News:



  • June 16, 2024, 07:02:02 AM

Login with username, password and session length

Author Topic: airfoil  (Read 947 times)

Offline Terry Bolin

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Captain
  • *****
  • Posts: 428
  • Havin' the time of our lives!
airfoil
« on: February 26, 2007, 02:54:49 PM »
Could someone give a brief discription of what "Clark" and Pollywog airfoils are?
Thanks, Terry

Offline L0U CRANE

  • AMA Member
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 1076
Re: airfoil
« Reply #1 on: February 26, 2007, 04:12:53 PM »
Terry,

The Clark Y airfoil actually had a specific set of coordinates - heights of upper and lower surfaces listed by % distance back from the leading edge. I doubt many "true" Clark Y aifoils were ever used by modelers. Instead, just about any airfoil with a normal looking top surface curvature and flat bottom surface, from near the leading edge back, has been called a Clark Y-type airfoil. It was, probably still is, popular for free flight sport type models, and other uses where you basically only need lift when the model is right side up. (A "lifting" airfoil, not symmetrical.)

Pollywog airfoils' shape drops below a smooth outward-bulging curvature in the back third or so of the wing's chord. Most pollywog sections I've seen were symmetrical, usable for stunt. There's a story often heard that an early kit manufacturer changed the ribs in his kits to this shape so that he could print or die-cut more ribs on a sheet of balsa that fit into his kit boxes. If you've ever seen a Free Flight "undercambered" airfoil wing, you should get the idea...

Pollywog airfoils  are a bit tricky to cover, since the paper, or whatever fabric, shrinks, and will try to lift off the ribs where the curvature is below a straight line or outward curve.

Speed and racing CL models usually don't do much inverted or outside stuff, so they use "lifting' airfoils. Many full-size planes used "lifting' sections, so Scale and Carrier models often do too. You may still hear these called Clark Y-type...

Pollywog airfoils work well for stunters, but there's no real advantage over more normal sections that don't have that tendency for the covering to lift away from the ribs.
\BEST\LOU

Offline phil c

  • 21 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 2480
Re: airfoil
« Reply #2 on: February 27, 2007, 07:39:10 AM »
Pollywog airfoils may generate more lift than you'd expect.  A stock Flitestreak has a 'pollywog" airfoil formed by the main wing and the fixed flap.  It flys better than you'd expect.

I built a combat plane with a pollywog Epler airfoil, can't remember the number right now.  Of the series I got from Steve Sacco, I picked the one with the latest drag build up as the angle of attack went up.  The structure was a pain, even using foam and ended up a couple ounces heavier than normal.  It still turned just as tight, so that is about a 10% increase in lift(22 oz. plane instead of a 20 oz er).
phil Cartier


Advertise Here
Tags:
 


Advertise Here