Keith,
You have some really great models there. Are they still around today?
Those models have wings similar to mine.
Let's put that "stick" wire or whatever issue behind us, for a moment.
Here's my question:
Just run the leadouts through the wing and out at the tip. Will the model fly and be controllable if this is done?
Charles
Charles,
Yes, those models are on the wall with the several other models built for the Tucson 1/2A multi-engine profile scale contests. The B-47, 39" span, was built earlier for a contest in Los Angeles (the Black Sheep Squadron), then it flew at the 2000 Nats in Profile Scale where it placed 3rd. It has two Norvel .049's. The Tu 95 has four Norvel .061's, 56" span. Both to 1/36 scale.
Now, to your question about just running your leadouts through the tips. Go back several posts on this thread. The CG of the airplane determines where the leadouts MUST be, even if it is inconvenient to NOT put them through the wing tip. If the leadouts are behind the CG in an extreme way, the model may fly but it will yaw seriously to the outside of the circle, it will put the leadouts in a serious bind and the model may be uncontrollable, even if it gets off the ground.
For your model, the leadout position at the wing tip should be maybe 3 or 4 degrees behind the CG position. You might be able to use slightly less, like 2 degrees, but 3 or 4 degrees will be safe. For scale/sport flying, that would be adequate. Only when you are looking for refined response/maneuverability for stunt flying would you want to experiment with less line rake. If you are using a throttle and anticipate a lot of taxi maneuvers and slow flight, you might want to have slightly more line rake.
As I explained earlier, the Tu-95 has the CG slightly behind the wing TE at the center section and the leadout guide holds the leadouts about 6" in front of the tip LE edge.
Keith