I cannot add much to what Bob Heywood explained above. I was in Dayton when Roselle and Frye decided to produce various versions of their speed engines and was a bit involved with some of those activities. Their main commercial endeavor was to produce engines for the RC pylon racers. I worked on several pylon ships that were test beds for those racing engines with a top pylon pilot there in Dayton to fly them. To make a long story short, Roselle backed out of the endeavor, Fox got financially involved, the engines would perform but were not consistent and Fox took the equipment and parts to Arkansas and marketed several versions based on the RAF cases.
While Jack Frye was working on these engines, he produced one .40 with timing for stunt for me to put in an airplane. This was in 1972. At the time, it was one of the few rear exhaust stunt .40's in existence. Jack made a muffler for this so it could be completely enclosed in the nose. The muffler made the engine run quiet and actually, the engine gained as much as 200 rpm when coupled with that muffler. That airplane/engine placed 10th at the 72 Nats. The shaft broke sometime later and efforts to get another shaft set up never materialized.
Jack Frye did make up some drawings of each of the engines planned for production. In addition to the racing .40 with rear exhaust, rear intake, there was the stunt 40 with the front intake, a .36 for profile carrier with a front intake, a .60 for speed. and others. Plans were to produce engines for pattern RC, Racing RC, speed, carrier, rat racing, stunt, and combat. a .15 was planned. There was an advertisement for these engines that appeared at least once in Model Airplane News, Jul 73. These were based on the RAF record setting B and C speed jobs. It is unfortunate that the potential of these engines never materialized.
Keith