News:


  • May 01, 2024, 01:32:15 AM

Login with username, password and session length

Author Topic: Martinez's Westland Wyvern  (Read 738 times)

Offline Dennis Saydak

  • 23 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 595
Martinez's Westland Wyvern
« on: September 07, 2009, 12:00:54 PM »
Has anyone built & flown this model? In reviewing the plan I noticed that there is a lot of positive incidence built into the the wing. I'm wondering why this is necessary since the model does have flaps for slow seed. The + wing incident seems at first glance to be unnecessary and could be detrimental to high speed flight but I certainly stand to be corrected on that observation.
Just when you think you're getting ahead in the rat race.....you find the rats just get faster! MAAC 13120L

Offline skyshark58

  • skyshark58
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Captain
  • *****
  • Posts: 401
Re: Martinez's Westland Wyvern
« Reply #1 on: September 07, 2009, 12:55:28 PM »
The Robert's Martin Mauler had too much positive incidence and would fly with a lot of down elevator at high speed. If this was taken out during the building prosses it flew much better. I would agree that positive incidence is a bad thing, make it zero.  Mike
mike potter

Offline Wayne J. Buran

  • AMA Member
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 1096
Re: Martinez's Westland Wyvern
« Reply #2 on: September 07, 2009, 05:38:32 PM »
The Robert's Martin Mauler had too much positive incidence and would fly with a lot of down elevator at high speed. If this was taken out during the building prosses it flew much better. I would agree that positive incidence is a bad thing, make it zero.  Mike

thanks for the heads up on the Mauler.
Wayne
Wayne Buran
Medina, Ohio
AMA 14986 CD
USAF Veteran 35 TAC GP/ 6236 CSG, DonMuang RTAFB, Bangkok, Thailand 65-66 North Coast Controliners   "A fine is a tax for doing wrong. A tax is a fine for doing well!

Offline john e. holliday

  • 24 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 22774
Re: Martinez's Westland Wyvern
« Reply #3 on: September 10, 2009, 09:10:39 AM »
I built my Robert's Mauler box stock with McCoy 60 and had no problems with the high speed.  DOC Holliday
John E. "DOC" Holliday
10421 West 56th Terrace
Shawnee, KANSAS  66203
AMA 23530  Have fun as I have and I am still breaking a record.

Offline Bob Heywood

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • ******
  • Posts: 999
Re: Martinez's Westland Wyvern
« Reply #4 on: September 10, 2009, 09:41:19 AM »
It's been some time since I looked at the Wyvern plan so the airfoil shape doesn't pop into my memory. I do have a Mauler plan. A number of Carrier designs used something like a Clark Y section. One thing to remember, incidence isn't measured from the bottom surface of the wing. It is measured from the chord line. The chord line runs from the center of the LE to the center of the TE. So, when the lower rear surface of the Clark Y is parallel to the longitudinal datam the wing has positive incidence.

Without realizing it we probably trim in some down on most of our planes at high speed. It did seem that the Maulers I have seen looked like they flew tail high. But, no one ever said it caused any particular difficulty.

It wouldn't hurt to build the model with zero incidence.

Bob

« Last Edit: September 10, 2009, 11:38:51 AM by Bob Heywood »
"Clockwise Forever..."

Offline skyshark58

  • skyshark58
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Captain
  • *****
  • Posts: 401
Re: Martinez's Westland Wyvern
« Reply #5 on: September 10, 2009, 12:29:47 PM »
It's not that you can't control the climb it's how much easier it is to control with zero insidince.
                                                                                                                                     Mike
mike potter

Offline Dennis Saydak

  • 23 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 595
Re: Martinez's Westland Wyvern
« Reply #6 on: September 10, 2009, 12:48:00 PM »
It's been some time since I looked at the Wyvern plan so the airfoil shape doesn't pop into my memory.

Bob, here's what the Wyvern plan looks like. Perhaps the + incidence was used to counteract the effect of the "drooped snoot"? I was hoping that someone who built the model could report on its flight performance at high speed. Apparently Marvin did well with it in competition.
Just when you think you're getting ahead in the rat race.....you find the rats just get faster! MAAC 13120L

Offline john e. holliday

  • 24 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 22774
Re: Martinez's Westland Wyvern
« Reply #7 on: September 11, 2009, 09:26:15 AM »
That rib looks small to be a center rib.  Of course I know little about the design.  I can see the tip being positive for low speed.  DOC Holliday
John E. "DOC" Holliday
10421 West 56th Terrace
Shawnee, KANSAS  66203
AMA 23530  Have fun as I have and I am still breaking a record.

Offline Dennis Saydak

  • 23 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 595
Re: Martinez's Westland Wyvern
« Reply #8 on: September 11, 2009, 11:12:57 AM »
That rib looks small to be a center rib.  Of course I know little about the design.  I can see the tip being positive for low speed.  DOC Holliday

DOC, that is definitely the center rib shown. The construction article states that when building the wing the centerline of the ribs should be parallel to each other. So, the entire wing would have + incidence as set by the lower fuselage keel. I think the model would tend to climb like a homesick angel at high speed unless lots of down elevator was used to compensate. The design has LARGE flaps for low speed flying.

Aklthough we chose to build Boss's Sea Furys this winter we are thinking ahead that the Wyvern could be next winters project. It's good to have as much information as possible beforehand and everyone's opinions and advice is greatly appreciated.
Just when you think you're getting ahead in the rat race.....you find the rats just get faster! MAAC 13120L

Offline Mike Anderson

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • ******
  • Posts: 945
Re: Martinez's Westland Wyvern
« Reply #9 on: September 11, 2009, 02:09:34 PM »
With that much camber in the airfoil, you are going to fly with lots of down elevator anyway - as speed increases, so will the need for down elevator.

The positive incidence MIGHT be to partially counter any nose-down tendency when the flaps drop - given the low wing and the high camber I'm guessing that large flaps will cause a large 'negative pitch' response.

As for the tips being washed in (or out) probably none is the best, but if anything you would want the tips to be at a lower angle of attack then the center rib so that they stall after the center section.

Mike@   AMA 10086
Central Iowa


Advertise Here
Tags:
 


Advertise Here