News:


  • May 26, 2024, 09:57:58 PM

Login with username, password and session length

Author Topic: Flat bottom or symmetrical  (Read 527 times)

Offline Bob Reeves

  • 2016 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 3415
    • Somethin'Xtra Inc.
Flat bottom or symmetrical
« on: August 04, 2011, 11:42:38 AM »
Thinking about the next version of my FJ-4 and wondering about a semi flat bottom airfoil. From what little I remember it won't hurt the high speed and may help on low speed..

So the question is...... symmetrical or (not really a true clark Y) flat bottom airfoil?

Offline BillLee

  • AMA Member
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 1296
Re: Flat bottom or symmetrical
« Reply #1 on: August 04, 2011, 12:28:25 PM »
Many (MANY!) years ago when I built my last carrier model I used a Clark-Y airfoil, essentially a flat-bottom section. It worked TOO well! It created so much lift that I could not get the model to stall/land, it had to be driven(!) into the deck.

I suggest a symmetrical airfoil is the better choice.

Bill
Bill Lee
AMA 20018

Offline Tim Wescott

  • 2016 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 12822
Re: Flat bottom or symmetrical
« Reply #2 on: August 04, 2011, 12:43:43 PM »
Many (MANY!) years ago when I built my last carrier model I used a Clark-Y airfoil, essentially a flat-bottom section. It worked TOO well! It created so much lift that I could not get the model to stall/land, it had to be driven(!) into the deck.
In the full-scale and RC would not stalling is a sign of not enough elevator authority -- there the prescription would be either for more elevator or a more forward CG.

But I don't fly carrier, so take the above with a big grain of salt.
AMA 64232

The problem with electric is that once you get the smoke generator and sound system installed, the plane is too heavy.

Offline bill bischoff

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • ******
  • Posts: 1707
Re: Flat bottom or symmetrical
« Reply #3 on: August 04, 2011, 02:03:08 PM »
If the model is meant to hang, use a symmetrical airfoil. It makes a smooth transition into and out of the hang.
I use 12-13% at the root and 15% at the tip. Phil Cartier recently told me that the thickness didn't make much difference in high speed, and I can't dispute him, but I've been using the thinner airfoils with good results. If the model isn't meant to hang, you could probably use something flat bottom"ish", but I would mount it a few degrees negative (leading edge low) To keep it from climbing as Bill Lee described.

Offline Bob Reeves

  • 2016 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 3415
    • Somethin'Xtra Inc.
Re: Flat bottom or symmetrical
« Reply #4 on: August 04, 2011, 02:54:50 PM »
Sounds like symmetrical is the right answer..

Thanks guys..

Offline john vlna

  • 21 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 1353
Re: Flat bottom or symmetrical
« Reply #5 on: August 04, 2011, 03:07:26 PM »
I have normally used symmetrical airfoils, but My seafire with a flat bottom has no problem hanging. It is not a Clark Y however but a KFm 2


Advertise Here
Tags:
 


Advertise Here