News:



  • June 13, 2025, 10:24:30 PM

Login with username, password and session length

Author Topic: AMA Carrier Rule Proposals  (Read 53369 times)

Offline Dennis Holler

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Commander
  • ****
  • Posts: 295
Re: AMA Carrier Rule Proposals
« Reply #50 on: June 18, 2024, 11:56:38 AM »
New rules should limit designs to high performance aircraft that actually were deployed on carriers.

No light observation planes that could land anywhere.
No one-off sales stunts like the Mustang and the Airabonita.
No German fighters that might have flown off a carrier that was never built.
No land planes that were launched from carrier with no return.
No land planes that made an emergency landing of a carrier.

That still leaves plenty of genuine US, British and Japanese designs.

There should be an exception for anyone crazy enough to enter a four engine C130 in a carrier event....and with no hook no less..... S?P
I've never entered an event but if I do it will probably be in something like a Guardian or Mauler with a .40 or .65...although I do have a couple of other carrier planes in process for the last 15 years.... I'm such a slacker...  HB~> HB~> HB~> HB~>

Since these comments are a year old, I assume nothing came of these particular proposals?
I've started plenty...would be nice to finish something!!!

Offline john e. holliday

  • 25 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 22973
Re: AMA Carrier Rule Proposals
« Reply #51 on: June 18, 2024, 01:54:26 PM »
I thought before now this was all settled.  I haven't checked the AMA site yet to see the results of the voting if there was any. S?P
John E. "DOC" Holliday
10421 West 56th Terrace
Shawnee, KANSAS  66203
AMA 23530  Have fun as I have and I am still breaking a record.


Advertise Here
Tags: