stunthanger.com

Building Tips and technical articles. => Building techniques => Topic started by: Tim Wescott on April 20, 2011, 11:50:08 AM

Title: Inventory of line attachment methods
Post by: Tim Wescott on April 20, 2011, 11:50:08 AM
Has someone put together a page of line attachment methods for control line?  I know of:


Are there others?  The middle two ones both seem to depend on keeping the leadouts stationary with respect to a bushing, which then provides a nice bearing surface for the bellcrank (or pin).  They both look like great trades for work committed vs. longevity gained.  The 'button' style is used by combat fliers who don't use leadouts, per se, at all.  The "plain ol'" style is a good way to get a plane in the air quickly, and to save money on materials costs in kits.
Title: Re: Inventory of line attachment methods
Post by: Randy Powell on April 20, 2011, 11:59:17 AM
Tim,

I use a method similar to the Brett Superbellcrank. I lay up a carbon fiber bellcrank with a sort of horseshoe sort of end on them. The I make up the teardrop shaped ends out of PC board and use a 4/40 shoulder bolt through the bellcrank.

I've also used a more, ah, robust method. I machined some aluminum horseshoes, ran the leadouts into the end and secured them in closed loop pull through method with a bobbin in the middle sort of like a guitar string end. Then the forks went over the thinner, solid bellcrank with a 4-40 shoulder bolt through the forks and bellcrank. Worked extremely well, but it was a lot of work to make the end pieces so I went to my current setup.
Title: Re: Inventory of line attachment methods
Post by: Tim Wescott on April 20, 2011, 12:15:44 PM
Randy:

Got pictures?
Title: Re: Inventory of line attachment methods
Post by: Randy Powell on April 20, 2011, 12:16:49 PM
Tim,

At home somewhere. I scout around later.
Title: Re: Inventory of line attachment methods
Post by: Clint Ormosen on April 20, 2011, 05:38:52 PM
Tim,

At home somewhere. I scout around later.


Well, hurry up about it. We're all waiting.

The last few planes I built all used a bellcrank/leadout setup from Tom Morris products. Leadouts go through brass tubing then the tubes get bent through the BC in a "U". I guess it's close to the Brickhaus style. Looks pretty bulletproof to me.
Title: Re: Inventory of line attachment methods
Post by: Randy Powell on April 20, 2011, 08:24:38 PM
hey, I had to find it. I don't have a pic of the second type (a victim of a previous hard drive crash).
Title: Re: Inventory of line attachment methods
Post by: Steve Helmick on April 20, 2011, 09:42:51 PM
Oddly, the NoblARFs have a rather cute little wire dingus that connects the BC to the LO's. It could be easily improved...and who knows about the quality of the materials they used? What I envisioned (before the NoblARFs hit the market) was 1/16" wire with a pigtail aimed toward the LO guide. An eyelet and copper wire would fix the "clip" and LO into a unit. This would prevent flexing of the cable and prevent the clip from hanging up on ribs and stuff.
 H^^ Steve
Title: Re: Inventory of line attachment methods
Post by: Gene O'Keefe on April 21, 2011, 07:17:13 AM
Randy...I must say ( a picture is worth a thousand words ) .... NICE WORKMANSHIP ON THAT WING   !!!!!
Title: Re: Inventory of line attachment methods
Post by: Rafael Gonzalez on April 22, 2011, 10:37:48 PM
Randy,

Fantastic wing structure and craftsmanship! The way I build, I would have started that wing ~5-6 times...after being stumped on  j1. When it comes to finesse, I am an elephant in a Yadro shop HB~> That is why combat is so easy to me. Line up 10-15 planes and build. Don't have to be pretty. But I droll when I see you guys and your masterpieces. Makes me want to do the challenge more so than Combat ( no creativity, just flying) Kudos  BW@
Title: Re: Inventory of line attachment methods
Post by: bill bischoff on April 23, 2011, 07:53:44 AM
For info on button attachment, go to my post in Carrier about attaching lines to bellcranks. No reason you couldn't do the same thing with leadouts..

Bill Bischoff
Title: Re: Inventory of line attachment methods
Post by: Bill Little on April 30, 2011, 09:53:21 PM
hi Tim,

It seems that most either use a method like Tom Morris, or like Brett's.  The most I have seen were the "Morris" type.  It is sufficient for anything that will last say, oh, 200 years...........

Solid .032 run through the nylon bellcranks do not wear after about 500 flights. (that's the most I personally know of).  There was absolutely no evidence of either wearing at that point.

The major problem was in the old unbushed Perfect, Veco, Fox, and early Brodak bellcranks where stranded wire was run through them.  The wire would either saw through the aluminum, or the aluminum edge would wear the strands, either way causing a catastrophic failure.  The new molded BCs have almost eliminated that, and running stranded wires through the brass does eliminate it.

The problem these days is terminations causing stress risers which fatigue and break the wire.

Big Bear