News:



  • March 18, 2025, 02:23:58 PM

Login with username, password and session length

Author Topic: Endgame IV Build  (Read 337830 times)

Offline Ken Culbertson

  • 25 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 6847
Re: Endgame IV Build
« Reply #100 on: March 08, 2025, 04:14:17 PM »
72 oz ready to fly with 5s 4200 battery.  Removed 3@ of the pocket hinges.  ^ @ flap was way too many and getting the hinge wire to hit 12 .030 holes was taking my patience.  Also had to enlarge the battery hatch to fit the larger battery.  I was totally too tail heavy so instead of adding lead, I added battery. 3oz under getting the "Miss Piggie Decal".  I am comfortable flying a heavy plane and I think I have the power and with 710 squares I hope I am OK.  It balances at just under 30% of center chord which has me worried some. It gets it's stripes, registration and name Monday.  I am thinking of calling it what it is - "Endgame Mk4" on the Wing and "Hammerhead" on the fuselage side....or not.

Already getting the butterflies.  1st flight probably late this week.

Ken
AMA 15382
If it is not broke you are not trying hard enough.
USAF 1968-1974 TAC

Offline Ken Culbertson

  • 25 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 6847
Re: Endgame IV Build
« Reply #101 on: March 08, 2025, 07:52:38 PM »
Dang Ken, I'm sure reminded of a Hammer head Shark with this one..... Looks very interesting. I'm looking forward to flight reports as you tune it up. Congrat's on a fine job.  y1

John M.
I am renaming the plane to Hammerhead.  It will still say Endgame Mk4 on the Fuselage but the wing is going to say Hammerhead.  Working on the wing art now.  Nothing exotic. Not sure which one I will use.
May keep Endgame on the wing and put this on the fuselage side.
Ken
AMA 15382
If it is not broke you are not trying hard enough.
USAF 1968-1974 TAC

Offline Don Jenkins

  • 25 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 491
Re: Endgame IV Build
« Reply #102 on: March 09, 2025, 06:59:03 AM »
Very nice Ken.  By the way I like logo number 3!

Don

Offline Colin McRae

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Captain
  • *****
  • Posts: 665
  • Are we having fun yet??
Re: Endgame IV Build
« Reply #103 on: March 09, 2025, 12:17:02 PM »
Very nice Ken.  By the way I like logo number 3!

Don

Me too!!

Ken, very nice model.

Offline Larry Renger

  • 21 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 4043
Re: Endgame IV Build
« Reply #104 on: March 09, 2025, 12:41:11 PM »
Yup,  number 3 is the way to go!
Think S.M.A.L.L. y'all and, it's all good, CL, FF and RC!

DesignMan
 BTW, Dracula Sucks!  A closed mouth gathers no feet!

Offline Ken Culbertson

  • 25 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 6847
Re: Endgame IV Build
« Reply #105 on: March 09, 2025, 01:07:10 PM »
So Far the votes are 1-0, 2-0, 3-5, 4-0 both on and off this thread.  I think I will use 4... LL~
It is 3 by a wide margin.

ken
AMA 15382
If it is not broke you are not trying hard enough.
USAF 1968-1974 TAC

Online John Miller

  • 24 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 1721
Re: Endgame IV Build
« Reply #106 on: March 09, 2025, 03:16:47 PM »
I'm happy to ee this Ken. It truly helps describe the approach and mission of your work with this concept. It looks devastatingly lethal and project's maximum purpose. By the way, #3's the one.

John M.
Getting a line on life. AMA 1601

Offline Ken Culbertson

  • 25 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 6847
Re: Endgame IV Build
« Reply #107 on: March 12, 2025, 09:19:30 PM »
Tomorrow, she loses her virginity.  Bench trimmed and pre-flight completed.  All that is left is wrapping the leadouts and mounting the Canard.  I always do that right before flying the first time.  I have the Canard off for the pictures since I did a 20 second full power run to test the electronics.  I cannot believe how much air that little 2320 motor produces.  I needed nose weight so my flight battery will be a 5s 4200.  Lots of 1 min trim flights in that puppy.  Balance came out at around 25% center chord.

Still have a lot of monokote trim and a few decals.  The finish is a joke but it looks great at 10'.  I will try and get some video.  My trim regiment is to get wings level at 5.2-4 then some turns and a few laps inverted to get the timer set.  Before I open it up to the full pattern I do an hourglass and overhead 8.  If the trim lets me do that without having to change my underwear, then it is full patterns and trim baby trim.

