News:


  • June 17, 2024, 05:54:29 AM

Login with username, password and session length

Author Topic: Improving Cox Sure-starts  (Read 780 times)

Offline minnesotamodeler

  • 2014 Supporters
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 2335
  • Me and my Chief Engineer
    • Minnesotamodeler
Improving Cox Sure-starts
« on: September 22, 2009, 07:15:15 PM »
Somewhere (I can't find the thread now) Larry Renger (IIRC) recommended drilling out the Cox production engine's venturi, which narrows down beyond the NVA, to the existing exterior diameter. I tried it with one of mine, and it sounds more like a Black Widow than a Babe Bee! And still starts,  draws fuel, and needles just fine.  So my thanks to Larry, and you guys oughtta try it if you want to make your Surestarts into superior sport engines.

No official tach comparisons, sorry.  But a significant upgrade according to my ear.
--Ray 
Roseville MN (St. Paul suburb, Arctic Circle)
AMA902472

Online ray copeland

  • 24 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 871
Re: Improving Cox Sure-starts
« Reply #1 on: September 22, 2009, 09:02:05 PM »
Ray, have you actually tried this on a plane yet or just bench testing?  I am curious about the fuel draw with the nose up . 
Ray from Greensboro, North Carolina , six laps inverted so far with my hand held vertically!!! (forgot to mention, none level!) AMA# 902150

Offline minnesotamodeler

  • 2014 Supporters
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 2335
  • Me and my Chief Engineer
    • Minnesotamodeler
Re: Improving Cox Sure-starts
« Reply #2 on: September 23, 2009, 12:42:02 AM »
On a plane but on the ground, Ray.  But I did point the nose up, down and all around!  The mod doesn't seem to have affected the fuel draw at all. 
--Ray 
Roseville MN (St. Paul suburb, Arctic Circle)
AMA902472

Offline Larry Renger

  • 21 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 4003
Re: Improving Cox Sure-starts
« Reply #3 on: September 29, 2009, 10:15:24 PM »
It will, however have affected the fuel consumption.  But with that engine you use an external tank, so who cares?
Think S.M.A.L.L. y'all and, it's all good, CL, FF and RC!

DesignMan
 BTW, Dracula Sucks!  A closed mouth gathers no feet!

Offline minnesotamodeler

  • 2014 Supporters
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 2335
  • Me and my Chief Engineer
    • Minnesotamodeler
Re: Improving Cox Sure-starts
« Reply #4 on: September 30, 2009, 08:18:57 PM »
Right, extra power has to come from somewhere--no free lunch, huh.  So who notices an increase from 1/2 oz. to 3/4? I expect I'll do all my surestarts this way (I have 8 I guess, hard to keep track--4 on planes and 4 still wrapped up in the coffee can. I think.).

P.S. Ray, I did fly the little beastie and it did fine, loops, eights, inverted. 
--Ray 
Roseville MN (St. Paul suburb, Arctic Circle)
AMA902472


Advertise Here
Tags:
 


Advertise Here