News:


  • May 04, 2024, 07:50:53 PM

Login with username, password and session length

Author Topic: Jack Sheeks "Freedom 45"  (Read 1149 times)

Offline Tom Niebuhr

  • AMA Member
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 2768
Jack Sheeks "Freedom 45"
« on: June 16, 2007, 09:42:34 AM »
Here is another Sheeks Classic Era airplane.

The "Freedom 45" is a beautiful airplane. It appeared in Flying Models, May 1968. FM plan is CF121.
This one can have either a Foam wing, or a "C" tube wing.

We would love to see one at VSC 2008!
AMA 7544

Offline Randy Powell

  • 21 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 10478
  • TreeTop Flyer
Re: Jack Sheeks "Freedom 45"
« Reply #1 on: June 18, 2007, 03:07:29 PM »
One of my favorites.
Member in good standing of P.I.S.T
(Politically Incorrect Stunt Team)
AMA 67711
 Randy Powell

Offline Mark Scarborough

  • 2015
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 5918
Re: Jack Sheeks "Freedom 45"
« Reply #2 on: June 18, 2007, 04:27:50 PM »
thats pretty cool, looks very "t-38" or F-5 ish
For years the rat race had me going around in circles, Now I do it for fun!
EXILED IN PULLMAN WA
AMA 842137

Offline Tom Niebuhr

  • AMA Member
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 2768
Re: Jack Sheeks "Freedom 45"
« Reply #3 on: June 18, 2007, 11:56:52 PM »
Randy,
 This gives you another one to think about building!

In a day or so I'll put another Sheeks Classic airplane on the forum.
« Last Edit: June 19, 2007, 02:07:13 AM by Tom Niebuhr »
AMA 7544

Offline Randy Powell

  • 21 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 10478
  • TreeTop Flyer
Re: Jack Sheeks "Freedom 45"
« Reply #4 on: June 19, 2007, 11:42:18 AM »
Tom,

I think this one of the only ones I don't have plans for. Orginally designed for an Enya 45, be cool with the Magnum 53 I have sitting in the drawer. Hmm....

I had thought about building a Bernie Ash Supersonic Stunter for that engine, but now I'm thinking maybe the Freedom 45.
Member in good standing of P.I.S.T
(Politically Incorrect Stunt Team)
AMA 67711
 Randy Powell

Offline dave shirley jr

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Commander
  • ****
  • Posts: 183
Re: Jack Sheeks "Freedom 45"
« Reply #5 on: June 19, 2007, 05:26:45 PM »
how big is it?
span and squares
Dave jr.

Offline Randy Powell

  • 21 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 10478
  • TreeTop Flyer
Re: Jack Sheeks "Freedom 45"
« Reply #6 on: June 19, 2007, 06:28:04 PM »
Dave,

60" span. I think around 650 squares.
Member in good standing of P.I.S.T
(Politically Incorrect Stunt Team)
AMA 67711
 Randy Powell

Offline dave shirley jr

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Commander
  • ****
  • Posts: 183
Re: Jack Sheeks "Freedom 45"
« Reply #7 on: June 19, 2007, 06:40:15 PM »
Hi randy
i just printed out the plan that was attached and scaled it out.
i got 58" span and about 650 squares just slightly bigger than a cobra
if you figure the C/G at 20% the leadouts might need to come out the front of the leading edge to be anywhere near the modern definition of optimum!
any thoughts ?
any one familiar with sheeks other swept back wings and where the leadouts ended up?
might just as well forget the adjustable leadouts and shove them all the way forward i guess
Dave jr.

Offline Tom Niebuhr

  • AMA Member
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 2768
Re: Jack Sheeks "Freedom 45"
« Reply #8 on: June 20, 2007, 09:25:24 AM »
The FM plans directory says the Freedom 45 is 60". The plans #CF121 are still available from FM. I hope they are more accurate than the Sea Vixen that I have started. (Thank God that Jack is only a phone call away.)

The best thing to do for the leadout position is to calculate the CG at approx 18% (25% max) of the Mean Aerodynamic Chord.  (Easiest method to approximate the MAC is to draw an "X" : LE tip to TE of flap at fuselage; LE at fuselage to TE of flap at tip. This will locate the MAC. The 18% of the chord location will be the starting GG location) I have calculated all this and the "X" method is amazingly close to the calculations. This is always a starting point anyway.

Look at Don Hutchinchin's F86 that was in August '03 Model Aviation ...he used a stinger in front of the wing with the forward leadout adjustable. It has worked well. I will use the same setup in my Sea Vixen.
AMA 7544

Offline Randy Powell

  • 21 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 10478
  • TreeTop Flyer
Re: Jack Sheeks "Freedom 45"
« Reply #9 on: June 20, 2007, 12:20:41 PM »
The plans show the leadout exit at the wing tip. Wonder how it flies if built as drawn?
Member in good standing of P.I.S.T
(Politically Incorrect Stunt Team)
AMA 67711
 Randy Powell

Offline Tom Niebuhr

  • AMA Member
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 2768
Re: Jack Sheeks "Freedom 45"
« Reply #10 on: June 20, 2007, 03:54:39 PM »
Probably flies well. Jack told me that he never published an airplane that didn't fly well.

I think that Jack would be glad to answer any questions on the leadouts, or particulars of the design. He will give unbiased , sound advice, on any chages that might be needed. His Tel number is in the PAMPA directory.
AMA 7544

Offline Airacobra

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Commander
  • ****
  • Posts: 292
Re: Jack Sheeks "Freedom 45"
« Reply #11 on: June 21, 2007, 10:26:52 PM »
I built mine per the plans. I used a Foam wing and frankly it is a porker. Despite that, the plane started out with a ST 46 which had plenty of power, but I was not able to carry enough fuel. It went on the wall and then I got an LA 46 which was able to fly it equally as well and I had more fuel economy. The plane seems to require about 1 1/2 ounces of tailweight. Now remember, mine was and is a porker. Don't ask me what it weighs as I built in in 1993. I had Jack sign it for me and it is a prized possession and if it hangs on the wall the duration of my life that will be fine for me. It is a cool looking airplane. I hope to post a picture here in the near future. Mine seemed to have a strange wiggle to it. Meaning that when it came out of a hard corner, the tail would wiggle in and out of the circle. Maybe that was due to the leadout/bellcrank location, I don't know for sure. I built it without adjustable controls, exactly like the plans. I would like to hear more about what Ed Ruane was saying about the setup he would use with the Sea Vixon.
Keith Bryant


Advertise Here
Tags:
 


Advertise Here