This project has been a real adventure.  Cramming a twin into a single motor fuselage and getting the canard to work with all the pushrods, wires (I have 18 pairs of bullet connectors and 10 ball links in play).

I applied the monokote with the intention of stripping it off if the plane performs well and refinishing with a classical silkspan and dope finish.
It weighed in at 72oz with an empty battery which puts her under 15ozft2 so she doesn't get the Mrs. Piggie decal.

Ken
AMA 15382
If it is not broke you are not trying hard enough.
USAF 1968-1974 TAC

Offline Ken Culbertson

  • 25 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 6847
Re: Endgame IV Build
« Reply #108 on: March 13, 2025, 12:27:21 PM »
First flight in the books.  Not much progress on the trim schedule but I can confirm that the 5" bellcrank and the up front Canard work as hoped.  The plane is rock solid in level flight even being a bit tail heavy.  It takes off and lands like it has tricycle gear with a long controllable glide.  Only time for two sets of corners (really more like hard bumps) which responded better than the first canard.  Line tension good through 45 degrees.  Needs to speed up a bit.  First flight was a 5.8.  I want no more that a 5.4.  Now that the butterflies are gone I can proceed with the real trim.

2nd flight was a disaster with a happy ending.  A wheel fell off just as the motors started.  it took nearly 1/2 lap but I got it air born with one wheel and a strut.  The inboard motor was not running and I flew it out on just the outboard.  I was told it would fly on one motor.  They were right, I could even maneuver some and had good line tension.  Still don't know why it stopped or for sure if it ever started.  The inboard prop shows signs of a prop strike which may have shut off the inboard ESC or far worse, the inboard didn't arm.  I will fix these little things and get back out again ASAP.

One thing that is abundantly clear.  I need a portable rack to put her on upside down to do trim.  I have a weak knee and getting my 220lb carcass up off of the ground is becoming a two man job.

Ken

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/3rPGDabplmw

I lost an update somewhere between here and there.  I found the reason the outboard, yes it was the outboard not the inboard that didn't start.  Some idiot forgot to turn off the programming mode on the timer so it thought it only had 1 ESC.  The Spin 33 beeps when it arms so takeoff protocol now includes "Do not start the timer if you don't get two beeps"!  I also learned that you really have to tighten the prop on the reversed one.  I found that the castle propnut has a purpose.
« Last Edit: March 13, 2025, 07:38:19 PM by Ken Culbertson »
AMA 15382
If it is not broke you are not trying hard enough.
USAF 1968-1974 TAC

Online Mike Morrow

  • 25 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Lieutenant
  • *
  • Posts: 84
Re: Endgame IV Build
« Reply #109 on: March 13, 2025, 06:14:56 PM »
I've enjoyed watching your progress with this. Looking forward to hearing how it trims out for you. Thanks for sharing it.

Mike

Offline Ken Culbertson

  • 25 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 6847
Re: Endgame IV Build
« Reply #110 on: March 16, 2025, 10:16:34 PM »
Time to close the build and open the trim thread.  Today was the first flight with some limited maneuvering.  Some loops and inverted a square and some lazy eights.  The canard in clean air works better than the one on Endgame III behind the prop.  The plane turns effortlessly and draws a straight line without fighting.  Turns are equal and no hint of hunting.  It needs some speed.  Right now it is turning a 6.0.  I need it down to at least a 5.6.  I think I want more pitch as well.  I am using BA 10-5s.  I think it will do better on a 6.  I am completely happy so far with my decision to go with a 5" bellcrank.  The controls are so solid.  The logarithmic box makes everything adjustable through one bottom hatch.  The bench trimming routine is quite different with the Canard.  Step 1 is to get the canard movement equal, then the elevators in line with the canard centered and locked down, and finally the flaps get centered.

The video is the first flight with maneuvering. The camera man must have misunderstood me when I asked him to not follow the plane.  I am testing limits and much of it was flown upwind.  I like to see how my planes perform when placed in the wrong spots.

The Twin has a completely different feel.  I don't know how to describe it yet, other than to say if you get the opportunity to fly one you will know what I am talking about.

Ken


« Last Edit: Today at 07:22:13 AM by Ken Culbertson »
AMA 15382
If it is not broke you are not trying hard enough.
USAF 1968-1974 TAC


Advertise Here
Tags: