title: Re: Sheeks Ryan SC
Post by: john e. holliday on March 20, 2009, 05:39:09 PM
Both planes are gorgeous and what I could see of Pete's plane it was flying good also.  DOC Holliday
Title: Re: Sheeks Ryan SC
Post by: Bill Little on March 20, 2009, 11:41:18 PM
I am glad to see that one built, Pete.  You did an excellent job and I hope it flies as good as it looks!

Mongo
Title: Re: Sheeks Ryan SC
Post by: Michael Boucher on March 23, 2009, 11:29:55 AM
Just Beautiful !!!  Thanks for posting your project. :)
Title: Re: Sheeks Ryan SC
Post by: Mike Keville on March 24, 2009, 07:24:32 AM
Pete's model was a very welcome addition to the Classic line-up at VSC-21.  It's a beauty!
Title: Re: Sheeks Ryan SC
Post by: Balsa Butcher on March 24, 2009, 08:01:07 AM
Thanks all.  It does fly well and it was real special seeing how Jack and Shirley appreciated my choosing to build it.  I encourage everyone to consider building a Sheeks design for next year.  Now I see why his designs were as popular as they were back in the day.  y1
Title: Re: Sheeks Ryan SC
Post by: John Bocksnick on February 13, 2016, 01:34:13 PM
How did you do the flap linkage to accommodate the swept forward trailing edge?

Thanks,

John Bocksnick
Title: Re: Sheeks Ryan SC
Post by: proparc on February 13, 2016, 02:34:53 PM
How did you do the flap linkage to accommodate the swept forward trailing edge?

Thanks,

John Bocksnick

That's what I would like to know-lucky boxes?
Title: Re: Sheeks Ryan SC
Post by: Balsa Butcher on February 13, 2016, 03:27:53 PM
It's been awhile since I have seen this thread. The center of the wing TE (inside the fuselage) was squared off so a standard flap horn was used. Lucky Boxes were built into the built up flaps (similar to the technique shown on many RSM kits). They worked as advertised and there was no binding in the controls.  8)