Thanks Dan! As to making more kits this year, well after making and moving nearly 100 Carrier kits in the last 4 years I am getting a bit tired. I have received a great deal of positive feedback on these efforts, but perhaps i need some time off.
One thing of interest though, and a real puzzlement to me. I started this 4 year project for the main reason in an attempt to get more people flying Carrier and entering Carrier competition. During this time frame I also sponsored the Postal Carrier Contest and through some effort got and mailed out nearly $2000 in prizes over the 4 years. After all of this all I hear is how much fun flying Carrier planes can be. One Father/Son team told me they had "Flown the paint off" one of my kits flying it so much. The real puzzlement is that out of all this work the actual number of my kits that have ended up in a Carrier contest is very slim. Why?, I ask.
Certainly the kits were never designed to be top performers or any challenge to the Top 20 Profile fliers. One did make a fairly good flight at Brodak's last June, and another did OK in the inaugural NW Sport .40 Profile event.
My 'coat tail" observation is somewhere between lousy designs and no contest interest. With my meager manual skill the first will never be solved. the other end, the lack of interest may present a problem for the future of Carrier contest flying and the NCS in particular. While I have never been an eager devote of more and more classes in Carrier, I do think the new .40 Sport Profile class here in the NW does show some positive interest in bringing new and retread Carrier pilots back to the deck.
Be gentle, be positive in your solutions, but please offer constructive feed back on this rather long statement that should perhaps been left to a simple "Thanks Dan".
Joe Just
2 of my "Wildcat" ships built by customers