News:


  • May 28, 2024, 10:05:19 AM

Login with username, password and session length

Author Topic: This is what I think of carrier in general  (Read 759 times)

Offline Ty Marcucci

  • 23 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 714
This is what I think of carrier in general
« on: April 01, 2012, 09:24:18 PM »
 H^^
« Last Edit: April 08, 2017, 08:19:04 PM by Ty Marcucci »
Ty Marcucci

Offline eric david conley

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Captain
  • *****
  • Posts: 499
Re: This is what I think of carrier in general
« Reply #1 on: April 02, 2012, 04:33:53 PM »
     When I first got into carrier I thought the plane was 60%, the engine 30%, and the slider 10%. Heck I already knew how to fly, right. Six months later I thought the plane was 40%, the engine 30%, the slider 15%, and some practice 15%. A year later I thought the plane was 20%, the engine 40%, the slider 15%, and some practice 25%. Now the way I look at it the plane can be almost anything that flys, the engine and how I can get it to work for me is 40%, and flying it so that you know just how it will handle different conditions (practice) is at least the other 60%.
     After the second year I knew I had to have Nelson engines because after I had them I could cross off what I should use for power and put my efforts into how well I could get everything to work while out in the middle of the circle. I have always been dismayed that the people I was flying with would say "Oh those Nelsons cost to much" and when I was out flying my carrier planes they were home working on one of their many engines that they had bought on e-bay or where ever and not getting anywhere but older in age. When you reach a certain age time is the most precious thing you have and for most of us that can very some but in the end (well you get the drift).
     Now I fly my best carrier planes when ever I can, smooth take offs up to 10' altitude, 7 fast laps, slow down as fast as I can and get into the hang, 7 laps of slow speed, and one lap later I try to catch the one arresting line I lay out between 2 2.5 pd weights. I only catch the arresting line maybe 30% of the time but usually don't miss it by much and never under shoot by far. Life is good.  Eric
Eric

Offline Dennis Holler

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Commander
  • ****
  • Posts: 266
Re: This is what I think of carrier in general
« Reply #2 on: April 02, 2012, 09:50:28 PM »
 LL~

And for me at middle age.... all I want to do is get a plane finished enough to be in the air and try to fly again.

I never knew what the stunt pattern was 30 years ago and didn't try carrier, although I did know what it was and built a Sterling Skyshark but never flew it due to going into the Navy.  Maybe this year... I got a Ringmaster built and also have one of Joe's Wildcats almost complete.  No Nelson's  LL~ LL~ LL~ but an ebay OS 40FP for it.  If it get's in the air I'll have done more than I would have otherwise.... LL~ LL~ LL~

Again, Thanks to Clancy, Jack and the rest of the bunch that puts up with me when I do make it down for a meeting, Those are really great, nice guys!

At this point, I just want to run out a full tank in the air  LL~ LL~ LL~ LL~ LL~ LL~

I've started plenty...would be nice to finish something!!!

Offline john vlna

  • 21 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 1353
Re: This is what I think of carrier in general
« Reply #3 on: April 02, 2012, 10:47:29 PM »
The two areas that most fliers seem to have problems with are getting a consistent engine run and the landing. I had plenty of CL experience when I started carrier, (started flying in 1950 or so) but literally none with throttled engines. It takes a while to get competent. You can go a long way if you learn how to run your engine. I have always focused on reliability and it has served me well. Then learn the landing. I do pretty well here but I don’t get 100%. A good solid flight with a good landing can win. I probably have put more time into low speed than any other area. I actually find flying stalled???? Fun. To get really good you have to practice and tune your plane. That is an area the I don't do enough, hence my scores aren't as high as they might be.

Offline john e. holliday

  • 24 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 22783
Re: This is what I think of carrier in general
« Reply #4 on: April 03, 2012, 07:19:24 PM »
John, you hit the nail on the head.   Engine reliability is what wins most of the time.   My old McCoy Redhead .60 in the Sterling Gaurdian is what I won most of my trophies with.   Then I went with a Rossi .60.   It was not as reliable as the old McCoy.   But, I never got to practice much and got out of touch in carrier when I started playing with F2C.   When I got fed up with training new pilots I tried to get back into carrier, but had no time for practice as such.   Flying off a stooge the engine would get hot most of the time.  So that is when I just started flying for the fun of it.   If I can hang a Slob, I should be able to hang a carrier plane.   Just need to get another good engine. H^^
John E. "DOC" Holliday
10421 West 56th Terrace
Shawnee, KANSAS  66203
AMA 23530  Have fun as I have and I am still breaking a record.


Advertise Here
Tags:
 


Advertise Here