If someone is using this brand of motor, I would be glad to tackle/provide a drawing. However.
They are small drawings and the resolution is low. It can be done but will require “a bit more” work to get accuracy, because of this.
The measurements are MM obviously, so more time is needed for conversion labor. Not a big issue but still has to be noted.
Once drawn to whatever scale the JPEG is, the vector drawing can be increased to any size easily.
Vector drawing. I’m used to using the term, “line art.” "Wire drawing," is also used. A designer at Hasbro Toys, refers to his work as "wire drawings."
A 3-view JPEG drawn to scale, with measurements in English, plus saved at a favorable resolution, per size of the image, would be ideal.
Only a better start.
Now, from my point of view, sure, it's nice to have the drawing looking "exactly" like the motor or engine, or any part. However, to build a model airplane, which is my eventual goal, around a particular motor or engine, one only needs datum points.
In all considerations, mine anyway, great drawings or highly detailed drawings, are useless unless they have accurate datum points used for drilling mounting holes, firewall placement, NVA exit areas, etc., etc. Having the physical motor to get measurements from helps as displayed in Dennis‘s photo. I did the line art for my MVVS .49 exactly this way.
So, from my point of view “only,” and I'm not talking for anyone else, the importance in my drawings, is the placement of the measurements with accuracy, not the appearance or emphasized detail.
An example would be having just an accurate scale/correct size "line outline" of any given motor or engine, where the mounting hole centerlines, both views, and the thrust line have measurement accuracy.
Charles